Tag Archives: Eosinophilic esophagitis

Briefly noted: Aerodigestive Medicine and Budesonide for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

A shout out to Ben Gold who is a coauthor on several new publications:

A Krasaelap et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 460-467. Pediatric Aerodigestive Medicine: Advancing Collaborative Care for Children With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

This is a terrific review of the dysphagia and the multidisciplinary approach to management. Many pearls are in this article. For example, laryngo-tracheo-esophageal cleft (LTEC), “while rare, 1 in 10,000-20,000 live births, the incidence of LTEC is higher (7.6%-22%) in children with aerodigestive issues such as a chronic cough.” [As an aside, this should be repeated given the changing population of patients being seen.]

VA Mukkada, SK Gupta, BD Gold et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 760-768. Pooled Phase 2 and 3 Efficacy and Safety Data on Budesonide Oral Suspension in Adolescents with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Key finding: Significantly more patients who received BOS (2mg BID) than placebo achieved histologic responses (≤6 eos/hpf: 46.7% vs 6.5%; ≤1 eos/hpf: 42.2% vs 0.0%; <15 eos/hpf: 53.3% vs 9.7%; P < 0.001)

Related blog posts:

View from Rua Augusta Arch in Lisbon

Increasing Burden of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

AY Lam et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 3041-3050. Open Access (Partial)! Epidemiologic Burden and Projections for Eosinophilic Esophagitis–Associated Emergency Department Visits in the United States: 2009-2030

Methods: Data from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) were used to estimate weighted annual EoE-associated ED visits from 2009 to 2019. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were used to project EoE-associated ED visits to 2030. NEDS is a large, publicly available, all-payer ED database in the United States, approximating a 20% stratified sample of US hospital-based EDs. 

Key points:

  1. There has been a near tripling of the frequency of EoE-associated ED visits over the course of the past decade which is correlated with an increasing prevalence of EoE. The annual volume of EoE-associated ED visits increased from 2934 in 2009 to 8765 in 2019, and is projected to reach 15,445 by 2030.
  2. Without new interventions, this article projects further increases with doubling again by 2030 (using conservative estimates).
  3. Increasingly EoE is being managed without admission, though average charges associated with ED visits for EoE have tripled since 2009. Total mean inflation-adjusted charges for an EoE-associated ED visit were $9025 US dollars in 2019.
  4. Half of EoE patients presenting to the ED required an endoscopy and 40% required a foreign body/food impaction removal.

Related blog posts:

FLIP Patterns for Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

DA Carlson et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 165: 552-563. Open Access! A PhysioMechanical Model of Esophageal Function in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

215 adults with EoE who completed FLIP during endoscopy were included in a cross-sectional study. FLIP helped separate the physiomechanical properties of esophageal function in this cohort. The criteria used to define the PhysioMechanical classification in EoE with a representative FLIP panometry image for each classification. Normal compliance was defined as a DP >17 mm and body compliance >450 mm3/mm Hg; reduced compliance (fibrostenosis) was defined by DP ≤17 mm or compliance ≤450 mm3/mm Hg. Normal EGJ opening was defined as a maximum EGJ diameter ≥16 mm; reduced as maximum EGJ diameter <16 mm. ∗Spastic-reactive contractile response (SRCR) with normal body distensibility and normal EGJ opening was assigned as “achalasia pattern” (n = 1 in this cohort).

Key findings:

  • FLIP was normal in 50 (23%), weak pattern in 7 (3%), IsoEGJOO stricture pattern in 27 (13%), IsoEGJOO achalasia pattern in 26 (12%), Fibrostenosis with normal reactivity in 61 (28%), spastic reactive fibrostenosis with normal reactivity in 30 (14%), and noreactive fibrostenosis in 14 (7%)

My take: FLIP testing helps define the mechanism of esophageal dysfunction in patients with EoE. Longer duration of symptoms was associated with more severe esophageal dysfunction.

