Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

Big gift, how much risk

When an individual is considering donating a part of their liver, it is no exaggeration to say this may be lifesaving.  In pediatric hepatology, live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is frequently considered by desperate parents. The risk of this gift has been poorly understood due to a lack of a LDLT registry.

This month (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 273-80) better data has emerged.  By combining information from UNOS and the Social Security Death Master File, the authors were able to follow 4111 LDLTs (donors) in the U.S. between 1994 and 2011. Key findings:

  • Seven early deaths (1.7 per 1000)
  • Death rate was not affected by portion of liver donated
  • 11 early catastrophic events: early deaths or acute liver failure (2.9 per 1000)
  • Long term mortality was similar to that for live kidney donors and NHANES III healthy participants over 11 year followup (1.2%, 1.2%, and 1.4% respectively)

Although these data are somewhat reassuring, there is a definite increase in mortality and morbidity among LDLT donors.  An editorial in the same issue (pg 207-09) states that LDLT donors are probably healthier than the general population; up to 65% of donor candidates are rejected during the evaluation process.  As such, when survival at 11 years is similar to NHANES III participants, this indicates the likelihood of a detrimental effect on long-term health. Besides early perioperative deaths, suicide and drug overdoses among donors was significant (n=4) and 4% of donors may develop psychiatric problems.  Specific complications include biliary leaks (9%), bacterial infections (12%), and incisional hernias (6%).

At the same time, the direct benefit of this gift including the potential of saving a loved one cannot be measured.  In addition to avoid a protracted uncertain period on the waiting list for a recipient, a donated liver may help another unidentified individual obtain a deceased donated liver.

Additional references:

-Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 468. Donor morbidity/mortality. n=393. 62% without complications. 3 deaths and significant morbidity.
-Liver Transplantation 2006; 12: 499. Review.
-DDW 2003, T Tran, n=56. only 27% of prospective donors c nl histology.
-NEJM 2003; 348: 818-25. (L & R-Lobe) complications from donating in 449. 6% biliary complications, reop in 4.5%, death 0.2%
-NEJM 2002; 346: 1074-1082. & 1038. R lobe Tx.
-J Pediatr 1999; 134: 280.  Results of LDLT: 92% 1 yr survival; higher biliary complications 19-34%.

Holes in the fiber theory

Since the 1970s, it has been accepted that diverticular disease is related to low fiber intake and the Western diet.  Problem is that this might not be right (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 205-10).  In this observational cross-sectional study (n=2104), low dietary fiber was not associated with diverticulosis; just the opposite.  High fiber intake, after adjusting for other factors, had an adjusted prevalence ratio of 1.3.  Due to the nature of the study, there may be potential bias that would not be present with a prospective study, especially with regard to dietary recall.  An editorial in the same issue (pg 205-07) lists three other studies; two of these also could not demonstrate a protective effect of fiber.  In addition to these findings, this study did not find an association between fat, red meat, physical activity and diverticulosis.

Although these data throw a big question mark regarding the pathogenesis of diverticular disease, this does not mean you should throw away your fiber bars quite yet.  Although low fiber may not cause diverticular disease, several large prospective studies have been completed which convincing show an association with lower complications/hospitalizations among individuals with higher fiber intake.  In addition, increased fiber in the diet has been shown to lower cardiovascular complications.

Additional references:

  • -Br Med J 1971; 2: 450-54.  Seminal article on diverticular disease and association with Western countries with low fiber intake.
  • -Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 757-64.  Prospective study showing benefits of fiber in preventing diverticular complications (n=47,888); RR=0.58 for developing symptomatic diverticulitis.
  • -BMJ 2011; 343: d4131.  EPIC study, n=47,033, showing benefit of fiber in reducing hospitalizations due to diverticular dz over 12yrs (0.59 RR)
  • -NEJM 1999; 340: 169. fiber does not decrease Colon Ca risk.
  • -NEJM 2000; 342: 1149 & 1159. fiber does not decrease risk of recurrent adenomas.
  • -Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 70: 1433-1438. Fiber lowers cholesterol & can decrease risk of heart attack by 15%.

Food as medicine

Two recent articles add some useful information regarding enteral therapy for Crohn’s disease (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 246-53 & JPGN 2012; 54: 298-305).

