Category Archives: Gastroenterology

Dupilumab for FPIES

Posted on by

M Plassmeyer et al. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2025; Dupilumab Opens a Therapeutic Window in Food Protein Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome by un-licensing dendritic cells

Thanks for Ben Enav for this reference.

Methods: This was a two-part study: “(i) a detailed single-patient case of wheat-triggered, endoscopy-confirmed colitic FPIES treated with dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneously every two weeks and (ii) a prospective follow-up of seven additional FPIES patients all of whom initiated dupilumab for approved comorbidities. Serial flow cytometry quantified dendritic-cell OX40L and CD8+ CRTH2+ T-cell subsets before and after treatment; open food challenges assessed clinical tolerance.”

Key Findings:

  • Index case: Within two injections of dupilumab, the wheat sensitive patient tolerated a 50 g wheat protein challenge without gastrointestinal symptoms—this was the first uneventful exposure in 20 years. Discontinuation of dupilumab led to relapse; re-initiation again restored clinical tolerance
  • Cohort: All seven additional patients (ages 2–58 yr; triggers: milk, soy, rice, wheat, shellfish) achieved unrestricted dietary tolerance within three months
  • An important finding in the index case as well as the follow up cohort is the dupilumab induced drop in dendritic cell OX40L. OX40L is a TNF-superfamily co-stimulatory molecule induced on dendritic cells and other antigen-presenting cells.

My take: Dupilumab appears to be a promising medication for FPIES and warrants further study. If confirmed to be effective, it is likely to be targeted to those with approved comorbidities and those with more severe presentations.

Related blog posts:

Amicalola Falls State Park

Prior Exposure to TNF Antagonists May Increase Response to JAK Inhibitors in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

HH Lee et al. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025; 23, 2102 – 2114. Open Access! Differential Efficacy of Advanced Therapies in Inducing Remission in Ulcerative Colitis Based on Prior Exposure to TNF Antagonists

Methods: Meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials in 8871 adults with moderate-severe UC. The authors calculated the ratio of odds ratio of achieving remission with active drug vs placebo, in TNF antagonist–naïve vs TNF antagonist–exposed patients.

Key findings:

  • JAK inhibitors: Less efficacious in TNF antagonist–naïve vs exposed patients (6 trials; ratio of OR, 0.47)
  • IL-23 antagonists: No significant difference was observed in efficacy of selective interleukin-23 antagonists vs placebo in TNF antagonist–naïve vs exposed patients (6 trials; ratio of OR, 1.07)
  • Lymphocyte trafficking inhibitors: More efficacious in TNF antagonist–naïve vs exposed patients (5 trials; odds ratio [OR], 1.88)

Discussion:

  • This study “confirmed prior observations that exposure to TNF antagonists significantly reduces the efficacy of lymphocyte trafficking inhibitors in inducing remission, including both vedolizumab and S1P receptor modulators, by approximately 50%.In contrast, prior exposure to TNF antagonists was associated with a significant increase in the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in inducing remission, with 2-fold higher efficacy in TNF antagonist–exposed vs TNF antagonist–naïve patients”
  • In the SELECT-COMPARE trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, there was also an improved response to upadacitinib in patients with prior adalimumab.
  • “The current findings raise the intriguing possibility that exposure to TNF antagonists could result in lasting effects on the immune system that differentially alter responsiveness to therapies with distinct mechanisms of action”

My take: This study suggests that JAK inhibitors are a good choice for secondary therapy after anti-TNF agents. Other factors, besides efficacy, including safety, extraintestinal manifestations, and cost, have to be considered as well.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Comprehensive ACG Clinical Guidelines for Crohn’s Disease (2025)

Posted on by

GR Lichenstein et al. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 120(6):p 1225-1264, June 2025. Open Access!!  ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn’s Disease in Adults

Yesterday and Today I am highlighting two adult clinical guidelines both of which are equivalent to up-to-date textbook chapters with specific recommendations; both are open access. In addition, the articles have accompanying author podcasts. Thanks to Ben Gold for these references.

