Only one chance to make first impression

Posted on by

Infliximab (IFX) came into clinical practice in 1998 after impressive results, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, demonstrated remarkable success in refractory Crohn’s disease  and even allowed resolution of fistulas.  Due to its expense and perceived risks, IFX has been typically reserved for treatment failures & significant perianal disease.  Although there have been discussions about ‘top-down’ therapy for many years, more and more it has become apparent that the best opportunity to influence the natural history of Crohn’s disease is early in the course; and perhaps in some cases of ulcerative colitis early IFX treatment may be worthwhile.  Clinical experience and treatment trials have shown that IFX response is significantly greater in Crohn’s disease than ulcerative colitis.  
Data on the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease has been informative on this approach as have large studies demonstrating that IFX is likely at least as safe as any other medication treatments for moderate-to-severe disease (eg. thiopurines, corticosteroids, methotrexate, tacrolimus).  With regard to postoperative Crohn’s disease, it has been shown that microscopic disease may develop within one week of intestinal resection.  More than 70% of postoperative patients develop significant mucosal recurrence within 12months (i2 or greater); yet, symptoms may not develop for a much longer time.  When significant mucosal disease is present, it may already be too late to achieve optimal response to IFX and similar agents due to remodeling of the intestinal submucosa.  Early in the course of Crohn’s disease, the vast majority of patients have an inflammatory phenotype (Cosnes J, et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002; 8:244-25), whereas later in the course, stricturing and penetrating disease are increasingly common.  

Postoperative mucosal scoring system:

• i1 – 5 or fewer apthous lesions

• i2 – more than 5 apthous ulcers with normal mucosa between, or skip areas of larger lesions

• i3 – diffuse apthous ileitis with diffusely inflamed mucosa

• i4 – diffuse inflammation with large ulcers, nodules or narrowing

 Rutgeerts et al. Gastroenterology 1990;99:956-83

Top-down approach:

Benefits: higher efficacy, lower disease-related complications, decrease surgery, improvement in catchup growth/bone formation (both not shown in AZA trials)

Risks: higher costs (but probably cost-effective)

**IFX therapy early may save health care costs by reducing surgery/hospitalizations:  Jewell DP et al, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, Leombruno JP et al Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011

Conventional approach with accelerated step-up:

Risks: lower efficacy, higher infection risk/mortality with repeated steroids

Benefits: possibly lower cost

Potential drawbacks with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine class):

  • IBD 2011; 17: 2138. AZA can achieve remission in only ~30%.
  • Canc Research 2009; 69: 7004.  AZA is carcinogen– incorporated into DNA & changes sun absorption.  Skin cancer risk never drops when stopping med.
  • Gastro 2011; 141: 1621: CESAME (n=19,486)  thiopurines associated with NHL risk.  HR 5.28.
**Much of the information on this posting was influenced by presentations at “Advances in IBD 2011.”  Specific speakers that influenced this posting include Robert Baldassano, Marla Dubinsky, and Miguel Regueiro.

Additional References:

  • IBD 2009; 15: 1583. Postoperative mgt: low risk (1st surg, short stricture) –>no Rx; moderate risk (<10yrs of dz, long stricture, inflammatory dz)–>6MP; high risk (penetrating dz, >2 surg) –>IFX.  Post-op scope @6-12mo
  • JPGN 2009; 48 suppl 2: S72
  • Clin Gastro & Hep 2009; 7:183. Long term results with surgery for small bowel Crohn’s. n=865 surgeries. Risk for repeat surgeries: younger age, upper small bowel location, stricturing
  • Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 441. IFX prevents recurrent Crohn’s post-op. n=24. 1/11 w recurrence vs 11/13 control patients.
  • Am J Gastro 2008; 103: S412 (abstract 1054) IFX reduces post-op recurrence. clinical recurrence 0% at week 54 vs 39% of controls. n=23. 90% in IFX group with endoscopic remission vs 15% of placebo group.
  • Lancet 2008; 371: 660-667.   top-down strategy more likely to achieve endoscopic remicssion after 2yrs: 73% vs 30%. n=129.
  • NEJM 2010; 362: 1383. Sonic study. Combination AZA/IFX with greater efficacy. 56.8% remission in combo Rx vs IFX monotherapy.
  • Gut 2010; 59: 1363.   n=121.  Co-treatment helpd reduce complications & flares relative to monotherapy (& azathioprine appeared to be more effective than methotrexate).
  • JPGN 2009; 49: 183.  REACH pediatric trial showed good perianal dz response to infliximab.