The first article enrolled 34 children with newly-diagnosed Crohn’s disease.  Patients were divided into elemental and polymeric formula groups and followed in a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial for two years.  Measures of improvement included the PCDAI as well as fecal calprotectin and fatty acids.  Both groups of patients responded clinically.  93% (14/15) of the elemental formula group achieved remission based on PCDAI scores (<11) and 79% (15/19) of the polymeric formula group.  The initial treatment was use of formula (along with only clears) either by NG or oral for 6 weeks.  All patients had NG placed at time of endoscopy and if sufficient oral intake was demonstrated (for 2 days), NG was removed.  All subjects had small bowel and colonic disease.  Although calprotectin levels decreased, they remained very elevated.  In the EF group, the median calprotectin dropped from 2023 μ/g to 1113 μ/g, though only one patient had a level below 400; similarly in the PF group the calprotectin dropped from 1929 μ/g to 1134 μ/g, and only two patients had a level below 400.  Some to the reasons why changes in diet may be useful have been alluded to in a previous post: Eat your veggies…if you don’t want to get sick.

The second reference is a clinical guideline on the use of exclusive enteral nutrition EEN).  The introduction notes that 65% of European pediatric gastroenterologists use EEN compared to 4% for North American pediatric gastroenterologists.  In pediatric trials, EEN and corticosteroids were considered ‘equally effective’ in a pediatric meta-analysis which included five randomized controlled trials (n=147).  However, a Cochrane review favored corticosteroid treatment over EEN in a meta-analysis that included adult and pediatric patients (n=192 EEN, n=160 corticosteroids).  According to the authors, small studies have demonstrated other potential advantages of EEN including higher rates of mucosal healing and better linear growth.  With regard to mucosal healing, the initial cited study casts with ongoing elevated calprotectin indicates that this does not occur in the majority of children with EEN therapy.  Other caveats:

  • Disease location: some evidence favors small bowel disease rather than colonic disease
  • Formula composition: does not seem to matter whether elemental or polymeric
  • Duration of therapy: majority treat for 6-8 weeks of EEN.  The authors recommend at least 8 weeks
  • Time for response: Inflammatory markers improve in a little as a week, remission typically 2-4 weeks
  • Concomitant medications: many places initiate immunomodulator treatment; others cycle EEN
  • Start with goal 120% of ‘maintenance’ nutrient needs.  On 1st day, authors recommend starting at 1/2 goal volume and gradually increase over 1-2 days
  • Partial enteral nutrition (PEN) (eg. overnight feedings & normal daytime diet) has been helpful in improving growth and may improve remission rates.
Why not EEN or PEN? Potential barriers include cost, difficulty changing diet, fear of tube feedings, and more acceptable alternatives.  At the same time, some of these barriers could be overcome.  Quality of life measures have improved in children receiving enteral nutrition.

The use of more top-down therapy may affect all of the above considerations (Only one chance to make first impression).

Additional references:

  • -Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD000542.  Enteral nutritional therapy vs corticosteroids to induce remission in Crohn’s disease.
  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 742. AGA guidelines on use of enteral nutrition in wide variety of conditions.
  • -Gastroenterology 2008; 135 : 1005. omega-3 fatty acids ineffective in Crohn’s dz for maintaining remission.
  • -Pediatr Res 2007; 61: 356-60.  Enteral nutrition effect on protein turnover in adolescents with Crohn’s disease.
  • -J Pediatr 2000; 136: 285-91. Nutritional Rx w polymeric diet is effective w/in 8 weeks in 32/37.
  • -Scand J Gastro 2001; 36: 383-8. Elemental & polymeric diets successful in maintaining remission in ~43% of adults with complete steroid withdrawal
  • -JPEN 1992; 16: 499. improved wt,ht, decreased prednisone, decreased CDAI
  • -JPGN 2000; 31 (supp 2) A291. Polymeric vs elemental diet.
  • -JPGN 2002; 35: 339-40. Lactase deficiency – same prevalence in IBD as in RAP.
  • -JPGN 2000; 31: 3 & 8. EN about as effective as steroids for primary Rx.

