Category Archives: Uncategorized

Nuance in Celiac Serology Interpretation

Posted on by

A recent study adds additional nuance to the interpretation of celiac serology (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 398-403).

In this study the authors analyzed anti-TTG IgA levels from 104 consecutive pediatric and adult patients who were not IgA deficient.  The study took place between 2000-2009.  In addition, samples from 537 consecutive controls were available for comparison.

The study determined the likelihood of having celiac disease based on antibody level from four different companies and pre-test clinical factors.  The general population pretest probability was 1%; the pretest probability for their population was 6% if their were gastrointestinal complaints, 14% if weight loss/small stature was present, 11% for patients with anemia/iron deficiency, and 9% for patients with malabsorption.

Key findings:

Even in those with high antibody titers (>10-fold normal), if they were asymptomatic, only 53%-75% had celiac disease (depending on the individual assay).  That is, >10-fold elevation with some commercial assays did not correspond to >10-fold elevation in all of the assays leading to variable probabilities.

In patients with low level elevations (1-3 fold times the cut-off level), the probability of having celiac disease in asymptomatic individuals varied from 1% to 7%.  Thus, mild elevations in TTG IgA are not highly predictive in this asymptomatic population.  However, in those with pretest probability of 14%, the frequency of celiac disease varied among the four assays from 14% to 56%.

Take home message:  Not all assays for celiac disease are comparable.  While very high serology levels (>10 fold) are associated with celiac disease, in asymptomatic patients as few as 53% may have celiac disease.

Related blog links:

Button Battery Algorithm Link

Posted on by

The following website has a useful button battery algorithm (thanks to JL for forwarding this link):

One important point is that in an asymptomatic patient, a button battery in the stomach can be left alone if no coingestion with a magnet.  If gastric battery is > 15 mm and child is less than 6 year,  the recommendation is to check xray in 4 days and remove if still in stomach or whenever there are symptoms.
Of course, a button battery in the esophagus is a true endoscopic emergency. Recognizing that it is a button battery and not a coin can alter the outcome.
Related blog links:
Another link on foreign bodies, 2011: Postgraduate Course Syllabus – Slides, only – NASPGHAN.org (Look for the slides from Marsha Kay)

Fish Oil, IFALD, and Liver Fibrosis

Posted on by

While there has been a lot of enthusiasm for the use of fish oil as a potential breakthrough for intestinal failure-associated liver disease, this has been based largely on the use of surrogate markers of liver disease and based on comparisons with the historical use of conventional intravenous lipids.  The latter problem has been discussed before on this blog (see links below).

A recent study begins to address the issue of surrogate markers by reinforcing the viewpoint that improvements in bilirubin and aminotransferases may not translate into improvement in liver fibrosis or other clinically-meaningful outcomes (JPGN 2013; 56: 364-69).  A previous pediatric study (J Pediatr 2010; 156: 327-31) showed failure of regression of hepatic fibrosis in 2 children receiving FOE therapy.

In this study, the authors sequentially examined 6 children on fish-oil lipid emulsions (FOE) who underwent multiple liver biopsies.  In this cohort, 5 of 6 children had gastroschisis and the mean gestational age was 35 weeks.  Median intestinal (small bowel) length beyond the ligament of Treitz was 26 cm and most children retained about 2/3rds of their colon.  Liver biopsies were obtained at the time of other open abdominal operations (eg. serial transverse enteroplasty, stoma takedown).

Key results:

  • Liver fibrosis persisted in 2 cases, progressed in 3 cases, and regressed in 1 case.
  • Histology and biochemistries indicated improvement in cholestasis and inflammation.
  • One patient has weaned off parenteral nutrition, two patients underwent isolated small bowel transplantation due to recurrent line infections, and three patients receive 25-40% of their calories parenterally.

The biggest limitation of this study besides the small number of enrolled patients was the relatively short  time period that was studied.  Only one patient who was studied had data reported for FOE more than 36 weeks.  The oldest age of any patient at the time of their last biopsy was 131 weeks old.

Take-home points:

  • “There is no direct evidence to support any one [proposed theoretical benefit of FOE] as clinically meaningful as yet.”
  • “Lipid minimization strategies are also effective in reducing cholestasis.”
  • “Many of the biopsies taken right at the time of FOE initiation” showed significant fibrosis which “speaks to how quickly fibrosis can develop.” One child had stage 2 fibrosis at 14 weeks of life.
  • “The biochemical resolution of cholestasis is at best a weak surrogate marker ..for…enteral independence and overall survival.”  “These findings make a strong case for early referral of children with short bowel syndrome to specialized intestinal rehabilitation centers.”

Related blog posts:

True red flags in recurrent abdominal pain

Posted on by

For pediatricians and pediatric gastroenterologists alike, identifying which children need additional workup for recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) is facilitated by recognizing “red flags.”  “Red flags” are clinical features that indicate a higher likelihood of a nonfunctional disorder.  A recent study notes that reports of waking from sleep and joint pains do not distinguish functional from nonfunctional causes of RAP (J Pediatr 2013; 162: 783-7).

This study, performed between 2005 to 2008, had patients presenting to an outpatient pediatric gastroenterology clinic for RAP prospectively complete a detailed questionnaire. Data, though, was extracted retrospectively. In this population (n=606), 85% were Caucasian.  After their evaluation, patients with functional GI diseases (FGID, n=478) were compared with patients confirmed with Crohn’s disease (CD, n=128).  All FGIDs underwent biochemical testing, 41% had upper endoscopy, and 32% underwent colonoscopy.

Additional key findings:

  • Using a tree analysis, the cumulative sensitivity for Crohn’s disease was 54% with the presence of anemia, 78% when blood in stool was added to anemia, and 94% when weight loss was added as well.
  • FGID patients were more likely to report stress and headaches, more likely to have family history of FGID, and less likely to have anemia, hematochezia, or growth issues.
  • FGID patients were more likely to experience vomiting.

The sensitivity and specificity of these symptoms/signs will vary based on the population.  For a general pediatric clinic, it is likely that the sensitivity of these red flags would remain high; the specificity would likely be lower than in a pediatric gastroenterology office due to the increased prevalence of functional diseases in the general pediatric setting.

Related blog posts:

Fluctuating Elastase Levels in Infants with Cystic Fibrosis

Posted on by

A recent study sheds light on the variability of elastase levels in both pancreatic sufficient (PS) and pancreatic insufficient (PI) infants with cystic fibrosis (CF) (J Pediatr 2013; 162: 808-12).

After eliminating infants who did not have elastase values prior to 3.5 months and after 9 months, the study consisted of 61 formula-fed infants who had been diagnosed with CF.  Diagnosis was established based on either a positive sweat test or having two known CF mutations.

Background: Pancreatic elastase is produced by pancreatic acinar cells and is not degraded during intestinal transit.  It can be measured while on pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) because it is specific for human elastase rather than porcine elastase.  In addition, samples are stable at room temperature for weeks.

Among this cohort, 28 (46%) were homozygous for the F508del mutation. Infants were part of a large docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) study; as such, they were randomized to receive either standard formula or formula supplemented with DHA.  Monthly stool samples were collected.

Results:

  • Of 29 infants with initial fecal elastase <50 mcg/g, all had a value <200 mcg/g at one year.  However, 3 had a value >200 mcg/g at some time during the first year of life.
  • Of 36 infants with initial elastase <100 mcg/g, 32 had a level <100 mcg/g at 1 year.  Only one infant in this group had a value consistent with PS and this infant had a mutation associated with increased likelihood of PS.
  • Of 12 infants with initial values between 100-200 mcg/g, more variability was noted in their multiple samples.  This group accounted for the majority of infants who were reclassified from PI initially to PS after one year of life.  Among all 48 with values <200 mcg/g, 4 were considered PS at final evaluation.  However, 13 had values >200 mcg/g at some point.
  • 13 infants were considered PS at initial evaluation with a value >200 mcg/g.  At the study conclusion, 3 had values <180 mcg/g.
  • The majority of fluctuation in elastase values occurred during the first 6 months of life.

These results lead to the following conclusions:

  1. Fluctuations in elastase levels during the first year of life indicate that some infants with PS become PI and vice versa.  Retesting at one year of life is important.
  2. The authors recommend that all CF patients with elastase values below 200 mcg/g receive PERT.
  3. One can extrapolate these findings to other populations.  A single normal or abnormal elastase value may not indicate ultimately whether a patient will remain pancreatic insufficient or sufficient. Though, values <50 mcg/g are more likely to indicate persistent PI status.

The authors do provide some speculation regarding these fluctuations.  They note that “a fecal elastase obtained very early in life might not reflect the child’s true functional pancreatic status.  Intestinal mucosal damage can cause secondary pancreatic insufficiency by decreasing signaling of the pancreas from enteroendocrine cells.”

Related blog links:

References:

  • -JPGN 2007; 44: 219.  Use of elastase in CF.  Pancreas secretes elastase; not degraded & does not cross react with porcine elastase, thus allowing measurement even in individuals on enzyme treatment.  Excellent sensitivity/specificity.
  • -J Pediatr 2004; 145: 322 & 285,  A fecal elastase-1   >100mcg/g has a 99% predictive value for excluding pancreatic insufficiency.
  • -JPGN 2003; 36: 314, 392.  Fecal elastase-1 is marker for exocrince pancreatic function & enteropathy.
  • J Peds 2009; 155: supplement. Clinical practice guidelines for infants/children <2 years of age with CF:
  1. -routinely give salt 1/8-1/4tsp/day
  2. -measure elastase & supplement if PI
  3. -Dose: 2000-5000 units lipase per feed –can go as high as 2500 units/kg (max daily 10000 units/kg/day)
  4. -monitor & supplement ADEK
  5. -consider 7% saline Rx & azithromycin in symptomatic

Websites recommended by GI families

Posted on by

Some useful websites that I recommend have been identified by patient’s or their families. They include the following:

As an unrelated aside, a recent commercial might be of interest to anyone who enjoys a little ‘potty humor:’  Kmart’s ‘Ship My Pants’ Commercial [HD] – YouTube

Related blog post:

Oley: Check it out | gutsandgrowth

Paris Classification of Pediatric Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

A recent study described the phenotypic results of a prospective, web-based registry of new-onset pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in 17 European countries and Israel (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 378-85).

The EUROKIDS Registry included 582 pediatric Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients classified according to Paris classification:

  • 16% with L1 involvement of the terminal ileum only
  • 27% with L2 colonic involvement only (more common in younger children)
  • 53% with L3 involvement of the ileum and colon
  • 4% with L4 isolated upper GI disease.  Upper tract disease can be further subdivided into L4A esophagogastric disease and L4B jejunal/proximal ileal disease.
  • *Upper GI disease can coexist with L1, L2 or L3.  In this study, 34 (6%) had esophageal involvement, 102 (18%) had gastric involvement, and 100 (17%) had duodenal involvement.
  • In this study, 165 of the 507 patients did not undergo small bowel imaging. Of those who did, 64% had small bowel follow-through, 38% had MRI, 6% CT, and 5% video capsule.

Other findings:

  • Perianal disease (e.g.. fistula or abscess) noted in 9% at diagnosis.
  • Granulomas were found in 43% of patients who had biopsies from at least 10 segments of the GI tract
  • 82% of CD patients had nonstricturing, nonpenetrating disease (B1), 12% had stricturing disease (B2) and 5% had penetrating disease (B3).  2% had both stricturing and penetrating disease.
  • Extraintestinal manifestations were seen in 20% of the study population.
  • The authors estimated that the diagnostic yield of upper endoscopy  in the workup for pediatric IBD was  7.5% and for intubation of the ileum/ileoscopy 13%.

Study limitations included a selection bias of centers and pediatric gastroenterologists with a special interest in IBD.  Also, in this registry, older adolescents are underrepresented. In about one-third of the centers, patients older than 15 years are seen primarily by adult gastroenterologists.

Don’t Fix What’s Not Broken

Posted on by

A recent study provides information about elective switching from infliximab (IFX) to adalimumab (ADA) in stable Crohn’s disease (CD) (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 761-66).  As a practical matter, patients and families inquire about switching therapy due to potential convenience and flexibility.  Thus far, there is little data to guide clinicians.  As such, the authors explored this question by designing an open-label study which would allow enrollment of any patients who had stable disease for >6 months (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤ 8) on IFX therapy.

In total, 29 patients with CD were enrolled with an average age of 39.  Twelve had previous resections.

Key results:

  • 21 patients (72%) were able to remain on ADA at 54 weeks.  8 patients discontinued ADA due to disease activity (n=3), side effects (n=4), or other symptoms (n=1).
  • 4 patients were restarted on IFX therapy; 1 required dose intensification.
  • At 54 weeks, 13 patients indicated a preference for IFX due to efficacy (n=9) or safety profile (n=4).  12 patients indicated a preference for ADA.  4 patients had no preference.

The authors state that a recommendation to avoid elective switching.  In their study, 28% were not able to be maintained on ADA therapy, more patients preferred IFX after experiencing both therapies, and switching back to IFX has been associated (in some) with reduced efficacy.  The main concern with an elective switch is the potential loss of response with very limited therapeutic alternatives.

The authors note that their study showed better results with an elective change than a previous study (the SWITCH trial, n=73).  In the SWITCH trial, “elective switch from IFX to ADA in patients with stable CD led to 47% of patients requiring dose intensification or interruption of treatment” in the ADA arm compared with 16% of patients who continued IFX therapy.  (Adalimumab in Crohn’s Disease Controlled by Infliximab)

The better outcomes in the current trial may have been due to selection of patients with milder disease and the more frequent use of concomitant immunosuppression.  In the current trial, 52% had concomitant immunosuppression (48% thiopurine, 4% methotrexate); in contrast, only 17% received concomitant immunosuppression in the SWITCH trial.  Another important difference was that the patients in the current trial received 160-80 loading doses rather than 80-40 induction.  Also, the trial designs were different.  The current trial enrolled patients without randomization; in contrast, the SWITCH trial randomized some patients to continue IFX and others to change to ADA therapy.

Related reference:

  • -Gut 2012; 61: 229-34. SWITCH trial.

Related blog references:

Trouble Sleeping and Gastroesophageal Reflux

Posted on by

Determining whether reflux is causing an infant to have trouble sleeping is quite difficult as a practical matter.  A recent retrospective study adds information to this topic but opens up a can of worms (JPGN 2013; 56: 431-35).

The main problem is that clinical reflux occurs in the majority of infants and that sleeping problems are ubiquitous as well.  This leaves the door open to testing a lot of infants. At the  same time, effective therapeutic options are limited.  So, identifying that reflux is causing trouble sleeping, when feasible, may be akin to getting the license plate of the truck that ran you over.

In this retrospective study (2008-2010) of 24 infants with a median age of 5 months, 18 were receiving acid-suppressing medications prior to evaluation.  Determination that reflux was causally associated with awakenings and arousals was determined with symptom association probabilities (SAP) based on 2-minute measurement intervals with multichannel intraluminal impedance/pH monitoring/simultaneous polysomnography; SAP was considered significant if ≥95%.

Findings: Seven patients had a positive SAP for arousals due to GER (5 exclusively related to non-acid GER).  Nine patients had a positive SAP for awakenings due to GER (4 exclusively related to non-acid GER).

There were several limitations of the study.  Besides the small size, the main limitation of this retrospective study was a selection bias.  Other limitations included a large number of patients with comorbid conditions and the coincident usage of acid-suppressing medications.  19 of 24 patients had one or more significant comorbid conditions: laryngomalacia in 10, prematurity in 5, genetic syndromes in 3, esophageal atresia in 1, and SLE in 1.

Take-home point: This study is in agreement with the general consensus that GER (acid and non-acid) may trigger sleep interruptions in infants. Nevertheless, given the lack of impact on management, only rarely will infants with poor sleep benefit from these investigations.

Related blog entries:

How Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers May Cause Problems for Preemies

Posted on by

Previously, this blog has noted an association between ranitidine usage and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (see below).  Now, another study provides insight into a potential mechanism (JPGN 2013; 56: 397-400).

This study examined the fecal microbiota in 76 premature infants who were enrolled in a case-controlled, cross-sectional study.  25 infants receiving H2-blockers were compared with 51 matched controls.

Results: microbial diversity was lower, relative abundance of Proteobacteria was increased, and Firmicutes was decreased in the stools of infants receiving H2-blockers.

While this study did not specifically examine the effect of H-2 blockers on NEC (no infants in this study had NEC), there are multiple reasons why the findings should be a cause for concern.

  • Gastric acidity acts as a natural defense against bacterial growth and H-2 blockers (as well as proton pump inhibitors) inhibit this defense
  • Previous studies have shown an association between NEC and with diminished microbial diversity/increased Proteobacteria.  Proteobacteria include well-known pathogens like Klebsiella, Shigella, Escherichia coli, and Citrobacter.

Related blog entries: