Category Archives: Uncategorized

Serology in IBD

Posted on by

Serological antibodies against a number of antigens have shown some utility in differentiating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from non-IBD and in distinguishing Crohn’s disease (CD) from ulcerative colitis (UC).  A recent article evaluated 204 articles in a systematic review of these serological markers (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 1340-55).

The study has several useful tables and a long list of references.  In its Table 1, 10 serologies are listed with a range for prevalence in CD, UC, alternative GI conditions, and in healthy population.  Table 2 summarizes the data in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for these antibodies in determining IBD from non-IBD.

With regard to specific antibodies, the review highlights 10 antibodies:

1. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA).  Autoantibody directed against a constituent of neutrophil granules.  With IBD (especially UC), an atypical perinuclear (pANCA) staining pattern with indirect immunofluorescence and DNase-sensitive make this pattern different from ANCA due to vasculitis.

2-7. Anti-glycan antibodies –directed against cell wall microbes and reflect interaction between the immune system and glycosylated cell wall components of microbiota.

2. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA IgA and IgG) –antibodies directed against yeast cell wall.  While ASCA antibodies are commonly found in CD patients, 20-25% (or higher in some studies) of healthy relatives will test positive for these antibodies as well.  Approximately 6% of relatives of UC patients will be ASCA-positive.

3. Anti-laminaribioside carbohydrate IgG antibodies (ALCA) –antibodies directed against laminaribioside

4. Anti-chitobioside carbohydrate IgA antibodies (ACCA) –antibodies directed against chitobioside

5. Anti-mannobioside carbohydrate IgG antibodies (AMCA) –antibodies directed against mannobioside

6. Anti-L –antibodies directed against laminarin (large polysaccharide)

7. Anti-C –antibodies directed against chitin (large polysaccharide)

8. Anti-OmpC.  OmpC is a transport protein of E coli

9. Anti-I2.  I2 is a Pseudomonas-associated antigen

10. Anti-CBir1.  CBir1 is a bacterial flagellin antigen

Conclusions:

  • Serology has only limited value for the initial diagnosis of IBD.
  • Serology has ‘better value’ in differentiating CD from UC, though there is substantial variability in serologic responses in both diseases.  Probably, serology is most useful in unclassified IBD (IBD-U) in preoperative setting; serology may help predict risk of developing complications among patients undergoing pouch surgery.
  • Serology is useful in predicting a complicated disease course. The presence and magnitude of these antibodies are strong predictors of disease progression.

Additional references:

  • Pediatrics. 2010 Jun ;125 (6):1230-6.  Shortcomings of the inflammatory bowel disease Serology 7 panel. 
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 1105. Increased immune reactivity/markers associated with aggressive disease.
  • -IBD 2006; 12:1122. Expression of I2 antibodies (against a bacterial antigen of psedomonas fluorescens) was highly associated with clinical response to diversion. 15/16 with I2-pos had clinical response; 2/11 I2-neg had clinical response.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: S4 abstract 0010. Practical experience with IBD serology (n=90) much less accurate than reported by Prometheus: overall accuracy of 63% (vs 92%), 66% sensitivity (vs 93%), 59% specificity (vs 95%), 75% PPV (vs 96%), and 49% NPV (vs 90%). In this population, 34% of known IBD were incorrectly predicted. Of 32 who did not have any evidence of IBD after clinical investigation, 40% (13) were seropositive.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 1105. Increased immune reactivity/markers associated with aggressive disease.
  • -IBD 2008; 14; 129. Serologic markers not very useful clinically.
  • -Pediatrics 2007; 119: e193. IBD serology performed poorly in comparison to combination of Hgb/ESR with regard to sensitivity (60% vs. 83%), specificity (92% vs. 96%), positive predictive value (60% vs. 79%) for IBD in children, n=227. Also one third of all positive serology in patients w/o IBD. The positive predictive value in patients w/o rectal bleeding was 35% vs 60% for routine tests.
  • -Gastroenterol 2006; 131: 366. antibodies against laminaribioside, chitobioside, and mannan have predictive value in detecting Crohn’s disease.
  • -Gastroenterol 2006; 130: 1078. Unaffected relatives positive for either OmpC or ASCA in 20% in large cohor (n=619 unaffected relatives. OmpC present in up to 44% of CD pts, up to 24% of UC pts, and 6% of controls.

An unexpected finding with gastroschisis management

Posted on by

A presumption that paralysis in infants with gastroschisis leads to quicker resolution in silo-assisted closure is not correct (J Pediatr 2012; 161: 125-8).  This presumption had been based on the idea that abdominal muscular relaxation with paralysis would facilitate visceral reduction.

This retrospective Canadian study examined 186 infants with gastroschisis, between 2005-2009.  Standardized data for this study was collected prospectively from 16 perinatal centers in Canada. Findings:

  • 79 had paralysis and 88 did not.  These groups were nearly identical in birth weight, gestational age, and presence of bowel atresia.
  • Paralyzed infants took longer to achieve closure, 8 days versus 5 days.  In addition, the paralyzed group had longer ventilation period, 12 days versus 7 days.
  • These findings persisted after regression analysis/adjusting for other variables.  The analysis included examination of illness severity scores (SNAP-II); it was not simply the sicker infants receiving paralysis.
Besides debunking a false premise with gastroschisis management, this study highlights the necessity of collecting data so that our presumptions can be challenged.

Additional references:

  • -J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 801-7.  Outcomes/variation in diaphragmatic hernia and gastroschisis from Canadian Pediatric Surgery network.
  • -J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 30-4.  Outcomes in 100 cases of gastroschisis.

What’s the best medical therapy for Clostridium difficile?

Posted on by

More data on the superiority of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in adult patients has been published (Lancet 2012; 12: 281-9).  While this study was a ‘double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial,’ the data tilt in favor of fidaxomicin.  This study enrolled 535 patients from 45 sites in Europe and 41 sites in U.S.

On an intention-to-treat basis, a clinical cure was noted in 88% of fidaxomicin group (200 mg BID x 10 days) and 86% of vancomycin group (125 mg QID x 10 days).  Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhea and no need for further treatment.  The big difference was in recurrence risk:  13% of patients receiving fidaxomicin compared with 27% of patients receiving vancomycin.  Recurrence was defined as development of three unformed bowel movements in 24 h, a positive stool toxin, and need for retreatment within 30 days of treatment completion.  A sustained response (=”global cure”) was noted in 77% with fidaxomicin compared with 63% of vancomycin group.

Both groups of patients had similar variables: severity of illness, frequency of B1/027 strains, geographic distribution, concomitant antibiotics, previous C difficile infection, age, and inpatient status.  In the group with concomitant antibiotics, fidaxomicin outperformed vancomycin with respect to cure rate: 90% versus 73%.  Adverse reactions were similar as well (Table 7).

To underscore the severity of C difficile in this population, there was a significant mortality rate in both groups.  8% of patients receiving at least one dose of fidaxomicin died compared with 7% of vancomycin-treated patients.

Why does fidaxomicin have a lower recurrence rate?  Probably due to a more narrow antibiotic spectrum and minimal effect on commensal gut flora.  Fidaxomicin also has roughly eight times more potency in vitro than vancomycin against clinical isolates of C difficile.

Previous related blog entries/reference:

Colonoscopy, Split-dosing bowel preps, and Ottawa scores

Posted on by

Adequate bowel cleansing improves the results of colonoscopy.  Since colonoscopy is a big part of gastroenterology/pediatric gastroenterology, a lot has been written comparing bowel preparations.  A recent study has examined a split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) preparation (Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 583-90).

This prospective study from a single center in South Korea examined the effectiveness of a split-dose regimen in 366 patients (18 -65 years).  An interval of 3 to 5 hours between the completion of the last dose of the preparation and the start of the colonoscopy had the highest scores for bowel cleansing.  The authors used the “Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale” for assessing a quality score.  Favorable odds ratios were noted with optimal preparation interval (OR 1.85), amount of PEG ingested (OR 4.34), and adherence with diet instructions (OR 2.22).

Instructions for preparation in this study:

  • 1. Low-fiber diet for 3 days prior
  • 2. Regular diet for breakfast & lunch day prior; soft diet for dinner, then only clear liquids
  • 3. Two liters of PEG on day prior and then two liters early in morning (5-7 am) on day of procedure –NPO for at least two hours prior to procedure.  While taking PEG, patients were instructed to consume 250 mL every 10 minutes.

Ottawa Scale –score right, mid, and left colon:

  • 0    no liquid
  • 1    minimal liquid –no suctioning required
  • 2    suctioning required to see mucosa
  • 3    wash and suctioning needed
  • 4    solid stool, not washable
  • Plus 0-2 points for overall quantity of fluid.
  • Max score 14 points

In this study, a prolonged interval (> 7 hours) between prep and colonoscopy had increasingly higher scores.  Score for 3-4 hours was 4.25; score for 7-8 hours was 5.20 and score for > 8 hours was 5.92.

As alluded to above, individuals who consumed adequate volume of preparation, had good bowel cleansing.  99% of patients who took at least 75% of PEG (> 3 liters) had a satisfactory preparation.  And, 95% of patients who took less than 75% of PEG had an unsatisfactory preparation.  Compliance with diet instruction was associated with a satisfactory prep in 89% and poor compliance was associated with a poor prep in 81%.

While this study identified these risk factors, it is telling that even in a research study, 141 patients had an unsatisfactory preparation (Ottawa scale 6-14); 225 had a satisfactory preparation (Ottawa scale 0-5).

Additional references –bowel preparations:

  • -JPGN 2011; 53: 71. 2 day prep: Miralax 2 gm/kg, bisacodyl 5mg. n=111.
  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 254. Review of bowel preparations
  • -Gastroenterol 2006; 130: 2240. Oral phospho fleets associated with alarming risk of nephropathy. 21 additional cases identified
  • -J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 3389-3396
  • -NEJM 2003; 349: 1006. acute phosphate nephropathy after oral phospho fleets in a 71yo woman
Additional references –colonoscopy screening:
  • -Gastroenterol 2010; 138: 73, 27 (ed). Overutilization of colon screening in low risk situations and underutilization in high risk situations in clinical practice.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2009; 7: 1217.  Fewer polyps detected as day progresses at a VA hospital n=477 pts. 27% decline in polyp detection.
  • -NEJM 2009; 361: 1179. Review of screening for colorectal cancer.
  • -Gastroenterol 2009; 137: 792. Use of CT colonography -current appraisal.
  • -Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 1-8. Says endoscopists miss most cancers on right side & colonosopy reduces cancer by ~60% primarily due to left-sided cancers.  Most, 73%, of colonoscopies not done by GI/colorectal surgery in this study.
  • -Gastroenterol 2008; 134: 1570. Update recommendations from ACS, ACR, US Multi-society task force.
  • -Gastroenterol 2008; 134: 1311. Screening in 40-49 detects similar # of adenomas as in older groups (>50) but fewer advanced Ca.

Other references/links:

1. “Take it easy, Doc, you’re boldly going where no man has gone before.”
2. “Find Amelia Earhart yet?”
3. “Can you hear me NOW?”
4. “Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?”
5. “You know, in Arkansas, we’re now legally married.”
6. “Any sign of the trapped miners, Chief?”
7. “You put your left hand in, you take your left hand out. You do the
Hokey Pokey….”
8. “Hey! Now I know how a Muppet feels!”
9. “If your hand doesn’t fit, you must acquit!”
10. “Hey, Doc, let me know if you find my dignity.” and
11. “Could you write me a note for my wife, saying that my head is not, in fact, up there?”

Avoid ranitidine (acid suppression) in neonates

Posted on by

More evidence that ranitidine may contribute to necrotizing enterocolitis and fatal outcomes has been published (Pediatrics 2012; 129: e40-45).