Related blog posts:

But How Well Does It Work in Theory and Eosinophilic Esophagitis Treatments

Posted on by

C Mayerhofer et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 2197-2210. Open Access! Efficacy of Elimination Diets in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“That’s all well and good in practice… but how does it work in theory?” I saw this quote many years ago when I was visiting the University of Chicago.

This quote came to mind as I was reading this article which showed relatively little change in the efficacy between more and less stringent elimination diets for eosinophilic esophagitis. This meta-analysis included 915 children and 847 adults and assessed the efficacy rates of 4 major dietary treatment regimens in eosinophilic esophagitis: 6-food (SFED), 4-food (FFED), 1-food (OFED), and a targeted elimination diet (TED).

Key findings:

  • The overall rate of histologic remission was 53.8% and in the individual dietary groups was 61.3% for SFED, 49.4% for FFED, 51.4% for OFED, and 45.7% for TED.
  • The overall rate of clinical response was 80.8%, with response rates of 92.8% for SFED, 74.1% for FFED, 87.1% for OFED, and 69.0% for TED.
Percentage of food antigen triggers identified via endoscopic
and clinical evaluation after food re-introduction.

My take: It is clear to me that more restrictive diets can yield better response rates; however, in clinical practice they are difficult to maintain and this study shows that the improvement with more food restrictions may be quite limited.

Another reference on eosinophilic esophagitis: CJ Ketchem et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2252-2259. Open Access! Higher Body Mass Index Is Associated With Decreased Treatment Response to Topical Steroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Key finding: Histologic response (n=296) to topic steroids was higher for those who were nonobese compared with obese at fewer than 15 eosinophils per high-power field (61% vs 47%; P = .049); in addition, nonobese patients had significantly greater endoscopic and symptomatic responses.

Related blog posts:

When to Use Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Multispecialty Guidelines

Posted on by

SS Aceves et al. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. 2023; 130: 371-378. Open Access! Clinical guidance for the use of dupilumab in eosinophilic esophagitis

This article summarizes updated recommendations for eosinophilic esophagitis from the Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy Asthma Immunology and American College of Allergy Asthma Immunology and the American Gastroenterology Association (JTF-AGA). It offers a good number of recommendations regarding when using dupilumab should be considered.

Other Key Points:

  • “Dupilumab can be considered as first-line therapy in patients presenting with severe EoE”and in patients with multiple atopic diseases.
  • In addition, it recommends “performing a repeat EGD, along with obtaining biopsies, 5 to 6 months after either starting dupilumab therapy or whenever adjusting the dupilumab dose.” In some cases, like stricture dilatation, the authors indicate that earlier EGD may be appropriate.
  • The advantages/disadvantages of current treatment options are summarized in Table 3. For dupiliumab, the disadvantages include its high price of dupilumab and weekly injections. Conjunctivitis has been an adverse effect identified in its usage with other indications.

My take: Dupilumab is a major advance for patients with EoE. Due to the need for weekly injections and its costs, it is likely a 2nd line agent for most kids with EoE.

Related blog posts:

Shorts: Hep E in Urine, Genetics in Autoimmune Enteropathy, EndoFlip Findings in EoE

Posted on by

D Ying et al. Hepatology 2023; 77: 1722-1734. Urine is a viral antigen reservoir in hepatitis E virus infection

Key findings:  HEV Ag was specifically taken up by renal cells and was disposed into urine, during which the level of Ag was concentrated >10‐fold, resulting in the higher diagnosing sensitivity of urine Ag than serum Ag. Moreover, Ag in urine appeared 6 days earlier, lasted longer than viremia and antigenemia, and showed good concordance with fecal RNA in a rabbit model.

