Category Archives: Nutrition

What We Should Not Worry About

Posted on by

A few useful studies provide reassurances regarding exposures in the prenatal period and perinatal period that we should NOT worry about.

CN Bernstein et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 50-7.

In this study with 1671 individuals with inflammatory bowel disease and 10,488 controls, “people with IBD were not more likely to have been born by cesarean section than controls or siblings without IBD.  These findings indicate that events of the immediate postpartum period that shape the developing intestinal microbiome do not affect risk for IBD.”

J Julvez et al. Am. J. Epidemiol. (2016) Full Text Link: doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv195. First published online: January 5, 2016 (thanks to Mike Hart for this reference)

For parents of autistic kids who avoid fish, this article provides information indicating that this is counter-productive.  ” Seafood consumption during pregnancy is thought to be beneficial for child neuropsychological development, but to our knowledge no large cohort studies with high fatty fish consumption have analyzed the association by seafood subtype.” The authors “evaluated 1,892 and 1,589 mother-child pairs at the ages of 14 months and 5 years, respectively, in a population-based Spanish birth cohort established during 2004–2008…” Key finding: “Consumption of large fatty fish during pregnancy presents moderate child neuropsychological benefits, including improvements in cognitive functioning and some protection from autism-spectrum traits.”

My take: We often worry about the wrong things.  These articles provide reassurance that mode of birth and consumption of seafood during pregnancy are things we should not worry about.

Screen Shot 2016-01-30 at 3.22.06 PM

 

Sleep Duration and Subsequent Obesity

Posted on by

A provocative study from Brazil (CSE Halal et al. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 99-103) examined a cohort of 4231 infants and assessed sleep duration from 1-4 years of age.

Findings:

  • 10.1% of cohort had short sleep duration at any follow-up
  • At 4 years of age, 201 children (5.3%) were obese and 302 (8%) were overweight
  • Prevalence ratio for obesity/overweight was 1.32 among those who were ‘short-sleepers’

This study introduction notes that studies in adults have suggested an association between poor sleep and weight gain, “possibly through elevation of cortisol and gherlin levels, along with reduction in leptin levels, thereby leading to increased hunger and reduced energy expenditure.”

Normal sleep patterns: for infants 12-15 hours/day, & for toddlers 11-14 hours/day.  At night, average expected sleep is 12 hours at 1 year of age and 11 hours at 4 years of age.

My take: Looking at early sleep patterns helps reduce the likelihood of reverse causation.  This study and others shows an association with less sleep and increased likelihood of weight gain.  Why???

In same issue (AI Wijtzes et al. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 118-25) report that breakfast skipping at age 4 years is associated (ß =1.38) with a higher percent fat mass at age 6 years, though no associations were found with BMI or weight status.  This study involved prospectively collected data from 5914 children in the “Generation R Study” in The Netherlands.

Briefly noted: JA Emond et al. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 158-63. “Greater child commercial TV viewing was significantly associated with more frequent family visits to those fast food restaurants …toy collecting partially mediated that positive association.” This study involved 100 parents with children aged 3-7 in a rural community.

Related blog posts:

This graphic identifies commercial entities influencing food choices

This graphic identifies commercial entities influencing food choices

Adolescent Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at 3 Years

Posted on by

A prospective study (TH Inge et al. NEJM 2016; 374: 113-23) with 242 adolescents from five U.S. centers provides data on outcomes at 3 years. Here’s the scoop:

  • At baseline, mean age was 17 years, 75% were female, 72% were white, and mean BMI was 53.

At 3 years:

  • Mean weight decreased 27% (similar results for gastric bypass and gastric sleeve)
  • 95% had remission of type 2 diabetes (of those with diabetes at baseline)
  • 86% had remission in abnormal kidney function (of those with diabetes at baseline)
  • 74% had remission in elevated blood pressure (of those with diabetes at baseline)

lonnnngg Table 4 details the serious complications:

  • 13% of the participants (n=30, 47 procedures) had undergone additional abdominal procedures. While most of these were related to the procedure, a good number may have occurred regardlessly (eg. 18 cholecystectomies, 2 appendectomies)
  • 13% (n=29) also underwent endoscopic procedures including 9 who needed stricture dilatation.

The most common nutrient deficiency at followup was iron deficiency.  57% had low ferritin levels at 3 years compared with 5% at baseline.  Vitamin B12 deficiency was common; it declined by 35% and 8% had a deficiency at 3 years.  Vitamin A deficiencies increased (16% at 3 years). My take: this study documents the durability of weight loss and its beneficial effects on a multitude of problems.  It also shows that careful followup is needed for nutrient deficiencies and the risks of adverse events. Related blog posts:

Weight Gain in Preemies, Neurodevelopmental Outcomes, and Reverse Causation

Posted on by

Since a trial which randomizes premature infants into groups that are well-nourished and poorly-nourished and then following them prospectively is never going to happen, it is difficult to know with certainty the effects of optimal nutrition are with respect to long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

An article I enjoyed reading on this subject (MB Belfort et al. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 30-5) pushes back on the correlation between good weight gain, as a surrogate marker for nutritional status, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

In this study, 1070 infants between 23-27 weeks gestational age were followed with weights on days 7-28 along with weights at 12 and 24 months.  This data was compared with several indices on neurodevelopmental outcome.  Here is the key finding:  “Weight gain in the lowest quartile from 7-28 days was not associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes.”

In commentary on their findings, the authors point out that “we found no evidence to suggest that faster weight gain from 7 to 28 days of life reduced the risk of adverse outcomes…almost all of the associations between low weight gain..were attenuated or eliminated when we restricted our analysis to those children able to walk independently.”

“Overall, it appears that low weight in children with severe neurodevelopmental impairments may be caused by factors closely related to the impairments themselves…reverse causation may be at play.” Thus, underlying brain damage may limit body weight gain, rather than poor nutrition limiting brain development.”

My take: I may be apt to ‘confirmational bias’ as this study reinforces my view that improved nutrition may not change outcomes appreciably.  To be clear, I still believe that efforts to optimize the nutrition of premature infants are a good idea but we need to be skeptical about the magnitude of benefit that we will derive.

Related blog posts:

A Few Years Ago in Yosemite

A Few Years Ago in Yosemite

“A Healthy Diet’s Main Ingredient? Best Guesses”

Posted on by

A recent commentary from the NY Times (A Healthy Diet’s Main Ingredients? Best Guesses) explores some of the failed efforts to improve health by reducing fat or eliminating eggs and explains why these are no longer recommended.  The article has a 12 minute video which reviews some of the confusion regarding dietary recommendations.

Here’s an excerpt:

Conventional wisdom held that fat was bad, period, with relatively few Americans distinguishing between saturated fats (meat, eggs, dairy products) and healthier unsaturated fats (fish, vegetable oils, nuts). Typically, people turned to breads, cereals and potatoes — and to sugary soft drinks — for the calories they no longer got from protein-rich foods…The result? Carbo-loading Americans grew fatter. “We put the whole country on a low-fat diet,” Mr. Taubes said, “and, lo and behold, we have an obesity epidemic.”…

New guidelines are expected to be issued this month by the Departments of Agriculture and of Health and Human Services, which tend to follow the recommendations of an advisory committee. One likely eye-catcher is a new assessment of cholesterol, long an archvillain. It seems destined for rehabilitation to some degree. Months ago, the advisory committee concluded that the dietary intake of cholesterol (the body produces this waxy, artery-obstructing matter on its own) had no real effect on blood levels of LDL, the so-called bad cholesterol. “Cholesterol,” the committee said, “is not a nutrient of concern for overconsumption.”

There is a conspicuous American tendency to cling to a favored diet as the gateway to good health, keeping weight down, staving off cancers and banishing heart attacks. A consequence is an abundance of regimens — vegan, gluten-free, Paleolithic, fruitarian and many more — each promoted by its adherents as the one true path.

But nutrition experts, including those in this Retro Report, caution that life is complex, and that we are more than what we eat.

Related blog posts:

Eating the Right Foods and Weight Loss

Posted on by

In a recent NY Times article, Rethinking Weight Loss and the Reasons We’re ‘Always Hungry’, the idea that too many calories causes obesity is challenged:

“…overeating doesn’t make you fat. The process of getting fat makes you overeat.”

Here’s an excerpt:

Dr. Ludwig, an obesity expert and professor of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, argues that weight gain begins when people eat the wrong types of food, which throws their hormones out of whack and sets off a cycle of cravings, hunger and bingeing. In his new book, “Always Hungry?,” he argues that the primary driver of obesity today is not an excess of calories per se, but an excess of high glycemic foods like sugar, refined grains and other processed carbohydrates…

Simply cutting back on calories as we’ve been told actually makes the situation worse. When we cut back on calories, our body responds by increasing hunger and slowing metabolism. It responds in an effort to save calories…

It’s the low fat, very high carbohydrate diet that we’ve been eating for the last 40 years, which raises levels of the hormone insulin and programs fat cells to go into calorie storage overdrive.

My take: The idea of changing the types of foods that we consume is not new in the fight against excessive weight gain.  Some of the best data on healthy eating is associated with the Mediterranean diet.

Related blog posts:

Another review (from the NY Times) of the book ‘Happy Gut’ describes a diet promoted by a NY internist to help with problems like irritable bowel: Seeking a ‘Happy Gut’ for Better Health. “Cutting out dairy and gluten reversed many of his symptoms. Replacing processed foods with organic meats, fresh vegetables and fermented foods gave him more energy and settled his sensitive stomach.”

Banning Mills

Banning Mills

 

Continuous Feeds versus Bolus Feeds

Posted on by

Briefly noted:

Another study (JB van Goudoever et al. JPGN 2015; 61: 659-64) indicates that bolus feeds are likely as safe as continuous feeds in preterm infants; though, the “continuous” feeding was atypical.  In this study, the bolus group received their feedings every 3 hours via gravity whereas the “continuous” feeding cohort received feedings by gravity by giving one-fourth of the hourly feeding every 15 minutes.

Key finding: In a study of 246 infants (<1750 g & <32 weeks gestational  age), there was no significant difference in reaching full enteral feedings between the group assigned to continuous feedings compared with bolus feedings

Related blog post:  Which is Safer -Drip Feeds or Bolus Feeds in Healthy Preterm …

 

“Eternal Nutrition” Therapy

Posted on by

NASPGHAN twitter feed (with links to enteral therapy podcasts) was probably a typo &/or autocorrect issue:

“Podcast series must! Eternal Nutrition as Primary Therapy for Crohn’s disease. ”

Related blog posts:

My Favorite Posts 2015

Posted on by

I want to thank all of those who have provided input to this blog this year.  Best wishes to all for a happy and healthy 2016.

Here’s my list of favorite posts in the past year:

On being a doctor:

Nutrition posts:

Gastroenterology posts:

IBD posts:

Liver posts:

Screen Shot 2015-12-09 at 8.21.20 PM