In this study (which was reviewed in The Journal of Pediatrics 2012; 161: 168-69), four neonatal intensive care units in Italy performed a multicenter prospective observational study of very low birth weight (VLBW) inants.  There were 274 neonates with gestational ages ranging from 24-32 weeks and birth weights ranging from 401-1500 grams.  The patients receiving ranitidine were similar to the unexposed group in terms of risk factors for infection/NEC, birth weight, gestational age, sex, APGAR scores, PDA, intubation duration, and central vascular access duration.

  • 34 of 91 (37%) exposed to ranitidine developed infections compared with 9.8% of the group not exposed to ranitidine (OR 5.5)
  • Risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was 6.6-fold higher among ranitidine-treated neonates
  • Mortality was 9.9% for ranitidine-treated patients compared with 1.6% of control patients
Since gastric acid acts as a defense against ingested pathogens, theoretically inhibition of acid production allows proliferation of these pathogens with subsequent infections and development of necrotizing enterocolitis.  These potential risks and the general lack of benefit of acid suppression in neonates should help guide clinician decision-making.
Another concern with ranitidine has been among acute appendicitis patients (see references below) where it has been associated with an increased likelihood of developing an abscess.

Additional references/previous related blog entries:

Helicobacter pylori –useful advice

Posted on by

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infections remain an important cause of gastritis, ulcers, and adenocarcinoma of the stomach.  One new approach in treatment has been the use of sequential therapy.  More data is now available on the effectiveness of this approach and choice of antibiotics (Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 55-61 & editorial 10-12).

In the study, a 10-day sequential regimen (SR) was compared with a 5-day concomitant regimen (CR).

  • CR group (n=90): esomeprazole 40 mg BID, amoxicillin 1 g BID, levofloxacin 500 mg BID, tinidazole 500 mg BID.  Eradication rate (intention-to-treat): 92%
  • SR group (n-90): esomeprazole 40 mg BID, amoxicillin 1 g BID for 5 days, then esomeprazole 40 mg BID, levofloxacin 500 mg BID, tinidazole 500 mg BID for 5 days. Eradication rate (intention-to-treat): 93%
  • Both groups had good results in part due to low resistance rates

Useful advice on this study from the editorial:

  • ‘We prefer concomitant therapy because it is not complex and it may retain its effectiveness at a slightly higher level of resistance compared with sequential therapy.”  Authors prefer 4-drug non-bismuth-containing concomitant treatment.
  • With bismuth therapy (eg. bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline-PPI), authors prefer a 14 day course.  10-day treatment may be effective when metronidazole resistance is considered unlikely.
  • “Clarithromycin should be abandoned as an empiric regimen” due to resistance in U.S.
  • Fluoroquinolone resistance is increasing rapidly and “prior use virtually ensures resistance.”  Suggested use of fluoroquinolone therapy among adults would be as a rescue therapy (failed 2 different therapies), using dosing regimen as noted in cited study, and in patient without history of prior fluoroquinolone use (&/or proof on susceptibility testing)
What about treatment in kids?
In pediatrics, guidelines for treatment have been recently updated (JPGN 2011; 53: 230-43). (Benjamin Gold, MD -one of my partners is one of the authors and was the lead author of the first guidelines published in 2000.)  NASPGHAN guidelines. PDF of powerpoint slides: H. pylori infection in children: ESPGHAN/ NASPGHAN guidelines … & pdf of text: Evidence-based guidelines from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN for …
Recommendations for first line treatment are a triple-based therapy with PPI and two antibiotics (eg. amoxicillin and metronidazole).  Alternatives, include bismuth plus two antibiotics, or sequential therapy.  Use of clarithromycin is recommended only after susceptibility testing.

Additional references:

  • -Gut 2010; 59: 1143-53.  Changing treatment recommendations for Helicobacter pylori in the face of resistance.
  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2007;  102: 1808-1825. American College of Gastroenterology Guideline on the Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection.  Doxycycline can be used in place of tetracycline
  • -Gastroenterol 2007; 133: 985. Review. Good article for resistant infections.
  • -Gastroenterol 2005; 129:1414-19.  Sequential Rx (amox + PPI x 5 days, then biaxin, tinidazole, PPI for 5 days) had 97% success.

Clues about constipation and more than 2.5 million views

Posted on by

A recent article identifies some important factors contributing to constipation in Hong Kong children (JPGN 2012; 55: 56-61).

Using a territory-wide questionnaire in 2318, Hong Kong Chinese elementary school students, the authors identified several factors associated with constipation which was present in 12.2% of this cohort:

  • Refusal to pass bowel movements at school (OR 1.97).  In Hong Kong, students spend >8 hours per day at school.
  • Having dinner with one/both parents <50% of time (OR 1.52).  May indicate less time with parents and less parental prompting.
  • Nighttime sleep <7 hours (OR 1.87).  This is postulated to be related to increased homework and more stress which may affect gut motility.
  • Frequent fast food consumption (OR 1.14).  This may be associated with less fiber intake.

On a tangential note, one of my sons informed me of “bad lip reading” on YouTube; some of these clips are really funny.  Since there was one relevant to the subject at hand, with over 2.5 million views, I’ve provided a link:

“Everybody Poops” – a bad lip reading of the Black Eyed Peas …

Additional blog entries related to constipation:

Stimulants for constipation

Diagnostic tests hardly ever help patients poop

It’s worth the cost

Think twice about checking thyroid

Looking better or feeling better in EoE?

Posted on by

When seeing a new diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), I often try to explain that there are two potential goals of treatment: clinical remission (improvement in symptoms) and histologic remission (improvement in appearance of esophagus with microscope).  Unfortunately, these two outcomes are not always synchronous; more proof of this comes from a recent study (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 742-49, 750-52 [editorial]).

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of fluticasone in adult patients with a new diagnosis of EoE, 19 patients were treated with fluticasone (880 μg BID) and 15 patients were treated with placebo inhaler –for six weeks.  Initially, 21 patients were assigned to each group; 2 dropped out of treatment group and 6 dropped out of placebo group before completion of followup EGD.   The average age in the treatment group was 37 years versus 38 years in the placebo group.  A complete histologic response was defined as >90% reduction in mean eosinophil count; this occurred in 62% of fluticasone patients and in none of the placebo group, based on an intention-to-treat analysis.  Another measure of eosinophil activity, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), was reduced by 81% on intracellular staining in the treatment group compared with 8% in the placebo group.  Figures 1 through 3 show this staining –it’s pretty cool!

Yet, the clinical response was not statistically different.  Dysphagia was reduced by 57% in the treated subjects compared to 33% in the placebo subjects in an intention-to-treat analysis.  Results were improved modestly in those who actually were treated: 63% (12 of 19) compared to 47% of placebo patients.  A complete response for dysphagia was noted in 42.9% of fluticasone group compared with 28.6% of control group based on an intention-to-treat analysis.  A fairly high rate of candidiasis was noted in treated patients 26%;  no placebo patients developed candida.

Another interesting finding was that among those who continued PPIs for heartburn symptoms the response to fluticasone was not improved.  40% of PPI users had a complete histologic response compared with 79% of non-PPI users.

So what are the reasons for the discrepancy between clinical and histologic response?

  • Established strictures and small-caliber esophagus may require dilation rather than medicines to relieve dysphagia
  • Esophageal fibrosis and subsequent esophageal compliance may not respond to topical therapy or take a lot longer to improve
  • Secondary candidiasis may reduce clinical response –though in this study, 5 of 6 patients with candida did in fact have symptom resolution
  • Compensatory behaviors may improve clinical symptoms –chewing food, cutting up food better, drinking more fluids, and avoiding some foods.  This may make it harder to detect important differences.

Patient information link: (Eosinophilic esophagitis – CCDHC Home)

Related posts:

Look of improvement on an EoE diet

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

The undiscovered country

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

Regurgitation harder to treat than heartburn, especially for NERDs

Posted on by

While all pediatric gastroenterologists know that the title of this blog entry is right, it is helpful to have data.

A recent study (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 612-19) used a reflux questionnaire to evaluate responsiveness of regurgitation from 2 randomized controlled trials.  The trials compared a newer acid blocker (AZD0865 dosed at 25-75 mg/day)) to esomeprazole (20-40 mg/day).  Patients had either non-erosive reflux disease (NERD , n=1460),  or reflux esophagitis, (RE, n=1314).  Inclusion criteria included the presence of substernal burning for ≥4 days/week.

Regurgitation-taste (RT), defined as an “acid taste in the mouth,” or regurgitation-movement (RM), defined as an “unpleasant movement of material upwards from the stomach” were analyzed.  Among NERD patients, either or both symptoms were present in 53% at baseline compared with 54% among the RE group.  In both NERD and RE patients, the presence of these regurgitation symptoms was associated with a poorer response to therapy.

  • Complete response of NERD patients with regurgitation symptoms:  RT 34%, RM 26%; in comparison to heartburn response of NERD patients which was 49%
  • Complete response of RE patients with regurgitation symptoms:  RT 44%, RM 33%; in comparison to heartburn response of NERD patients which was 55%

Additional references/blog entries:

Diet or drugs for cyclic vomiting syndrome

Posted on by

Dietary modifications are frequently recommended for migraines.  Given the overlapping features between migraines and cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), dietary treatments for CVS have aimed at eliminating trigger foods.  Investigators from the UK describe a single center cohort of 21 children (2-16 years) were placed on a low-amine diet with instruction from a dietician (JPGN 2012; 54: 698-99).  16 (76%) of the children had a strong family history of migraines.  The diet was implemented for a ‘minimum of 6 to 8 weeks.’ 13 had a complete resolution of vomiting and 18 (86%) had at least a partial response.

Specific foods that were avoided included cheese, chocolate, citrus fruits, pork, peas, broad beans, shellfish, yeast extract, beef extract, gravies, caffeine, and alcohol.

This small study does not prove that a low-amine diet is effective.  In fact, most of the information on a low-amine diet is derived from alternative medicine sources (eg .  Low Amine Diet | www.integrative-medicine.com.au).  Nevertheless, it is likely that a subset of patients will benefit from avoidance of trigger foods.  How to identify potential culprits is unclear.

NASPGHAN Guidelines for CVS (JPGN 2008; 47: 379):

  • Diagnostic criteria: (90% will have idiopathic CVS)

1. at least 5 attacks or 3 over 6-month interval
2. episodic, last 1 hour to 10 days & at least a week apart
3. stereotypical pattern for individual patient
4. vomiting >4 times/hr for at least 1 hour
5. healthy in between & no other attributable problem

  • PROPHYLACTIC Measures:

Avoid triggers:
fasting, excessive excitement (eg. downplay big events), sleep deprivation
foods that trigger symptoms (?chocolate, cheese, caffeine, MSG)
excessive fatigue

Assure adequate carbohydrates
-provide sugar-containing drinks & extra snacks before exertion & bedtime

  • PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT:

Less than 5 years:
1. cyproheptadine (0.25-0.5mg/kg/day divided bid)
2. propranolol 0.25-1/kg/day –often 10mg bid or tid
contraindications: asthma, diabetes, heart disease, depression
keep resting heart rate >60

5 years & older
1. amitriptyline (or nortriptyline -liquid formulation) start at 0.25mg/kg qhs and increase ’til 1mg/kg/dose
check EKG before and 10 days after peak dose
2. propranolol 0.25-1/kg/day –often 10 mg bid or tid
contraindications: asthma, diabetes, heart disease, depression
keep resting heart rate >60

Alternative prophylactic treatments:
1. phenobarbital 2mg/kg qhs
2. anticonvulsants: topiramate, valproid acid, gabapentin, levetiracetam -?consult neurology

Supplements:
L-carnitne 50-100mg/kg/day divided bid (max 1gm tid)
Co-enzyme Q10 10mg/kg/day divided bid (max 100mg tid)

  • SUPPORTIVE/ABORTIVE CARE

Fluids: D10NS w KCL @ 1.5 maintenance (or possibly D10 0.45NS -some children prone to hyponatremia); add TPN if no enteral intake for 3-5 days
Antiemetics:
1. ondansetron 0.3-0.4mg/kg/dose q4hours (max 20mg); alternative granisetron
Sedatives:
Benadryl 1mg/kg/dose q6hours
Ativan 0.05-0.1mg/kg/dose q6hours
Thorazine (chlorpromazine) 0.5-1mg/kg/dose q6hrs (with benadryl)
Analgesics:
Toradol 0.4-1mg/kg/dose q6hrs (max 30mg)
Narcotics (morphine)

May need to treat hyponatremia, hypertension, hematemesis (H2RAs & PPIs)

Also, can try Sumatriptan 20mg intranasally at onset of episode as potential abortive measure or other triptan

  • TYPICAL EVALUATION:

1. CMP, Amylase/lipase, UGI on all patients
2. If pain/hematemesis, check U/S of abd/pelvis, and EGD
3. If abnormal neuro features: (motor asymmetry, gait abnormality, severe altered mental status)
ammonia
lactate, serum amino acids, urine organic acids, plasma carnitine/acylcarnitine profiles, urine ketones
MRI brain
4. If precipitated by fasting/high protein meals, or intercurrent illness= neuro w/u w/o brain MRI.

  • ALARM symptoms:

1. pain & bilious emesis
2. attacks precipitated by intercurrent illness, fasting or high protein meals
3. progressive/worsening/chronic pattern
4. abnormalities on neuro exam

**Note to blog readers –I recommend that all drug dosing be reviewed for individual patients.  The recommended doses are based on my reading of the referenced material & transcription errors are possible.

Additional references:

  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 44. Use of zonisamide or levetiracetam (used at Sz dosing in 20 adults); 75% response & 20% remission.
  • -J Pediatr 2002; 141: 724. Suggests initial treatment along with UGI as most cost-effective strategy. Extensive w/u in those with persistent sx.
  • -Am J Gastro 1999; 94: 2855. response to TCAs.
  • -J Pediatr 1999; 134: 567. 82% migraine-assoc or FHx. Better response to Rx
  • NASPGHAN 2003:  postgraduate course (B Li):80% response to elavil if fhx migraines.
    “There are no controlled randomized, double-blinded trials, only open label ones. In these studies, beta-blockade (Pfau Pediatrics 97:364,1996), cyproheptadine (Anderson Pediatrics 100:977, 1997), amitriptyline (Anderson), phenobarbital (Gokhale JPGN 25:64, 1997) and erythromycin (Vanderhoof JPGN 17:387, 1993) all have approximately 70% efficacy as prophylactic agents. In Dave Fleisher’s work, he has demonstrated a 70% effect of consultation alone without pharmacologic therapy. In other words, there appears to be a striking placebo effect in this disorder that should temper any interpretation of results. In addition, I believe CVS is a heterogeneous disorder that has multiple etiologies that could allow it to respond to multiple classes of agents.”

DDx:
Infection, IBD, addison’s, diabetes, renal dysfxn, metabolic errors/urea cycle d/o, FAO d/o, porphyria, CDG (glycosylation), pregnancy, ipecac/munchausen, PUDz, Giardia, pancreatitis, UPJ, malrotation/duplication, increased ICP/CNS Dz, Migraine-equivalent

Workup:

1. CBC, ESR, amylase, ammonia,UA, stool heme, chem 20, HCG
2. UGI
3. giardia ag, abd U/S & DPTA, EGD, urine organic acids, plasma amino acids, carnitine, lactate, pyruvate, sinus films, head CT/MRI, toxicology, delta-aminolevulic acid/ porphobilinogen (urine), beta-HCG, serum transferrin isoelectric focusing