Tag Archives: biologic

IBD Management in Pregnancy: Global Consensus

Posted on by

U Mahadevan et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025 (published ahead of print). Open Access! Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Addendum -updated reference: U Mahadevan et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025; 23: S1-S60. Open Access! Global Consensus Statement on the Management of Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This is a 60 page open access article. Table 1 lists 34 “GRADE” statements and Table 2 lists 35 consensus statements. This article is also jointly published in the following:

  • Gut
  • Am J Gastroenterol
  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
  • Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis
  • Aliment Pharmacol Ther

For Moms:

For Babies:

My take: This is a useful reference –mainly helpful for gastroenterologists rather than pediatric providers.

Related blog posts:

IBD Updates: Extending Mirkizumab Induction, Best Biologic, Fatigue in Pediatric IBD, Adalimumab Success in Patients with Abdominal Abscess

Posted on by
  1. G D’Haens et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae004. Extended Induction and Prognostic Indicators of Response in Patients Treated with Mirikizumab with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the LUCENT Trials

Key findings:

  • Of patients not achieving clinical response during 12-week induction, 53.7% achieved response following extended induction (additional 3 doses of IV infusion every 4 weeks)
  • With “extended induction,” total of 80.3% mirikizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response by W24

2. S Schreiber et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30: S7. NETWORK META-ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF BIOLOGICS FOR MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE

Methods: A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to evaluate comparative efficacy of licensed biologics. Phase 3 randomized controlled-trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics approved by the European Medicines Agency or United States Food and Drug Administration as of 31 March 2023 for maintenance treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe CD were included, i.e. infliximab (IFX) intravenous (IV) and SC, adalimumab (ADL) SC, vedolizumab (VDZ) IV and SC, ustekinumab (UST) SC, and risankizumab (RZB) SC.

Key findings:

  • Among 8 comparator arms, IFX SC 120 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) showed the highest odds ratio (95% credible interval) vs. PBO for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (3.52 [2.18–5.65]).

My take: This meta-analysis shows a favorable response for IFX SC; however, head-to-head trials are needed to really determine which biologic has the highest efficacy.

3. N Bevers et al. JPGN 2024; 2023; 77: 628-633. Fatigue and Physical Activity Patterns in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In this cross-sectional study with 104 children (24 with fatigue), biological parameters (CRP, fecal calprotectin) did not discriminate fatigued from non-fatigued patient

4. Y Bouhnik et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 3365-3378. Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients With Crohn’s Disease After Resolution of an Intra-abdominal Abscess: A Prospective Study From the GETAID

In this multicenter prospective study with 117 patients, the authors examined the success rate of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with CD with an intra-abdominal abscess resolved without surgery.

Key findings:

  • At W24, the survival rate without abscess recurrence or surgery was 74% (n=87)
  • Abscess drainage was significantly associated with ADA failure at W24 (odds ratio, 4.18)

My take (borrowed from authors): Provided that the abscess was carefully managed before initiating medical treatment, this study showed the high efficacy of ADA in the short and long term in biologic-naïve patients with CD complicated by an intra-abdominal abscess

Adjacent to Honeymoon Beach, St John

Promising Biologic for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

A recent study (I Hirano et al. Gastroenterol 2019; 156: 592-603) showed that RPC4046, a monoclonal antibody against IL13 is a promising agent for eosinophilic esophagitis. This multicenter double-blind study with 99 adults compared RPC4046 at doses of either 180 mg or 360 mg to placebo for 16 weeks.  Endoscopy was performed at baseline and at 16 weeks.  The study population included a high number who were considered steroid-refractory and excluded patients who were responsive to proton pump inhibitors. The study drug was administered initially as an IV load followed by weekly subcutaneous injections.

Key findings:

  • Mean changes in esophageal eosinophil count dropped by 94.8 in patients receiving 180 mg dosing and 99.9 in patients receiving 360 mg dosing.  In contrast, placebo-treated patients had a meager reduction of 4.4.
  • In this phase II study, there were no serious safety issues identified
  • There were no significant changes relative to placebo in dysphagia symptoms using the DSD (dysphagia symptom diary) composite score. Though there was improvement in global PRO measures compared to placebo.

There is an associated editorial (pg 545) explains the need for better therapies.  While both dietary therapies and topical steroids are likely effective in >70%, dietary therapy is plagued by problems with long-term adherence and there may become less effective with longer-term administration.

My take: Particularly for patients with refractory EoE, newer therapies are needed.  Given the chronic nature of EoE, cost of new treatments could be another hurdle.

Related blog posts:

Assessing and discussing risk of lymphoma in IBD

Posted on by

A recent article has shown that the absolute lymphoma risk from medications in children and young adults with IBD is quite low (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 838-43).

In this single center study from 1979-2008, 1374 pediatric IBD patients had charts reviewed to determine whether lymphoma developed.  In total, two male patients who had received thiopurines developed lymphoma (one Hodgkin, one anaplastic large cell) in 6624 patient-years of follow-up.  Both patients are alive after chemotherapy.  Mean follow-up was 4.8 years per patient.  The absolute lymphoma incidence rate was 3 per 10,000 patient-years; after thiopurine exposure, the rate was 4.5 per 10,000 patient-years compared to an expected 0.58 per 10,000 patient-years.

In this study, 22% of the patients had received TNF inhibitors.  None developed lymphoma.  The risk of biologics could not be fully assessed due to a limited study period: 713 person-years taking the medication.

The risk of thiopurine-associated lymphoma was similar to previous studies but did not reach statistical significance.  As related in other studies, the risk of biologic agents, like Remicade, Humira, and Cimzia, is heavily influenced by whether patients had also received immunomodulators.

One useful way to try to convey this risk has been with diagrams.  One useful diagram is a palette of one thousand people or of 10,000 people showing the absolute risk and one showing the risk for other complications like infection.  You can make your own by going to the following link:

Download Communication Tools

RiskComm

Additional references/blog entries:

Only one chance to make first impression

Biologics | Living Longer | Arthritis Today Magazine -From Arthritis magazine: biologics improve survival in Rheumatoid arthritis