Tag Archives: Vedolizumab

Vedolizumab: summary of latest data

Posted on by

BG Feagan et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 229-39.

From Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, Feb 2017 Issue Highlights Link from AGA twitter feed:Vedolizumab in Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Naïve or Previously Exposed Ulcerative Colitis Patients

“Feagan et al present data comparing patients based on past exposure to anti-TNF agents. This post-hoc analysis compared 464 patients who received vedolizumab or placebo who were naïve to TNF antagonists to 367 patients who had been exposed but had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to TNF antagonists…

The investigators describe greater differences in efficacy for vedolizumab (versus placebo) in patients who were naïve to TNF inhibitors than for patients with prior exposure to anti-TNF agents.

Week 6 reponse rates to vedolizumab or placebo were 53% vs 26% amongst patients naïve to TNF antagonists (absolute difference 26%) compared to 39% vs 21% in patients with prior anti-TNF exposure (absolute difference 18%).

Week 52 remission rates with vedolizumab and placebo were 47% and 19%, respectively, for patients naïve to TNF antagonists (absolute difference 28%) compared with 36% and 5%, respectively, in patients with prior exposure to TNF biologics (absolute difference 29.5%).

Thus, while vedolizumab demonstrated significantly greater efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy for UC patients whether or not they had previously received therapy with anti-TNF agents, there were numerically greater treatment benefit at week 6 among patients who had never received prior biologic therapy.“

My take: Given the higher response in anti-TNF naive patients along with the favorable safety profile, vedolizumab could be considered as a first-line therapy.

Related Blog Posts:

Induction endpoints in TNF-failure patients by type of failure. Forest plots show difference from placebo and 95% CIs for percentages of patients with (A) clinical response, (B) clinical remission, and (C) mucosal healing at Week 6. Patients with more than one type of TNF antagonist failure were evaluated by each type of failure; thus the number of patients in the subgroups may total more than the number of enrolled patients.

Induction endpoints in TNF-failure patients by type of failure. Forest plots show difference from placebo and 95% CIs for percentages of patients with (A) clinical response, (B) clinical remission, and (C) mucosal healing at Week 6. Patients with more than one type of TNF antagonist failure were evaluated by each type of failure; thus the number of patients in the subgroups may total more than the number of enrolled patients.

Latest on Vedolizumab

Posted on by

A Amiot et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol November 2016 Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 1593–1601.

Abstract:

Background & Aims

Phase 3 trials have shown the efficacy of vedolizumab, which binds to integrin α4β7, in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in patients who failed anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy.

Methods

From June through December 2014, there were 173 patients with CD and 121 patients with UC who were included in a multicenter nominative compassionate early access program granted by French regulatory agencies. This program provided patients with access to vedolizumab before it was authorized for marketing. Vedolizumab (300 mg) was administered intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks. Disease activity was assessed using the Harvey–Bradshaw Index for CD and the partial Mayo Clinic score for UC. We report results obtained after the 14-week induction phase.

Results

Among the 294 patients treated with vedolizumab (mean age, 39.5 ± 14.0 y; mean disease duration, 10.8 ± 7.6 y; concomitant steroids, 44% of cases), 276 completed the induction period, however, 18 discontinued vedolizumab because of a lack of response (n = 14), infusion-related reaction (n = 2), or infections (n = 2). At week 14, 31% of patients with CD were in steroid-free clinical remission and 51% had a response; among patients with UC, 36% were in steroid-free clinical remission and 50% had a response. No deaths were reported. Severe adverse events occurred in 24 patients (8.2%), including 15 (5.1%) that led to vedolizumab discontinuation (1 case of pulmonary tuberculosis and 1 rectal adenocarcinoma).

Conclusions

In a cohort of patients with CD or UC who failed previous anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy, approximately one third of patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission after 14 weeks of induction therapy with vedolizumab. This agent had an acceptable safety profile in these patients.

