Author Archives: gutsandgrowth
Common Sense Media Web Site
“Common sense is not so common.” Voltaire,, Dictionnaire Philosophique 1764
A website that I learned about recently from the Journal of Pediatrics article, “The Elephant in the Examination Room: Addressing Parent and Child Mobile Device Use as a Teachable Moment:” commonsensemedia.org
Related blog post:
Dietary Patterns in First Year of Life May Increase Risk of Celiac Autoimmunity
M Barroso et al. Gastroenterol 2018; 154: 2087-96.
Background: “Western-like diets –mainly characterized by high intake of red and processed meats, refined grains, simple sugars, and saturated fats and low intake of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains– have been associated with low-grade chronic inflammation, which is involved in the etiology of inflammatory conditions.” Ref: Br J Nutr 2015; 114: 999-1012.
To examine how diet may influence the development of celiac autoimmunity, defined by TG2A positivity, the authors examined a subset of patients (n=1997) from the prospective Generation R study (Netherlands); 27 in this cohort developed celiac autoimmunity (1.4%).
Key finding:
- Higher adherence to a “prudent” diet which had a higher intake of vegetables, vegetable oils, pasta, and grains and low consumption of refined cereals and sweet beverages at 1 year of age was associated with a lower odds of celiac autoimmunity at 6 years of age with an odds ratio of 0.67.
This study is limited by the relatively low number who had celiac autoimmunity and by its use of a food questionnaire.
My take: This study indicates that diet plays a role in the development of celiac along with other disease, but this likely involves a complex mix of components rather than a single toxic agent.
Related blog posts:
- Northern Latitudes -Higher Celiac Disease Rates
- Celiac Disease Epidemic (High rate of celiac disease reported in Denver children)
- Vaccine for Celiac Disease
- Celiac Disease Risk –TEDDY study
- Celiac Disease and Mode of Delivery -Perhaps Not Very Consequential
- Celiac disease and diabetes
- Celiac disease and psychological problems
- How Birth Can Affect Your GI Tract | gutsandgrowth
- How to Protect Children From Celiac Disease
- Why are we seeing so many more cases | gutsandgrowth
- Why is Celiac Disease Becoming More Prevalent?
How Many Eosinophils Indicate Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis or Colitis?
A recent study (Z Kiss et al. JPGN 2018; 67: 6-12) provides more data on normative values for eosinophil counts in the GI tract. For their report, the authors reviewed 3 databases for a systematic search of the literature. They screened 1316 abstracts but found only 8 articles with complete/relevant data. Among these 8 articles, data regarding each segment of the GI tract was present in as few as 3 articles and as many as 6 articles. The authors provide confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs); the latter account for the wider uncertainty due to insufficient data.
Key points:
Normal eosinophil cell number per high-power field (HPF area = 0.2 mm squared):
- Duodenum 8.26 with CI 4.71-11.8 and PI of 0 to 20.57
- Terminal ileum 11.52 with CI 7.21-15.83 and PI of 0 to 60.64
- Cecum 14.12 with CI 9.05-19.19 and PI of 0 to 38.64
- Ascending colon 13.25 with CI 8.65-17.86 and PI of 0 to 35.42
- Transverse colon 11.52 with CI 7.80-15.23 and PI of 0 to 25.85
- Descending colon 10.32 with CI 7.22-13.42 and PI of 0 to 49.10
- Sigmoid colon 8.80 with CI 6.82-10.77 and PI of 0 to 32.49
- Rectum 7.39 with CI 4.20-10.59 and PI of 0 to 22.33
Other points:
- The authors note that eos/HPFis a flawed measurement due to technical parameters of the microscope. Some HPFs are bigger than others –this could affect eosinophil count up to 5-fold. The authors specify an HPF to be =0.2 mm squared.
- Obtaining appropriate mucosal samples for normal number of eosinophil counts can be difficult. Even patients with functional disorders like irritable bowel syndrome and nonulcer dyspepsia could have abnormal numbers of eosinophils.
My take: These numbers of expected eosinophil counts for pediatric histology are a good starting point. The prediction intervals remain large due to insufficient data.
Related blog posts:
Pediatric NAFLD: You Don’t Have to be Obese/Overweight to Have Fatty Liver Disease (but it helps)
A recent study (P Kumar et al. JPGN 2018; 67: 75-9) examined suspected NAFLD in 12 to 18 year olds using data from NHANES. In the analysed cohort, there were 124 suspected NAFLD and 1385 without suspicion of NAFLD. This subset was weight to represent a U.S. population of over 18 million.
Key definitions:
- Suspected NAFLD was defined by abnormal ALT (>25.8 U/L for boys and >22.1 U/L for girls) who did not have another explanation (eg. viral hepatitis, medication)
- Lean BMI was defined by BMI less than 85th% for age
- Hypertriglyceridemia ≥ 150
- Low HDL ≤ 40 mg/dL
- HOMA-IR =fasting glucose x insulin (microU/mL) divided by 405. Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA-IR ≥ 3
Key findings:
- Suspected NAFLD affects ~8% of lean adolescents in the U.S.
- Hypertriglyceridemia was noted in 10 of 124 suspected NAFLD and was a risk factor (P=0.028) as was Low HDL which occurred in 15 (P=0.016) and IR which occurred in 43 (P=0.053)
My take: Elevated ALT, a marker for fatty liver disease, is common even in adolescents without obesity. Elevated triglycerides, low HDL, and insulin resistance are all risk factors for suspected NAFLD in non-overweight/non-obese teens.
Related blog posts:
MRE Does Not Fare Well at Detecting Lesions Evident on Upper Endoscopy
A recent study (PC Church et al. JPGN 2018; 67: 53-8) examined how well EGD findings were detected by MRE in 188 children (mean age 14 years).
Key findings:
- EGD was macroscopically abnormal in 93 (49%) with ulcerations being the most common abnormality in 66 (35%).
- In contrast, the local radiologist identified UGI inflammation in 7 (4%) and the central radiologists identied UGI inflammation in 20 (22%). “There was no agreement between local and central radiologists when examining the UGI as a whole (κ=-0.02, P-0.59)”
- The local radiologists “correctly identified only 5 of 93 (8%) patients with UGI findings on EGD.” The central radiologists “correctly identified 9 of 45 (30%) patients with UGI findings on EGD.”
The authors state that “the Porto criteria mandate the performance of EGD for all pediatric patients suspected of having IBD. Our study has demonstrated that MRE cannot be relied upon as the sole method of evaluating the UGI.”
My take: For those who take care of children with IBD, this study will not come as a surprise as many of the UGI findings (found at endoscopy) are subtle. This study does quantify the much higher sensitivity of endoscopic evaluation and is similar to studies that have compared capsule endoscopy to MRE.
Related blog posts:
- Capsule Endoscopy More Sensitive than MRE for Crohn’s Disease
- ESPGHAN IBD Diagnostic Practice Recommendations -Revised Porto Criteria
- Magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn’s disease …
- Paris Classification of Pediatric Crohn’s Disease …
- How sensitive is Calprotectin? | gutsandgrowth
Pediatric Pancreatitis -Working Group Nutritional Recommendations
M Abu-El-Haija et al. JPGN 2018; 67: 131-43. This working group made ~27 recommendations (summarized in Table 1) and indicated the quality of evidence supporting the recommendation as well as the agreement among team members –virtually all received at least 12 of 13 votes.
Here are the ones that grabbed my attention:
For Acute Pancreatitis (AP):
- 1a & 1aa. Children with mild AP should be started on a regular diet –preferably via mouth as compared to nasogastric route
- 1b. Enteral nutrition (EN) should be attempted in children with severe AP within 72 hours from presentation, once deemed hemodynamically stable.
- 1.4 Even in severe AP, jejunal tube feeding should be reserved for those unable to tolerate oral or NG tube feeding
For Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis (ARP):
- 2.1a & 2.1b. Children should receive a regular-fat diet in between bouts of ARP and a regular-fat diet can safely be started within 1 week after the onset of a bout of AP (except in those with very elevated triglycerids (>1000 mg/dL)
- 2.2a & 2.3a. PERT is NOT recommended in children with ARP without eocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Antioxidants are NOT recommended (insufficient supporting evidence)
For Chronic Pancreatitis (CP):
- 3.1b & 3.12a. Recommends routine followup every 3-6 months and a regular diet
- 3.3a, 3.4a, & 3.5a Monitoring: recommends checking fat-soluble vitamin levels every 6 to 12 months, checking for EPI with elastase (or 72 hr fecal fat) every 6-12 months, and BMD (bone mineral density) if CP and malnutrition (especially if Vit D deficiency or hx/o fractures)
My take: This report provides a methodical approach for the care of children with these pancreatic disorders.
Related blog posts:
- Acute Pancreatitis: Clinical Report from NASPGHAN
- Acute Pancreatitis Review (2016)
- For the pediatric pancreatologists
- Pancreatitis Update (part 1) | gutsandgrowth 2017
- Pancreatitis Update (part 2) 2017
- Changing Practice Patterns with Pediatric Pancreatitis | gutsandgrowth
- Why an ERCP Study Matters to Pediatric Care | gutsandgrowth This post explains why LR may be best.
Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease
Briefly noted: P Singh et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 823-36. After a systemic review which selected 96 articles from a pool of 3843 published between 1991 through 2016, the authors determined a pooled global prevalence of 1.4% in 275,818 individuals based on seroprevalence (positive TTG or EMA). Biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was noted in 0.7% in 138,792 individuals.
In their study, biopsy-proven disease was most prevalent in Argentina, Egypt, Hungary, Finland, Sweden, New Zealand, and India.
Related blog posts:
- Never Too Old for Celiac Disease
- Northern Latitudes -Higher Prevalence of Celiac Disease and Gluten Avoidance
- Celiac Disease Epidemic (High rate of celiac disease reported in Denver children)
- Vaccine for Celiac Disease
- Celiac Disease Risk –TEDDY study
- Celiac Disease and Mode of Delivery -Perhaps Not Very Consequential
- Celiac disease and diabetes
- Celiac disease and psychological problems
- How Birth Can Affect Your GI Tract | gutsandgrowth
- How to Protect Children From Celiac Disease
- Why are we seeing so many more cases | gutsandgrowth
- Why is Celiac Disease Becoming More Prevalent?
Serology Titers Associated with Clinical Expression of Ulcerative Colitis in Children
Briefly noted: A recent study (EA Spencer et al.Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24: 1335-42) examined phenotype and serology in 399 children with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis (PROTECT study).
Key findings:
- 65% had positive serology for pANCA; 62% in those <12 and 66% in those ≥12 years
- 19% had positive serology for anti-CBir1; 32% in those <12 and 14% in those ≥12 years
- High titer (≥ 100)) pANCA positivity was associated with more extensive disease but not with PUCAI values or Mayo endoscopic subscores.
My take: The serology titers for IBD, in my view, have academic interest but do not routinely enhance patient care.
Related blog post:
- Low-Value Care: IBD Serologies for Diagnosis of IBD
- How helpful are serologies in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease?
Pilot Study: Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Beneficial Effects on Fatty Liver Disease in Children
Briefly noted: A small pilot study (n=9) (SS Sundaram et al. J Pediatr 2018; 198: 67-75) showed that treatment (with home CPAP) of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with improved alanine aminotransferase levels, reduced metabolic syndrome markers and lower F(2)-isoprostanes (a marker of oxidative stress) in pediatric patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All nine of the participants were Hispanic males with a median age of 11.5 years; they had a median BMI of 29.5 and had biopsy-proven NAFLD. The improvement in NAFLD parameters occurred despite an increase in BMI. The authors note that studies in adults have shown contradictory findings with regard to whether treatment of OSA helps NAFLD.
My take: This study suggests potential beneficial liver effects of treating OSA. Regardless, treatment of OSA could be considered a quality metric in the care of children with NAFLD as better sleep at night has additional clear benefits.
Related blog posts:
















