Vitamin D and Ulcerative Colitis Remission

Posted on March 18, 2017 by gutsandgrowth

A recent study (J Gubatan et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 240-6) examined a prospective study of 70 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). These patients (average age 48.6 yrs) were initially in clinical remission. Key findings:

Mean baseline vitamin D (25-OH) level was lower among patients with subsequent relapse (29.5 ng/mL) than those without relapse (50.3 ng/mL)
Over 12 months, a 25-OH D value <35, was associated with a small increased risk of relapse (odds ratio1.25). 20% of patients with a value <35 had clinical relapse compared with 9% (P= .003) who had values >35.

Because vitamin D levels are inversely related to UC disease activity, this study is particularly intriguing. By enrolling patients prospectively while in remission, this study suggests that good vitamin D levels may directly have immunoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties.

The AGA Journals blog provides an excellent summary of this study: Can Vitamin D Affect Risk of Ulcerative Colitis Relapse?

“In an editorial that accompanies the article, Stephen Hanauer reminds readers that the mean vitamin D level in the entire cohort was 44 ng/mL, and 60% of the subjects were taking vitamin D supplements. A normal vitamin D level is considered to be 20–40 ng/mL in healthy individuals, and the 35 ng/mL cut-off level used in the study was within this range.

Hanauer also mentions that in assessing the confidence intervals for risk of relapse at lower or higher vitamin D levels, there does not appear to be a dose–response effect in the odds ratios according to levels. Based on these findings, Hanauer says it would be premature to target a level of 35 ng/mL. He states that the best predictors of clinical relapse are still endoscopic and histologic markers of inflammation.”

My take: At this time, trying to maintain a normal vitamin D level is likely to be worthwhile; though, values obtained during acute flares remain unreliable.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Vedolizumab: summary of latest data

Posted on February 10, 2017 by gutsandgrowth

BG Feagan et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 229-39.

From Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, Feb 2017 Issue Highlights Link from AGA twitter feed:Vedolizumab in Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Naïve or Previously Exposed Ulcerative Colitis Patients

“Feagan et al present data comparing patients based on past exposure to anti-TNF agents. This post-hoc analysis compared 464 patients who received vedolizumab or placebo who were naïve to TNF antagonists to 367 patients who had been exposed but had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to TNF antagonists…

The investigators describe greater differences in efficacy for vedolizumab (versus placebo) in patients who were naïve to TNF inhibitors than for patients with prior exposure to anti-TNF agents.

Week 6 reponse rates to vedolizumab or placebo were 53% vs 26% amongst patients naïve to TNF antagonists (absolute difference 26%) compared to 39% vs 21% in patients with prior anti-TNF exposure (absolute difference 18%).

Week 52 remission rates with vedolizumab and placebo were 47% and 19%, respectively, for patients naïve to TNF antagonists (absolute difference 28%) compared with 36% and 5%, respectively, in patients with prior exposure to TNF biologics (absolute difference 29.5%).

Thus, while vedolizumab demonstrated significantly greater efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy for UC patients whether or not they had previously received therapy with anti-TNF agents, there were numerically greater treatment benefit at week 6 among patients who had never received prior biologic therapy.“

My take: Given the higher response in anti-TNF naive patients along with the favorable safety profile, vedolizumab could be considered as a first-line therapy.

Related Blog Posts:

Induction endpoints in TNF-failure patients by type of failure. Forest plots show difference from placebo and 95% CIs for percentages of patients with (A) clinical response, (B) clinical remission, and (C) mucosal healing at Week 6. Patients with more than one type of TNF antagonist failure were evaluated by each type of failure; thus the number of patients in the subgroups may total more than the number of enrolled patients.

What Happens When Infliximab Is Stopped in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Remission

Posted on November 4, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’

Perhaps, the above sentiment is needed for patients with ulcerative colitis who are doing well with infliximab therapy according to a recent study (G Fiorino et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 1426-32).