Selected Management Recommendations:

  • Table 1, #3: We suggest against requiring failure of conventional therapy before initiation of advanced therapy for the management of CD
  • Table 1, #13: We recommend combination therapy of intravenous infliximab with immunomodulators (thiopurines) as compared with treatment with either immunomodulators alone or intravenous infliximab alone in patients with CD who are naive to those agents
  • Table 1, #33: In patients with high-risk CD, we recommend anti-TNF therapy to prevent postoperative endoscopic recurrence

Key Concepts:

  • Table 2, #9: Symptoms of CD do not correlate well with the presence of active inflammation and therefore should not be the sole guide for therapy. Objective evaluation by endoscopic or cross-sectional imaging should be undertaken periodically to avoid errors of under- or over-treatment.
  • Table 2, #14: The 10-year cumulative risk of major abdominal surgery in CD is 40%–55%, although recent studies performed in the biologic era suggest that the 10-year risk may have decreased to 30%. The 10-year risk of a second resection after the first is 35%, although again more recent studies suggest that this may have dropped to closer to 30%.
  • Table 2, #15: In CD, the 5-year rate of symptomatic postoperative recurrence is ∼50%.
  • Table 2, #29: Small bowel imaging should be performed as part of the initial diagnostic workup for patients with suspected CD.
  • Table 2, #31: Because of the absence of radiation exposure, magnetic resonance enterography should be used preferentially in young patients (younger than 35 years) and in patients in whom it is likely that serial exams will need to be performed.
  • Table 2, #38: Mucosal healing as determined by endoscopy is a goal of therapy. Scoring systems are available to measure the endoscopic disease activity and may be used to monitor response to therapy.
  • Table 2, #41: Antibiotics are not an effective treatment for luminal inflammatory CD and should not be used as a primary therapy.

My take: Given the rapid changes in available therapies, it would be optimal to make these collaborative guidelines (AGA, ACG, NASPGHAN) available online with frequent updates (similar to HCVguidelines.org).

Related blog posts:

Comprehensive ACG Clinical Guidelines for Ulcerative Coliits (2025)

Posted on by

D Rubin et al. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 120(6):p 1187-1224, June 2025. Open Access! ACG Clinical Guideline Update: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults

Today and tomorrow I am highlighting two adult clinical guidelines both of which are equivalent to up-to-date textbook chapters with specific recommendations; both are open access. In addition, the articles have accompanying author podcasts. Thanks to Ben Gold for these references.

Table 2 in the UC guideline makes 54 recommendations and Table 3 provides 57 key concepts.

Selected Management Recommendations:

  • Table 2, #4: We recommend treating patients with UC to achieve endoscopic improvement (Mayo score 0 or 1) to increase the likelihood of sustained steroid-free remission and to prevent hospitalization and surgery
  • Table 2, #5: We recommend the use of FC (fecal calprotectin) in UC to assess response to therapy, to evaluate suspected relapse, and during maintenance
  • Table 2, #33: When infliximab is used as induction therapy for patients with moderately to severely active UC, we recommend combination therapy with a thiopurine
  • Table 2, #43: Recommend continuing tofacitinib or upadacitinib as compared with no treatment for maintenance of remission in patients with prior moderately to severely active UC now in remission after induction with tofacitinib or upadacitinib. **The authors recommend continuing each biologic that achieved remission with induction therapy (#38-#43)
  • Table 2, #51: In patients with ASUC failing to adequately respond to intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) by 3 days, we recommend medical rescue therapy with infliximab or cyclosporine (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence).

Key concepts:

  • Table 3, #29: Patients who are primary nonresponders to an anti-TNF (defined as lack of therapeutic benefit after induction and despite sufficient serum drug concentrations) should be evaluated and considered for alternative mechanisms of disease control (e.g., in a different class of therapy) rather than cycling to another drug within the anti-TNF class.
  • Table 3, #31:  Subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab are considered equivalent to the standard intravenous maintenance dosing of these agents. The equivalence of the subcutaneous formulations for induction or as substitution for escalated doses of these therapies has not been robustly established.
  • Table 3, #41: Patients with UC should have available all medical options as recommended by their doctor and healthcare team. Third-party payers and requirements for step therapy should not come between the patient and their healthcare team in making decisions about treatment for UC.
  • Table 3, #48: All patients with ASUC should undergo a flexible sigmoidoscopy within 72 hours and preferably within 24 hours of admission. This should be used to assess endoscopic severity of inflammation and to obtain biopsies to evaluate for cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis.
  • Table 3, #51: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), narcotics, and medications with anticholinergic side effects should be avoided in ASUC.
  • Table 3, #57: In patients with ASUC initiating infliximab, dose intensification should be considered for those patients with low serum albumin (<2.5 g/dL).