Pain changes brain

For several years, there has been research showing changes in PET scans and functional MRI in association with functional abdominal pain.  A recent article goes a step further showing microstructure  brain changes in patients with chronic pancreatitis (Gut 2011; 60: 1554-62).

This study examined 23 patients with pain due to chronic pancreatitis and 14 controls.  Using a 3T MR scanner, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and ‘fractional anistotropy’ (FA) values were assessed in numerous parts throughout the brain.  This new technology, uses an MRI for diffusion tensor imaging which assesses changes in white and grey matter microstructure not evident with more conventional imaging.  Chronic pancreatitis patients had increased ADC in the amygdala, cingulate cortex, and prefrontal cortex.  In addition, FA values were reduced in the cingulate cortex and secondary sensory cortex.  These areas of the brain with these changes are known to be involved in the processing of visceral pain.  Microstructural changes were correlated to patients’ clinical pain scores.  Some of the changes can be influenced by other factors including alcohol usage, depression, Alzheimer’s or diabetes.

This study echoes findings from others that demonstrate structural reorganization of the brain in association with chronic pain.

Additional references:

  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1310. n=15 IBS women, 12 controls.  IBS pts have emotional modulation of neural responses to visceral stimuli (eg rectal stimulation) –based on functional MRI studies.
  • -Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 26 & 34. Functional MRI measured in response to barostat show increased sensitivity in pts c IBS. Also, altered 5-HT signaling in IBS-D & IBS-C.
  • -J Pediatr 2001; 139: 838-843. Pts c IBS, RAP more sensitive to visceral perception in rectum and stomach respectively.
  • -Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1819. Brain response to visceral aversive conditioning –>similar cortical responses between actual and anticipated stimuli.
  • -Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 1409-19.  Changes in brain anatomy associated with neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury.
  • -J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 49: 173-83.  White matter microstructure changes in adolescents with major depression.

A cure for satiety

A safe cure for excessive appetite is a holy grail in pharmacology.  Although gluttony is a much more pervasive problem that poor appetite, an effective cure for satiety is also needed.  In the clinical setting, poor appetite remains a common problem with and without underlying problems.  Treatments to this point, such as cyproheptadine or megestrol, may be useful in some patients.  Better treatments are needed.  One drug of interest is ghrelin (Cancer 2012; DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27430).

The introduction summarizes ghrelin’s biologic activity: “Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor and is secreted predominantly by gastric endocrine cells.  It induces dose-dependent, GH-releasing activity; stimulates appetite and food intake; and triggers a positive energy balance through a central mechanism involving hypothalamic neuropeptides.”

Plasma ghrelin levels decrease after gastric resection, helping to maintain weight loss. Therefore, the stomach may act as endocrine organ to maintain appropriate weight. Exogenous administration may increase appetite.

This cited article reports a prospective randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 study in which ghrelin was administered to 21 patients with esophageal cancer, receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy; the dosage was 3 μcg/kg twice daily for 1 week.  A placebo group  (n=20) received saline.  The ghrelin group consumed 18.2 kcal/kg/day compared with 12.7 kcal/kg/day.  A measure of appetite, an appetite visual analog score, was also higher in the ghrelin-treated patients, 6.2 vs 4.1.  Patients in the ghrelin group had fewer adverse effects of chemotherapy related to anorexia and nausea than patients in the control group.  One patient receiving ghrelin stopped therapy because of excessive diaphoresis.

Although this medication is being studied in adult chemotherapy patients, down the road ghrelin and potential analogs may have a role in pediatric patients with a variety of disorders which inhibit their appetite.

Additional references:

  • -Adachi S, Takiguchi S, Okada K, et al. Effects of ghrelin administration after total gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled phase II study. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1312-1320.
  • -NEJM 2002; 346: 1623-30, 1662. Plasma ghrelin levels decrease after gastric resection.   Therefore, stomach may act as endocrine organ to maintain appropriate weight. However, ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity; so it is not clear that further reduction of these levels is clinically important.
  • -Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1492. Review of ghrelin.
  • -Yamamoto K, Takiguchi S, Miyata H, et al. Randomized phase II study of clinical effects of ghrelin after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Surgery. 2010;141:31-38.
  • -Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, et al. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature. 2001;409:194-198.
  • -Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, et al. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone- releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 1999; 402:656- 660.
  • http://www.surgjournal.com/article/S0039-6060(09)00784-3/abstract
  • http://pennmedicine.adam.com/content.aspx?productId=16&pid=16&gid=50495 Review of cited article.

