Tag Archives: fecal microbiota transplant

Early Results of FMT for IBD -Any Efficacy?

Posted on by

As more data emerges on fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for inflammatory bowel disease in well-designed trials, it is not clear if FMT will be effective.  A summary of some recent abstracts is available at this link to Gastroenterology and Endoscopy News: Fecal Transplants for IBD Show Mixed Results in Trials

One trial with 53 patients with mild to moderate UC (27 randomized to FMT, 26 to placebo) once weekly for six weeks showed similar results in both groups with 7 FMT patients and 8 placebo recipients experiencing improvement of at least 30% in their Mayo scores.  Dr. Lawrence Brandt said, “It may be that we need to look at the patient’s unique bacterial composition and determine which organisms need to be replaced and formulate FMT accordingly.”

Related blog posts:

A C difficile two-fer

Posted on by

Two recent review articles on Clostridium difficile are quite useful:

  • Mezoff EA, Cohen MB. J Pediatr 2013; 163: 627-30.
  • Dupont HL. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1216-23.

The first publication reviews acid suppression and the risk of C difficile infection (CDI).  It starts off with  a terrific piece of advice from Sir William Osler: “One of the first duties of the physician is to educate the masses not to take medicine.”  The authors note that pH above 4 has been shown to increase bacterial survival, including  C perfringe spores in a mouse model.  In addition, the article notes that there have been concerns as early as 1982 that acid suppression could be a risk factor for CDI.  Several recent studies were summarized, including the following:

  • A recent meta-analysis (Kwok CS et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1011-9) with 42 studies (N= 313,000 patients) “found an association between PPI use and risk of CDI (OR1.74, 05%CI 1.47-2.85).”
  • A review of the literature (Deshpande A et. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 225-33) between 1990-2010 found an overall increase in CDI risk with PPIs to be OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.81-2.55). No prospective studies were identified.
  • In pediatrics, a study (Turco et al. Alimentary Pharmacol Therapeut 2010; 31: 754-9) with 910 children admitted for abdominal pain and diarrhea identified 68 with CDI.  Compared with control patients, use of PPIs was significantly higher in CDI patients (OR 4.52, 95% CI 1.4-14.4).

The FDA has stated that PPIs may be associated with an increased risk of CDI.  In addition, the use of antibiotics “appear to act synergistically with PPIs.”  Thus, the authors recommend stopping PPIs in those who do not need them.  Periodic ‘holidays’ or dosing step-downs may help assess continued need for PPIs.

The second publication succinctly reviews the diagnosis and management of CDI.  The various diagnostic methods are compared in Table 1.  Therapeutic options for 1st time infection are reviewed in Table 2.  For adults with mild-to-moderate infections, metronidazole (500 mg TID for 10 days) is preferred.  Vancomycin or Fidaxomicin are recommended for more severe infections.

Table 3 lists treatment options for recurrent CDI.  Repeat course of any of the 1st round treatments can be considered depending on patient’s illness severity.  In addition, other potential treatments included the following:

  • vancomycin tapered dose (week 1: 125 mg 4 times/day, week 2: 125 mg 2 times/day, week 3: 125 mg once/day, week 4: 125 mg every other day, week 5 & 6: 125 mg every third day)
  • rifaximin (550 mg BID x 20 days)
  • high-dose vancomycin (250-500 mg 4 times/day for 10 days) followed by S boulardii (2 capsules BID for 28 d)
  • fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) –“although family member stool donors have been used, the current movement is toward volunteer donor pools.”  [I do not think ‘current movement’ was intended as a pun by the authors.]  Volunteer donors could lower the screening costs.
  • intravenous immunoglobulin (small clinical trials have failed to show efficacy)
  • monoclonal antibodies to toxins A/B

Related blog posts:

NASPGHAN Preview

Posted on by

I had a few free minutes so I decided to take a look at a bunch of upcoming lectures from the 2013 NASPGHAN upcoming meeting.  With electronic media, it is easy to take a quick glance.  Here’s the master link to all of the following talks:

Annual Meeting page.

Some of the power point lectures that I’ve seen so far:

  • Is my PPI dangerous for me? Eric Hassall MBChB, University of British Columbia One point in his slides that I had not seen much about was a hypothesis that PPI use may predispose to the development of eosinophilic esophagitis by allowing food proteins to be more intact ( attributed to Merwat, Spechler. Am J Gastro ’09).  He explains that “acid reflux” is a clever marketing term and has a slide with Madmen actors.  If there is “acid,” one must need acid suppression.
  • My child doesn’t go to school Lynne Walker MD, Vanderbilt University.  Lynne shows an interesting fax from a parent that asks if the problem is physical, how will she help? And, if it is psychological, how can this be remedied?  She outlines a lot of pain theory and indicates that parents need to become health coaches, avoid catastrophizing (?spelling), and encourages mental health evaluation.  Use the parents words ‘I’m going to refer xxx for relaxation and stress management.’
  • My child’s H. pylori will not go away – (the resistant bug) Benjamin Gold MD, Children’s Center for Digestive Healthcare. Ben manages to stuff so much information into his talk.  His talk is like one of those clown cars where more and more people keep coming out.  He has slides with worldwide resistance maps, slides with treatment regimens and algorithms, and the reasons for treatment failure. Perhaps I can convince him to give a live preview.
  • Administrative/executive functioning Richard Colletti MD, Fletcher Allen Healthcare. Offers personal and pragmatic advice for career advancement.  His slides indicate that he started his GI fellowship at age 40.  One of his quotes, “80% of success is showing up” (Woody Allen) is definitely true.  It’s pretty much akin to what I learned about success in medical school.  You need the three As: availability, affability, and ability.  My mentor said the first was what people needed most.
  • The changing face of intestinal transplantation
    Simon Horslen MD, Seattle Children’s Hospital.  Lecture notes that number of intestinal transplants have decreased dramatically, particularly in children. In 2012, only about 100 intestinal transplants were performed whereas it had peaked at nearly 200.  Much of the credit is due to intestinal rehabilitation work and adjustments in parenteral nutrition (eg. lipid minimization, line care).  Two most common reasons for intestinal transplantation at this time are gastroschisis and volvulus.
  •  Gluten sensitivity: Fact or fiction Alessio Fasano MD, MassGeneral Hospital for Children. This blog has covered a lot of the same material, but Alessio’s slides are pretty impressive.  Also, I was not aware that Lady Gaga consumes a gluten-free diet
  • Controversies in parenteral nutrition Christopher Duggan MD, Boston Children’s Hospital.  This lecture provides a timely update on nutrient deficiencies due to component shortages and discusses lipid minimization compared with fish oil-based lipid emulsions.
  • Vitamin D and immunity James Heubi MD, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Medical Center.  In the beginning of the slides, Jim provides a very user-friendly definition of an expert and a suitable picture.  He indicates that in 2011 there were 3746 vitamin D publications but inexplicably only chooses to review a tiny fraction.

At the time of this posting, I haven’t had a chance to look through these talks:

 

 

Fecal Transplants -NY Times Opinion Piece

Posted on by

The following link (thanks to Kayla Lewis) to a recent NY Times article provides a first hand anecdotal account of fecal microbiota transplant for an adult patient with ulcerative colitis and discusses the use of FMT for Clostridium difficile infections.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/06/why-i-donated-my-stool/?ref=health

Bottom-line: Expect more questions about this emerging treatment.

Also, a quick way to keep up on NY Times -follow the twitter feed: @nytimesHealth

Related blog posts:

FMT -not quite the new Laser

Posted on by

I distinctly remember one of my high school teachers saying that if you asked someone if they were willing to have a serious operation like a brain lobe removal, that most would be unwilling unless there was no other choice.  However, if you told them that you were going to do it with a laser, people would want to get it done right away.  Such was the mesmerizing appeal of the word “laser.”

Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) certainly does not sound as enticing as a laser treatment. Nevertheless, the authors of a recent report state that “we received interest from patients all over the world to participate.”  That being said, this recent report reintroduces the concept of FMT for ulcerative colitis (UC) (JPGN 2013; 56: 597-601).

In the introduction, the authors note that probiotics, in particular VSL#3, have shown usefulness in the treatment of UC and have noted previous sporadic reports of FMT for inflammatory bowel disease.  This led to their pilot study of 10 subjects (7 to 21 years); this was a single-center, uncontrolled study.  Due to financial constraints, there was no correlation with fecal microbial profiling, histologic/colonoscopic activity, or stool inflammatory markers.

The authors extensively describe their protocol of FMT (240 mL [in four aliquots] daily for five days) including donor exclusion criteria and donor screening.  Participants did not receive any bowel preparation prior to FMT.  The majority of participants had pancolitis;  only one patient had disease limited to proctitis. One of the ten patients could not retain FMT enemas.

Results:

  • Short-term improvement was noted with 7 of 9 (78%) achieving a clinical response within one week and 3 of 9 (33%) achieving a clinical remission.
  • The authors note that 6 of 9 (67%) maintained a clinical response at 1 month.  Although if one examines the study’s figure 2, this graphically demonstrates a fairly meager response in about half of these patients based on their PUCAI score.
  • The authors do not overstate their interpretation of their results.  “This unique biologic is potentially efficacious.”
  • Adverse effects appeared to be mild and self-limiting.

Ultimately if FMT proves efficacious for inflammatory bowel disease, feces with the right microbial mix would be quite valuable.  For now, this study indicates that further research is needed in this area.

Related blog entries: