Author Archives: gutsandgrowth

Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

Rope-A-Dope with Hepatitis C

Posted on by

Methods: The authors developed an agent-based model (ABM) “simulating the dynamics of HCV transmission and demographic changes from 2006 to 2030, using data from Ontario, Canada.14 Predicted long-term health outcome effects for current HCV policies (status quo) and those following the implementation of various scale-up interventions were compared to the elimination goals set by the WHO.”

Key findings:

  • Under the current status quo of risk-based screening, we predict the incidence of CHC-induced decompensated cirrhosis, HCC, and liver-related deaths would decrease by 79.4%, 76.1%, and 62.1%, respectively, between 2015 and 2030
  • However, chronic hepatitis C (CHC) incidence would only decrease by 11.1% (WHO goal by 2030 is a reduction of 80%)

From the editorial:

“According to the study by Tian et al,3 the future incidence of HCV infection will be mainly related to HCV transmission, stressing the fact that harm reduction strategies, in addition to the highest treatment rate, are paramount to reducing the further HCV spread and reinfection risk, especially in marginalized populations. In high‐income countries, HCV treatment rates among people who use drugs remain inadequate due to a lack of simplified HCV testing, scale‐up of harm reduction‐based HCV treatment programs, and numerous additional barriers to HCV services.”

“It is not just a matter of time until high-income countries get rid of HCV infection. The ongoing mass screening campaign in Italy shows that having political will and financial coverage is insufficient to achieve the HCV elimination targets. In high-income countries, encouraging and convincing people to get tested is among the most challenging and underrated.”

My take: The development of highly effective HCV treatments has been a remarkable feat, reducing the rate of death and complications from HCV. Nevertheless, it has not brought about a big improvement in HCV transmission. To achieve this, it looks like a vaccine will be necessary. Until then, our fight against HCV is akin to the ‘rope a dope‘ boxing strategy –we are not getting a knock-out anytime soon against this opponent.

Related blog posts:

Canyonlands National Park, Utah

IBD Updates: SMART IBD App, SC Vedolizumab Durability, Risk Factors in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

KA Hommel et al. JPGN 2024; 78:1273–1278. Pilot and feasibility of the SMART IBD mobile app to improve self-management in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

The Self‐Management Assistance with Recommended Treatment (SMART) IBD app –Key findings:

  • Patients rated the app quality as good and accessed the app adequately overall, with some pages being used often.
  • Medication adherence increased over the course of the study and was associated with sleep duration, mood, and stool consistency and blood content.

My take: IBD Management apps could be quite helpful, especially for teens and young adults.

S Hsiang et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 8, August 2024, Pages 1284–1294, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad166. Safety, Effectiveness, and Treatment Persistence of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in IBD: A Multicenter Study From the United Kingdom

Methods: IBD patients (n=563) on IV vedolizumab across 11 UK sites agreed to transition to SC injections or otherwise continued IV treatment

Key findings:

  • Data from 563 patients, demonstrated no differences in disease activity, remission rates, and quality of life between the SC and IV groups at all time points
  • Drug persistence at week 52 was similar (81.1% vs 81.2%; P = .98)

Related blog posts:

CFD Li Wai Suen, et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 8, August 2024, Pages 1389–1405, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad183. Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis 

This systematic review identified 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion.

Related blog posts:

ESPGHAN Eosinophilic Esophagitis Guidelines

Posted on by

Yesterday was “National Dog Day.” Here’s our pooch:

J Amil-Dias et al. JPGN;79:394–437. Open Access! Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: An update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

This report makes 52 statements and 44 recommendations. Overall this is a helpful report but there are many statements and recommendations that have NO value for pediatric gastroenterologists (except for those trapped in a cave for the last 10 years). Here are a couple examples of that:

  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that pediatricians should be aware of the higher incidence of EoE in relatives.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that a high index of suspicion for EoE must be maintained in children with concomitant atopic disease.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends the peak value of 15 eos/HPF as the cut‐off value in esophageal biopsy specimens, for the histological diagnosis of EoE in an appropriate clinical context”

Some helpful recommendations:

  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends against using available allergy tests to predict dietary triggers of EoE.” This is not new information but helpful to have clearly stated in guidelines.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends maintenance therapy to all patients after achieving histological remission” Commentary: “There are no prospective data on the best duration of maintenance therapy in pediatric EoE…[In a large study of adults} sustained untreated combined remission was seen in only 1.3% of patients who discontinued treatment.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG suggests endoscopic and histological re‐evaluation after 1‐3 years during the maintenance phase in cases of stable clinical remission”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that dupilumab can be used in selected cases of children over1 year old weighing >15 kg with EoE refractory to conventional treatment and in those with concomitant atopic burden with approved indications for biologics”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG suggests that a short course of systemic steroids be considered as an alternative to dilation in the presence of moderate to severe esophageal strictures with severe symptoms.” “Treatment with short term systemic steroids can significantly reduce the need for mechanical esophageal dilation in moderate to severe strictures associated with pediatric EoE”
  • Suggested drug dosing is noted in Table 3 (see below)

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

NASPGHAN Dysphagia Webinar: Dr. Khalil El-Chammas, Dr. Peter Osgood, and Dr. Jose Garza

Posted on by

I signed up for this webinar mainly to hear my partner Jose Garza’s presentation (who presented last), though all the speakers were good. I took a couple screenshots on my phone during the presentations. The webinar is available/archived at NASPGHAN website.

  • Dr. El-Chammas’ presentation gave a quick review on normal swallowing physiology, modalities for evaluation (eg. VSS, FEES) and showed some cool slides particularly with regard to pharyngeal manometry.
  • Dr. Osgood reviewed the etiologies/workup for dysphagia including helpful slides on esophagrams, FLIP and manometry.
Manometry typical of Type 2 Achalasia
  • Dr. Garza provided insightful information on gastric vs supragastric belching. Supragastric belching can be treated with diaphragmatic breathing and cognitive behavioral therapy. Supragastric belching has shown poor response to pharmacologic therapy. He also explained the physiology behind the inability to burp.
Important to distinguish reason for belching as this affect management
This study shows that with gastric belching the air works its way from the stomach up and with supragastric belching air is swallowed and expelled from the esophagus

My take: Our motility colleagues have some cool toys. When the treatments are as good as the toys, being a motility specialist will be even more fun.

One Week Treatment to Protect Non-Liver Transplant Recipients of HCV+ Organs & Baseball Dog

Posted on by

Link: Bat Dog

————

A recent report in Gastroenterology and Hepatology News (July 2024: Shortened Protocol Can Prevent Infection in Recipients of HCV+ Organs) highlighted the recommended use of 1 week empiric treatment to prevent the development of hepatitis C in transplant recipients of HCV+ organs.

The cost for a one week course of “the Toronto Protocol” which includes glecaprevir-pibrentasvir along with ezetimbe is ~$2800. This is much less than a full course which likely would cost ~$30,000. Ezetimbe, cholesterol-lowering agent, has the ability to prevent HCV from entering cells.

For liver transplant recipients of HCV+ donor, a 12 week course of treatment is recommended

From HCV Guidelines:

Related blog posts:

Lean Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Have Higher Risk of Steatotic Liver Disease Than Lean Patients Without IBD

Posted on by

SJ Martinez-Dominguez et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 8, August 2024, Pages 1274–1283, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad175 Open Acess! Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is an Independent Risk Factor for Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Lean Individuals 

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, case-control study including 300 lean cases with IBD and 80 lean controls without IBD, matched by sex and age (median age ~45 yrs). All participants underwent a liver ultrasound, transient elastography, and laboratory tests. All patients with current or previous use of systemic steroid in the last 2 years were excluded from the analysis

Key Findings:

  • The lean IBD group showed a significantly higher prevalence of MASLD compared with lean non-IBD group (21.3% vs 10%; P = .022), but no differences were observed in the prevalence of significant liver fibrosis (4.7% vs 0.0%; P = 1.000)
  • No differences were found between the prevalence of MASLD in IBD and non-IBD participants who were overweight/obese (66.8% vs 70.8%; P = .442)
  • IBD was an independent risk factor for MASLD in lean participants (odds ratio [OR], 2.71) after adjusting for classic metabolic risk factors and prior history of systemic steroid use
Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in cases and controls according to body mass index (BMI) status. Blue bars: cases (inflammatory bowel disease). Red bars: controls (non–inflammatory bowel disease). P values in bold indicate statistical significance (P < .05).

My take: This study suggests that “chronic inflammation could play a role in MASLD development.” Also, this indicates that MASLD could be a reason for elevated LFTs in patients with IBD, even in lean patients.

Related blog posts:

Fibrosis and Steatotic Liver Disease -Who Needs to be Followed by Hepatology?

Posted on by

N Ma et al. JPGN 2024; 79:229–237. Fibrosis and steatotic liver disease in US adolescents according to the new nomenclature

Methods: Among 1410 adolescents (12–19 years) in NHANES (2017-March, 2020), the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) of transient elastography (TE) was used to define steatosis and fibrosis (TE ≥ 7.4 kPa). Obesity and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 80 U/L were used to identify adolescents qualifying for hepatology referral according to practice guidelines.

Key findings:

  • At the supplier (EchoSens)-recommended CAP threshold of 240 dB/m, 30.5% of adolescents had steatotic liver disease (SLD) and about 85% of adolescents with NAFLD met criteria for MASLD. At a CAP threshold of 270 dB/m, SLD prevalence was about 16% in adolescents. The other 15% of NAFLD patients do not meet diagnostic criteria MASLD and would receive a diagnosis of cryptogenic SLD or possible MASLD
  • At higher CAP thresholds, MASLD/NAFLD concordance increased and approached 100%.
  • Among adolescents with MASLD-fibrosis, only 8.8% had overweight/obese and ALT ≥ 80 U/L. Thus, more than 90% of adolescents in this group would not merit hepatology evaluation based on current guidelines.

My take: This study identifies potential problems with current thresholds for which patients need to be seen by pediatric hepatologists. This will be even more important as effective pharmaceuticals become available.

Related blog posts:

Channel Islands off the California coast

Selecting Patients with Biliary Atresia for Variceal Endoscopy Screening

Posted on by

Y-C Ling et al. JPGN 2024;79:222–228. Performance of Baveno VII criteria for the screening of varices needing treatment in patients with biliary atresia

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 48 BA patients (23 females and 25 males) who underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and transient elastography at a mean age of 11.18 ± 1.48 years. Transient elastography (Fibroscan® 502 Touch; Echosens) was applied for the LSM assessment in all BA patients recruited in this study.

Clinically-significant portal hypertension (CSPH) of Baveno VI criteria recommend avoiding upper endoscopies for cirrhotic patients with liver stiffness <20 kPa and platelets>150 × 10-9 cells/L (favorable Baveno VI status), and the CSPH of the expanded Baveno VI criteria as the exclusion of subjects with LSM < 25 kPa and platelet count >110 × 10-9 cells/L. (Ref: D Thabut et al. Gastroenterol 2019. Validation of Baveno VI Criteria for Screening and Surveillance of Esophageal Varices in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis and a Sustained Response to Antiviral Therapy)

CSPH of Baveno VII criteria was defined as LSM ≥ 25 kPa and excluded patients with LSM < 15 kPa and platelet count ≥150 × 10-9 /L. Subjects with LSM between 20 and 25 kPa and platelets <150 × 10-9 /L or LSM between 15 and 20 kPa and platelets <110 × 10-9/L are also defined as CSPH. (Ref: Baveno VII criteria Ref: M Mendizabal et al. Annals of Hepatology; 2024: 29: 101180. Evolving portal hypertension through Baveno VII recommendations)

Key findings:

  • The sensitivity and negative predictive value of Baveno VI and Baveno VII criteria for the prediction of varices needing treatment (VNT) in BA patients were both 100% and100%, respectively

In the discussion, the authors note that the utility of the Baveno VII criteria for adults. “The real‐world data showed the CSPH defined by Baveno VII criteria predicts a five‐times increase in the risk of liver decompensation in chronic active liver disease patients.”

My take: This study shows that the combination of LSM and platelet counts using the Baveno VI or VII criteria help select patients with BA who need upper endoscopy to screen for varices needing treatment. These criteria also identify patients needing liver transplantation.

Related blog posts:

Channel Islands off California coast
View from Griffith Park, Los Angeles

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

ENTERPRET: Vedolizumab Optimization Study in Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

V Jairath et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 1077-1086. Open Access! ENTERPRET: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vedolizumab Dose Optimization in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Early Nonresponse

Methods: ENTERPRET was a phase 4, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (n=278) that included patients with moderate to severe UC who had high drug clearance at week 5 (serum concentration, <50 μg/mL) and nonresponse to standard vedolizumab treatment at week 6. At week 6, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard dosing (300 mg every 8 weeks) or dose-optimized vedolizumab (600 mg at week 6, then 300 mg every 4 weeks; or 600 mg at week 6, then 600 mg every 4 weeks [based on week 5 serum concentration]). 

After an initial clinical response of 47.5% (132/275) at week 6, 108 patients were subsequently randomized into either standard (n = 53) or dose-optimized vedolizumab (n = 55). The majority (86%) with nonresponse at week 6 had high drug clearance

Key findings at week 30:

  • Endoscopic improvement: 10 patients (18.9%) with standard vedolizumab vs 8 patients (14.5%) with dose-optimized vedolizumab
  • Clinical remission: Five patients (9.4%) with standard vedolizumab vs 5 patients (9.1%) with dose-optimized vedolizumab
  • Clinical response: 17 (32.1%) with standard vedolizumab vs 17 (30.9%) patients (30.9%) with dose-optimized vedolizumab

In their discussion, the authors note the gain of clinical response of ~16% in both groups is consistent with other studies showing “8% to 16% increase in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response between 6 and 14 weeks.” Thus, duration of treatment may be more important that serum drug level.

My take (borrowed in part from authors): “In patients with early nonresponse and high drug clearance, vedolizumab dose optimization is probably not required.” At week 30, both standard dosing and dose-optimized groups had a significant response despite lack of response at 6 weeks. So, it may be best to give a longer treatment course before reaching a conclusion on vedolizumab’s efficacy.

c Mayo endoscopic subscore </= 1.
d Reduction in total Mayo score of >/=3 points and >/= 30% from baseline with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of >/=1 or absolute rectal subscore of </= 1

Related blog posts:

Overuse of Tongue-Tie Surgeries

Posted on by

J Thomas et al. Pediatrics 2024; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067605. Open Access! Identification and Management of Ankyloglossia and Its Effect on Breastfeeding in Infants: Clinical Report

To examine the tongue, the authors recommend the following:

  • Assessment of tongue movement and coordination with a clean, gloved finger in the mouth to test the suck reflex and to palpate the hard and soft palate
  • Appearance of lingual frenulum, including the inability of the infant to extend tongue over the lower alveolar ridge or lift tongue midway to the palate, or a heart-shaped tongue on extension

Key Recommendations:

  • Ankyloglossia is a variation of a normal oral structure. Symptomatic ankyloglossia is defined as a restrictive lingual frenulum that causes problems with breastfeeding that are not improved with lactation support. Infants with ankyloglossia and normal feeding patterns need no intervention. Frenotomy for other problems or to prevent issues such as speech articulation or obstructive sleep apnea in the future is not evidence based.18 
  • Posterior ankyloglossia is a poorly defined term, lacking agreement from experts, and should not be used as a reason to perform surgical intervention on an infant.
  • Labial and buccal frenae are normal oral structures unrelated to breastfeeding mechanics and do not require surgical intervention to improve breastfeeding. Sucking blisters are a normal finding in newborn infants, and as such, are not suggestive of pathology.
  • Suboptimal breastfeeding is a complex issue and every nursing dyad with painful or ineffective feeding should have a complete breastfeeding assessment before any treatment is offered.65,66  Here, multidisciplinary communication and management between lactation specialists, feeding therapists, surgeons, and pediatricians are paramount for the best outcome for the family.
  • Newborn infants with possible symptomatic ankyloglossia need close monitoring, support of breastfeeding while in the hospital, early postdischarge follow-up, and monitoring of weight gain in their medical home.
  • Surgical intervention for symptomatic ankyloglossia, versus laser, can reasonably be offered after other causes of breastfeeding problems have been evaluated and treated. Frenotomy may decrease maternal nipple pain.6,17,67  Although the evidence is not strong, addressing pain is important for successful continued breastfeeding.
  • Frenotomy should be performed by a trained professional, either the medical home provider or another to whom the medical home refers the patient. The performing professional should be experienced in the medical care of newborns and older infants and should maintain needed privileges for the procedure. As with any surgical procedure, before performing a frenotomy, the performing provider should take a “time out” to:
  • Obtain a signed consent
  • Discuss alternatives, risks, and benefits of the procedure
  • Discuss and provide pain control options
  • Document previous receipt of intramuscular vitamin K
  • Provide information on postsurgical care and follow-up
  • Attention to prevention of surgical complications, hemorrhage risk, pain mitigation, and evidence-based postsurgical care is recommended. Postoperative stretching exercises are not evidence-based and are not recommended.
Number of inpatient newborn ankyloglossia diagnoses in United States by year from Wei EX, Tunkel D, Boss E, Walsh J. Ankyloglossia: update on trends in diagnosis and management in the United States. 2012–2016. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(5):1029–1031.
“(A) An example of anterior ankyloglossia with the lingual frenulum attaching at the tongue tip, limiting tongue mobility. (B) Posterior attachment of lingual frenulum. In the AAO-HNS consensus statement, consensus was not reached regarding the definition of posterior ankyloglossia. Some in the consensus group would describe this figure as an example of posterior ankyloglossia if there are objective findings of restricted tongue mobility caused by the lingual frenulum”

My take: Everyday I see infants with feeding problems that were attributed to being tongue-tied who do not improve after frenotomy. Most often, ankyloglossia does not need any intervention.

Related article: NY Times 7/2/24: Pediatricians Warn Against Overuse of Tongue-Tie Surgeries “The tongue procedures, which often cost several hundred dollars, should be done only to the small fraction of infants with severely tethered tongues, the report said.”