Category Archives: inflammatory bowel disease

Remission in Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

A recent article highlights the issue of remission in Crohn’s disease (CD) (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1645-53).

As noted in previous blog entries (see links below), improvements in remission with ImproveCareNow and with previous drug trials have several limitations due to the current definition of remission.  Currently, even during periods of clinical remission (defined currently mainly by symptoms), laboratory or endoscopic evidence of persistent inflammation can be seen.  Persistent inflammation is likely to lead to progressive bowel damage. With the advent of more effective treatments as well as better biomarkers, a more objective measure of remission is needed.

“Remission is an evolving concept in CD. At its most fundamental level, remission should be a state with little or no risk of disease progression, likely implying the absence of biological evidence of inflammation.”

The authors proposed definitions of remission based on whether the patient has “early” disease or “late” disease.  Early disease “may be defined as disease duration ≤18 months without previous exposure to immunosuppressants or biologics.”

Early disease:

  • Biologic remission (inflammation control): a) mucosal healing on colonoscopy (no ulcers with the exception of a few aphthous ulcers <5 mm in diameter) and/or b) improvements in serum and fecal biomarkers: CRP < 5 mg/L, fecal calprotectin <250 mcg/g
  • Clinical remission in practice (symptom control): complete absence of symptoms; 1-2 formed stools per day without abdominal pain.  In a clinical trial, CDAI <150 points.
  • Outcomes: no disease progression or complications, normal quality of life

Late disease:

  • Biologic remission (inflammation control): a) mucosal healing on colonoscopy (no ulcers with the exception of a few aphthous ulcers <5 mm in diameter) and/or b) improvements in serum and fecal biomarkers: CRP < 5 mg/L, fecal calprotectin <250 mcg/g
  • Clinical remission (symptom control): a: inflammatory symptom improvement (may have residual symptoms due to previous damage or surgery). In clinical trial, CDAI 150-220 points.
  • Outcome: stabilization of noninflammatory symptoms and no progression of structural damage, improved quality of life

The authors goal is to rework remission to include symptom control and histologic/mucosal healing.  This concept is not novel.  Investigators in the adalimumab EXTEND study coined the term “deep remission.” This term referred to patients with both CDAI remission and complete mucosal healing.  Patients who achieved deep remission had improved outcomes, including fewer hospitalizations and fewer surgical resections (Gut 2010; 59: A80).

Bottomline: Improvements in both objective measures of biologic inflammation along with resolution of clinical symptoms are needed to change the long-term outcome for patients with Crohn’s disease.  The definition of remission should reflect this reality.

“When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind” –Lord Kelvin 1883

Related blog entries:

Mixed-review for Thiopurines

Posted on by

In this era of biologic agents for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the estimation of the risks and the benefits of thiopurines has been changing (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 395-97).

The referenced article is an editorial that reviews new data on thiopurines as well as provide a background for their usage.

Main points:

  • After the SONIC trial, the usage of combination therapy in many IBD patients has regained favor with the main question: “How long to continue combination therapy?”
  • STORI trial evaluated withdrawal of infliximab (IFX) in patients on combined therapy.  More than 40% of patients who were withdrawn from IFX relapsed at 1 year.
  • After >20 years of thiopurine usage, more data is available on both short-term and long-term risks/benefits.  The risk of lymphoma in IBD patients on thiopurines is “4-fold increased…in the 6 evaluated studies.” Nonmelenoma skin cancer risk is increased by a hazard ratio of 5.9 in ongoing users and 3.9 in past thiopurine users.
  • At the same time, more recent studies have lowered the expectation of benefit for thiopurines (AZTEC trial, Cosnes study).

Related references:

  • Cosnes et al. Gastroenterol 2012; 142: s161.
  • Gastroenterol 2012; 142: 63-70.
  • Med Clin North Am 2010; 94: 93-113.

Related blog links:

Frequency of Functional Pain Overlap in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

If a patient with Crohn’s disease has pain, it may signal a flare-up of the inflammatory process.  Other causes like secondary infections, strictures, and functional pain need to be considered as well.  Functional pain can be particularly challenging.  A recent study reports on the prevalence of functional pain overlap in this setting (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 826-31).

This study prospectively enrolled 307 patients from two centers; it was a substudy to a cognitive behavioral therapy trial.