Deadly consequences of pain management

Posted on by

A big part of a pediatric gastroenterologist’s daily practice is trying to help patients with recurrent abdominal pain.  The goals are to determine the reason for the pain and then to offer the best therapy.  In many cases, these goals can be quite difficult.  With regard to diagnosis, the majority of patients have ‘functional’ pain and the diagnosis is in part a diagnosis of exclusion, trying to rule out other potential etiologies.  With regard to treatment, this is also difficult.

Narcotics are not often given for pediatric abdominal pain, but are used under certain circumstances.  These medications can have unintended consequences.  One consequence of frequent narcotic usage is that individuals may tolerate pain more poorly after receiving narcotics.  A useful review of narcotic overuse was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2010.  (NEJM 2010; 363: 1981).

“Deaths from unintentional drug overdoses in the United States have been rising steeply since the early 1990s …and are the second-leading cause of accidental death, with 27,658 such deaths recorded in 2007.”  11,499 of the deaths in 2007 were due to unintentional narcotic overdose.  In comparison, in the same year, there were about 6,000 deaths from cocaine & 2,000 deaths from heroin.

Besides the number of deaths, the other alarming factor has been a sharp rise (10-fold since 1990) in the usage of narcotics in the past two decades.  One of the factors driving this increase has been a compassionate interest in relieving pain.  The availability of these drugs throughout the country even in remote regions allows these abusable drugs to be more accessible than illicit drugs like cocaine and heroin.   While the availability of these medications may increase the rates of suicide, most opioid-overdose deaths are tragic accidents. Often, laboratory tests identify one or more substances in addition to the opioid, indicating that the depressant effects of alcohol or other drugs were additive  in causing death.

With regard to gastroenterology/pediatric gastroenterology, another important aspect of narcotics use is the association of increased mortality risk with inflammatory bowel disease.  This has been shown by analyzing a registry for infliximab (IFX) (Lichtenstein G, DDW 2010, abstracts#T1039 & T1040.).  In the TREAT registry with 6273 patients (3334 treated with IFX), the only risk factors for increased mortality/increased infections were steroids and narcotics.  This study also showed that IFX did not increase mortality, serious infections, malignancy or lymphoma in this cohort.

Additional Reference:

Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 978. Refractory abdominal pain review.  ‘Narcotics over time increase frequency, duration and intensity of pain.’ Practical recommendations:
treat constipation, withdraw narcotics, consider mental health (CBT/hypnosis/psychotherapy/stress mgt), and possible TCA or SNRI therapy.

More evidence that breastfeeding improves cognitive development

Posted on by

A large cohort study from the United Kingdom with 11,101 term infants and 778 preterm infants shows improved cognitive development when infants are breastfed.  J Pediatr 2012; 160: 25-32.  There have been a number of previous studies as well that have shown that breastfed children have an IQ that is ~5 points higher than nonbreastfed children; however, when adjustment for confounders, especially maternal education, this effect is weaker.  Since this is an observation study (randomized blinded study would be impossible), it is difficult to control for all variables.  Nevertheless, prolonged breastfeeding, more than 2 months in preterm and more than 4 months in term infants, is associated with higher cognitive development.

Additional references:

  • Am J Clin Nutr 199; 70: 525-35.
  • BMJ 2006;  333: 945.
  • Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65: 578-84.
  • Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003; 17: 81-90.