My take: This article does an excellent job of summarizing current available evidence and good practice. Many of the recommendations may be helpful in garnering approval from third party payers.

Related blog posts:

Inability to Burp: How Effective is Botox?

Posted on by

Briefly noted: S Sanagapalli et al. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 120(9):p 2051-2058, September 2025. Prospective Controlled Study of Endoscopic Botulinum Toxin Injection for Retrograde Cricopharyngeus Dysfunction: The Inability to Belch Syndrome

This study explored a treatment with botulinum toxin (aka. Botox) for people who can’t belch due to a condition called retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction (R-CPD), which causes gas-related discomfort. Researchers used high-resolution manometry (HRM) with carbonated drink provocation to diagnose R-CPD. Then, they tested a treatment involving botulinum toxin injections into the cricopharyngeal muscle.

Out of 65 participants, 52 received the treatment, and 92% of those who received the treatment were able to belch after three months, significantly improving their symptoms and quality of life. In contrast, the control group, which included participants who deferred or declined treatment, saw no improvement. After 3 months, 43/51 (84%) of the treatment group reported being satisfied or very satisfied with therapeutic outcome.

Related blog posts:

Consensus Recommendations on Functional Bloating and Distention

Posted on by

C Melchior et al. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 2025; 00:1–39. Open Access! European Consensus on Functional Bloating and Abdominal Distension—An ESNM/UEG Recommendations for Clinical Management

A total of 21 experts (authors of article), recommended by ESNM, The European Association for Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Nutrition (EAGEN) and The European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology (ESPCG), from different countries agreed to participate as the International Working Group for the European Consensus on Bloating to vote on the Delphi statements.

This article regarding bloating/distension in adults is summarized in two tables. Table 1 has 75 statements. Table 2 is a summary –here are many of its recommendations:

Patients with functional bloating and abdominal distention should receive a lactose‐limiting diet trial based on their self‐reported symptoms or the presence of intolerance during a breath test after ingestion of a defined lactose load

  • A low FODMAP diet is effective in reducing functional bloating and abdominal distention
  • Rifaximin may be useful for the treatment of functional bloating and abdominal distention with efficacy
  • Among antispasmodic agents, pinaverium and otilonium bromide have been shown to be the most effective drugs for the treatment of functional bloating and abdominal distension
  • Lubiprostone, plecanatide and linaclotide are effective in improving constipation associated with functional bloating and abdominal distension
  • Linaclotide is the most effective secretagogue for functional bloating, although limited data is available for lubiprostone and plecanatide as well
  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI’s) are effective in reducing symptoms of functional bloating
  • Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) such as amitriptyline are effective in reducing symptoms of functional bloating
  • In patients with discrete episodes of visible abdominal distension, biofeedback‐guided techniques to re‐educate abdominothoracic muscular activity are safe and effective for correction of abdominal distention and are associated with improvement in the subjective sensation of abdominal bloating
  • “Hypnotherapy improves symptoms of bloating in patients with IBS. However, its effect on functional bloating and abdominal distension was not explored and cannot be recommended”
  • Figure 1 provides an algorithm. For workup, it suggests checking the following in all patients: TSH, HgbA1c, CBC, CRP, TTG IgA, IgA, Glucose
  • In those with alarm features (eg. anemia, wt loss, suspicion of organic disease), more extensive evaluation is recommended

My take: One of my colleagues would often say that if there are a lot of treatments for a disease it usually indicates that none of them are very good.