MicroRNAs and biliary atresia

The human genome may encode over 1000 microRNAs (miRNAs), which may target about 60% of mammalian genes and are abundant in many human cell types. MicroRNAs are a class of short (18-23 nucleotide) noncoding RNA molecules which act as a negative regulator of target mRNA stability and translation.  This month the interaction of miRNAs with biliary atresia is examined (JPGN 2012; 54: 186-92).

Using a mouse model, the authors identify miRNA-29 overexpression associated with the downregulation of two mRNA targets related to biliary atresia pathogenesis.  The research has several limitations, including the use of adult mice.  The reason why I highlight this study is that miRNAs are helping elucidate basic disease mechanisms and identifying new therapeutic targets.  Some of these same investigators published “Circulating microRNA is a biomarker of pediatric Crohn disease.” (JPGN: 2011;  53(1): 26-33).  In this study, 11 CD-associated serum miRNA were identified with encouraging diagnostic potential.  These specific miRNAs were found in Crohn disease patients but not in controls and patients with celiac disease.  The sensitivity for Crohn disease was over 80%.

Despite this intriguing research, it not clear whether or when miRNAs will have an important role in bedside management.

Additional references:

Pediatric pharmaceutical poisoning

Overdosing and taking a bad mix of medications is not just a problem in adults.  This remains a big problem in pediatrics (J Pediatr 2012; 160: 190-192, 265-70).  The study and accompanying editorial discuss the ongoing impact of pediatric pharmaceutical poisoning and what can be done to improve the situation.  This study involved 453,559 children (<5yrs) who had ingestion of a single product (55% prescription, 45% OTC).  Child self-exposure was responsible for 95%.  Between 2001-2008, these exposures led to 248,023 health care visits, 41,847 admissions, and 18,191 significant injuries.  This data likely underestimates the full extent as the data was collected ‘passively’ by the National Poison Data System (from the U.S. Poison Control Centers).

Although the number of ingestions has been increasing, the number of deaths declined marginally from 2001-2004 to 2005-2008, mainly due to a decline in pediatric acetaminophen deaths.  The authors conclude the problem is getting worse, not better.

What can be done to decrease this burden?

1. Packaging.  Since the poison prevention packaging act was passed in 1970, it has been recognized that the child-resistant closure (CRC) is not sufficient.  The main problem has been that once the vial is open, the entire contents of the vial are available for ingestion.

Options: insertion of needleless syringe for liquid medicines, requiring pressure to be applied to bottle to express medicine & blister packs (inside CRC container) for pills.

2. Targeting interventions for the highest risk medications.  Opioids, cardiovascular agents, and sedatives.

3. Healthy People 2020.  A collaborative approach to this problem is underway.

In our patient populations, we need to remember that the medications we prescribe may be inadvertently ingested by our patients (overdose) or by their siblings.  A word of precaution may save a life.

Additional references:

  • -Pediatrics 2011; 127: e1597-9. Preventing medication overdoses in young children.
  • -Ann Emerg Med 2009; 47: 348-54. Unrecognized toll of opioid abuse on young children.
  • -NEJM 2009; 361: 2105. Changes in FDA labeling of analgesics. ~30,000 hospitalizations  each year due to acetaminophen overdose in U.S. –1/2 inadvertent overdose.
  • -Hepatology 2007; 46: 966. AASLD public policy re: acetaminophen. It is leading cause of acute liver failure in U.S.  500 deaths annually. 10% of cases may occur in those receiving the proper doses.
  • -JAMA 2006; 296: 87-93. Prospective study of daily 4gm acetaminophen in healthy volunteers. (stayed at research facility). ALT >3 ULN in 38%. Resolved over 6 days.
  • http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId+27

The undiscovered country

The title of this blog is derived from a Star Trek movie.  I think that when we see patients with eosinophilic esophagitis that we are often seeing something new and poorly characterized.

Despite so many unanswered questions, particularly on an individual basis, this topic has seen a lot of interest and there are many advances in both bedside and basic research.  The review article  (Allergy 2012; DOI: 10: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02787.x) focuses on many of the similarities and differences between pediatric and adult patients.  Is it the same disease? (Probably yes)

With regard to medical history, the article reminds clinicians to ask about coping strategies:

  • do you wash food down with liquid?
  • are you the last one to finish your food?
  • do you chew your food a long time?
  • do you avoid foods like meats or breads?

Clinical features –main difference is greater presentation variety in children.  Adults almost always have long-standing dysphagia.  In pediatrics, painful symptoms, reflux symptoms, and feeding refusal are often seen in early stages.  In both populations, other atopic diseases are very common.

Immunopathogenesis (same in pediatrics and adults):  Th2-type inflammatory response; not just eosinophils but also IL-5-expressing T-cells, B cells, and IgE-bearing mast cells.  A break-down of all the types of quantified cells from a large number of studies is detailed (Table 2).

Allergic profile –main difference is much higher aeroallergen sensitization in adolescent & adult patients than in pediatric patients.  In children, top four allergens: milk, wheat, egg, and soy.  In older patients/adults, nuts are frequent food allergens.

Treatment strategies –basic question of whether to treat for symptomatic relief or histologic response is still debated.  Three goals of treatment are the same:

  • improve quality of life
  • reduce the risk of severe esophageal injury
  • prevent esophageal damage

3 D’s of treatment drugs, diet, dilatation:

Drugs: topical steroids (fluticasone, budesonide) are effective in ~50% of children & these agents may reverse subepithelial fibrosis, PPIs -small percentage have EoE PPI-responsive disease, & systemic steroids.  Lower doses of budesonide may be effective as maintenance treatment (0.25mg BID).  Interestingly, infliximab has not been effective clinically or histologically despite the high amounts of TNF.  Azathioprine (or 6-MP) was effective in three steroid-dependent patients in a pilot study.

Diet –review does not cover new territory (see previous blog: Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet).  States that elemental diets are not practical in adults.  Discusses the fact that food allergy identification is difficult & remains a pressing research need.

Dilatation –can provide long-lasting symptom relief.  Dilatation is infrequently utilized in pediatrics and virtually never in absence of other therapies.

On a side note, in my training I was taught that there were 3D’s to treating every patient: diet, drugs, and demeanor — a good attitude goes a long way, particularly in an uncertain world.

Additional references:

  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1593.  anti-IL-5.  partially effective for EoE.
  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 723. n=91.  Incidental gastric eosinophils does not predict a worse response to fluticasone then isolated EoE.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2011; 9: 400 (editorial 370). Budesonide at dose of 0.25mg BID was partially effective in adult cohort of n=28.
  • -Aceves SS et al. Allergy 2010; 65: 109-116. 3 month course of budesonide can lead to resolution of esophageal remodeling. Lamina propria fibrosis resolution correlates with response to topical steroids. Examined effect on lamina propria after 3 months of Rx.
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1526. n=36. (summary pg 1429) 15 day course of budesonide (1mg BID). 13/18 in Rx group had improved dysphagia, 72% wiht histologic remission, 92% reduction in eosinophil count. Did not seem to matter if “allergic” or not. 3 pts developed mild candida.
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 418. Randomized placebo study showed effectiveness.n=15 Rx (n=9 placebo). 87% of Rx group responded.  2ml of water with 0.5gm pulmicort and mixed it with 4-5 packets of splenda.
  • -JPGN 2007; 45: 281/370/319. Review/research symposium/subepithelial fibrosis associated with EoE & dysphagia.
  • -JPGN 2007; 45: 22-31. Th2 Immunity w Eotaxin-3/ C-C chemokine receptor in EoE.
  • -Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1381-1391. Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluticasone for EoE: 880mcg divided bid; n=21 Rx, n=15 placebo. 50% (vs 9% controls) achieved histologic remission; Rx more effective in those w/o detectable food allergies. 67% (vs. 27% controls) resolution of vomiting.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: xxiv. EoE causing Boerhaave’s syndrome (spontaneous rupture)
  • INCREASED FRAGILITY: -Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 407-12. -Clin Gastro Hepatolo 2003; 1: 433-37.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 1328. absolute eosinophilia (AEC 440 vs 140 controls), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and eotaxin-3 act as biomarkers of EE activity.
  • -Gastroenterology2006; 131: 2018 (-J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 536-547. ) Eostaxin-3/EcE transcript signature.
  • -J Pediatr 2005; 147: 540 Picture of ringed esophagitis.
  • -JPGN 2004; 39: S8 [abstract 0005]. CHOP experience in 250 pts. NG elemental diet was most effective. ~6% of pts presenting with GER. Strict avoidance of allergens needed.

