Category Archives: Uncategorized

Increased Intestinal Blood Flow with Bolus Feedings in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Posted on by

From Journal of Pediatrics:  V Bozzetti et al. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.05.031

Abstract:

Objective

To detect changes in splanchnic perfusion and oxygenation induced by 2 different feeding regimens in infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and those without IUGR.

Study design

This was a randomized trial in 40 very low birth weight infants. When an enteral intake of 100 mL/kg/day was achieved, patients with IUGR and those without IUGR were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (n = 20) received a feed by bolus (in 10 minutes), then, after at least 3 hours, received the same amount of formula by continuous nutrition over 3 hours. Group B (n = 20) received a feed administered continuously over 3 hours, followed by a bolus administration (in 10 minutes) of the same amount of formula after at least 3 hours. On the day of randomization, intestinal and cerebral regional oximetry was measured via near-infrared spectroscopy and Doppler ultrasound (US) of the superior mesenteric artery was performed. Examinations were performed before the feed and at 30 minutes after the feed by bolus and before the feed, at 30 minutes after the start of the feed, and at 30 minutes after the end of the feed for the 3-hour continuous feed.

Results

Superior mesenteric artery Doppler US showed significantly higher perfusion values after the bolus feeds than after the continuous feeds. Near-infrared spectroscopy values remained stable before and after feeds. Infants with IUGR and those without IUGR showed the same perfusion and oxygenation patterns.

Conclusion

According to our Doppler US results, bolus feeding is more effective than continuous feeding in increasing splanchnic perfusion.

Related blog posts:

Iceberg Lake, Glacier Natl Park

Iceberg Lake, Glacier Natl Park

FDA Gives Ustekinumab (Stelara) Approval for Crohn’s

Posted on by

Here’s a link summarizing FDA approval: Medscape: FDA Clears Ustekinumab (Stelara) for Crohn’s Disease

An excerpt:

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ustekinumab (Stelara, Janssen Biotech, Inc) for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease in patients aged 18 years or older.

Specifically, the interleukin-12/23 inhibitor is indicated for Crohn’s patients who have failed or were intolerant to immunomodulator or corticosteroid therapy but who never failed treatment with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker or who failed or were intolerant to treatment with one or more TNF blockers, according to a company news release.

Ustekinumab is already approved in the United States for treatment of patients with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis…The clinical development program for ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease included more than 1300 patients across three pivotal phase 3 studies, which served as the primary basis for FDA approval.

In clinical studies of patients who were either new to, experienced with, or failed anti-TNF therapy, between 34% and 56% of patients experienced symptom relief in the 6 weeks after receiving a one-time intravenous induction dose of ustekinumab. “Noticeable improvement was observed as early as 3 weeks,” the company said.

Most patients who responded to induction dosing and who continued ustekinumab treatment with subcutaneous maintenance doses every 8 weeks were in remission at the end of 44 weeks (52 weeks from initiation of the induction dose), the company said.

Full prescribing information and a medication guide are available online.

screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-4-18-01-pm

 

Small Pediatric IBD Studies …Briefly Noted

Posted on by

G Wahbeh et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 348-51.  This retrospective case series with 4 children  (aged 12-17 years) indicated that 2 had a ‘clinical response’ to ustekinumab therapy, though one of these had ongoing elevation of CRP.  The dosing may have been too low: 90 mg at week 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks.  My take: This study shows that ustekinumab’s use in pediatric IBD seems to be a ‘shot in the dark’ given the lack of coherent data.

Related posts:

L Zimmerman et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 352-56. Among a cohort of 123 children who had underwent a bowel resection, from 1977-2011, the overall postoperative complication rate was 13%.  This included 3 of 24 who had prior infliximab and 9 of 99 who had not received infliximab. It is noteworthy that the infliximab group had more corticosteroid exposure. The authors concluded that preoperative infliximab was not associated with increased complications but noted that their sample size was small. My take: Studies of adults with Crohn’s disease have yielded conflicting results on whether preoperative infliximab increases the risk of complications.  This study shows that children likely have a lower rate of postsurgical complications and more pediatric specific data are needed.

Related post:

From KT Park’s Twitter Feed:

calprotectin

4-week-ada-trough-ktparj

Latest on Tofacitinib for Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

From Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News July 2016: Tofacitinib Effective in Refractory and Severe UC

An excerpt:

Tofacitinib (Pfizer), an oral agent already approved for certain patients with rheumatoid arthritis, can induce clinical remission in up to 25% of individuals with moderate to severe, refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and clinical response in as many as 60% of these patients.

