Tag Archives: Crohn’s disease

Improve Care Now

Posted on by

Several years ago, “ImproveCareNow” Network was established with a goal of improving the quality of care children with inflammatory bowel disease. https://improvecarenow.org/ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beG2eMROWqg)

Documentation of some outcomes of this effort have now been published (Pediatrics 2012; 129: e1030-e1041).  In this study from six U.S. centers, data from 843 children with Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative Colitis were available.  Centers were eligible to participate if they did not have extensive quality improvement (QI) experience and if they were able to enroll >75% of their IBD patients.  During the course of the study (2007-2010), there were increases in the proportion of patients with measurement of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) before initiation of thiopurines, increased percentage of individuals receiving an appropriate thiopurine dosage, and an increased percentage of patients with inactive disease.  In Crohn’s disease, the number with inactive disease changed from 55% to 68%; in ulcerative colitis, the number increased from 61% to 72%.  

This study shows significant progress in these patients and the potential benefit of a more-structured approach.  However, some of the improvements in these outcomes may not be to process improvements. 

Study limitations:

  • The study does not document the rate of inactive disease in non-participating centers; thus there is not an adequate control population.  Given more widespread use of biologic therapies, this may account for much of the improvement in outcomes.   In fact, the study does not describe the percentage of patients receiving thiopurines or biologic agents.
  • The use of the physician global assessment (PGA) as indicative of disease activity.  The authors acknowledge that “PGA ….is a relatively subjective measure.”  A more reliable measure of disease activity like a stool calprotectin, endoscopy, or imaging study improvement would have been helpful.  
  • Better documentation or better outcomes? It is not clear whether some of the improvement reflects better documentation or improved care delivery.

Despite the limitations of this study, it is a good starting point.  The goal of improving the care of patients is shared by almost all physicians.  One way to start making a difference is measuring specific outcomes and targeting specific goals/checklists. Going forward with QI there are many QI hurdles: 

  • Defining optimal care is nearly impossible, there are few trials comparing efficacy & difficult to judge risk/benefit ratio of many therapies.
  • Difficulty selecting appropriate outcome measures -indications for hospitalization and surgery are not clear-cut in many cases.  Surgery may be an appropriate treatment rather than a negative outcome. 
  • Risk adjustment is an imperfect science.

Goals with Quality Improvement:

  • Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
  • Learning from high-performing centers -benchmarking

Warranted vs unwarranted variations:
Unwarranted: selecting inadequate dosing of medications, failure to check for TB before remicade/biologics, failure to consider drug interactions, failure to discuss options with families
Warranted: variation due to differences in disease (eg budesonide for ileitis but not pancolitis), variation driven by patient preferences (eg. using NG instead of corticosteroids)

“When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind” –Lord Kelvin 1883

“Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.” –Albert Einstein

Additional references on quality improvement:

  • Free Self Management Handbook endorsed by ImproveCareNow:

https://improvecarenow.org/patients/self-management-handbook

  • -JPGN 2009; 49: 272.  Review of quality measures/history.
  • -Kohn LT, et al. To Err is Human: Building Safer Health System.  Nat’l Academy Press; 2000
  • -Crossing the quality chasm.  Wash DC: Nat’l Academy Press; 2001.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2010; 8: 709.  Quality indicator sets in cirrhosis.
  • -J Pediatr 2005; 146: 744-50.  Bucuvalas JC et al.  Adjusting calcinerin inhibitor dosing
  • -IBD guidelines: www.cincinnatichildrens.org/svc/alpha/health-policy/ev-based/ibd.htm
  • -JPGN 2009; 49: 297.  Variation in care in pediatric Crohn disease. (Our center participated in this study)
  • -J Pediatr 2009; 154: 582.  Ventilator assoc pneumonia reduced w bundle of hand hygiene, elevated HOB, not changing ventilator circuits except when soiled & mouth care
  • -“The Learning Curve”(Atul Gawande) in The Best American Essays 2003 -some CF ctrs outperform, extending life expectancy ~14yrs.
  • -” A Surgeons Notes on Performance-Atul Gawande
    -NEJM 2007; 357: 2652.  Nice editorial.
  • www.icsi.org
  • www.qualityforum.org
  • www.ambulatoryqualityalliance.org
  • www.ncqa.org
  • www.cms.hhs.gov/hospitalqualityinit

