Category Archives: inflammatory bowel disease

Pediatric Experience with Vedolizumab

Posted on by

 

N Singh et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 2121-25.  Abstract:

Background: Though vedolizumab has received regulatory approval for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults, there is increasing off-label use in children.

Aims: To describe the experience with vedolizumab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at 3 tertiary IBD centers and examine predictors of remission.

Methods: A retrospective review identified pediatric IBD patients (age < 18 yrs) receiving vedolizumab. Data on demographics, disease behavior, location, activity, and previous treatments/surgeries were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the weighted pediatric CD activity index or pediatric UC activity index. Primary outcome was week 14 remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index <10 or weighted pediatric CD activity index <12.5. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed to examine associations of clinical characteristics with efficacy.

Results: Fifty-two patients, 58% CD and 42% UC, initiated vedolizumab between June 2014 and August 2015. Median age at vedolizumab initiation was 14.9 (range 7–17) years. Ninety percent had failed ≥1 anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent. Week 14 remission rates for UC and CD were 76% and 42%, respectively (P < 0.05). Eighty percent of anti–TNF-naive patients experienced week 14 remission. At week 22, anti–TNF-naive patients had higher remission rates than TNF-exposed patients (100% versus 45%, P = 0.04). There were no infusion reactions or serious adverse events/infections.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that vedolizumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric IBD patients, with UC patients experiencing earlier and higher rates of remission than CD patients. Anti–TNF-naive patients experienced higher remission rates than those with anti-TNF exposure. Controlled clinical trial data are needed to confirm these observations.

Related Blog Posts:

Glacier Natl Park

Glacier Natl Park

How helpful are serologies in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease?

Posted on by

For quite some time, I have been unimpressed with the utility of serologies in distinguishing Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative Colitis.  While some of these tests claim some usefulness, when one excludes the obvious cases of Crohn’s disease (eg. perianal disease, fistulizing disease, small bowel disease), these claims seem quite dubious  Another study backs up my interpretation: L Birimberg-Schwartz et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1908-14

This longitudinal report from the IBD Porto Group examined a multicenter retrospective cohort of 406 children with isolated colonic disease.  These children had a mean age of 10.5 years.  117 had Crohn’s colitis, 143 had ulcerative colitis, and 146 had IBD-unclassified (IBDU).

Key findings:

  • Among those with IBDU, the most prevalent serologic profile was pANCA neg/ASCA neg (41%).  34% had pANCA pos/ASCA neg, and 17% and pANCA neg/ASCA pos.
  • ANCA+: present in 43% of patients with IBDU, 64% of patients with UC, and 30% of patients with Crohn’s.
  • ASCA+ (IgA or IgG): present in 26% of  patients with IBDU, 6% of patients with UC, and 40% of patients with Crohn’s.
  • pANCA neg/ASCA pos did help differentiate Crohn’s colitis versus IBDU with 83% specificity, 96% positive predictive value; however the sensitivity was only 33% and the negative predictive value was only 13%.
  • pANCA neg/ASCA pos also differentiated Crohn’s colitis compared with ulcerative colitis with 97% specificity, and 90% positive predictive value however the sensitivity was only 33% and the negative predictive value was only 40%.
  • pANCA pos/ASCA neg did NOT differentiate well.  For IBDU versus UC, the specificity was 66%, the positive predictive value was 94%; the sensitivity was 65% and the negative predictive value was 38%.

In short, these tests generally have poor sensitivity.  If ASCA antibodies are present, which occurred in only 23%, the serology performs better but still usually not well-enough to help with big decisions. The presence of positive serology was associated with an increased likelihood of more severe disease.

Before you order IBD serology, you may want to consider whether you might use the money for this costly test in a better way.

My take (borrowed from authors): “Serology cannot routinely be recommended for differentiating between IBDU versus CC or UC as a sole diagnostic criterion given its low diagnostic utility.”

Related blog posts:

Trail to Iceberg Lake, Glacier Natl Park

Trail to Iceberg Lake, Glacier Natl Park

Biologic Exposure Prenatally and Perinatally

Posted on by

The widespread use of anti-TNF therapy for inflammatory bowel disease has improved clinical outcomes including fewer surgeries, hospitalizations, and complications.  One consequence of this usage has been the exposure of infants to biologics due to their usage by their mothers during pregnancy.  A recent study (M Julsgaard et al. Gastroenterol 2016; 151: 110-19) explores this topic further.

In this study, the authors prospectively followed 80 pregnant women: 36 received adalimumab & 44 infliximab. In addition, 39 received concomitant thiopurine therapy.

Key findings:

  • The time from last exposure to anti-TNF agent correlated inversely with the concentration of these drugs in the umbilical cord and in mothers at the time of birth.
  • Median ratio for infant: mother drug concentration at birth was 1.21 for adalimumab and 1.97 for infliximab.
  • Mean time for drug clearance: 4.0 months for adalimumab and 7.3 months for infliximab. Drugs were not detected after 9 months of life for adalimumab and after 12 months of life for infliximab.
  • No increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes were identified; preterm birth was low (n=3 or 3.8%). 48% of women experienced a disease relapse during pregnancy.
  • In this small study, the relative risk for infection was 2.7 in infants exposed to combination therapy.  Benign courses of viral infections were noted in 16 (20%) of the entire cohort and of bacterial infections in 4 (5%).

The authors recommend avoidance of live virus vaccines in biologically-exposed infants for up to 1 year unless drug clearance has been documented. Currently, this would affect only rotavirus vaccination.

My take (borrowed from editorial pgs 25-26): “For now, the sum of evidence seems to support continued use of anti-TNF therapy in pregnancy when clinically indicated and, despite measureable levels in offspring, there does not seem to be a significant clinical consequence.”

Related study: “Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among women with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-basd study from England” Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1621-30. The authors identified 1969 pregnancies from a total of 364,363 singleton pregnancies.  Women with Crohn’s had increased preterm births with an Odd ratio of 1.42, babies with low birth weight (OR 1.39); women with ulcerative colitis had only a small increase risk in preterm birth (absolute risk <2.7%).

Related blog posts:

Art at Big Creek Greenway, Alpharetta

Art at Big Creek Greenway, Alpharetta

Lower Fiber Intake May Increase Risk of Crohn’s Flare

Posted on by

According to a recent study, lower fiber intake was associated with an increased risk of a flare of Crohn’s disease over a 6-month period (CS Brotherton et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 1130-36).

This study examined dietary surveys from 1619 participants (Crohn’s disease in 1130, Ulcerative colitis in 489).  All participants were considered to be in remission at baseline. The key endpoint was disease flare at 6 months which was defined as a disease activity index score exceeding remission cutoff values.

Key finding: “Compared with those in the lowest quartile of fiber consumption, participants with Crohn’s disease in the highest quartile were less likely to have a flare” (adjusted odds ratio 0.58). There was no significant association with ulcerative colitis.

The associated editorial (1137-39) notes that “among 12 RCTs that enrolled patients with Crohn’s disease, fiber did not influence disease activity in studies of induction (flare to remission) or maintenance (remission to flare)…most RCTs had small sample size.”

My take (borrowed from editorial): “A high fiber diet is likely safe in patients with IBD [in the absence of a known stricture/obstructive symptoms] and may impart a weak benefit.”  Overall, dietary approaches are gaining traction and careful evaluation of competing claims will likely be of great benefit.

Related blog posts:

This is where I was completely soaked. Grinnell Trail

This is where (moments later) I was completely soaked. Grinnell Trail

More on Ustekinumab, plus Allopurinol Study

Posted on by

More data emerging that indicates that subcutaneous ustekinumab will be useful for refractory Crohn’s disease: S Khorrami et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1662-69.

  • This open-label cohort of 116 patients identified a clinical response (Harvey-Bradshaw Index) in 97 (84%) after loading dose, and clinical benefit in 58% at 12 months of followup.
  • Perianal disease improved in 11 of 18 (61%).
  • This cohort had refractory disease with almost 90% had failed or were intolerant to 2 or more anti-TNFs.

Another strategy for managing inflammatory bowel disease is using allopurinol which can help low-dose azathioprine achieve therapeutic levels.  In the largest cohort to date, Pavlidis et al (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1639-46) showed that at the end of followup (median 19 months after treatment initiation) 113/164 (69%) of patients with Crohn’s disease and 83/136 (61%) with ulcerative/unclassified colitis had a clinical response; 52% and 54% respectively were in remission. The azathioprine dose was 25% of weight-based monotherapy dose adjusted based on TPMT status; thus, for normal/high TPMT activity, azathioprine was dosed at 0.5 mg/kg whereas for heterozygous/intermediate activity, azathioprine was dosed at 0.25 mg/kg.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Vickery Creek, Sandy Springs

Vickery Creek, Sandy Springs

Gold Medal Winner: Infliximab (anti-TNF competition)

Posted on by

According to a recent retrospective study, (S Singh et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 1120-29), infliximab outperformed its rivals.  In the spirit of the recent olympics, we’ll give infliximab a gold medal in the anti-TNF category.

Here’s the play-by-play:

This study used an administrative claims database with more than 100 million US enrollees.  In total, there were 3205 biologic-naive patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) with a mean age of 41 years.  All of the participants had not received a biologic agent for at least 12 months prior to their first study dose (between 2006-2014). In addition, the authors excluded patients who had a concomitant diagnosis which could necessitate a biologic, including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriasis.

Race details:

  • Compared to adalimumab-treated patients, inlfiximab-treated patients had a lower risk of CD-related hospitalization (aHR [adjusted Hazard Ratio] 0.80), abdominal surgery (aHR 0.76), and corticosteroid use (aHR 0.85)
  • Compared to certolizumab pegol-treated patients, infliximab-treated patients had a lower risk of hospitalization (all-cause) (aHR 0.70), and CD-related hospitalization (aHR 0.59).
  • All agents had comparable risk of serious infections

Post-race analysis:

Was this a fair race (ie study)? Definitely.  If anything, this study may have underestimated the benefit of infliximab.  Due to trouble with confounders across retrospective studies, it may be that infliximab was chosen preferentially among sicker patients.

My take: There is limited data on comparative effectiveness of anti-TNF agents.  This retrospective study  indicates that infliximab is likely superior to its competitors.  Definitive proof would necessitate a head-to-head live-action (prospective) competition.

Related blog posts:

Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 11.46.48 AM

4 Points for C diff in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

A nice review: K Rao, PDR Higgins. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1744-54.

Many aspects of Clostridium difficile with and without coexisting inflammatory bowel disease has been reviewed on this blog.  This review adds a few additional points:

  1. C difficile testing in patients with IBD, “start with enzyme immunoassay-based tests with a reflex to PCR test for discordant enzyme immunoassay results.”  Rationale: “PCR is quite sensitive for the presence of toxigenic C difficile, it may increase the detection of asymptomatic colonization and shedding.”
  2. Don’t test for C difficile in patients in clinical remission. “Clayton et al evaluated outpatients with IBD who were in clinical remission and had no recent exposure to antimicrobials, corticosteroids, immunomodulatory agents, or hospitalizations.  These patients had toxigenic C difficile carriage rates of 8.2%.”
  3. What to do when IBD patients test positive for C difficile infection (CDI) -treat which one or both? The authors recommend, that “if there is no response to the treatment for CDI after 48 hours, then concurrent immunologic therapy can be started/escalated.”
  4. Safety of FMT with IBD. “There may be additional risk incurred in the IBD population…[in a recent study] 14% of the subgroup of patients with IBD experienced adverse events including IBD flare, requiring hospitalization in some instances.” Overall, there is not enough data to “risk stratify patients in terms of these adverse outcomes.”

In addition to these pointers, advice on treatment based on severity and whether CDI is recurrent is listed on Table 1.

  • For primary CDI (nonsevere): metronidazole, vancomycin or fidaxomicin.
  • For primary CDI (severe): vancomycin or fidaxomicin.
  • For primary CDI (severe & complicated*): vancomycin at highest dose and IV metronidazole and (if ileus present) vancomycin rectally
  • Recurrent CDI: 1st recurrence — same as initial Rx, 2nd recurrence -same as initial Rx, then use either vancomycin pulsed and/or tapered regimen of 6 or more weeks

Related blog posts:

View from Grinnell Glacier Trail, Glacier Nat'l Park

View from Grinnell Glacier Trail, Glacier Nat’l Park

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Fecal Calprotectin Monitoring Helpful at Identifying Relapse in IBD

Posted on by

Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference: Y. Zhulina et al. Aliment Pharm Ther 2016; 44: 495-504.

Methods: 

  • Patients aged 18 years or older, with a known diagnosis of IBD in clinical remission, were prospectively studied. Patients provided faecal samples every third month and were prospectively followed until the first clinical relapse or the end of the 2-year follow-up period.  
  • Relapse was defined as increasing symptoms necessitating intensified medical therapy or surgery.

Key finding:

  • Among 104 patients, Crohn’s disease (n = 49) and ulcerative colitis (n = 55), 37 had a relapse. A doubling of faecal calprotectin level between two consecutively collected samples was associated with a 101% increased risk of relapse (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.53–2.65; P < 0.001).

My take: Another study showing that stool calprotectin is quite useful. How long will it be until I will not need to write letters to insurance companies to get this test covered?

Also noted in the same issue: 
“The safety of autologous and metabolically fit bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in medically refractory Crohn’s disease – a phase 1 trial with three doses” (pages 471–481) T. Dhere, I. Copland, M. Garcia, K. Y. Chiang, R. Chinnadurai, M. Prasad, J. Galipeau and S. Kugathasan. Aliment Pharm Ther 2016; 44: 471-81. This study examined the use of mesenchymal stromal cells in 12 patients.

In conclusion, a single infusion of fresh autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells propagated ex vivo using a non xenogeneic human platelet lysate growth supplement at doses ranging 2–10 million cell/kg BW was well tolerated in patients with medically refractory moderate to severe Crohn’s disease in this preliminary study. Our data neither addressed long-term safety nor sustained efficacy. However, this study informs that a future phase 2 study 

A previous study of mesenchymal stromal cells was briefly discussed in a previous blog: Sanjay Gupta is Wrong…about Stem Cell Therapy

Related blog posts:

Hidden Lake at Glacier National Park

Hidden Lake at Glacier National Park

“Explain It To Me Like I’m a Six Year Old”

Posted on by

Sometimes when I read an article, I wish it was presented in a much simpler manner.  In the movie “Philadelphia,” the lawyer played by Denzel Washington tells his clients to “explain it to me like I’m a six-year-old.”

A recent clinical report (MI Ardura et al. JPGN 2016; 63: 130-55) probably would have benefitted from this idea to some degree.  This report examines infectious disease issues with regard to patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) inhibitors.  All in all, it is very thorough and reviews more than 20 infectious agents (bacteria, fungi, mycobacteria, and viral agents).

Table 2 is most helpful.  In this table, the authors recommend that before starting TNF inhibitors:

  • Risk factor screening for Brucella (eg exposure to animals, unpasteurized dairy products), Bartonella (eg exposure to kitten), Listeria (eg dietary history), Salmonella (eg exposure to reptiles), Aspergillus (eg exposure to construction), coccidioidomycosis (exposure to endemic area), Histoplasma (long list of exposures listed in Table 3 includes barns, caves, chicken coops, old buildings), and Hepatitis C virus
  • Direct testing is recommended for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Hepatitis B virus, HIV (≥ 13 yrs if in hospital or ≥15 years), and Varicella zoster virus

Table 4 lists recommended vaccines.  For live virus vaccines, the authors recommend to avoid unless they can be administered at least 4 weeks prior to immunosuppressive therapy.

Other useful information:

  • “Granulomatous infections caused by bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi are the most frequently  described infections in patients receiving anti-TNFα therapies.”
  • Infection rates of 239/100,000 reported with infliximab between 1998-2002.
  • More than 70% of these infections occurred within 3 to 6 months of starting infliximab therapy, “suggesting the possibility of reactivation of latent infection.”
  • M tuberculosis was most common (54/100,000)
  • “In general, anti-TNFα therapy should be discontinued during any severe infection.”

My take: This report offers a lot of information. Its impact on daily practice would be much greater if the authors created a simple one-sheet screening questionnaire form with recommended bloodwork and vaccines.

Related blog posts:

Shem Creek Pelican Art

Shem Creek Pelican Art

Disease extent and need for higher infliximab dosing

Posted on by

A recent study (JM Shapiro et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 867-72) reviewed 98 pediatric patients treated with infliximab (2012-2014) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

The authors divided their patients into three groups, mainly based on extent of colonic involvement.  In those with limited colonic involvement, they were labelled “limited” disease (n=53).  In those with patchy inflammation involving the entire colon, they were considered to have “moderate” disease (n=27).  In contrast, those with continuous pancolitis were ascribed to have “extensive” disease (n=18).  Overall, Crohn’s disease accounted for 85 patients (87%),  ulcerative colitis for 11 patients (11%), IBDU for 2 patients (2%).  Interestingly, the majority (9 of 11) of those patients without Crohn’s disease were considered to have extensive disease.

Key findings:

  • “Patients with moderate and extensive disease, started taking 5 mg/kg per dose, showed statistically significant shorter times to escalation that those with limited disease.”
  • 70% of those with extensive disease required dose escalation, compared with 58.3% of those with moderate disease and 26.4% of those with limited disease.
  • The authors note that patients (n=8) with extensive disease who started with 10 mg/kg dosing  “exhibited longer treatment durability;” all 8 patients who started on 10 mg/kg dosing remained on this dose at the study’s conclusion.  Among the 10 patients that started on 5 mg/kg dosing, only 7 were on IFX therapy at the study conclusion–3 remained on 5 mg/kg, 4 were escalated to 10 mg/kg; there were 3 patients who stopped IFX therapy (1 infusion reaction, 2 with nonresponse).

My take: This is a small study. Yet, the implication is that early optimal dosing of IFX is likely  helpful, especially in the setting of extensive disease.

Related blog posts:

Chattahoochee River

Chattahoochee River