Category Archives: Gastroenterology

Price Per Poop with Vibrating Capsule and New AGA Constipation Guidelines

Posted on by

SS C Rao et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 164: 1202-1210. Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Vibrating Capsule for Chronic Constipation

Methods: This was a a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with chronic constipation, who were randomized to receive either a vibrating or placebo capsule, once daily, 5 days a week for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end points were an increase of 1 or more complete spontaneous bowel movements per week (CSBM1 responder) or 2 or more CSBMs per week (CSBM2) from baseline during at least 6 of the 8 weeks

Key findings:

  •  A greater percentage of patients receiving the vibrating capsule achieved both primary efficacy end points compared with placebo (39.3% vs 22.1%, P = .001 for CSBM1; 22.7% vs 11.4% P = .008 for CSBM2).
  • Spontaneous bowel movements per week, adjusted mean change: 1.40 vs 1.24 per placebo (0.16 per week difference)

The capsule used is 24 mm x 11 mm and includes a motor for vibrations, a battery, a computer chip and a latex-free plastic shell.  The control group had received a dissolvable sham capsule.

I looked up cost of this new treatment and it is approximately $89/month which equates to $139 price per poop (PPP). To my knowledge, the PPP is a new metric –I have not seen it previously. For the vibrating capsule, I derived this figure by dividing the monthly cost into a weekly cost and dividing it by 0.16 (mean difference in weekly stooling with vibrating capsule). The PPP may be competitive with some of the constipation medications which cost in the range of ~$500 per month on GoodRx (like prucalopride and linaclotide) but is much more costly than senna products which can be purchased for ~$5/month.

My take: The vibrating capsule is an expensive way to help with constipation

Related article: L Chang, WD Chey, AJ Lembo et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 164: 1086-1106. Open Access! American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Gastroenterol 2023; 164: 1107. Open Access! Clinical Decision Support Tool

These guidelines for adults with constipation are similar to guidelines published in 2020 with the addition of prucalopride.

IBD Updates: Treat-to-Target Uptake, Long-Term Data on Ustekinumab Intensification, and Low Rates of C diff with Tofacitinib (& Clinical Pearl)

Posted on by

JL Yang et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 735-743. Utilization of Colonoscopy Following Treatment Initiation in U.S. Commercially Insured Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease, 2013-2019

In this study with 39,734 commercially-insured initiators of IBD medications (18-64 year old), 34% had a colonoscopy by 12 months and 42% at 15 months. The authors state that “it is evident that patients without any colonoscopy during this interval are not being followed under an optimal long-term T2T (treat-to-target) paradigm.”

RS Dalal et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 830-833. Long-Term Outcomes After Ustekinumab Dose Intensification for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

This retrospective study examined 123 patients with Crohn’s disease and 40 with ulcerative colitis who had dose intensification with ustekinumab (to either every 4 weeks, n=91, or every 6 weeks, n=72). Dose escalation was effective in both achieving and maintaining corticosteroid-free clinical remission for 61% of patients with Crohn’s disease and 40% with ulcerative colitis at 24 months; endoscopic remission was noted in 43% with Crohn’s disease and 55% with ulcerative colitis.

EV Loftus et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 744-751. Open Access! Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Tofacitinib in the Ulcerative Colitis Program 

Using data from multiple studies with 1157 patients, only 9 tofacitinib patients developed Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) which was lower than the placebo group. CDI were all mild–moderate in severity and resolved with treatment in 8 patients. Six of 9 patients continued tofacitinib treatment without interruption. The low rate of infection was likely in part due to screening for CDI prior to treatment. In addition, “it is possible than the lower rates of CDI …may be due to better-controlled disease…, thus reducing susceptibility to infection.”

One clinical pearl in the discussion: “When considering treatment [for CDI], initial therapy with oral vancomycin should be considered instead of metronidazole, and treating for at least 21 days should also be considered [in patients with IBD due to]…lower rates of CDI recurrence.”