One more cause of rectal bleeding

Two articles in this month’s JPGN, along with the editorials, make it clear that when patients are having rectal bleeding, we should ask if they are spending an inordinate amount of time straining on the toilet.  (JPGN 2012: 54: 263-65, 266-70, 167-68, 169-70).  This question may help uncover Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS).

This syndrome which is often a misnomer because many cases have erythema rather than ulcers; and, lesions can be ulcerative or polypoid.  They can be single or multiple involving the distal rectum.  SRUS often has a delayed diagnosis, 1.7 years and 3.2 years respectively in the two studies.  The differential diagnosis includes polyps, infections, IBD, abuse, and rectal manipulation.  Histology features include muscularinization of lamina propia, mixed inflammatory infiltrate, thickened muscularis mucosa, and epithelial hyperplastic changes.

Treatment includes avoidance of straining/behavior modification, use of laxatives, and perhaps topical mesalamine.

Additional references:

  • -Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37: 645-68. Rectal disorders/SRUS -review.
  • -Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 5: 755-62,
  • -Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 2: 89-92. SRUS in children.
  • -Gut 2004; 53: 368-70.  Biofeedback for SRUS.
  • -Pediatrics 2002; 110: e79.
  • -Clinical Perspectives in Gastroenterology 1999; 2: 190.

Protecting the most vulnerable

Although pediatric gastroenterologists are not on the front lines of the vaccine controversies, we should add our voices to support immunizations.  Some of our immunocompromised patients are among the most vulnerable and rely on herd immunity to lessen their chances of serious infection.  When healthy children and adults do not receive their immunizations, this does not only increase their risk of infections but the risk to others.

A perfect example of this is highlighted in NEJM 2012; 366: 391-92.  In 2010, California reported over 9000 cases of pertusis; of these cases, 89% occurred in infants less than 6 months.  This population is too young to be adequately immunized.  Ten of these infants died.

The author recommends trying to persuade those who are hesitant to proceed with immunizations.  Parents who are opposed based on personal beliefs will not be persuaded.

  • Remove socioeconomic barriers to vaccination
  • Enforce school entry requirements; it should not be easier to opt out of immunizations than to receive them
  • Aggressively address misinformation
  • Learn to use persuasion effectively: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/conversations

Additional references:

  • -NEJM 2011; 365: 1108. RV vaccine resulted in 64,000 less hospitalizations in US between 2007-2009.
  • -NEJM 2010; 362: 289, 299, & 358. Rotavirus vaccines lowering death rate in Africa & Mexico.
  • -NEJM 2011; 364: 2283. Rotavirus vaccine: risk of intussception ~1:50,000-1:70,000; thus could cause ~96 cases per year. Vaccine at same time prevented 80,000 hospitalizations & 1300 deaths in Brazil & Mexico.
  • -Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 1287. Two decades of HBV vaccination in Taiwan
  • -NEJM 2007; 16: 1275, 1278, 1281.  Medical evidence refuting Thimersol toxicity; yet many vaccine cases in litigation
  • -Liver Transplant 2008; 14: 1389.  Vaccine policies:  MMR/Varicella can be given as early as 6 months of age. Must give 3-4weeks before Tx. Can give inactivated ~6-12 mo p-OLT. Except for oral polio, good idea for contacts to get all their immunizations.
  • -Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;15:1410–1416.  Vaccination Strategies for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on immunomodulators and biologics

Live Virus Vaccines, Generally Contraindicated in Patients Receiving Immune-Suppressive Therapy:

Anthrax vaccine
Intranasal influenza
Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)
Polio live oral vaccine (OPV)
Rotavirus
Smallpox vaccine
Tuberculosis BCG vaccine
Typhoid live oral vaccine
Varicella
Yellow fever