Related Blog Posts:

screen-shot-2016-11-08-at-8-18-44-pm

Vedolizumab Study in IBD

Posted on by

From CGH Associated Editor Charles Kari:

Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab Induction Therapy for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Vedolizumab is a biologic agent which targets the integrin receptor and is approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Vedolizumab inhibits the interaction between α4β7 integrin and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM–1).

In this [November] issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amiot and colleagues report the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab induction therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC and CD who previously failed anti-TNF therapy. Active IBD was defined according to the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) >4 for CD patients and the Mayo Clinic score ≥6 for UC patients. Patients received intravenous vedolizumab at a dose of 300 mg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and then every 8 weeks through week 52. Concomitant use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, or methotrexate was permitted. The primary outcome measure was steroid-free clinical remission at week 14, which was defined as a HBI ≤4 for CD patients and a partial Mayo Clinic score ❤ with a combined stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 for UC patients. A total of 294 patients were enrolled (CD, 173; UC, 121), of whom 276 completed the induction period. At week 14, 63 (36%) and 47 (39%) patients were in clinical remission in the CD and UC groups, respectively, of whom 53 (31%) and 43 (36%), respectively, were in steroid-free clinical remission. The clinical response rates at 14 weeks were 64% for CD patients and 57% for UC patients. Adverse events occurred in 93 patients (31.6%) out of 294 patients with serious adverse events in 24 (8.2%) and adverse events leading to vedolizumab discontinuation in 15 (5.1%) including one case of pulmonary tuberculosis.

In conclusion, in a cohort of IBD patients who failed anti-TNF therapy and received vedolizumab, about one third experienced steroid-free clinical remission at 14 weeks, with good safety profile (Figure 3).

screen-shot-2016-10-24-at-10-42-42-am

screen-shot-2016-10-24-at-10-42-50-am

Related Blog Posts:

Safer Than You Think: Biologic Therapies for IBD and Risk of Infection and Malignancy

Posted on by

While there have been a number of studies which have highlighted the potential risks of biologic agents, many studies have NOT identified any risk of infection or malignancy.

Another recent systematic review/meta-analysis (S Bonovas et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 1385-97) provides reassuring data regarding the following biologics: infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, natalizumab, and vedolizumab.

The authors identified 49 randomized placebo-controlled studies with 14,590 participants.

Key findings:

  • There was a moderate infection risk with odds ratio of 1.19 (19% increase in odds of developing an infection) and significant increase in opportunistic infections (eg. tuberculosis) OR 1.90
  • Risk of serious infections was NOT increased in patients treated with biologics with OR 0.89.  In studies with low risk of bias, the risk of serious infections had OR of 0.56.
  • No increase in malignancy risk was identified with OR 0.90 but the authors note that data was insufficient in terms of exposure and follow-up to be conclusive.

The authors note that the studies including in this review challenge some of the findings of observational studies. “However, observational studies lack the experimental random allocation of participants…the discrepancies between observational studies and randomized trial evidence might be explained by the inability of observational designs to fully address the complex and important differences between the IBD patients receiving and those not receiving biologics.”

Study limitations include “sponsorship bias -because the trials were supported by pharmaceutical companies and limited followup of 24 months. In addition, most of the trials in the meta-analysis were judged to be at high or unclear risk of bias because of their methodological characteristics.

My take: This study indicates that biologic therapies do not appear to increase the risk of serious infections and may not increase the overall risk of malignancy.

Related blog posts:

Portland Fish Market

Portland Fish Market

 

 

October 2016: IBD Studies

Posted on by

Briefly noted:

E Zittan et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 2442-47.  In this study with 773 patients with history of ulcerative colitis/ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, there was no significant difference in complications/leak among the 196 with preoperative anti-TNF exposure (n=26, 13.2%) compared with the control group (n=66, 11.7%). Preoperative anti-TNF exposure does not appear to worsen outcomes after surgery.

C Hartman et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 437-444. This cross-sectional survey of 68 children with IBD (57 Crohn’s disease) found frequent nutrient deficiencies based on 3 day diet records.  Interestingly, children on exclusive enteral nutrition were much less likely to have inadequate intakes of energy, minerals, or micronutrients. This article provides plenty of reasons for children with IBD, particularly Crohn’s disease, to work with a nutritionist.