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Lego Art at Tucson Botanical Gardens

Data on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis and Case Report of Vancomycin for Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

NEH Chehade et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 808-817. Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials

HS Almomen, B Al-Bawardy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 837-838. Oral Vancomycin Induced and Maintained Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Post-liver Transplantation

In the first study by Chehade et al, the authors analyzed six RCTs involving 324 patients. Key findings:

  • Compared with placebo, FMT has significant benefit in inducing combined clinical and endoscopic remission (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-7.72; P < .0001)
  • clinical remission with FMT was 46.2% compared 22.5% for placebo
  • clinical response with FMT was 51.6% compared to 30.1% for placebo
  • endoscopic remission with FMT was 18.9% compared to 6.1% for placebo
  • endoscopic response with FMT was 36.7% compared to 22.4% for placebo

Discussion Points:

  • “The studies included in our article indicate that there is a shift in the microbiota composition of responders in the FMT group to resemble the profile of healthy donors”
  • FMT delivery via upper GI tract was equally effective as delivery via lower GI tract in these studies in inducing combined remission
  • “The understanding of FMT effectiveness for IBD is in its infancy.”

In the case report by Alomomen et al, a 34 year old with refractory ulcerative colitis and PSC (post-transplant) had not responded to infliximab, vedolizumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib or 10 months of ustekinumab (every 4 weeks). In addition, he was receiving tacrolimus therapy due to his liver transplant. His colonoscopy demonstrated a continuous Mayo 3 colitis. Subsequently, vancomycin therapy was added to his treatment (500 mg BID); he continued ustekimumab. Six months afterwards, his fecal calprotectin had dropped to 277 from 1600 and his CRP and hemoglobin had normalized. Repeat colonoscopy demonstrated complete endoscopic healing.

My take: There are many patients who do not respond to current IBD therapies. These two studies show that both FMT and vancomycin could be useful in selected patients.

Related blog posts:

Lego Art at Tucson Botanical Gardens
Lego Lion
Lego Panther

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

How Long to Hold Biologics and Small Molecule Drugs Perioperatively

Posted on by

BL Cohen et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol l2023; 21: 1148-1151. How to Manage Targeted Immune Suppressants (Biologics and Oral Small-molecule Drugs) Perioperatively for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and non-Inflammatory Bowel Disease surgery

This article makes pragmatic recommendations with regard to surgery timing in individuals taking medications that target the immune system.

Key points:

  • Several recent large studies have “observed no association between biologic exposure and postoperative infectious outcomes.”
  • The primary risk factor for infectious complications has been corticosteroid/glucocorticoid use.
  • For IBD Surgery: “If patients are deriving therapeutic benefit, including reducing the need for steroids, we propose continuing treatment until surgery…It may be practical to perform the surgery mid to late dosing interaval in the case of biologics with longer half-lives…Our expert opinion is that therapy may be resumed 14 days postoperatively or when recovered from infectious complications.”
  • For Non-IBD surgery: “Expert opinion suggests medications may be re-dosed by 14 days postoperatively if there have been no complications. Consideration should be given to resuming oral small molecules earlier given their short half-lives.”
  • Emergency or urgent surgeries “should be performed promptly regardless of targeted immune suppressant use.”
David Yetman Trail (Tucson)

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

One If By Colon and Two If By Capsule For Clostridioides difficile

Posted on by

Well, this study is not exactly Paul Revere territory; nevertheless, the blog title seemed better than “Eat Shit for C diff.”

BP Vaughn et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 1330-1337. Effectiveness and Safety of Colonic and Capsule Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

Methods: Clinical outcomes and adverse events after FMT performed for rCDI at 6 sites (n=269) were captured in a prospective registry. FMT was performed using either freeze-dried/encapsulated or frozen-thawed/liquid.  

The authors note that the cohort with a mix of academic and private practices reflects real-world use of FMT. Since the study products were free of charge, providers and patients selected treatment based on their preference (65% selected oral capsule).

Key findings:

  • At 1 month, rCDI cure rate was 91% for FMT-colonoscopy and 84% for FMT-capsule (no significant difference, p=0.12)
  • At 2 months, rCDI were 83% and 81% for FMT-colonoscopy and FMT-capsule respectively
  • Use of non-CDI antibiotics increased failure rates: 28% at 2 months compared to 10% who did not receive antibiotics
  • One serious adverse event was related to colonoscopy (aspiration pneumonia), otherwise no new safety signals were identified

My take: This study indicates similar effectiveness of FMT-capsule to FMT-colonoscopy. FMT-capsule is easier and avoids risks associated with colonoscopy. But, it does require patients to eat (encapsulated) feces

Related blog posts:

More Pics from Tucson -above picture near Wasson Peak

When Will Intestinal Ultrasound for IBD Become Practical?