F Charbit-Henrion et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 1368-1371. Open Access! Genetic Diagnosis Guides Treatment of Autoimmune Enteropathy

Background: Autoimmune enteropathy (AIE) is a severe form of enteropathy characterized by chronic diarrhea refractory to any exclusion diet and associated with autoimmunity…In a recent cohort of 40 AIE patients, anti-enterocyte antibodies were reported in only 14% (4/28) of the cases, likely caused by the high frequency of patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia…30%–50% of adult AIE can display anti-transglutaminase antibodies. The common histopathologic presentation of AIE includes intestinal villous atrophy with variable lymphocytic infiltration and various features of follicular lymphoid hyperplasia, cryptitis, graft-versus-host disease-like lesions, and loss of Paneth and goblet cells.

Key findings: Pathogenic variants were identified in 20/48 adult patients (41.6%); most common variants: CTLA4, LRBA, STAT3, and STAT1; 12/20; 60% of those with variants. Thus, specific therapeutics were available for more than half of the patients who received a molecular diagnosis

Representative endoscopic aspects in patients with CTLA4 variants and AIE.

NV Hoffmann et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 1188-1197. Esophageal Distensibility Defines Fibrostenotic Severity in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Key finding: In this prospective pediatric cohort (n=59) with EoE, distensibility index (DI) <4.5 mm2/mmHg predicted grade 2 rings on endoscopy. Lower DI was associated with increased risk of food impaction but did not correlate with eosinophilic count. DI was “superior to diameter in assessing fibrostenotic severity.”

Related blog posts:

Seronegative Villous Atrophy

“Tug” Sign For Eosinophilic Esophagitis and EoE Bowel Sounds Tips

Posted on by

EA Pasman et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 1108-1110. Quantitative Analysis of Tug Sign: An Endoscopic Finding of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Background: “Chronic inflammation can lead to tissue remodeling in the esophagus with fibrosis in the lamina propria that is partially responsible for symptoms and complications of EoE.3,4 At times, a firmness to the esophagus can be appreciated with a noticeable force required to obtain biopsies from EoE. This sensation has been described as the “tug” or “pull” sign.5,6“

Methods: in this prospective study with 159 patients (128 pediatric, 31 adult), the authors devised a digital force gauge to measure the force required to take biopsy specimens. The study included 88 patients with EoE and 71 controls.

Key finding:

  • EoE patients showed an increase in the mean force required to obtain biopsies: 14.9 Newton (N) compared to 11.6 in control group
  • Peak force was greater in EoE patients: 20.4 N compared to 15 N in control group.
  • The pediatric subgroup had higher peak force in EoE patients: 22.4 N compered to 16.1 N for control group

My take: I had not heard of the term “Tug” sign for EoE, though it is something that is intuitive for GI providers who care for these patients. This study quantifies this problem.

“When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind” –Lord Kelvin 1883

Related topic: Recent bowel sounds episode with Amanda Muir discussed eosinophilic esophagitis. A few pointers:

  • Useful YouTube video explaining how to swallow inhaled steroid (from Glen Furuta/Colorado Chilren’s): How to Use an Inhaler for EoE
  • Budesonide can be administered with 1 tsp honey, 1 tsp maple syrup or with 1 tsp apple sauce
  • Approximate equivalent dose of Flovent 4 puffs of 220 mcg =~1 mg budesonide
  • Elemental feedings are difficult to maintain and used much less, mainly in children who already have enteral tubes.
Little Finger Rock Trail, Tucson AZ
HooDoo Rocks, Mount Lemmon. Tucson, AZ

The Eosinophilic Esophagitis Diagnostic Cup is Half Empty with the Esophageal Sponge

Posted on by

JA Alexander et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 299-306. Open Access! Use of the Esophageal Sponge in Directing Food Reintroduction in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Methods: In this prospective non-blinded trial, 22 responders to 6-food elimination diets underwent sequential food reintroduction guided by esophageal sponge cytology

Key findings:

  • At the post food reintroduction evaluation, sponge cytology and biopsy histology were in agreement in 59% (13/22) of cases using a cutoff of <15 eos/hpf and 68% (15/22) of cases using a cutoff of <6 eos/hpf. With the cutoff of <15 eos/hpf, the median absolute difference was 38 eos/hpf.
  • Interestingly, the authors noted a high rate (23%) of dietary responders who had dietary reintroduction without a dietary trigger being identified; this is possibly related in part to lower sponge sensitivity, and possibly due to a short food reintroduction period of 2 weeks prior to testing.

The authors in their discussion note that it is unclear whether the values from the sponge or from the biopsy is more reliable.

My take: This is a disappointment for those of us waiting for a reliable non-invasive measure of EoE activity. Those with abnormal sponge results are fairly likely to have abnormal endoscopy; however, many of those with normal values with sponge testing are likely to have active EoE.

Related blog posts:

Combination Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

MA Buendia et al. JPGN Reports 3(4):p e273, 2022. DOI: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000273. Relapse of Eosinophilic Esophagitis on Dupilumab

Yesterday’s post reviewed the landmark study leading to dupilumab’s FDA approval. Today’s case report shows that we have a lot we need to learn about its use.

The authors present a case report of a patient with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) who had ongoing active EoE while receiving topical steroids (TS) and PPI (and previously dietary elimination therapy). He achieved remission after the addition of dupilumab. “When his TS were weaned after achieving remission, his disease relapsed with worsening of his dysphagia and a peak eosinophilic count (PEC) of 55 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf). Upon restarting TS to his ongoing dupilumab, symptoms fully resolved, and he achieved histologic remission (PEC 10 eos/hpf).”

My take: This study indicates that there are some patients need dupilumab and topical steroids in combination, rather than monotherapy. Reliable biomarkers to more easily determine response and/or to predict optimal therapy are clearly needed.

Sunset at Siesta Key, FL

Landmark Dupilumab Study for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

ES Dellon et al. NEJM 2022; 387; 2317-2330. Dupilumab in Adults and Adolescents with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

This study was pivotal for receiving FDA approval of dupilumab (dupixent) for the treatment of EoE (the only FDA approved therapy). Background: “Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, which have key roles in eosinophilic esophagitis..Standard-of-care treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis include food elimination diets, proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), swallowed topical glucocorticoids (applied to the esophagus by swallowing), and, in the case of strictures, esophageal dilation.11,12 However, the rates of response are variable (30 to 40% of patients may not have a response to first-line treatments).”

Key findings from three-part study (see images below):

  • Part A: Histologic remission occurred in 25 of 42 patients (60%) who received weekly dupilumab and in 2 of 39 patients (5%) who received placebo
  • Part B: Histologic remission occurred in 47 of 80 patients (59%) with weekly dupilumab, in 49 of 81 patients (60%) with dupilumab every 2 weeks, and in 5 of 79 patients (6%) with placebo 
  • Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) scores:  the scores improved with weekly dupilumab as compared with placebo, with differences of –12.32 (95% CI, –19.11 to –5.54) in Part A and –9.92 (95% CI, –14.81 to –5.02) in Part B (both P<0.001) but not with dupilumab every 2 weeks (difference in Part B, –0.51; 95% CI, –5.42 to 4.41)
  • The most common adverse effect was injection site reactions. There were 10 serious adverse events; none of these “were considered by the trial investigators to be related to the trial regimen.”

In the associated commentary, (pg 2379-2380), Dr. Alex Straumann notes that since EoE is localized to the esophagus, whether a patients should be treated with a systemically acting medication, “particularly in light of the fact that topical glucocorticoids have been shown to be as efficacious as systemically acting prednisone.”

My take (borrowed in part from editorial): It remains unclear whether dupilumab “is better than the good old topical glucocorticoids in improving disease outcomes, particularly in light of considerable costs associated with this treatment.” Due to its cost (see below), dupillumab is likely best situated as a 2nd line treatment at this time for most patients.

Related blog posts:

Cost comparison (from Laura Targownwik on twitter):