Comments from lead author forwarded to blog:

Thanks for including our recent paper in your blog.  I agree with the study limitations as you mentioned, but wanted to put a couple of things in context.  We actually thought very hard about the issue of a control group, and specifically how to determine what the remission rate would be without the intervention.  We could not come up with a reasonable comparator (very few people/groups outside of ICN even know what the remission rate of their population is).  One very rough measure (which we did not feel was legitimate to include) is the rate of remission for new sites as they are joining the collaborative.  Established sites with complete participation have better outcomes than newer sites or sites that participate less fully, suggesting that at least a significant portion of the effect is due to the QI intervention rather than secular trend.  As far as the objective measures for outcomes, I know you realize that we are not able to mandate specific objective evaluations for a QI/observational research study, so we may never be able to use mucosal healing (for example) as our measure of remission.  However you probably noticed in the paper that we did demonstrate improvements in objective measures including sPCDAI, PUCAI and use of corticosteroids.  Certainly improvements in process measures may have been due in part to better documentation, but it is unlikely that objective outcome measures improved due to documentation. Thanks again for sharing our work with your audience.

Biomarkers identify patients who benefit and how

Posted on by

Fecal calprotectin and serum CRP levels are helping to identify which patients benefit most from biologic therapies, how frequently to dose individuals and how well inflammation correlates with changes in CDAI.  Several abstracts from ACG highlight these issues:

Abstract #1175: Fecal calprotectin concentration and clinical remission in patients with active Crohn’s disease treated with certolizumab pegol: results from PRECiSE 1 (Sandborn W et al).

Abstract #1164: Baseline C-reactive protein is associated with disease progression in  patients with Crohn’s disease (Colmbel J-F et al).

Abstract #1165: Association of baseline C-reactive protein with maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease treated with adalimumab (Sandborn W et al)

Abstract 1175 uses a post hoc analysis of patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) who were treated with certolizumab or placebo for 26 weeks.  Baseline calprotectin concentrations were higher in patients who achieved remission.  Another interesting finding of this study was that placebo patients did not have improvement in calprotectin levels.  So, even though some patients  had improvement in CDAI scores, indicating subjective improvement, inflammatory activity did not decline.  This is another indicator of how flawed a CDAI is for indicating the effectiveness of an IBD therapy.

Abstract 1164 looked at 238 patients with moderate to severe CD who were randomized to placebo arm in the CHARM study.  These patients were given open-label adalimumab for induction (80 mg week 0, 40 mg week 2) followed by blinded weekly placebo treatment from weeks 4-56 with a switch to open-label adalimumab after week 12 for a disease flare.  Higher baseline CRP levels in patients with moderate or severe CD were associated with higher disease scores after four weeks and after one year.  This suggests that a patient with higher CRP is more likely to have disease progression without adequate treatment.

Abstract 1165 examined the relationship between CRP and remission in CHARM patients. In the high baseline CRP group, 39 patients received adalimumab every other week, 28 weekly, and 34 received placebo.  In the low baseline CRP group, there were 42 every other week patients, 33 weekly, and 39 placebo patients.  In the high baseline CRP group, remission rates were 50% higher in the weekly treatment group compared to the every other week group.  Patients with low baseline CRP had similar results when treated weekly versus every other week.  Thus, patients with high baseline CRP are more likely to benefit from dose escalation and low CRP patients are more likely to have coexistent issues contributing to their symptoms (eg. IBS).

One other caveat: CRP production is geneticallly-determined and some patients do not make CRP in spite of active inflammation.

Related blog entries:

Food as medicine

Speed matters

Additional calprotectin references:

  • -IBD 2010; 16: 482. Calprotectin correlated with inflammation of ileum after pouch creation in children.
  • -IBD 2009; 12: 1851. Calprotectin was the only marker to correlate with endoscopic activity; n=134.
  • -JPGN 2009; 48: 48. Good sensitivity/specificity of calprotectin & lactoferrin. Up to 96% sensitivity & specificity.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 1218. Lack of correlation between clinical symptoms and fecal biomarkers. However, biomarkers do correlate with mucosal/endoscopic disease. n=164.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1392. Monitoring IBD activity level c calprotectin & lactoferrin; n=15.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1229. Clinical utility in assessing histological relapse in kids. n=73 over 8yrs…may allow avoidance of invasive tests; cut off of 275mcg/gm had 97% sensitivity/neg pred value 85% pos pred value/specificity at predicting relapse.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 669. Fecal calprotectin good at predicting relapse in pediatric IBD w cutoff of 400.

C-reactive protein references:

  • -J Pediatr 2011; 159: 340. CRP helps identify IBD.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2011; 9: 421. CRP predicts response to IFX. n=718. those with high CRP had 91% response vs 83% in pts with NL CRP.
  • -Gastro 2004; 126: 1574-81. Crohn’s review. High CRP suggests likely response to anti-TNFα treatment.
  • -JPGN 2004; 38: 509-12. CRP more reliable than ESR for IBD.
  • -NEJM 1999; 340: 448. Review on acute phase reactants. CRP better than ESR as ESR is an indirect measure (resistance of plasma, due to fibrinogen, to the falling of RBCs) & broader range for CRP.

Magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn’s disease

Posted on by

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has increasingly been recognized as an effective way to characterize small bowel disease in Crohn’s disease (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 520-28).

In this retrospective pediatric study, 95 patients with Crohn’s disease underwent MRE from 2006-2009.  As expected, terminal ileal disease was the most common site of involvement with 54%; this was followed by ileum with 19%, and jejunum with 17%.  Other findings included solitary jejunal inflammation (3.7%), small bowel stenosis (1.9%) fistula (1%), and abscess (1%).  Specific evidence of inflammation included contrast enhancement, bowel wall thickening or derangement of bowel wall shape.  The images in the article are excellent.

The main advantage of MRE over CT enterography (CTE) is the lack of ionizing radiation.  In addition, MRE can better detect soft tissue contrast suggestive of bowel wall edema.  This helps distinguish acute from chronic inflammation.  Obtaining an MRE is technically more challenging and more costly.  The youngest patient in the study was seven; though the authors note that the youngest patient they have performed MRE was six.

Additional references:

  • More imaging needed?
  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 603.  MRE for suspected IBD.  Useful in pediatric Crohn’s disease.
  • -IBD 2009; 15: 1635. U/S compared favorably with endoscopy in correlating postoperative recurrence with Crohn’s.
  • -Clin Gastro Hepatol 2006; 3: 1221. MRI as accurate in evaluating ileocolonic disease with flareups as endoscopy.
  • -IBD 2004; 10: 452-61. U/S was very helpful in identifying disease and complications.

Drug levels for inflammatory bowel disease

Posted on by

In many conditions, drug levels are helpful to make sure the patient receives an adequate dose for the indication.  When we treat infections or seizures, drug levels predict the effectiveness of the medication and allow dosing adjustments to improve responses as well as to lower toxicity. Drug levels are helpful in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well.  Drug levels may help with thiopurine dosing and with infliximab (IFX) dosing.

Infliximab (IFX) levels can guide therapy (Scand J Gastroeneterol 2011; 46: 310-18). This study examined 106 patients (85 with CD and 21 with UC) over a ten-year period. In this cohort, patients received concurrent hydrocortisone, acetaminophen, and cetirizine to prevent acute reactions and to try to limit anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI), also called anti-human antichimeric antibodies (HACA).  Infusion intervals ranged from 4-12 weeks.

69% of Crohn’s patients maintained response to IFX and 48% of UC patients.  Infliximab trough levels were significantly increased among patients who maintained their response.  A cutoff value of 0.5 μg/mL was defined as clinically relevant for IFX trough concentrations for Crohn’s patients and for UC the cutoff was 0.8 μg/mL .  Trough levels below this cutoff were 86% sensitive and 85% specific for identifying loss of response.  The overall accuracy for the test was 87% in identifying loss of response.

Also, ATIs were significantly higher in CD patients who had lost response to infliximab.  Patients who had been “re-treated,” were significantly more likely to have developed ATIs.  “Re-treated” was defined as having interruption of IFX treatment more than 6 months.

These specific cutoff values apply to the radioimmunoassay technique for measuring IFX and ATI.  These values may not extrapolate to ELISA assays.  At the same time, the findings suggest a practical approach in patients with symptoms while receiving IFX:

  • Check IFX level (at trough or at 4 weeks)
  • If low level and no ATI, likely to respond to dose escalation
  • If low level but positive for ATI, not likely to respond to dose escalation
  • Do not assume symptoms are due to drug failure; reassess with imaging &/or scope. Consider alternate etiologies (eg infections, stricture, celiac, IBS).
  • Cotherapy with an immunomodulator reduces ATIs and boosts levels of IFX.
More usage of IFX and ATI levels is likely; however, cost issues preclude frequent measurements.

Additional references:

  • Only one chance to make first impression.  Previous blog entry on use of infliximab.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2011; 9: 395. Do not assume symptoms are due to drug failure -reassess with imaging &/or scope. Consider alternate etiologies (eg infections, stricture, celiac, IBS). Check IFX level –if >12 @ 4weeks or >1.4 mcg/mL at trough –>predicts good response.  If +HACA, ~90% response with alternative TNF.  In those with low level, 86% responded to dose escalation.
  • -DDW 2011, Abstract #772. If loss of response to IFX, **confirm active dz (labs, scope) & not due to CDT. **check HACA –if +, only 10-20% chance of responding to dose escalation; better chance of responding to similar agent **check IFX week 4 level, if low (& neg HACA) then 90% respond to dose escalation
  • -NEJM 2010; 362:1383-1395. SONIC study.  Patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease who were treated with infliximab plus azathioprine or infliximab monotherapy were more likely to have a corticosteroid-free clinical remission than those receiving azathioprine monotherapy.
  • -Gut 2010; 59: 49-54. Trough IFX levels in UC. n=115. Antibody status can only be measured at trough levels. Undetectable trough level (<1.4 mcg/mL) associated with lower remission (15% vs 69%) and lower endoscopic response (28% vs 76%) & higher colectomy rate (55% vs. 7%).
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 344 (review of above Gut article). Similar to Crohn’s disease: 82% remission with detectable trough vs 6% w/o detectable level.
  • –Lancet 354 (9194): 1932–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05246-0. PMID 10622295.”Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT Study Group”.
  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1133-39. If lack/loss of response, may need dose escalation with humira or Cimzia (q2weeks):
  • -IBD 2011; 17: 141-51. Loss of response to biologics.
  • -Gastro & Hep 2008; 4: 12. “primary nonresponse can be determined after 2 doses” in table reiterating AGA consensus guidelines. 85% of responders show benefit by 2weeks & all responders benefit c/in 6 weeks (Am J Gastro 2001; 96: S303). Worsening Sx despite infliximab indicates need to look for stricture, infxn, etc.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 1248. Clinical remission associated with measurable infliximab troughs; thus, if no measurable trough, increase dose or shorten interval. If level detected & no response, unlikely to respnd to TNF class. Also, concurrent immunomodulators were not helpful.
  • -Am J Gastro 2010; 105: 2617 (Oussalah et al). 2-3yrs 41% IFX failure in UC. withdrawal of AZA increase loss of response –7x more likely
  • -Am J Gastro ; 105: 1133-40. n=155. 23% ATI -92% respond to med change, 17% respond to dose change. Level <12 @ 4weeks, 86% respond to dose change
  • -Gut 2010; 59: 1363. n=121. Co-treatment helped reduce complications & flares relative to monotherapy (& azathioprine appeared to be more effective than methotrexate).