Posted on by

M Allocca et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 164: 851-855. Open Access! Intestinal Ultrasound in the Assessment and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Is It Ready for Standard Practice?

This short article outlines the indications, availability, technical skills, cost-effectiveness and potential value of intestinal ultrasound (IUS). Some key points:

  • Goal: “IUS is used as a first-line investigation and can avoid or delay the need for more invasive and expensive testing (CT, MRI, or colonoscopy). Thus, costs are minimized and patient convenience is optimized”
  • Availability: “IUS is quite widespread in many European countries, but its uptake has been significantly less in other parts of the world, including the United States. Limitations to its use include the absence of standardized and reproducible protocols, lack of local expertise, and the perception that IUS is an operator-dependent tool, feasible only by highly experienced operators. In reality, however,…. studies specifically addressing sonographer variability demonstrate substantial agreement for color Doppler signals and almost perfect agreement for bowel-wall thickness, as the most relevant IUS parameter.”
  • Expertise: Trainees “have to perform at least 300 supervised ultrasound examinations in Italy and 400 in Germany to achieve full competency…It is believed that learners can achieve competency in IUS after approximately 200 supervised examinations, but it is important to acknowledge that a formal learning curve and the criteria for competency assessment have not yet been fully defined”

My take: Despite all the interest in this useful point-of-care tool, for IUS to become more widespread in the U.S. it will need to be incorporated in training programs. The threshold for competency is not achievable with a weekend seminar. It will be interesting to see how this test affects cost, management, and outcomes. Will it reduce or increase other cross sectional imaging testing? Is the information from IUS more useful than a calprotectin (stool biomarker) which could also be a point-of-care test?

Related blog posts:

The Oro Valley/Tucson Loop shared use bike path extends over 130 car free miles throughout unincorporated Pima County, Marana, Oro Valley, and Tucson.

Landmark Study: Oral Biologic for Crohn’s –Upadacitinib

Posted on by

EV Loftus et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1966-1980. Upadacitinib Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn’s Disease

This study is the basis for the FDA’s approval of updacitnib (Rinvoq) for Crohn’s disease in adults: New FDA Rinvoq (upadacitinib) Indication: Oral Treatment For Crohn’s

This publication describes the results of two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled induction trials (n=1021 adults,U-EXCEL, U-ECEED) and one maintenance trial (n=502, U-ENDURE) with Upadacitinib (Rinvoq). The induction trials involved an early mandatory glucocorticoid taper.

Key findings:

  • A significantly higher percentage of patients who received 45-mg upadacitinib than those who received placebo had clinical remission (in U-EXCEL, 49.5% vs. 29.1%; in U-EXCEED, 38.9% vs. 21.1%) and an endoscopic response (in U-EXCEL, 45.5% vs. 13.1%; in U-EXCEED, 34.6% vs. 3.5%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons).
  • There was a rapid onset of action with a difference in clinical response compared to placebo at 2 weeks
  • Maintenance Trial of clinical responders: At week 52 in U-ENDURE, a higher percentage of patients had clinical remission with 15-mg upadacitinib (37.3%) or 30-mg upadacitinib (47.6%) than with placebo (15.1%), and a higher percentage had an endoscopic response with 15-mg upadacitinib (27.6%) or 30-mg upadacitinib (40.1%) than with placebo (7.3%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons).
  • Adverse effects included gastrointestinal perforations (6 in study medication, 1 in placebo), neutropenia in up to 2.6%, and increased Herpes Zoster infections in patients receiving study medication (1.5% to 3%).

A good commentary of this study is in the same issue: M Abreu. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2005-2009. It is noted that upadacitinib showed a good response even though a different JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, had disappointing results for patients with Crohn’s disease. Other points:

  • “It is hard to compare findings across studies because of differences in the characteristics of patients and end points. That being said, the incidences of clinical remission observed by Loftus et al. were greater than those observed in most studies of biologic drugs to treat Crohn’s disease. Moreover, upadacitinib was more likely than placebo to resolve extraintestinal manifestations.”
  • “They did not find evidence of cardiovascular or thromboembolic complications, which were previously observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib and which led to a black-box warning.10 However, the treatment of greater numbers of patients for a longer duration will be required to determine whether upadacitinib is asssociated with a risk of such complications.”
  • “Among the most common upadacitinib-specific adverse events were anemia [6.9%] and acne [6.3%]. The increase in anemia may be due to off-target effects of upadacitinib on erythropoietin signaling through JAK2.”

My take: This is great news for patients with Crohn’s disease. In addition to having a new option for refractory disease, this option does not require IV administration. When will pediatric data be available?

New FDA Rinvoq (upadacitinib) Indication: Oral Treatment For Crohn’s

Posted on by

5/18/23: FDA approves first oral treatment for moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease

“Patients should start with 45 mg of Rinvoq once daily for 12 weeks. Following the 12-week period, the recommended maintenance dosage is 15 mg once a day. A maintenance dosage of 30 mg once daily can be considered for patients with refractory, severe, or extensive Crohn’s disease.”

“The most common side effects of Rinvoq as indicated for Crohn’s disease are upper respiratory tract infections, anemia, fever, acne, herpes zoster, and headache…. Serious infections, mortality, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, and thrombosis have occurred with JAK inhibitors such as Rinvoq.”

Tucson Botanical Gardens

How Does Bowel Ultrasound Stack Up to MRE for Crohn’s Disease?

Posted on by

A Rispo et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 563-569. David Against Goliath: Direct Comparison of Handheld Bowel Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease

Lately, there has been a lot of ‘buzz’ about the potential use of point-of-care bowel sonography (aka intestinal ultrasound). This study (2019-2021) prospectively enrolled patients with a high likelihood of Crohn’s disease (CD) and compared handheld bowel sonography (HHBS), MRE (all patients, n=85, had ileocolonoscopy)

Key findings:

  • Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for CD diagnosis were 87.50%, 91.89%, 93.33%, and 85% for HHBS; and 91.67%, 94.59%, 95.65%, and 89.74% for MRE, without significant differences in terms of diagnostic accuracy (89.41% for HHBS vs 92.94% for MRE, P = NS)
  • Magnetic resonance enterography was superior to HHBS in defining CD extension (r = 0.67; P < .01) with a better diagnostic performance than HHBS for detecting location (k = 0.81; P < .01), strictures (k = 0.75; P < .01), abscesses (k = 0.68; P < .01), and fistulas (k = 0.65; P < .01).

My take: In this study, MRE was clearly superior at defining CD complications. This study suggests that HHBS could be an effective screening tool but is not likely a definitive imaging study. In terms of bedside monitoring, it would be helpful to see how clinical monitoring with HBSS compares with a highly sensitive marker like a calprotectin. I also worry that HBSS could perform more poorly with more widespread application due to potential increase in operator error.

If a Gastroparesis Medication Works in the Forest But No One Sees It, Did It Really Work?

Posted on by

MR Ingrosso et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 164: 642-654. Open Access! Efficacy and Safety of Drugs for Gastroparesis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

The authors examined  29 RCTs (3772 patients). Key findings:

  • Only two medications (neither available in U.S.) were identified as being more effective than placebo for global symptoms of gastroparesis: clebopride (RR, 0.30) followed by domperidone (RR, 0.68) 
  • Oral metoclopramide ranked first for nausea (RR 0.46), fullness (RR 0.67), and bloating. Though, use may result extrapyramidal adverse effects

In the associated editorial (pg 522-524, Drug Treatments for Gastroparesis—Why Is the Cupboard So Bare?), the authors note that the label “gastroparesis” applies to a heterogeneous population.

Key points:

  • I tend to abide by the recommendation proposed by Masaoka and Tack10 some years ago that one should use the term gastroparesis only “when persistently and severely delayed gastric emptying is found in the absence of mechanical obstruction.” 
  • An obsession with gastroparesis as the basic issue among patients with “gastroparesis-like” symptoms has translated into a therapeutic fixation on the acceleration of gastric emptying. This too has led to frustration and disappointment. As already mentioned, symptoms are a poor predictor of the rate of gastric emptying, and a normalization of delayed emptying has not consistently correlated with symptom responses and vice versa.11,12
  • Oblivious to research illustrating how upper gastrointestinal symptoms can result from several other derangements in foregut physiology, such as impaired accommodation of the upper stomach, visceral hypersensitivity, and antropyloric distensibility and dysmotility,13, 14, 15, 16

My take: Currently, pharmaceutical agents geared towards symptoms like nausea and sensory disorders are much more promising than prokinetic agents for gastroparesis

Related blog posts:

Sunset in Tucson, AZ at Tumamoc Hill