Patients in remission were defined by the following:

  • all normal laboratory findings:erythrocyte sedimentation rate <10, albumin >3.5, C-reactive protein <1 mg/dL
  • absence of clinical signs/symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease: 3 or less stools per day, no bloody stools, no nocturnal stools, no strictures, no concurrent steroid therapy
  • no escalation in medical therapy or clinical relapse in previous 6 months

Results: 139 of 307 patients had abdominal pain.  Among those with pain, 18 (13%) patients had functional abdominal pain (FAP). 10 of the 18 had either a colonoscopy or MRI in the previous year.  In these patients, the median PCDAI was 10.

This study noted a higher rate of depression in patients with both FAP and Crohn’s: 56%. This is compared with 29% of Crohn’s patients in remission without pain and 45% of Crohn’s patients with pain due to active disease.

Key points:

  • Pain with or without active disease can lead to an overestimation of disease activity based on PCDAI.
  • Depression is common in patients with pain, regardless of etiology
  • Current diagnostic criteria for FAP are flawed.  In fact, the Rome III criteria for FAP which specify absence of organic disease.
  • Biomarkers and imaging modalities are the best tools to exclude active disease.

Related blog links:

Treating Allergic Reactions to Infliximab

Posted on by

This week on the GI bulletin board there was a brief discussion about overcoming allergic/anaphylactic reactions to infliximab.  A reference and a thoughtful response by Athos Bousvaros (in italics) follows:

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001 Feb;7(1):34-7. Successful desensitization and therapeutic use of infliximab in adult and pediatric Crohn’s disease patients with prior anaphylactic reaction. Puchner TC, Kugathasan S, Kelly KJ, Binion DG.   

 IN summary:

1.  Premed with 4 days of steroids (1mg/kg up to 40mg), and hydrocortisone day of the infusion.

2.  Give two test doses (0.1 mg, 1 mg), each over 10 minutes,

3.  If no problems, run the infusion over 4 hours instead of two.

 

Getting antibodies to infliximab before the challenge may also be helpful.  If high levels of antibodies are present, the patient may be more likely to fail the challenge. WE can “rescue” about half our patients using this protocol, and keep them on infliximab. IMPORTANT that a physician is around during the challenge.

Given the potential for adverse reactions and the importance of not depleting useful treatments, it is definitely worthwhile to read the entire cited reference rather than the aforementioned summary.

Related blog entry:

Overcoming ATIs | gutsandgrowth

Neurological Complications Associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

Though I have not seen much in the way of neurological complications in our pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, nevertheless I worry about them.  A recent article provides some insight into the incidence, the pathophysiology and approach to these complications (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 864-72).

Types of neurologic complications: The most common neurologic complication is peripheral neuropathy.  The frequency is quite variable based on data collection method.  In large administrative healthcare data, the prevalence has been reported around 2% whereas in cohort studies the range has been 8-15%. Other complications include meylopathy, cerbrovascular disease, cranial nerve palsy (eg. Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome), seizures, and demyelinating diseases.

With regard to demyelinating diseases, this has gained additional attention in the setting of biologic agents which have been associated with this complication.  However, the authors note that a pre-biologic treatment study from Olmstead County, observed a prevalence of multiple sclerosis of 1% which was 3.7 times higher than expected.  In addition, similar studies have confirmed this finding.

Potential mechanisms vary greatly depending on the neurologic complication. With regard to cerebrovascular disorders, “venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been shown to occur 3 times more frequently in patients with IBD (the risk increases to 8-10-fold in patients with active colitis) than the general population.”  Hence, VTE prophylaxis is recommended by the authors in hospitalized IBD patients, especially if they are experiencing a disease exacerbation.

In addition to the underlying disease, vitamin deficiencies (eg. Vitamin B12) and medications can trigger neurologic complications.

  • Natalizumab: progress multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
  • Metronidazole: peripheral neuropathy (typically reversible with drug discontinuation)
  • Anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab): demyelination, rarely seizures, and rarely PML
  • Cyclosporine: various neurotoxicity in ~25%

Related blog entries:

Tacrolimus for Refractory Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

While tacrolimus has been considered a potential option for refractory Crohn’s, data on its usage are sparse, mostly small retrospective studies.  Another small retrospective study from the Mayo clinic provides data from their experience with 24 adult patients who were treated with tacrolimus for a median of 4 months (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1107-11).

17 (71%) of study participants were female and their median age was 38 years.  18 (75%) had ileocolonic disease.  All patients were either intolerant or unresponsive to at least one anti-TNFα agent.  Most patients received concurrent therapy: thiopurines (58%), methotrexate (8%) and antibiotics (46%).