M Fischer et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2016; 22: 2402-09. In a cohort study of 67 patients (35 with Crohn’s, 31 with ulcerative colitis, and 1 indeterminate colitis), fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for refractory Clostridium difficile infection was successful in 53 (79%) with a single infusion.  Four of the 14 failures, subsequently responded to anti-CDI antibiotics. Of the 8 who had a 2nd FMT, 6 were successful; and 1 of 2 responded to 3rd FMT.  Thus, 60 of 67 responded overall to FMT.  After FMT, IBD disease activity was reported as improved in 25 (37%), no change in 20 (30%) and worse in 9 (13%).  In this cohort, 1 needed colectomy and 1 needed diversion.  This article indicates that FMT for CDI in IBD was associated with high cure rates and low risk of IBD flare.

A Khoruts et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 1433-38. This was a study of 272 consecutive patients that underwent FMT for recurrent CDI. 15% had established IBD and 2.6% were determined to have IBD at time of FMT.  74.4% of IBD patients responded to a single FMT compared with 92.1% of patients without IBD.  More than one quarter of IBD patients experienced a clinical flare after FMT.

MA Conrad et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2016: 22: 2425-31.  This review of early pediatric experience with vedolizumab in 21 subjects (16 with Crohn’s disease) identified a clinical response in 6/19 (31.6%) evaluable subjects at week 6 and 11/19 (57.9%) by week 22. Steroid-free remission was noted in 3/20 at 14 weeks (15%) and 4/20 (20.0%) at 22 weeks.  Overall, this shows a fairly low response rate to vedolizumab in this highly selected cohort.  Prospective pediatric studies of vedolizumab are needed to identify which patients are most likely to benefit.

University of Virginia Rotunda

University of Virginia Rotunda

 

Pediatric Experience with Vedolizumab

Posted on by

 

N Singh et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 2121-25.  Abstract:

Background: Though vedolizumab has received regulatory approval for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults, there is increasing off-label use in children.

Aims: To describe the experience with vedolizumab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at 3 tertiary IBD centers and examine predictors of remission.

Methods: A retrospective review identified pediatric IBD patients (age < 18 yrs) receiving vedolizumab. Data on demographics, disease behavior, location, activity, and previous treatments/surgeries were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the weighted pediatric CD activity index or pediatric UC activity index. Primary outcome was week 14 remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index <10 or weighted pediatric CD activity index <12.5. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed to examine associations of clinical characteristics with efficacy.

Results: Fifty-two patients, 58% CD and 42% UC, initiated vedolizumab between June 2014 and August 2015. Median age at vedolizumab initiation was 14.9 (range 7–17) years. Ninety percent had failed ≥1 anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent. Week 14 remission rates for UC and CD were 76% and 42%, respectively (P < 0.05). Eighty percent of anti–TNF-naive patients experienced week 14 remission. At week 22, anti–TNF-naive patients had higher remission rates than TNF-exposed patients (100% versus 45%, P = 0.04). There were no infusion reactions or serious adverse events/infections.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that vedolizumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric IBD patients, with UC patients experiencing earlier and higher rates of remission than CD patients. Anti–TNF-naive patients experienced higher remission rates than those with anti-TNF exposure. Controlled clinical trial data are needed to confirm these observations.

Related Blog Posts:

Glacier Natl Park

Glacier Natl Park

Vedolizumab for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (with IBD)?

Posted on by

“The monoclonal antibody vedolizumab may reduce biliary inflammation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and comorbid inflammatory bowel disease, according to early, open-label study findings reported at the meeting sponsored by the European Association for the Study of the Liver”  –according to GIHepNews: Biliary inflammation reduced by IBD drug

“Vedolizumab given to 27 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) resulted in a 50% reduction or normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase levels in 17 cases (63%).”