Other refences:

  • J Pediatr 2009; 155: 421.  Breastfeeding may have possible protective effect from developing inflammatory bowel disease.  Review of multiple studies.
  • J Pediatr 2002; 141: 764.  Breastfeeding may protect against obesity.
  • BMJ 2007; 335: 815-20.  Longer time of breastfeeding does not reduce allergy/asthma. n=17,046 pairs of mother-infant (13,889 followed up at age 6.5yrs)

The cost of progress in treating Hepatitis C

Posted on by

Background information on Hepatitis C (HCV):

  • —170 million people worldwide infected with HCV, 2.7 milllion people in U.S. infected
  • —27% of worldwide cases of cirrhosis are due to HCV
  • —25% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma are due to HCV
  • —Established treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) and ribavirin have ~40% response rates in genotype 1 (74% of HCV in U.S.) and relapses are not uncommon among responders

New treatments for Hepatitis C (in combination with previous treatments):

  • —Two new drugs: Boceprevir (BOC) & Telaprevir (TVR)
  • —Overall sustained viral response (SVR) with BOC combination 63-66% vs 73-79% with TVR combination treatment
  • —Both trials demonstrate marked improvement over previous
  • Mechanism of action: —Protease inhibitor binding to NS3 HCV target
  • —BOC: Wholesale cost $1100/week (20-44 weeks)
  • —TVR: 12weeks cost: $49,000
Previous treatments for hepatitis C typically cost about $5000 per month (http://www.familydrugguide.com/family/ub/view/Consumer_Reports_Health/526033/4/hepatitis_c_drugs).  The addition of these newer drugs could add another $50,000 to the cost of treatment.  In some cases which respond well to the newer treatments, shorter treatment periods will lower the increase in cost.  Although these drugs are expensive, they may be lifesaving and may obviate the need for liver transplantation.  Due to the potential complications of HCV, more medications are in the pipeline.  They may be easier to take but are likely to be expensive as well.  The safety & effectiveness of these medications have not been demonstrated in published pediatric studies.
Article References:
  • Hepatology 2011; 54: 1433.  Updated AASLD HCV treatment guidelines
  • NEJM 2011; 364: 1195-206, Editorial pg. 1272. Addition of boceprevir, in 1097 previously untreated pts increased SVR. In whites, 40%–>67% & in blacks from 23% –>42%. Medication given after lead-in of 4 weeks. More frequent anemia in boceprevir-treated patients (SPRINT-2 study).Boceprevir dosing: 800mg (4 capsules) TID with food. (trying to space out doses evenly).
  • NEJM 2011; 365: 1014. n=540. Telaprevir study: extended SVR 72%. In pts with rapid viral response (RVR) at 4 & 12 weeks (no detectable HCV), Telaprevir12weeksPegRbv24 was as effective as Telprevir12weeksPegRbv48. Dosing for study: Teleprevir 750mg TID, PEGalfa-2a 180mcg/wk, RBV1-1.2gm per day.  Rash in 37% (severe in 5%), anemia in 39% (severe in 6%).
  • NEJM 2011; 364: 2405, 2417, 2429 (review). Telaprevir addition:  up to 75% response in HCV genotype 1 pts. n=1095 in 1st study, n=833 in 2nd study (re-treatment study)
  • Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 746. Summary of results of boceprevir (used with IFN -alfa 2b 1.5/kg) & telaprevir (used with IFN -alfa 2a 180mcg). “Similar effectiveness” thus far. Telaprevir used for 12 weeks without lead-in period.  TVR: most frequent problem -rash & then anemia.  In practice, dosing in adults: Telaprevir will be used at 750mg TID in combination with IFN-2a 180mcg & RBV 1-1.2g/d. & used for 1st 12 weeks of Rx. This will allow ~50% of patients to have shorter Rx duration:  if HCV RNA RVR –>24week total vs 48week total in those w/o RVR.  Both drugs best for genotype 1.

Good News for Celiac Disease

Posted on by

With the discovery of precise serologies to identify celiac disease, the likelihood of complications of celiac disease has been changing.  In addition, the presentation of celiac disease is different now.  Instead of seeing children with malabsorption and abdominal distention, many children and adults are identified with mild or no symptoms.  Also, the risk of severe complications including malignancy and autoimmune disease has been reevaluated based on larger cohorts.  Twenty years ago, the risk of these complications did serve as a motivator for continuation of a gluten free diet (GFD).   While a GFD remains important, these risks are much lower than previously reported.  The most recent article to support this contention is the following:

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2012; 10: 30-36.  This study examined ~45,000 patients with either celiac disease (villous atrophy, Marsh score of 3), duodenal inflammation (Marsh 1 or 2), or latent celiac disease (normal mucosa & positive serology).  After the first year, there was no significant increase risk for GI cancers.  During the first year, cancers that were identified may not have been causally-related to celiac disease but due to coincident detection.

This article due to its large cohort is very useful, but other articles have come to different conclusions.  Irregardless, there are still compelling reasons to continue a GFD.  Many individuals feel better on a GFD & did not recognize prior symptoms.  Maintaining this diet probably lowers the risk of developing certain autoimmune conditions and definitely improves bone health.

Other recent &/or related articles:

–Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 763. Mortality NOT worsened in undiagnosed celiac disease (identified by review of serology) in Olmstead County, though bone density decreased. n=129 of 16,847. (?milder cases undiagnosed)
–J Pediatrics 2010; 157: 373, 353. Even patients without villous atrophy & positive serology, benefited from GFD with regard to GI symptoms and serological markers.
–JAMA 2009; 302: 1171-78. n=29,096. Mortalitiy increased in celiac disease: 35% for latent, 72% for inflammation, 39% for celiac dz.

–Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 753.  Incidence of autoimmune diseases less in those celiac patients who were compliant with GFD. n=178.

–Gastroenterology 2002; 123; 1428-1435. n=12,000.  Risk for cancer 1.3 odds ratio (lower than in previous studies).

The Medical Pendulum and Gastroesophageal Reflux

Posted on by

In so many areas of pediatric gastroenterology, there is a gradual development of enthusiasm for a medical treatment.  In the vast majority, the enthusiasm goes too far and closer scrutiny often determines a more limited role for this medical treatment or potential adverse effects that were not initially appreciated.  The latest example of this may well be with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for gastroesophageal reflux disease, particularly in infants and individuals with asthma.  Although these medications may not have reached their apogee, more and more their effectiveness for so many ailments has been questioned.  In this month’s issue of JPGN, this is highlighted (JPGN 2012; 54: 8-14).  The article which emanates from the offices of the FDA discusses the fact that the usage of PPIs has increased 11-fold from 2002-2009 in infants <12months of age; 404,000 prescriptions were dispensed to 145,000 infants in the U.S. in 2009.    At the same time, althougth there have been four randomized controlled trials of PPIs in infants, NO studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of these drugs in this population.  As a consequence, the authors recommend that these drugs be restricted to infants with endoscopically-proven GERD/erosive esophagitis.  No other tools are sufficient to identify infants who are likely to respond.  Perhaps the reason why these agents work less well in infants is due to the fact that acid secretion is much less in infants than in children and adults.  For example, at 4months of life, average acid secretion rate in infants is ~27-fold lower than in adults (Am J Dig Dis 1969; 14: 400-14). As a consequence, their symptoms may not be responsive to acid reduction treatments.

Other related references on GERD in infancy:

–JPGN 2010; 50: 609-18. Pantoprazole helped improve symptoms but there were no significant differences compared to placeblo in withdrawal rates due to lack of efficacy. n=128.
-NASPGHAN 2009, Abstract#21. Meds/Rx of NICU pts did not shorten hospital stay or promote wt gain, n=1149.
–JPGN 2009; 49: 498. NASPGHAN GERD guidelines. “In infants and toddlers, there is no symptom or symptom complex that is diagnositc of GERD or predicts response to therapy.” Identical response to placebo (vs prevacid) in largest double-blind randomized study (54% at 4 weeks) (J Pediatrics 2009; 154: 514-20.)-Reflux is “not a common cause of unexplained crying. irritability..in otherwise healthy infants.” “There is no evidence to support the empiric use of acid suppression for the treatment of irritable infants.”

GERD and respiratory/ENT issues:

–Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1887. PPIs decreased postnasal drainage compared to placebo. n=75. (50% vs 5%) age discrepancy in patient populations.
–Clin Gastro & Hep 2010; 8: 741 (excellent editorial), 770 (article on rabeprazole improving heartburn Sx in pts with laryngitis), n=82. Editorial suggests 1-2month trial of BID PPI and if not effective, then little to offer. May change when studies looking at surgery (after impedance) outcomes.
–Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 754. 716 (editorial). Acoustic cough & reflux. Study recorded cough during pH measurement. n=71. ‘causality cannot be established until effective treatment’ available.
–Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1844. Critical review of below NEJM article. ‘a subset of asthmatics will have objective detection of GERD without typical symptoms…work by Amer Lung Assn suggests that twice daily PPI will not be helpful’..however, ‘perhaps 3-6months of PPI may still be reasonable until we can accurately identify subgroups of pts who may respond.’ –Gary Falk, Cleveland Clinic
–NEJM 2009; 360: 1487, 1551. Use of PPIs (nexium 40mg bid) in poorly-controlled asthma with no symptoms of GER –did not help w asthma control & pH studies were not predictive of response. n=412 adults. 40% c abnl pH studies in each group (nexium vs. placebo).
–Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 1379. Review of ENT findings and reflux.
–Am J Gastro 2007; 102: 716. Poor specificity of ENT findings for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux.
–Aliment Pharm Ther 2007; 25: 385-92. meta-analysis. Rx c PPIs not more effective than placebo in resolving ENT symptoms presumed to be due to GER. Editorial suggests some patients may benefit, but better tools are needed to identify them.

GERD and surgery:

–Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1938.  LOTUS study in JAMA summarized in this review. (JAMA 2011; 305: 1969) Medical treatment outperformed surgery. 92% under control (remission) with long term medical Rx vs 85% with surgery & fewer side effects of medical treatment.
–Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2009; 7: 1292, 1264 (editorial). 12yr outcomes for surgery vs PPI. n=154 omeprazole, n=144 surgery. Similar long term outcome ~50% with long term remission.

–Pediatrics 2006; 118:1828. 48,665 antireflux surgeries done from 1996-2003 (~7000/yr) in US

–Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 299. Frequent complications post-op and frequent need for GERD meds.  Dysphagia in 19%, dilatation in 6%, repeat surgery in 2%, mortality in 0.8% (n=3145). 50% required GERD meds.

–Clin Gastro & Hep 2004; 2: 978-984. Pediatric study.  n=198.  63% required post-op treatment for recurrent GERD -retrospective review 1996-99.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and reported adverse effects:

-Risk of Hypomagnesemmia -2011. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm245011.htm
–NEJM 2010; 363: 2114. large Denmark study. 5082 fetuses with PPI exposure (out of 840,968 live births). Risk of birth defects NOT increased with exposure during 1st trimester. Possible slight increase risk with preconception use except with omeprazole.
–Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1115. Review of safety of PPIs.
–Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 93. n=167,000. PPIs associated with hip fracture risk, OR 1.3, in patients with other risk factors.
–Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 896-904. 5yrs of PPI -no increase risk in hip/spine fx.
–Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 765-71, 747 (ed). PP not related to hip fx (n=161,806) women 50-79. INCREASE risk of spine fx, hazard risk 1.47
–Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 772-8. PPIs increase risk of Clostridium difficile infection (hazard ratio 1.42 –42% increase in risk), n=1166.
–Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 784-90. n=101,796. OR 1.74 for daily PPI, OR 2.36 if BID Rx; thus ~70% increase risk of nosocomial infection.
–Clin Gastro & Hep 2010; 8: 504. Increased bacterial overgrowth with PPI use.

-JAMA 2009; 301: 2120-2128. Use of PPIs associated with INCREASED hospital acquired pneumonia by ~30%. Could result in 180,000 HAP cases/yr with ~33,000 deaths. n+ 63,878 admissions, 52% on PPIs or H2RAs (83% PPIs, 17% H2RAs). H2RAs NOT associated with HAP cases.
–Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 80. PPIs induce acid-related symptoms in ~22% vs 7% of placebo in healthy volunteers.
–Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 391-398. Risk for pneumonia associated with short-term PPI use, not long term
–Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 1418. Increases risk of bacterial gastroenteritis.
–JPGN 2007; 45: 395, 421. Increasing use of PPIs-4-fold from 2000-2003; 0.5% of all infants. No safety/efficacy data.
–J Pediatrics 2007; 150: 262. Long term use (up to 11yrs of usage) of PPIs in 166 children; minimal problems: 2 c nausea, 2 c skin rash, 1 c diarrhea, 1 c agitation.
–JAMA 2006; 296: 2947-53. Risk of bone fracture –odds ratio 1.44-2.65 with long-term PPI treatment (>1yr); UK study looked at 1.8million

Clostridium difficile -Current Battlelines

Posted on by

The most recent how to treat Clostridium difficile with fecal microbiota transplantation is described in a review article, Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology; 2011: 9:1044-49.  This article details the rationale and effectiveness of this approach.  Indications include 2-3 recurrent episodes or moderate/severe episode not responding to conventional treatment. Workup for donors to minimize the risk of transmission is discussed.  The article points out that fecal transplantation can be accomplished by nasogastric or transpyloric tubes or can be delivered directly via colonoscope or via retention enema.