Results:

  • 67% responded to tacrolimus and 21% achieved a steroid-free remission.
  • Patients with trough levels of 10 to 15 ng/mL had the highest response (86%) and remission (57%).
  • Adverse events were common (75% of patients); 8 (33%) required dose reduction and 6 (25%) led to treatment discontinuation.  Frequent adverse events included acute kidney injury (29%), paresthesia (29%), headache (17%), and tremor (17%).
  • 54% of patients in this series required surgery within a median of 10 months after starting tacrolimus.
  • Of the patients who achieved remission (n=5), 2 were transitioned to immunomodulator therapy to minimize long-term toxicity. 1 patient did well after stopping all therapy during a 6 month followup.  1 patient stopped treatment due to paresthesias and 1 patient continued therapy for 2.5 years.

The study does not describe the use of antibiotics for the prevention of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.

Take-home message: Tacrolimus doesn’t look too promising for refractory disease.

Related blog post:

Additional references:

  • -IBD 2008; 14: 7-12. Tacrolimus of minimal efficacy for UC and Crohn’s. Some achieve response (22/32 in UC and 7/15 in Crohn’s) only 3/32 UC with remission and 1/15 Crohn’s with remission
  • -Gut 2006; 55: 1255-1262. Use of prograf in refractory UC. Troughs 10-15, then 5-10 after remission; partial response in 68% at week 2 & 58% at week 10 (n=19)
  • -Gastroenterol 2003; 125: 380. Tacrolimus helped but did not cure fistulizing disease
  • -J Pediatr 2000; 137: 794-799. n=14.
  • -Am J Gastro 1997; 92: 876. Use in fistualizing Crohn’s.
  • -Am J Gastro 1998; 93: 18. Use in IBD.
  • -IBD 1999; 5: 239. Combined c azathioprine for perianal fistulae. response: initial 2.4weeks, 12.2weeks complete. 7/11 c complete response.
  • -IBD 2009; 15: 193. topical tacrolimus for proctitis. 10/12 w proctitis responded to 2 mg or 4 mg enema in 100 mL of sterile water.
  • -IBD 2007; 13: 245. Use for perianal disease.
  • -Gut 2000; 47: 436-440. Topical tacrolimus may be effective in the treatment of oral and perineal Crohn’s disease.

Overcoming ATIs

Posted on by

Usually, when antibodies to infliximab (ATI) develop in combination with a loss of clinical response in an individual with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), this often indicates a need to switch treatments.  A recent study suggests that some patients can eliminate ATIs with the addition of immunomodulators (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 444-47).

In this small retrospective study, 5 patients (18-37 years of age) who developed ATIs were able to continue infliximab therapy after instituting immunomodulator treatment (3 with thiopurines, and 2 with methotrexate).  What makes this report interesting, was that these ATIs (prior to immunomodulator use) were identified multiple times and were associated with undetectable infliximab levels.  None of these patients had dose intensification of infliximab.  After instituting immunomodulator therapy, detectable infliximab was evident and the ATIs disappeared.  According to Figure 1, the timeframe for return of response was about 10 weeks in some of these patients.

The authors note that the addition of immunomodulators can gradually eliminate a preformed memory response to infliximab antigen.  They also note that ATIs can sometimes disappear spontaneously, though this had not been noted to occur previously when mulitple ATIs levels have been identified.

While these observations are important, a larger prospective study is needed to inform how frequently this strategy could be successful.

Related blog links:

Simponi (Golimumab) Approved for Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on 5/15/13 approved a new use for Simponi (golimumab) injection to treat adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

Here’s the link:

FDA approves Simponi to treat ulcerative colitis

From the link:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved a new use for Simponi (golimumab) injection to treat adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

Simponi works by blocking tumor necrosis factor (TNF), which plays an important role in causing abnormal inflammatory and immune responses. Previously approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (arthritis affecting the joints in the spine and the pelvis), Simponi is now approved to treat adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis that is resistant (refractory) to prior treatment or requires continuous steroid therapy.

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic disease that affects about 620,000 Americans. It causes inflammation and ulcers in the inner lining of the large intestine and is one of two main forms of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The inflammation can lead to abdominal discomfort, gastrointestinal bleeding, production of pus and diarrhea.

“Simponi is an important new treatment option for patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis,” said Andrew E. Mulberg, M.D., deputy director of the Division of Gastroenterology and Inborn Errors Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “It is critical that patients suffering from the serious and painful symptoms of ulcerative colitis have additional treatment options since patients experience the effects of the disease and respond to treatments differently.”

The safety and effectiveness of Simponi for ulcerative colitis were established in two clinical studies. Evaluations of patients included measures of stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings and a physician’s overall assessment.