This was an open-label, proof-of-concept study involving 27 patients aged 25-30 years with PSC and comorbid IBD.

My take: This is interesting but needs a lot more study.

Atlanta Zoo 2016

Atlanta Zoo 2016

CCFA Conference Notes 2016 (part 2) -Pediatric Lecture

Posted on by

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized this terrific presentation; most of the material has been covered in this blog in prior entries but still this was a useful review. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

2nd Lecture: What is Next in Treatments for Pediatric Patients? –Dr. Michael Rosen

I really enjoyed meeting Dr. Rosen. He is super-friendly and knowledgeable.

Combination therapy. Grossi V et al showed improvement in infliximab durability with concomitant therapy.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.44.52 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.44.38 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.46.30 AM

Now starting COMBINE trial (ImproveCareNow)–randomized to low dose MTX or placebo in combination with anti-TNF agent.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.42.32 AM

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatrics. Is this an alternative to combination therapy? Rationale (see slide): lower antibody formation if trough levels maintained. IFX level >5.5 associated with persistent remission (Singh et al 2014). Children are growing and they may need more adjustments. In Cincy, checking levels at week 14 after initiation and then every 6-12 months.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.48.03 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.47.12 AM

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. High rates of dose escalation in this population. Some of this is due to more rapid clearance of anti-TNF –leaking in gut and other mechanisms as well. Week 8 level of 40 associated with clinical response. Thus, this population may benefit from 10 mg/kg at start (in those with albumin <3) and may need more frequent dosing, especially early into treatment (?0, 2, 6, 10). ARCH study to look into this further

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.49.33 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.49.45 AM

Vedolizumab. Conrad MA 2015. About 1/3rd of these refractory patients in this abstract responded.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.50.01 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.50.16 AM

Ustekinumab . IL-12 & IL-23 blockage. No studies in pediatrics. Case report reviewed of good response in a refractory case.

Enteral therapy. Specific carbohydrate diet experience. These diets have some published data, most retrospective studies. Our group (Cohen SA et al) did perform a small prospective study. Sigall-Boneh R et al showed improvement with partial enteral nutrition.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.53.14 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.53.26 AM

 

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.54.44 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.55.08 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.54.57 AM

Very early-onset of IBD. IL-10 receptor deficiency was a key early discovery and can be treated with stem cell transplant. STAT3 mutation case reviewed which was managed with tocilizumab. More targeted therapy expected based on specific mutations.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.55.33 AM

 

Optimism for New Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: AJM300

Posted on by

Yesterday’s post on “Eternal Nutrition” had a link to podcasts on enteral nutrition as therapy for Crohn’s disease.  I listened to the podcasts and they were helpful (Enteral Therapy as Primary Therapy for Crohn’s Disease Podcast).  A few points that were made included the following:

  1. Try to have the right person teach/place the nasogastric feeding tube.  If the first experience is bad, this may make further attempts quite difficult.  At CHOP, their facility has an education center and they schedule 3-hour learning session for enteral feeds.  Teaching the teen to place the NG tube is preferred.
  2. Many pediatric gastroenterologists in U.S. are not informing their patients that enteral feedings are a treatment option.
  3. In most parts of the world, induction with enteral nutrition involves virtually 100% of diet as enteral nutrition for ~8-12 weeks.  CHOP modification involves 80-90% of calories delivered enterally, typically over an overnight drip.  If someone is not responding to enteral feeds, CHOP may increase calories delivered enterally.
  4. For maintenance with CHOP modification, gradually reduction from 7 days per week to 5 days per week is attempted.  At CHOP, they prefer hydrolysate for enteral tube feedings and think more rapid gastric emptying could be helpful.  However, the podcast state that specific formulas have not been shown to be superior in trials to date.  At CHOP, if formula is taken orally, then an intact protein formula is selected.
  5. If someone uses enteral formula for maintenance, then consideration of a gastrostomy tube (after 3 months) is reasonable.  They have not had local issues at sites due to Crohn’s disease.
  6. Resources include the Oley.org website and the Crohn’s Survival Guide.
  7. Enteral therapy seems to work in small bowel as well as colonic disease, despite early reports suggesting less efficacy with colonic disease.