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 111 patients with ulcerative colitis who had been in remission (>12 months) were followed after stopping infliximab (IFX) and compared with 82 controls who remained on therapy. Here’s what happened (see Figure 1 in study):

Among those who discontinued IFX, 53 patients (47.7%) relapsed in the followup period. This corresponded to an incidence of 23.3 per 100 person-years and with a median time to relapse of 3.6 years.
In comparison, for those who remained on IFX, 14 relapses (17.1%) occurred which corresponded to an incidence of 7.2 per 100 person-years at risk and with a median time to relapse of 7.6 years.
Thiopurine use after stopping IFX seemed to diminish the risk of relapse: 15.0 per 100 person-years compared with 31.2 per 100 person-years for those taking an aminosalicylate alone.
For those who restarted IFX, 77.1% had a response and 51.4% returned to remission; however, 17.1% had infusion reactions.

My take: In a real-life experience, stopping IFX in patients with ulcerative colitis who had been in sustained clinical remission resulted in a higher relapse rate. This finding is consistent with other studies.

Related blog posts:

The Lawn at University of Virginia

Latest on Tofacitinib for Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on September 22, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

From Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News July 2016: Tofacitinib Effective in Refractory and Severe UC

An excerpt:

Tofacitinib (Pfizer), an oral agent already approved for certain patients with rheumatoid arthritis, can induce clinical remission in up to 25% of individuals with moderate to severe, refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and clinical response in as many as 60% of these patients.

The results, based on two placebo-controlled trials involving more than 1,100 patients, showed the drug also increased the risk for serum lipid elevations but was otherwise safe. Researchers presented the data at the 2016 annual meeting of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO; oral presentation 019)…

The new data are from the OCTAVE Induction 1 and Induction 2 trials, identically designed, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled Phase III studies…In the OCTAVE 1 trial, 476 patients received 10 mg of tofacitinib orally twice daily for eight weeks and 122 received an oral placebo. In OCTAVE 2, 429 and 112 patients were randomized to receive the two regimens, respectively.

Screenshot from gastroendonews.com

Also from Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News August 2016: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis This article provides a succinct summary regarding diagnosis and treatments of ulcerative colitis; treatments discussed include emerging therapies like tofacitinib.

An Overlooked Finding in a Recent Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Study

Posted on July 20, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

A recent study (S Choshen et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 58-64) examined 283 children who were treated with IV steroids for acute severe ulcerative colitis. This study focused on steroid dosing. Their conclusion: “there does not seem to be a consistent superiority of high dose (>2 mg/kg/day) versus standard (1.25 mg/kg/day) or low-dose (1 mg/kg/day) methylprednisolone in pediatric acute severe colitis.”

Before looking into the details a little closer, one finding that was not even discussed in the abstract or discussion was the colectomy rate of 31%. Previous pediatric studies of patients with ulcerative colitis had found rates generally half that rate but notably included patients with milder presentations of ulcerative colitis. Thus, this rate of 31% (by 1 year after discharge) is useful information to reference when considering pediatric patients with acute severe colitis (ACS).

This study used datasets from the prospective Outcome of Steroid therapy in Colitis Individuals (OSCI) (n=128) and from the retrospective OSCI study (n=99).

Other results:

By day 5 of steroids, 45% had at most mild disease (ie PUCAI <35)
31% had failed IV steroids and required salvage therapy (biologic or calcineurin inhibitor)
20% had colectomy by discharge
When examining steroid dosage and outcomes, the authors could not discern any differences in need for salvage therapy, PUCAI <35 at day 5, or need for salvage therapy within 1 year. There was a mild difference in length of stay with 9 days in the low-dose group and 10-days in the high dose group.

My take: This large cohort provides some reassurance that current steroid dosing recommendations are probably right, in that there was no discernible improvement with higher doses. This is in agreement with previous studies in adults which have not shown advantages of methylprednisolone >60 mg/day. The high colectomy rate of 31% is worth keeping in mind in this population.

Related blog posts:

IBD School Videos for Patients and Families

Posted on June 13, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

While these “IBD School” YouTube videos have been around for several years, I only became aware of them in the past few months. I think they are good patient education resources.

Here are some links to a few of them:

IBD School 809: Inheriting IBD Peter Higgins/University of Michigan
IBD School 206: What Causes Flares? Peter Higgins/University of Michigan
IBD School 101: Introduction to the IBD Basics Peter Higgins/University of Michigan. After a 30 sec U of M promo, this video “aims to educate IBD patients, their friends, and families of people with IBD about Crohn’s Disease and ulcerative colitis. “

There are a lot of these videos including the following:

My take: these videos are generally ~4 minutes and a good way to get a lot of information on IBD pretty quickly.

Ozanimod for Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on June 8, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

The results of a phase 2 trial for Ozanimod have been published: WJ Sandborn et al. NEJM 2016; 374; 1754-62.

Ozanimod (RPC1063) is “an oral agonist of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1 and 5 that induces peripheral lymphocyte sequestration, potentially decreasing the number of activated lymphocytes circulating to the gastrointestinal tract.”

From the abstract:

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ozanimod in 197 adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive ozanimod at a dose of 0.5 mg or 1 mg or placebo daily for up to 32 weeks. The Mayo Clinic score was used to measure disease activity on a scale from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease; subscores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The primary outcome was clinical remission (Mayo Clinic score ≤2, with no subscore >1) at 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The primary outcome occurred in 16% of the patients who received 1 mg of ozanimod and in 14% of those who received 0.5 mg of ozanimod, as compared with 6% of those who received placebo (P=0.048 and P=0.14, respectively, for the comparison of the two doses of ozanimod with placebo). Differences in the primary outcome between the group that received 0.5 mg of ozanimod and the placebo group were not significant; therefore, the hierarchical testing plan deemed the analyses of secondary outcomes exploratory. Clinical response (decrease in Mayo Clinic score of ≥3 points and ≥30% and decrease in rectal-bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or a subscore ≤1) at 8 weeks occurred in 57% of those receiving 1 mg of ozanimod and 54% of those receiving 0.5 mg, as compared with 37% of those receiving placebo. At week 32, the rate of clinical remission was 21% in the group that received 1 mg of ozanimod, 26% in the group that received 0.5 mg of ozanimod, and 6% in the group that received placebo; the rate of clinical response was 51%, 35%, and 20%, respectively. At week 8, absolute lymphocyte counts declined 49% from baseline in the group that received 1 mg of ozanimod and 32% from baseline in the group that received 0.5 mg. The most common adverse events overall were anemia and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary trial, ozanimod at a daily dose of 1 mg resulted in a slightly higher rate of clinical remission of ulcerative colitis than placebo. The trial was not large enough or of sufficiently long duration to establish clinical efficacy or assess safety. (Funded by Receptos; TOUCHSTONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01647516.)

More on Anti-TNF Drug Levels (part 2) and a Few Mentions

Posted on June 1, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

Another study (K Papamichael et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 543-9) examined therapeutic drug levels with regard to infliximab induction and mucosal healing.

In this retrospective study with 101 patients with ulcerative colitis, 54 (53.4%) achieved mucosal healing between weeks 10-14, defined by a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 or 1. 97% of patients were treated with 5 mg/kg infusions.

Key finding:

Infliximab threshold concentrations of 28.3 mcg/mL at week 2, 15 mcg/mL at week 6, and 2.1 mcg/mL at week 14 were associated with mucosal healing.

My take: While this study provides information on what type of levels to expect at 2, 6, and 14 weeks, what is really important is figuring out which patients need higher doses of infusions from the start.

Unrelated, briefly noted:

R Yadlapati et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 535-42. In this prospective blinded cohort study of 59 subjects, oropharyngeal pH testing (Restech Dx-pH) and salivary pepsin analysis was not able to distinguish between healthy volunteers and subjects with a combination of laryngeal and reflux symptoms.