Additional information on this topic:

–Am J Gastro 2000; 95: 3283-5.
–Clin Inf Dis 2003; 36: 580-5.

More C difficile references:

  • –NEJM 2010; 364: 422, 473. Fidaxomicin – a macrocytic abx –more effective than vancomycin (92% vs. 90%) and with lower recurrence (15% vs 25%). Dose 200mg BID. n=629.
  • –NEJM 2010; 362: 197, 264 (editorial). 1st article: n=200. Rx with monoclonal antibodies (against toxins A & B) -single infusion (10mg/kg) –reduced recurrence rate from 25% vs 7% & among those with previous recurrence, the rate was reduced from 38% to 7%.
  • –NEJM 2011; 365: 1693. Host/pathogen factors. n=4143.
  • –Gastro 2009; 136: 1152, 1206. “reining in recurrent C. diff”
  • –JPGN 2009; 48 suppl 2: S63-65. Cohen MB. ~35% of patients now w/o antibiotic exposure.
  • –Curr Opin Gastro 2008; 25: 24-35. Use of sacchromyces boulardii(1gm/d)x 2 weeks w Vanco may reduce recurrence by >50&.
  • –Journal of Pediatrics 2009; 154: 607. n=198.  Virulent NAP1 strain present in~19% from 2 children’s hospitals.
  • –NEJM 2009; 360: 637. C diff (even toxigenic strains) present in ~50% of healthy newborns. Not convincingly associated with any illnesses in newborns –possibly due to lack of receptor in infants (J Clin Invest 1992; 90: 822-9).

 

Welcome to GutsandGrowth! My Background

Posted on by

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information.

Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources.

I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center.  I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract.  I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems.

Currently, I am the chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.  in addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation.

As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids) I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources.

I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 15 physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. For many families, more practical matters include the following:
– 14 office/satellite locations
– physicians who speak Spanish
– cutting edge research
– on-site nutritionists
– on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders
– participation in ImproveCareNow
– office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling)
– office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families)
– easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse)

I am married and have two sons. I like to read, walk/hike, exercise, swim, and play tennis with my free time as well as go to baseball games.

I do not have any relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

Posted on by

One of the topics that continues to have a number of important articles each month is eosinophilic esophagitis. One of the most important recent articles is the following:
**Kagalwalla AF, et al. JPGN 2011;53: 145–149. Identification of Specific Foods Responsible for Inflammation in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Successfully Treated With Empiric Elimination Diet.

Results: A total of 36/46 (25 M/11F) children who were initially successfully treated with SFED completed this trial; the mean age was 7.6 years. The most common foods identified were 25 to cow’s milk (74%), 8 to wheat (26%), 4 to eggs (17%), 3 to soy (10%), and 1 to peanut (6%). Milk was 8 times more likely to cause EoE compared with wheat, the next most common food (95% confidence interval 2.41–26.62, P1⁄4 0.0007).

Previous articles in this area include the following:
–Immunol Allergy Clin N Am; 2009; 29: 77-84. Review article.
–Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2006; 4: 1097.
–Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2006; 3: 1198.

These studies identify the divergent approaches to dietary treatment in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Some patients can be managed with elimination diet based on allergy testing. However, due to the difficulty of allergy testing and its potential flaws in this population, some patients need to resort to a so-called six-food group elimination diet (Milk, wheat, eggs, nuts, shellfish, and soy) and some even need a complete elemental diet. Almost all patients managed with dietary restriction require followup endoscopy to determine the effectiveness of this dietary approach. In subsequent posts, some of the references regarding medical treatments (eg. budesonide) and biomarkers will be reviewed.