Vitamin D, IBD, and Causality

Posted on by

The importance of vitamin D has been noted in this blog previously (Common to be “D-ficient” ).  Now a study implicates vitamin D as a risk factor for developing inflammatory bowel disease, especially for Crohn’s disease (Gastroenterology 2012: 142: 482-89).  It is known that vitamin D influences innate immunity.  As such, it may play a role in the susceptibility to Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC).

This prospective study included 72,719 women (age 40-73) enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study.  Research subjects completed an assessment of diet and lifestyle along with 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels.  The 25(OH)D levels were predicted; this prediction was based on a validated model which included vitamin D intake, sun exposure, race, and body mass index (J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 451-9).  This model was validated against directly measured 25(OH)D levels.

During nearly 1.5 million person-years of followup, 122 incident cases of CD and 123 cases of UC occurred.  The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the highest quartile of 25(OH)D was 0.54 for CD and 0.65 for UC compared to the lowest quartile.  Compared with a level less than 20, the highest quartile HR was 0.38 for CD and 0.57 for UC.

In addition, the authors identified a significant inverse association between dietary supplemental vitamin D and UC; an insignificant reduction in CD risk was noted with dietary intake.  Although it is difficult to determine causality, these data convincingly show that ‘healthy’ levels of vitamin D are associated with a lower risk of IBD.

Rifaximin for Crohn’s disease?

Posted on by

Rifaximin (Xifaxan®) shows promise as a new treatment for Crohn’s disease (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 473-81).  Rifaximin is an oral medication with minimal systemic absorption; it has a good track record in a number of GI indications, including bacterial gastroenteritis (traveler’s diarrhea), bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel disease, and hepatic encephalopathy.  There are a few reasons why rifaximin would be considered a good candidate treatment for Crohn’s disease:

  • The pathophysiology of Crohn’s disease involves interaction of adherent bacteria to the intestinal mucosa and with the immune system
  • Other antimicrobials have shown benefit for Crohn’s disease
  • Animal models do not manifest Crohn’s disease when in a bacteria-free environment

In this study of 402 patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease, a multicenter randomized double-blind trial examined efficacy and safety of rifaximin at doses of 400mg, 800mg, and 1200mg twice daily.  The primary end point was remission based on Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI).

At the end of the 12-week treatment period, 62% of the 800mg group were in remission compared to 43% of the placebo group.  This difference was maintained 12 weeks afterwards with 45% maintaining remission compared with 43% of patients receiving placebo.  When looking at the other dosing regimens, at 12 weeks, 54% of the 400mg group and 47% of the 1200mg group were in remission based on CDAI.

Clinical response, but not remission, occurred in 56% of placebo patients compared with 63% for 400mg patients, 72% for 800mg patients, and 57% of 1200mg patients.  This trial may have been hampered by patient selection in that the placebo response was high.  This may be due to the fact that ~50% of patients had a low CRP value at baseline.

Safety was good in all patient groups.  However, one rifaximin-treated patient developed C difficile infection.

The fact that a clear dose response was not evident suggests the need for more studies.

Additional Rifaximin References:

  • -NEJM 2011; 364: 22 (pg 81-editorial).  About 10% improvement over placebo in pts with IBS-D.  (see abstract below).  Effects lasted up to 3 months.
  • -JPGN 2009; 49: 400-04. helped symptoms in 61% of IBD pts. n=23 (12 w Crohn). dose 10-30mg/kg/day.
  • -Aliment Pharm Ther 2005; 22: 31-35. Use in SBBO. n=90; 1200mg/day x 7 days. NL glucose breath test in 60% (vs 17% in low dose group); no side effects.
  • -Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 557-563. double-blind, randomized controlled trial, n=87 for IBS. 400mg tid x 10days. Rx resulted in greater IBS improvement, ~40% improvement vs 20% w placebo during 10 week study
  • -IBD 2006; 12: 335. open-label use of rifaximim (400mg BID) for 30 pts c UC flare on ASA products resulted in clinical remission in 23 of 30.
  • -J Infect 2011; 62: 34-38. Rx may lead to resistant staphylococci.
  • -Hepatology 2010; 52: 1484. Review.

Additional Crohn’s Antibiotic/Probiotic References:

  • -IBD 2009; 15; 17. 40% response to Cipro in treatment of peranal fistulas. n=25. No response to metronidazole.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1597, 1585. No proven role for probiotics and IBD except pouchitis (after Abx)
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 145. Pouch problems reviewed -excellent review.
  • -IBD 2006; 12: 335. open-label use of rifaximim (400mg BID) for 30 pts c UC flare on ASA products resulted in clinical remission in 23 of 30.
  • -Curr Med Res Opinion 2005; 8: 1165-70. Rx for traveler’s diarrhea.  May be useful for Crohn’s as well.
  • -Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 856. Use of ornidazole prophylaxis reduced recurrence p-op from 37.5% to 8%.
  • -IBD 2004; 10: 318-325. antibiotics & IBD review.
  • -Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 412-21. adherent-invasive E. coli associated with ileal mucosa in 22% of Crohn’s (n=63) ileal mucosa vs. 6% of controls (n=16); higher colonization noted in neo-terminal ileums (36%).

Pediatric capsule endoscopy experience

Posted on by

Capsule endoscopy (CE) in pediatric gastroenterology has become a routine procedure.   The experience of our group is noted in a recent study (JPGN 2012; 54: 409-13).  In this study, our single pediatric center reviewed 284 CE procedures (277 patients) over a five-year period.  The youngest patient to swallow a capsule was 4.6 years old.  Twenty capsules were placed endoscopically, with the youngest & smallest patient being 3 years old (13.5kg).  A patency capsule was used in 23 patients.

Overall, the yield with CE was high. 205 (72%) had positive findings; 154 (54%) had small bowel findings.  The study also compared its data to pediatric and adult meta-analysis.  Similar to other pediatric studies, Crohn disease was the most common indication; in adult studies, CE is used mostly for occult GI bleeding and anemia.  CE procedures did not reach the colon in 65 (21%); 36 of these incomplete procedures had positive findings.

Capsule retention occurred in seven patients (2.4%) which is similar to the meta-analysis studies as well.  Six of the seven had surgery due to capsule retention, though one surgical procedure had been planned and capsule helped identify stricture site.  In addition, one of the seven was retrieved through a tight ileostomy.

Additional references:

  • -Gastroenteology 2010; 139: 1468. Predictions for upcoming advances.
  • -Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1197. Strongest indication -obscure bleeding.
  • -JPGN 2009; 49: 196. Capsule retention in 5.2% in known IBD. overall 3 of 207 studies (1.4%) To date, >170,000 capsule studies worldwide.
  • -Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 255-66. Authors recommend using CT/colonoscopy as primary investigations & reserving capsule only if negative initial evaluation. 17% of pts had asymptomatic partial small bowel obstruction -contraindicating use of capsule.
  • -Endoscopy 2008; 40: 30-35 & -IBD 2008; 14: 1287. Consider wireless capsule before IPAA in UC.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1219. Correlation of capsule & MRI enterolysis. Capsule detected more mucosal lesions.
  • -JPGN 2008; 47: 31. Capsule endoscopy may reclassify pediatric IBD
  • –Speed matters.  Additional references listed on this previous blog entry.

Methotrexate and liver toxicity

Posted on by

There are drawbacks with all of the therapies for inflammatory bowel disease; however, usually the inflammatory bowel disease is worse than any of the medications. One of the therapies that  has started to see increased usage in Crohn’s disease is methotrexate (MTX), both as an alternative to thiopurines and as an adjunct to Remicade.  There are a number of side effects; a patient handout is available at the following: http://www.ccdhc.org/diseases/MethotrexateLetter.pdf

One of the concerns with MTX has been liver toxicity, in part because of descriptions in the rheumatology literature with long-term usage.  In Crohn’s disease patients, it appears that the risk is much lower (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 359-67).  This study found 13 trials for their meta-analysis.  A total of 632 participants were included: 373 MTX, 131 thiopurines, 128 placebo.  In the MTX group, elevated hepatic aminotransferases occurred in 1.4 per 100 person-months.  The rate of elevation more than 2-fold the upper limit of normal was 0.9 per 100 person-months.  Thus, of the initial 373 patients, 39 had an abnormal aminotransferase.  26 of these 39 had spontaneous resolution, 3 improved with dose reduction & 10 withdrew from MTX treatment (0.8 per 100 person-months).  Seven of these withdrawals were from one of the earlier studies (Feagan et al. NEJM 1995; 332: 292-97). Besides the low likelihood of needing to stop MTX due to liver toxicity, the other observation was that the liver toxicity was mostly dependent on the dose; therefore, dosage reduction would likely be effective if needed.

In my practice, when considering MTX treatment, I usually recommend the following:

  • Monitoring: Baseline: CXR, CBC, Amylase, Renal, LFTs, urine HCG & then Q2-4 weeks initially, then Q3months
  • Give Folate during therapy.
  • Use zofran if needed for nausea
  • Avoid NSAIDs during treatment due to renal toxicity
  • Contraindicated with pregnancy (MTX=teratogen) -females should see gynecology
  • Families warned in writing that this medication is given once a week; more often can be deadly

Additional references:

  • -IBD 2011; 17: 2521. ~25% remission at 1yr, 16% at 2yrs.. n=93.
  • -JPGN 2011;53: 389. n=64. Supports use of zofran for 1st few months to prevent nausea.
  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 714. Use of MTX after thiopurines. n=27. 48% in remission at 6 months.
  • -JPGN 2009; 48: 526. Use in pediatric CD, n=25. 64% response
  • -JPGN 2009; 48 suppl 2: S111. MTX may be effective for UC.
  • -NEJM 2008; 359: 2790. Similar safety of AZA and MTX in vasculitis patients. AZA may be safer.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 756. MTX in Crohn’s. n=39. 71% remission (20% steroid-free).
  • -J Clin Pharm & Therapeutics 2007; 32: 327-31.
  • -Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61: 1380-84. review of MTX errors -FDA reported
  • http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/patientsafety/alerrts-and-directives/alerts/oral-methotrexate/
  • -Am J Gastro 2007; 102: 2804-2812. n=60 pediatric patients. ~42% in remission with MTX & ~50% improved. 13% (8) had to stop due to increased LFTs or sepsis.
  • -IBD 2006; 12: 1053. n=61. MTX for AZA nonresponders/breakthroughs: 80% with improvement/ 45% with long-term response; 10% discontinued due to side effects. Steroids stopped in 36.
  • -JPGN 2005; 40: 445. Oral MTX works as well as IM/SC.
  • -JPGN 2003; 37: 392 (194A) 0.4 mg/kg/weekly. 91% response at 2 mo, most still needed remicade
  • -Gastroenterology 2003; 124: suppl 1, A-41 (305) 11/12 responded – able to stop remicade
  • -Feagan et al. NEJM 1995; 332: 292-97.
  • -J Pediatr 1999: 134: 47. Hepatotoxic risk factors. (enzymes & obesity). Consider bx if serial enzymes increased >40% of the time over 1 year
  • -Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 2226.

Can I go?

Posted on by

How safe is it for IBD patients to travel?  A retrospective study from adult patients with IBD (n=222) compared with controls (n=224) indicates that the risk of travel for IBD patients is only a little more than the general population (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 160-65).

IBD patients with an average age of 37 years had infections during 15% of trips compared with 11% for controls.  92% of infections were due to enteric disease. However, this increased risk was identified in travel to industrialized countries not to developing countries.  This likely indicates that much of the increase is due to IBD flares rather than increased susceptibility to infections.  Nearly half of patients in this study were receiving immunosuppression: immunomodulators 29%, biologics 5%, dual therapy 6%, or corticosteroids 4%.  Not surprisingly, patients with increased IBD flares (OR 1.9) and IBD-related hospitalizations (OR 3.5) represent a group with higher risk for illness.  Most illnesses were mild & self-resolving in a few days.  Only five IBD patients required hospitalization for the following: dehydration, perianal abscess, malaria, flare, & small bowel obstruction).

Additional references:

  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2010; 8: 490. Review of traveler’s diarrhea. Recs pepto if emesis, rifaximin or cipro or azithromycin if watery diarrhea, azithromycin if bloody diarrhea
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 451. Use of rifaximin (200mg tid)-loperamide provided rapid improvement.
  • -NEJM 2006; 354; 119. Traveler’s diarrhea.
  • -NEJM 2002; 347: 505.  Illness after travel.
  • -www.cdc.gov/travel/index.htm

Add it to the list

Posted on by

A recent review article (NEJM 2012; 366: 158-64) describes a common, chronic recurrent granulomatous inflammatory disease that manifests as painful, deep-seated inflamed lesions (including sinus tracts and abscesses); it typically starts after puberty.  This disease is due in part to aberrant healing processes and impaired mechanical integrity. Investigations have shown that tumor necrosis factor α is involved in the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa.  There are a lot of similarities between hidradenitis suppurativa and Crohn’s disease as well as some overlap as up to 17% of individuals with Crohn’s disease have hidradenitis suppurativa.  In addition, hidradenitis suppurativa can be confused with Crohn’s disease especially when buttocks/perianal lesions are present.

Key clinical points with this disease:

  • Affects skin with apocrine glands
  • Long delay in diagnosis is common though disorder may affect 1% of population
  • Incision and drainage is not effective treatment –lesions recur
  • Few randomized studies –most often treated with combination of antibiotics (eg. clindamycin & rifampin)
  • More severe disease may benefit from TNF inhibitors or possibly complete surgical excision
For pediatric gastroenterologists, hidradenitis suppurative is another to add to the Crohn’s differential diagnosis list:
 

Infectious etiologies: 

Histoplasma , Amebiasis, CMV, C. diff, Klebsiella oxytoca, Actinomycosis, HIV

Noninfectious etiologies:

Sarcoidosis, Vasculitis (HSP,dermatomyositis, Wegener’s, SLE), FMF, allergic colitis, Hirschsprung’s, autoimmune enteropathy, Chronic granulomatous disease, glycogen storage dz, 1B, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, Wiskott Aldrich syndrome, NEMO (NF-kB essential modifier) deficiency, Leukocyte adhesion deficiency, SCID, Behcet’s, FELS/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, Typhlitis

Additional reference for hidradenitis suppurativa:

  • -Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 195-7.

Crohn’s Disease and differential diagnosis -references:

  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 690. Discusses sarcoid (check angiotensin converting enzyme), CGD, Hermansky Pudlak
  • -JPGN 2010; 50: 99. Perianal dz in young children may be due to autoimmune neutropenia.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1443. Phagocyte dysfunction. Also, discusses Hermansky-Pudlak, GSD 1B, chronic granulomatous disease, Chediak-Higashi, leukocyte adhesion deficiency, cylic neutropenia, congenital neutropenia
  • -JPGN 2006; 42: 405. Vasculitis mimicking IBD.
  • -NEJM 2005; 352: 489-94.
  • -J Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 15: 17-23.
  • -NEJM 2003; 349 (26): 2541-49.  Table 2. (Gold et al.)