In the first study, 513 patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis who could not tolerate or failed to respond to other therapies were randomly assigned to receive Simponi or a placebo. Results showed that a greater proportion of Simponi-treated patients achieved clinical response, clinical remission and, as seen during endoscopy, had improved appearance of the colon after six weeks compared with the placebo group.

In the second study, 310 patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis who were responders to Simponi were randomly assigned to receive Simponi or placebo. A greater proportion of Simponi-treated patients maintained clinical response through week 54 and had clinical remission at both weeks 30 and 54.  

The most common side effects in patients treated with Simponi are upper respiratory infection and redness at the site of injection. Patients treated with Simponi are at increased risk of developing serious infections, invasive fungal infections, reactivation of Hepatitis B infection, lymphoma, heart failure, nervous system disorders and allergic reactions.

Liver Injury from Anti-TNF Agents

Posted on by

While anti-TNF agents have been associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), it has been difficult to get a handle on how much importance to place on this.  A recent study provides more data and some reassurance (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 558-64).

The authors searched the U.S. DILI Network database from 2003 to 2011 and describe 6 cases of anti-TNF DILI; in addition, they searched PubMed for articles related to anti-TNF agent associated hepatotoxicity and identified an additional 28 cases. Other causes of liver disease were excluded in these patients, including reactivation of hepatitis B, and acute viral hepatitis (eg. hepatitis C, hepatitis E).

Results of anti-TNF hepatotoxicity:

  • 26 cases due to infliximab, 4 cases due to etanercept, and 4 due to adalimumab.
  • Based on scoring system, the anti-TNF agent was considered a definite cause of DILI in 1 (3%), very likely in 21 (62%) and probable in 12 (35%).
  • Median latency (duration of therapy before onset of DILI) was 13 weeks with a range of 2-104 weeks.
  • 22 (67%) had positive anti-nuclear and/or smooth muscle antibodies.  15 of 17 of these patients had liver biopsy features consistent with autoimmunity.
  • Among those 22 with autoimmune features, there was a higher peak alanine aminotransferase compared with the 12 without these features (784 vs 528 U/L)
  • Favorable outcome: all but one patient improved after discontinuation of the implicated drug; 12 received corticosteroids. One patient with underlying cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation after infliximab-induced liver injury.

While the authors note the potential for a class effect of anti-TNF agents, in studies from patients with psoriasis, there was a lack of cross-toxicity between etanercept and infliximab.

Take-home messages:

The risk of hepatocellular injury from anti-TNF agents is very low.  DILI due to anti-TNFs often have autoimmune features. The prognosis is favorable, and alternative anti-TNFs can be given after resolution.

Related blog links:

“Family Feud” for Pediatric Crohn’s Abscess Management

Posted on by

Initially, this blog entry was titled “What is the best way to manage an intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric Crohn’s disease?”  My answer was simple: it depends on who you ask (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 818-25).  As I thought about this study, the responses reminded me of “Family Feud” minus Richard Dawson.

This survey examined the responses of NASPGHAN members.  Of the initial 1608 emails which were delivered, 248 fully completed surveys.  25% of respondents were in practice for >20 years and 26% treated >50 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). 87% of respondents were from U.S.

  • What is the best way to image initially?  52% recommended CT scan, 26% MRI, and 21% ultrasound.
  • What is the best modality for followup imaging? 47% ultrasound, 33% MRI, and 13% CT
  • Antibiotics or drainage for abscess <2 cm? 61% recommended antibiotics; 51% would treat for 3-4 weeks, whereas 19% for 1-2 weeks.
  • Antibiotics or drainage for abscess >2 cm? 28% would attempt antibiotics alone
  • When is surgery indicated? 75% said only in select cases after completing antibiotics and interventional radiology drainage.
  • Anti-TNFα therapy?  The survey also questioned the shortest preoperative interval one would prescribe anti-TNFα therapy.  The results ranged from 12% for <1 week to 45% who would not give anti-TNFα therapy at all.

The authors note that there is “a paucity of research and practice guidelines for the optimal management of children with intra-abdominal abscess.”  There were no trends in management identified based on practitioner level of experience.  Some answers to the questions are alluded to by the authors but not expressed definitively. For example, “several studies have reported a lack of association between infliximab and an increased rate of postoperative complications.” “Most infections that occur while on anti-TNFα therapy tend to be opportunistic, not bacterial.”

The study’s conclusions are limited by the low participation rate.  In addition, when physicians are confronted with a specific situation, their response in practice may be different than in a theoretical scenario.  However, it appears that the answers to these important questions are closer to guesses on a game show rather than best care.  More research and collaboration is needed to reduce this highly variable care and determine the most effective approach.

Related blog entries: