Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder

“Watch for change in the stools”

Posted on by

Many years ago I noticed the tremendous burden that coin ingestions cause in terms of ER visits and need for endoscopy/anesthesia.  As a result, I contacted the US treasury.  I think if any other product resulted in this many hospitalizations and endoscopic procedures it would be removed from the market.  Well, the treasury stated that the coins are mandated by Congress and any change would need to be initiated in Congress. So, I contacted our Georgia senator and informed the office about the problem.  Apparently, it could be a while before this becomes a priority for him.

Some good news, though, based on a recent article, watchful waiting may be appropriate for many esophageal coins (Emerg Med J 2012; doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200958).  (The blog title quote comes from Bill Balistreri who use to say that it was not worth it to take out anything less than a quarter —just watch for change in the stools.)

Acheson J et al performed a retrospective review of esophageal coin ingestions between 2004-2010 (age <16 years).  Among asymptomatic patients who were told to wait 18 hours for a repeat xray, 33 of 37 passed spontaneously.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Previous esophageal disease
  • Previous tracheal disease
  • Coins present >24 hours

All mid-to-lower coins (that were given 18 hours) passed in this study.  The authors note that previous studies had spontaneous passage rates of 30-60%.  Some of the difference may be related to differences in the UK coins compared to coins in US.  In the UK, the authors suggest that patients who are asymptomatic and with no other risk factors should be sent home and reevaluated the next day.

**Before sending them home, make sure the “coin” is not really a button battery by examining the radiograph carefully.

Additional references:

  • -Pediatrics 2005; 116: 752 (editorial), 614-19 (article). 25-30% of coins (esp distal -56%) will pass spontaneously if given time (8-16hrs)–in this randomized study.
  • -Arch Pediatr Adol Med 1999; 153: 1073. 28% of uncomplicated esophageal coins pass c/in 24hrs
  • Emerg Med J doi:10.1136/emermed-2011-200958
    [Link to free full-text EMJ article]

Inadequate treatment of anemia in IBD

Posted on by

In some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), treatment of anemia associated with IBD sometimes results in more symptomatic benefit than treatment of the IBD.  Yet, anemia remains common in IBD, both in children and adults (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 513-19).

Using a cross-sectional observational study design, a tertiary adult and pediatric IBD center reviewed consecutive clinic patients in April 2009.  The prevalence of anemia was 70% (41/59) children, 42% (24/54) adolescents, and 40% (49/124) adult.  In addition, iron deficiency anemia was more common in the pediatric population: 36/41 children and 20/23 adolescents.  In the adults with anemia, only 55% (27/49) were iron deficient.  One of the key determinants of anemia was disease activity.

Interestingly, among patients with iron deficiency, younger age was inversely associated with treatment with iron therapy: 13% of children, 30% of adolescents, and 48% of adults.

Other important aspects of anemia in IBD:

  • Anemic patients can have quality of life scores as poor as those seen in malignancy
  • Almost all IBD patients will respond to either oral or parenteral iron.  Erythropoetin reserved for patients who do not respond to parenteral iron.

Additional references:

  • -NEJM 2005; 352: 1011. Anemia algorithm.  If transferrin saturation <16%, check ferritin.  If ferritin less than 30, then patient with Fe-deficiency; if >100, anemia of chronic disease.  If 30-100, could check soluble transferrin receptor (level of sTranReceptor/log ferritin < 1 is c/w anemia of chronic disease whereas when > 2, c/w combined Fe-def anemia and anemia of chronic disease)
  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 708. 25-50% still anemic 1yr post IBD diagnosis.
  • -IBD 2007; 13: 1545-53. Guidelines for anemia mgt w IBD. Max oral absorption is 10-20mg/day; thus IV iron often needed. Goal for iron Rx is transferrin saturation of 15-50% and ferritin > 30 mcg/L (>100 if active inflammation). Anemia of chronic disease likely if TS <16% and ferritin > 100. Rec IV iron Rx prior to use of Epo. IV iron effective alone in 70-80%. Epo if no response to IV iron & Hgb <10. Consider folic acid & B12 deficiency if high MCV. AZA/6MP usually associated with pancytopenia not isolated anemia.
  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 846. Ferric carboxymaltose better than iron sucrose (Ferrlecit/Venofer) b/c can use higher dose & give more rapidly.

More on magnet ingestions

Posted on by

Magnet ingestion has been a popular topic this past week on the pediatric GI listserv and follows a recent post on this blog as well (Magnet ingestion –urgent removal needed).  Two useful links are listed below:

Infliximab for children with Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

A large multicenter study of patients 6-17 years of age has shown that infliximab (IFX) can be effective for ulcerative colitis (UC) (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 391-99). Our pediatric GI group was part of this multicenter study which enrolled 60 patients. Stanley Cohen was lead CCDHC investigator and is one of the authors.

At week 8, 44 patients (73.3%) had a clinical response to IFX.  This group of ‘responders’ were eligible for the maintenance phase of the study and were divided into a q8 week treatment group (Q8) and a q12 week treatment group (Q12).  During the maintenance phase, patients who had lost response were eligible to have a dose escalation from 5 mg/kg/dose to 10 mg/kg/dose. At week 54,  patients receiving every Q8 had a remission rate of 38% (8 of 21) whereas among the Q12 responder group only 18% (4 of 22) were in remission.  Overall, the authors projected that if the entire cohort had been placed on every 8 week treatment, the response would have been 28% at week 54; in addition, analysis with ‘real-world’ dose adjustments could achieve a 42.8% remission rate.

The main serious adverse events reported during the study was worsening of UC.  Two patients were receiving immunomodulators during the study. Five of 60 patients required a colectomy within the 54-week study period.

The risk/benefit ratio of TNF antagonists for UC has been discussed in related posts (see below).

Previous related posts:

TNF antagonists and UC

Only one chance to make first impression

Additional references:

  • -Am J Gastroenterol (Oussalah A et al) 2010; 105: 2617-25. Multicenter study of IFX for UC.
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2282. Severe pediatric UC. 25/33 responded to IFX. colectomy rate 19% at 1 year.

CLMP–why some children are born with a short gut

Posted on by

CLMP stands for Coxsackie- and adenovirus receptor-like membrane protein. It is required for intestinal development (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 453-62).

In this study of seven patients from five families with congenital short-bowel syndrome (SBS), the authors identified a loss-of-function of CLMP in five of the patients.  CLMP is a tight-junction-associated protein that is expressed in the intestine of human embryos throughout development.

To study the effect of CLMP expression, the authors created a zebrafish model with compromised CLMP activity.  This lead to offspring with a foreshortened body and intestine, strengthening the evidence that CLMP dysfunction is responsible for congenital short-bowel syndrome.

Additional references/previous related posts:

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

Posted on by

In a previous post discussing MicroRNAs (miRNAs) (MicroRNAs and biliary atresia), I stated that “Despite this intriguing research, it not clear whether or when miRNAs will have an important role in bedside management.”  Well, as more articles emerge on miRNAs, it is becoming clear that miRNAs will have a role in clinical medicine; the questions are when and what cost.

The latest study (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 1064-75) by Lu et al from Cincinnati shows how this technique can identify a specific signature for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and how miRNAs can serve as a biomarker for disease response.  The investigators took plasma and esophageal biopsy specimens from patients with EoE, reflux esophagitis, and healthy controls; they used an array comprising 677 miRNAs.  254 miRNAs were expressed at greater than background levels, but 21 upregulated miRNAs and 11 downregulated miRNAs were markedly different.

To quickly understand how useful this technology could become requires a glance at the “heat maps” showing the expression profile of the 21 upregulated miRNAs and the 11 downregulated miRNAs, comparing EoE with healthy controls (Figures 1 & 3).  In addition, in Figure 3, it is readily apparent that the expression pattern is completely different from reflux esophagitis.  Furthermore, this figure demonstrates visually a normal-appearing pattern in patients who respond to fluticasone.

Other figures in the article and in the appendix demonstrate the complex relationships between these specific miRNAs and target genes.

Key points:

  • miRNAs from tissue or blood could serve as biomarkers for the presence of EoE and response to therapy
  • Of the identified miRNAs, miR-21 and miR-223 strongly correlate with esophageal eosinophilia as well as previously described EoE transcriptome
  • Plasma miRNAs that are most differentiated in EoE include miR-146a, miR-146b, and miR-223.

Related posts:

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

The undiscovered country

Magnet ingestion –urgent removal needed

Posted on by

This month’s Gastroenterology has an interesting picture of magnet(s) ingestion (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 701, 1044).  This case report describes an ingestion by a 3-year-old boy who had swallowed 5 ball-shaped magnets.  The authors considered this an emergency even though it appeared that all 5 balls were in the stomach. As it turns out, a gastric mucosa fold was trapped in between the balls.  By taking the child for emergency removal, the authors averted a gastric perforation.

When multiple magnets are ingested, they may attract each other and cause pressure and subsequent damage. Magnet ingestion has become an important ingestion with case reports that have even included a death secondary to sepsis as well as perforations, fistulas, and volvulus.  Due to the potential for severe harm, they should be retrieved when possible ASAP.

Additional references:

Treatment for rumination and belching

Posted on by

Treatment options for rumination and for belching are limited.  Baclofen improves symptoms and decreases events in both of these disorders (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 379-84).

Rumination is characterized by effortless regurgitation of recently ingested food into the mouth (or beyond). It is easily mistaken for vomiting disorders and motility disturbances.  With rumination, patients have retrograde flow of gastric contents into the esophagus through voluntary, though unintentional, abdominal muscle contractions with increased intragastric pressure increases.

Supragastric belching occurs when air is sucked into the esophagus by decreasing the intrathoracic pressure or by contracting pharyngeal muscles.

Baclofen is an agonist of the γ-aminobutyric acid B (GABA) receptor which results in increased lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures and reduced swallowing rates. Baclofen has been shown to improve reflux, mainly by reducing transient LES relaxations (TLESRs) but also by increasing basal LES pressures.

In the majority of patients, the mainstay of treatment has been behavioral which use diaphragmatic breathing to compete/extinguish these behaviors.  There are a shortage of therapists familiar with this approach.  As such, alternative treatments are needed.  In this study, high-resolution manometry-impendance recordings were taken from 16 patients (10 women; mean age 43 years; range 18-89 years); eight of the patients had rumination.  Only 12 patients were included in the final analysis; four patients refused repeat manometry.  Manometry was performed before and after treatment along with recording symptoms.  Both symptoms and manometry recordings improved with Baclofen therapy.  This was a one-week open-label study.  Baclofen was dosed at 10 mg TID.  At baseline the total number of “flow events” was 473; after treatment, this was reduced to 282 events.  In total, rumination events decreased by 68% during treatment.   This improvement correlated with increased LES pressures.

Four of the 12 patients reported mild side effects mainly sleepiness and difficulty concentrating.

Additional references:

  • -Clin Gastroenterol & Hep 2007; 5:772. Review. Supragastric belching usually due to aerophagia and is very frequen (up to 20/hr)t. GERD related belching is less infrequent, has sour taste, usually less loud & after meals. Gum chewing, excessive beverage drinks, rapid eating or drinking,  smoking or using straw for drinking may increase air in the stomach and lead to burping which can be behavioural problem as well.
  • -“Behavioral Treatment of Chronic Belching Due to Aerophagia in a  Normal Adult” Behav Modif 2006; 30; 341
  • -JPGN 2011; 52: 414. Mgt of severe rumination @ Columbus Ohio. n=5. Definitive dx established with AD manometry with typical r-wave pattern (when regurgitates after a meal)
  • -JPGN 2010; 50: 103. Rumination occurring in NL intelligent adolescents. May start with regurgitation and progress to inability to swallow saliva.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 1314. Review of management of rumination/case presentation
  • -Chitkara et al: Teaching diaphragmatic breathing for rumination syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;101(11):2449-52. Review. Can use behavioral interventions such as deep breathing exercises/ diaphragmatic breathing to break the spasms..
  • -Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1527-28. Review and criteria of rumination.
  • -Pediatrics 2003; 111: 158-62. Review of rumination dx, Rx, & prognosis.
  • -Clin Persp in Gastro 2000; 3 (5): 277.

Additional Baclofen references:

  • -J Pediatr 2006; 149: 436, 468. Baclofen reduces GER. 0.5mg/kg/day
  • -JPGN 2004; 38: 317. Effectiveness of baclofen in neurologically-impaired children w GER. (0.7/kg/day), n=8.
  • -Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 7-13. Use of baclofen to reduce TLESR.
  • -Aliment Pharm Ther 2003; 17: 243-51. Baclofen reduced GER (acid & nonacid). side effects -N, V, dizzy. dose: in adults, start at 5mg tid, increase c 5mg increments every 4th day to 10-20mg tid.

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

For a little while, I’ve meant to complete a post on the EoE guidelines published last fall (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 128: 3-20).  This article, based on the input of 33 physicians with EoE expertise, provides a lot of depth to this unfolding area in pediatric gastroenterology.

Diagnosis of EoE. The authors caution that this diagnosis is not a histologic diagnosis as a number of entities can cause esophageal eosinophilia; at the same time, a minimum number of eosinophils, 15/hpf, is a necessary diagnostic threshold.  A small number of patients may have EoE with fewer than 15/hpf, including PPI-responsive EoE, inadequate biopsy sampling, seasonal variation, or partial treatment (eg. patient on corticosteroids).

How many biopsies?  In one cited study in the article, 2, 3, and 6 biopsies had sensitivity of 84%, 97%, and 100% respectively.  Endoscopic biopsies remain the only reliable diagnostic test.

Why are there a subset of PPI-responsive EoE patients?  Potential explanations include improvement in immune-activation after healing of esophageal mucosa, inherent anti-inflammatory property of PPIs, or due to pitfalls in current diagnostic testing.  Due to recognition of this disorder, pH testing may be needed in many patients with suspected EoE.  Even still, the authors note that “PPI responsiveness or diagnostic testing (pH monitoring) might not adequately distinguish GERD and EoE.”

How useful are genotypic features?  Clinical  use of genotypes is not feasible at this time.  However, it is anticipated that esophageal gene expression will emerge as one way to differentiate EoE from other conditions and to determine optimal treatments.

What type of allergy evaluation? The majority of EoE patients have concurrent atopic diseases, including rhinitis, asthma, and eczema.  Thorough evaluation by an allergist (or immunologist) is recommended.  Specific recommendations: skin prick testing (SPT), serum IgE for immediate-type food allergy.  Atopy patch testing (APT) has high negative predictive values, >90%, except for milk which is ~50%.  APT needs to “be standardized and validated.”

Biomarkers? “Insufficient evidence to support any peripheral marker” including cytokines, and IgE (total).

Treatment –PPI: PPIs are useful to distinguish GERD as well as PPI-responsive EoE from EoE requiring other treatments.  They also help with symptomatic treatment in some patients who have secondary GERD.  Recommended dose in children 1 mg/kg/dose BID.

Treatment –Dietary: Three dietary regimens have potential effectiveness: 1) selective food diet based on allergy testing, 2) dietary restriction of the most likely food antigens (eg. six food group diet elimination) and 3) strict amino acid based diet.  Tolerance of foods that have been shown previously to provoke EoE is unlikely to develop in the majority of EoE patients.

Treatment –Corticosteroids: Corticosteroids are effective but when discontinued EoE almost always recurs.  Systemic corticosteroids can be particularly useful when severe dysphagia is present.  With severe endoscopic findings, a course of corticosteroids may help reduce the need for dilatation or lessen the risk.  Long-term use of systemic steroids is not recommended.  Topical steroids should be considered in all patients with EoE.  Recommended doses are given.

  • For fluticasone:  88-440 μg 2-4 times per day (max 880 μg BID)
  • For budesonide: 1mg daily (<10 y) and 2 mg daily (≥10 y)
Treatment –Dilation:  Dilation can provide relief of dysphagia.  In most cases, medical or dietary therapy should be attempted prior to use of dilation.  Goal of 15-18 mm.  Practical advice (not validated in studies): Limit dilation progression per session to 3 mm or less after resistance has been encountered.
Treatment –Alternatives:  Cromolyn, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or immunosuppressive agents (eg azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine) are “not recommended.”
Complications: Perforations (spontaneous & procedure-related), food impactions, strictures, and narrow caliber esophagus.  There has not been evidence of an increased esophageal cancer risk in EoE patients to date.
Unresolved issues: Despite the extensive consensus on many of these issues, the conclusions inform the reader of how far we need to go.  Some of the unresolved questions include such basic problems:
  • “Importance of treating asymptomatic patients”
  • “Natural history of EoE and rates and predictive indexes of complications”
  • “Accuracy of skin prick and patch testing”
  • “Optimal end points of treatment”

Previous related blog posts:

The undiscovered country

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

Practical information on EoE for families:

http://www.ccdhc.org/diseases/EoE.html

Biomarkers identify patients who benefit and how

Posted on by

Fecal calprotectin and serum CRP levels are helping to identify which patients benefit most from biologic therapies, how frequently to dose individuals and how well inflammation correlates with changes in CDAI.  Several abstracts from ACG highlight these issues:

Abstract #1175: Fecal calprotectin concentration and clinical remission in patients with active Crohn’s disease treated with certolizumab pegol: results from PRECiSE 1 (Sandborn W et al).

Abstract #1164: Baseline C-reactive protein is associated with disease progression in  patients with Crohn’s disease (Colmbel J-F et al).

Abstract #1165: Association of baseline C-reactive protein with maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease treated with adalimumab (Sandborn W et al)

Abstract 1175 uses a post hoc analysis of patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) who were treated with certolizumab or placebo for 26 weeks.  Baseline calprotectin concentrations were higher in patients who achieved remission.  Another interesting finding of this study was that placebo patients did not have improvement in calprotectin levels.  So, even though some patients  had improvement in CDAI scores, indicating subjective improvement, inflammatory activity did not decline.  This is another indicator of how flawed a CDAI is for indicating the effectiveness of an IBD therapy.

Abstract 1164 looked at 238 patients with moderate to severe CD who were randomized to placebo arm in the CHARM study.  These patients were given open-label adalimumab for induction (80 mg week 0, 40 mg week 2) followed by blinded weekly placebo treatment from weeks 4-56 with a switch to open-label adalimumab after week 12 for a disease flare.  Higher baseline CRP levels in patients with moderate or severe CD were associated with higher disease scores after four weeks and after one year.  This suggests that a patient with higher CRP is more likely to have disease progression without adequate treatment.

Abstract 1165 examined the relationship between CRP and remission in CHARM patients. In the high baseline CRP group, 39 patients received adalimumab every other week, 28 weekly, and 34 received placebo.  In the low baseline CRP group, there were 42 every other week patients, 33 weekly, and 39 placebo patients.  In the high baseline CRP group, remission rates were 50% higher in the weekly treatment group compared to the every other week group.  Patients with low baseline CRP had similar results when treated weekly versus every other week.  Thus, patients with high baseline CRP are more likely to benefit from dose escalation and low CRP patients are more likely to have coexistent issues contributing to their symptoms (eg. IBS).

One other caveat: CRP production is geneticallly-determined and some patients do not make CRP in spite of active inflammation.

Related blog entries:

Food as medicine

Speed matters

Additional calprotectin references:

  • -IBD 2010; 16: 482. Calprotectin correlated with inflammation of ileum after pouch creation in children.
  • -IBD 2009; 12: 1851. Calprotectin was the only marker to correlate with endoscopic activity; n=134.
  • -JPGN 2009; 48: 48. Good sensitivity/specificity of calprotectin & lactoferrin. Up to 96% sensitivity & specificity.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 1218. Lack of correlation between clinical symptoms and fecal biomarkers. However, biomarkers do correlate with mucosal/endoscopic disease. n=164.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1392. Monitoring IBD activity level c calprotectin & lactoferrin; n=15.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1229. Clinical utility in assessing histological relapse in kids. n=73 over 8yrs…may allow avoidance of invasive tests; cut off of 275mcg/gm had 97% sensitivity/neg pred value 85% pos pred value/specificity at predicting relapse.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 669. Fecal calprotectin good at predicting relapse in pediatric IBD w cutoff of 400.

C-reactive protein references:

  • -J Pediatr 2011; 159: 340. CRP helps identify IBD.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2011; 9: 421. CRP predicts response to IFX. n=718. those with high CRP had 91% response vs 83% in pts with NL CRP.
  • -Gastro 2004; 126: 1574-81. Crohn’s review. High CRP suggests likely response to anti-TNFα treatment.
  • -JPGN 2004; 38: 509-12. CRP more reliable than ESR for IBD.
  • -NEJM 1999; 340: 448. Review on acute phase reactants. CRP better than ESR as ESR is an indirect measure (resistance of plasma, due to fibrinogen, to the falling of RBCs) & broader range for CRP.