The results, based on two placebo-controlled trials involving more than 1,100 patients, showed the drug also increased the risk for serum lipid elevations but was otherwise safe. Researchers presented the data at the 2016 annual meeting of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO; oral presentation 019)…

The new data are from the OCTAVE Induction 1 and Induction 2 trials, identically designed, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled Phase III studies…In the OCTAVE 1 trial, 476 patients received 10 mg of tofacitinib orally twice daily for eight weeks and 122 received an oral placebo. In OCTAVE 2, 429 and 112 patients were randomized to receive the two regimens, respectively.

Screenshot from gastroendonews.com

Screenshot from gastroendonews.com

Also from Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News August 2016: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis  This article provides a succinct summary regarding diagnosis and treatments of ulcerative colitis; treatments discussed include emerging therapies like tofacitinib.

 

What to Make of A Motility Study of Children with Orthostatic Intolerance

Posted on by

While a recent study (A Darbari et al JPGN 2016; 63: 329-35) provides some interesting data regarding the potential origin of gastrointestinal symptoms in the setting of orthostatic intolerance, I cannot support their conclusion that antroduodenal manometry (ADM) “should” be part of the evaluation of these affected children.

Background:

  • Retrospective study which included only subjects with a positive tilt test

What’s interesting:

  • Among 35 children with orthostatic intolerance due to either neurally mediated hypotension (NMH) or postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), ADM was abnormal at baseline or during tilt table testing in 26 (75%).
  • ADM studies were more often abnormal than gastric emptying studies, which were normal in 12 or 25.
  • Specific findings included neurogenic intestinal dysmotility in 15, antral hypomotility in 4, visceral hyperalgesia in 2, and regurgitation in 5.
  • GI symptoms of nausea, abdominal pain or vomiting were reproduced during tilt testing in 31 of 35 patients (89%).

Based on the discussion, the authors imply that ADM testing could help determine if the symptoms are due to neurogastrointestinal pathology or if normal, could indicate a central origin for the GI symptoms.  Thus, they conclude that motility testing “should” be part of comprehensive” orthostatic intolerance evaluation.

I would argue that this study does not show that ADM testing can reliably distinguish whether symptoms are due to a neurogastroenterological pathology or central pathology. And, in fact, there are better tests to examine for central origin.  I wouldn’t be surprised if many of their subjects had brain imaging, though this is not reported.

In addition, the authors acknowledge that ADM testing may not influence therapeutic decisions.  “The clinical response to promotility agents in children with POTS is generally low.”

My take: This study provides a useful mechanistic explanation of symptoms associated with orthostatic intolerance.  However, “I’m not there yet” on supporting ADM for all children with OI.

Related blog post:

Avalanche Creek Lake, Glacier Natl Park

Avalanche Creek Lake, Glacier Natl Park

 

Cutting Edge for Endoscopic Control of Bleeding

Posted on by

A recent review elaborates on the newest methods for endoscopic control of bleeding. Topics included caplock clips, endoscopic suturing, and hemostatic sprays.

Full text: New Endoscopic Technologies and Procedureal Advances for Endoscopic Hemostasis (from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology)

Related blog posts:

 

Many Glacier Hotel

Many Glacier Hotel

Celiac Hepatopathies 2016

Posted on by

A recent study (GJ Lee et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 340-3) adds a little bit more information regarding hypertransaminasemia in newly diagnosed celiac disease.  Some previous information was summarized in a previous blog: Celiac Hepatopathies (2013)

In this retrospective, single center study, 185 children had transaminases obtained at the time of celiac diagnosis (185/388 = 47.7%).

Key findings:

  • Among this group, 28 (15.1%) had elevated transaminases, with an average of ALT 2.52 x ULN and AST 1.87 x ULN.
  • Patients with elevated liver transaminases tended to be younger (mean 6.3 yrs compared with 11.0 without elevation). Among those who had followup blood testing available, 15/21 (71.4%) normalized their values over an average of 210 days.
  • For the 6 who had persistent elevation of transaminases, 3 were suspected to have poor adherence, 1 was thought to have a fatty liver, 1 had only mild elevation, and 1 remained unexplained.

My take: This study indicates that elevated transaminases are common in children with celiac, particularly younger children.  As with other studies, the majority resolve on a gluten-free diet.  As there is a recognized association with autoimmune hepatitis, in those with elevated ALT, followup after institution of a gluten free diet seems prudent.

Iceberg Lake, Glacier Natl Park

Iceberg Lake, Glacier Natl Park

Eosinophilic Disease in Children with Intestinal Failure

Posted on by

Last week, this blog posted an abstract regarding the use of “real foods” for short gut kids.  This post looks into whether certain foods may provoke an allergic response.

A large (n=105) single center retrospective study (C Duggan et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 336-39) examined the histology from 208 endoscopic procedures to determine the frequency of eosinophilic disease in children with intestinal failure.

Key findings:

  • 37% of patients had evidence of eosinophilic inflammation in at least one section of the GI tract.
  • Most common sites for eosinophilic disease: colon/rectosigmoid 18/68 (26%), esophagus 17/83 (20%), ileum 9/54 (17%) and duodenum 4/83 (5%)
  • Both peripheral eosinophilia and hematochezia correlated with eosinophilic colitis
  • The authors state that “a strict elemental diet for 3 months before endoscopy was not associated with a decreased frequency of eosinophilic inflammation.”

While a strict elemental diet was not shown to be effective in this study, the limitations of the study design (eg. retrospective, small number on amino acid diet) preclude a definitive answer about the utility of these diets.  Other confounders, including ongoing parenteral nutrition support, also ‘muddy’ the picture.  A prospective study would be able to determine more conclusively how effective elemental diets are at minimizing eosinophilic inflammation and to allow for a more uniform definition of abnormal tissue eosinophilia.

Given the frequency of elemental diets early in life along with prior GI insults, the propensity to eosinophilic disease may have its origins well before this study period.  In healthy children, the LEAP, LEAP-ON, and EAT studies indicated that earlier exposure to allergens reduces the risk of allergic disease.

My take: This study shows a high prevalence of GI eosinophilic inflammation among children with intestinal failure.  Thus, in children with hematochezia and intestinal failure, eosinophilic colitis needs to be considered.

Related blog posts:

Grinnell Glacier, Glacier Natl Park

Glacier Natl Park

Pediatric Experience with Vedolizumab

Posted on by

 

N Singh et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 2121-25.  Abstract:

Background: Though vedolizumab has received regulatory approval for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults, there is increasing off-label use in children.

Aims: To describe the experience with vedolizumab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at 3 tertiary IBD centers and examine predictors of remission.

Methods: A retrospective review identified pediatric IBD patients (age < 18 yrs) receiving vedolizumab. Data on demographics, disease behavior, location, activity, and previous treatments/surgeries were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the weighted pediatric CD activity index or pediatric UC activity index. Primary outcome was week 14 remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index <10 or weighted pediatric CD activity index <12.5. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed to examine associations of clinical characteristics with efficacy.

Results: Fifty-two patients, 58% CD and 42% UC, initiated vedolizumab between June 2014 and August 2015. Median age at vedolizumab initiation was 14.9 (range 7–17) years. Ninety percent had failed ≥1 anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent. Week 14 remission rates for UC and CD were 76% and 42%, respectively (P < 0.05). Eighty percent of anti–TNF-naive patients experienced week 14 remission. At week 22, anti–TNF-naive patients had higher remission rates than TNF-exposed patients (100% versus 45%, P = 0.04). There were no infusion reactions or serious adverse events/infections.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that vedolizumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric IBD patients, with UC patients experiencing earlier and higher rates of remission than CD patients. Anti–TNF-naive patients experienced higher remission rates than those with anti-TNF exposure. Controlled clinical trial data are needed to confirm these observations.

Related Blog Posts:

Glacier Natl Park

Glacier Natl Park

Real Foods in Short Gut Kids

Posted on by

Screen Shot 2016-08-17 at 7.31.27 AM

 Reference from Kipp Ellsworth:

Transition to a Tube Feeding Formula With Real Food Ingredients in Pediatric Patients With Intestinal Failure K Samela et al. NCP: Published online before print August 4, 2016, doi:10.1177/0884533616661011

Abstract: Due to concerns related primarily to allergic response and malabsorption, enteral nutrition therapy has traditionally relied on the use of elemental formulas in children with intestinal failure (IF). Blended food diets via a gastrostomy tube have been reported to improve feeding tolerance in pediatric populations receiving long-term enteral nutrition therapy. Complex macronutrients have been shown to stimulate intestinal adaptation in animal models. We report on our experience in children with IF who had an overall improvement in stool output when transitioned from an elemental formula to a tube feeding formula with real food ingredients (TFRF). Data were collected in a retrospective chart review of children with IF, >1 year of age, who were receiving enteral nutrition via continuous infusion, bolus feeding, or both. Indications for the TFRF trial were diarrhea or inconsistent stooling patterns. Ten children with a mean small bowel length of 48.3 cm were trialed on TFRF. Nine of 10 (90%) children tolerated the transition to 100% TFRF, of which 7 of 9 (78%) had their entire colon in continuity. The average age at successful transition was 29.2 months, and the average length of time to transition to 100% TFRF was 67.3 days. TFRF is well tolerated in children >1 year of age with IF; it also improves their stooling patterns. A commercially available TFRF is a cost-effective and nutritionally adequate means of providing nutrition to this patient population.