M Moris et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 585-93. This study reports increasing findings of small pancreatic cysts with more (and better) MRI imaging.

Y Kawamura et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 597-605. This retrospective study shows, among almost 10,000 patients with fatty liver disease, that alcohol consumption of ≥40 g/day is an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma.

What happens when anti-TNF therapy is stopped

Posted on May 12, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

Another study (NA Kennedy et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43: 910-23) has examined the issue of outcomes after anti-TNF therapy withdrawal among patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

This study included 166 UK patient cohort (117 with Crohn’s disease [median 31 yrs], 19 with ulcerative colitis [median 40 years]) as part of a retrospective observational study and a meta-analysis incorporating 11 further cohorts totalling 746 patients (624 with Crohn’s dissease, 122 with ulcerative colitis).

Key findings:

In the UK cohort, relapse rates were 36% at year and 56% at 2 years for Crohn’s disease
In the UK cohort, relapse rates were 42% at year and 47% at 2 years for ulcerative colitis
Increased relapse rates were noted for those with a diagnosis prior to age 22 years (hazard ratio (HR) 2.78), calprotectin >50 mcg/g (HR 2.95).
In meta-analysis, 1-year relapse rates were 39% for CD and 35% for UC/IBDU patients
Retreatment with anti-TNF was successful in 88% for CD and 76% of UC/IBDU patients

To understand this study, it is important to note some of the study criteria. In the UK cohort, inclusion criteria required the patient to have had at least 12 months of ant-TNF therapy and be in corticosteroid-remission for at least 6 months. In addition, the relapse rate is likely to be underestimated due to using a definition of relapse that required either commencement of steroids, immunomodulator or anti-TNF therapy. The meta-anlaysis cohort studies also used clinical relapse rather than endoscopic or other objective markers.

My take: Relapse of clinical symptoms occur in about 40% after withdrawal in highly-selected groups who were doing well prior. Significantly higher rates of endoscopic relapse are likely. This study provides strong reasons for not interrupting therapy when it is working.

CCFA Conference Notes 2016 (part 3) -Malignancy and IBD

Posted on April 28, 2016 by gutsandgrowth

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized this terrific presentation; most of the material has been covered in this blog in prior entries but still this was a useful review. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

3^rd Lecture: Prevention and management of malignancy in IBD –Dr. Thomas Ullman

Malignancy risk (colorectal cancer [CRC]) is present with prolonged ulcerative colitis, though more recent studies have shown lower risk than in the past –not much higher than the general population.

CRC surveillance–colonoscopy monitoring after 8-10 years. Typically colonoscopy every other year for most patients, every year in higher risk patients (eg. PSC).

Unclear if chemoprevention is effective (5-ASA, thiopurines, others).
Chromoendoscopy “has not been consensus on its use in our field (yet).” It is time consuming and expensive and unclear if it will improve outcome.

Does medical therapy for IBD predispose to developing cancer?

Thiopurines increase the risk of malignancy. (Pasternak et al) though the risk returns to near baseline when stopped according to study below.

No overall increased risk with anti-TNF agents with RCTs (may not follow patients long enough) but also not seen in Danish registry either (JAMA study)

No increased risk of malignancy in this study with Anti-TNFs

Lymphoma risks: age, immunodeficiency, EBV
EBV negative are at risk for HLH with thiopurines
HTSCL ~200, >90% men and >90% <35 years. NOT EBV-related. Has not been identified in anti-TNF monotherapy.

Skin cancer –main concern is in non-melanoma skin cancer (possibly melanoma too). Skin cancer increase has not been noted with methotrexate. Prevention: Skin care, and annual dermatology visits.
Cervical cancer—likely increased risk in IBD, probably due to thiopurine exposure and reduced immune surveillance. Prevention: HPV vaccination, Pap testing.
Urinary Tract cancers –especially in those >65 years with thiopurine exposure

gutsandgrowth

Pediatric Gastroenterology

Tag Archives: Ulcerative colitis