———————

A recent phase II study (N Yoshimura et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1775-83) indicates that an oral antagonist of α4 integrin may be quite useful for ulcerative colitis.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 102 patients found the following:

  • A clinical response rate at 8 weeks of 62.7% in the treatment group and 25.5% for placebo)
  • Rates of remission were 23.5% in the treatment group  compared with 3.9% in the placebo group.
  • Mucosal healing were 58.8%% in the treatment group  compared with 29.4% in the placebo group.
  • No serious adverse events were noted.

In the commentary by  BG Levesque and S Ghosh (pg 1669-72), it is noted that subsequent oral integrins will be compared to vedolizumab and similar safety concerns exist; that is making sure that there are no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) which has been associated with natalizumab therapy.  For vedolizumab, the RAMP safety monitoring program has NOT identified PML in 2884 IBD patients.

The commentary (in blue) discusses several integrins as potential therapeutic targets and outlines future therapies.

Nontargeted therapies:

  • A) Induction: corticosteroids, 5- aminosalicylates, cyclosporin, and tacrolimus
  • B) Maintenance: thiopurines, methotrexate, 5-aminosalicylates, and tacrolimus.

Targeted therapies (those in development phase in italics)

  • A) Monoclonal antibodies (induction and maintenance): tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, vedolizumab, other integrin/adhesion molecule inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors, and interleukin-6 inhibitors.
  • B) Oral synthetic (induction and maintenance or stop and start): Jakinibs, integrin blockers, sphingosine-1-phosphate (s1P) regulators, and SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide.

“The results of AJM300 demonstrate feasibility of such an approach, and we anticipate a proliferation of such approaches given the robust evidence supporting integrins as a target, especially if the drug can be targeted or delivered in a gut-specific manner.”

My take: There are a number of therapies being developed that are likely to transform the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; future treatments will be more precise, more effective and have many more options.

Related blog posts:

Banning Mills

Banning Mills

 

Venous Thromboembolism: A Good Question for Pediatric Collaboration

Posted on by

Two recent clinical review articles (see below) indicate that most adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) admitted to the hospital would benefit from venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis.  Since children with IBD have a lower risk of VTE, it is unclear whether more efforts at VTE prophylaxis are needed in the pediatric population.  Previous studies have shown that in those IBD patients less than 20 years, the incidence rate was 8.9 per 10,000 person years.  In contrast, in those IBD patients older than 60, the incidence rate was 54.6 per 10,000 person years (VTE with IBD | gutsandgrowth).

  • Inflammatory Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 1195-1203.
  • Inflammatory Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 1204-1213.

In the first article, the authors review common risk factors and disease-specific risk factors.  They state the following:

Because hospitalization puts the patient at greater risk for TE compared with an outpatient setting, all hospitalized patients should receive anticoagulant therapy in the absence of severe bleeding, even if the patients are in remission.

The second review describes epidemiological data, pathophysiology, and VTE prevention. They also state the following:

Currently, the most effective strategy for preventing VTE in hospitalized patients with IBD with active disease is prophylactic anticoagulation.  In fact, all of the current guidelines for the management of patients with IBD suggest the use of anticoagulants to prevent VTE.

The authors note that the rates of thromboprophylaxis are “still unacceptably low.”

Bottomline: In adults with active IBD, VTE prophylaxis is recommended. In the pediatric population due to the lower incidence of VTE, more study is needed –perhaps another project for ImproveCareNow.

Briefly noted:

Cochrane Review of Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis.  Inflammatory Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 1151-59.  Based on four studies (n=606 patients) with low risk of bias, pooled analysis showed that vedolizumab was superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR=0.86), clinical response (RR=0.82), endoscopic remission (RR=0.82) and for achieving remission at 52 weeks in week 6 responders (RR=2.73).  No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between vedolizumab and placebo.

Zoo Atlanta

Zoo Atlanta