Related blog posts:

Bouquet of Flowers, Claude Monet

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

The Rise of Oral Obesity Therapies: Semaglutide and Orforglipron

Posted on by

SWharton et al. N Engl J Med 2025;393:1077-1087. Oral Semaglutide at a Dose of 25 mg in Adults with Overweight or Obesity

Methods: The participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral semaglutide (25 mg) or placebo once daily, plus lifestyle interventions.

Key Findings:

In their discussion, the authors note that the reasons why “patients may prefer oral administration over the subcutaneous route are most often needle aversion and local skin reactions.7,8 In addition, unlike injectable agents, oral agents may not require a refrigerated chain of delivery and could widen the reach of obesity care in many regions of the world where a lack of refrigeration represents a barrier to access.”

In addition, the results were similar to the “STEP 1 (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity) trial of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg (12.4 percentage points more than that with placebo),16“

As with prior trials of semaglutide, “treatment was also associated with substantial reductions in cardiometabolic risk factors including BMI, waist circumference, and levels of glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, lipids (very-low-density lipoprotein and triglycerides), and C-reactive protein.”

My take: Effective oral therapy is a big advance for management of obesity. The entire field of pharmacology for obesity has seen remarkable advances in the past few years. For me, it is reminiscent of the proliferation of published studies for hepatitis C around 10 years ago.

Related article in same NEJM issue: J Rosenstock et al. N Engl J Med 2025;393:1065-1076. Orforglipron, an Oral Small-Molecule GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, in Early Type 2 Diabetes

In the ACHIEVE-1 Trial: Key Findings (n=559 adults):

The associated editorial by DB Lowe (N Engl J Med 2025;393:1133-1134) notes that Orforglipron is a small molecule that manages to mimic the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) at the GLP-1 receptor. “The incretins, like many peptide hormones, are fairly small as proteins go — a few dozen amino acids long. But that makes them gigantic as compared with small-molecule drugs. Their molecular weights are at least 10 times as high as the 300 to 500 mass units that medicinal chemists have traditionally aimed for, and being peptides, they have generally undesirable properties as well. Many have short half-lives in the circulation, which can be a desirable feature for endogenous peptides but is nowhere near what is needed for the administration of a once-daily dose.”

Related blog posts:



AI for GI

Posted on by

This month’s Gastroenterology issue is devoted solely to the use/expected uses as well as risks of artificial intelligence (AI) for gastroenterology and hepatology.

DL Shung, M Iacucci. Gastroenterol 2025; 169: 391-392. Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology and Hepatology: Potential and Perils

An excerpt:

“AI is reshaping the landscape of gastroenterology and hepatology with the promise of better, faster, more objective, and standardized care of delivery. However, behind the algorithms lies a more insidious risk: the erosion of trust in human providers…Information risk …include both error commission (ie, when the models generate false statements, introduce nonsensical concepts, or fabricate sources) and error omission (ie, summaries that omit critical information)…

When AI becomes the center of care, patients may perceive their doctors as intermediaries…diminishing the therapeutic effect of the patient-physician relationship…This arrangement can dilute clinical training, increase physician burnout, and lead to medicolegal implications…Other risks include perpetuating bias from nonrepresentative training data and amplifying uncertainty of AI due to lack of real-world validation…

We hope that AI systems will allow us to spend more, not less, time with patients and empower us to provide personalized care by leveraging high-quality multimodal data.”

Most of the articles are behind a paywall in this issue. There are five that are open access articles:

My take: These articles provide a good deal of information about the applications and risks of AI. In my view, physicians will be needed more than ever to help interpret/manage the huge amount of information available.

Related blog posts:

Upadacitinib for Crohn’s Disease: U-ENDURE Study

Posted on by

R Panaccione et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; (In press) Open Access! Upadacitinib Maintenance Therapy in Crohn’s Disease: Final Results From the Randomized Phase 3 U-ENDURE Study

Methods: Clinical responders to 12 weeks of upadacitinib 45 mg once daily (QD) induction were randomized (1:1:1) to receive upadacitinib 15 mg QD (n = 221), upadacitinib 30 mg QD (n = 229), or placebo (n = 223) as maintenance therapy for 52 weeks

**This study presents data from the entire cohort (n=673); a previous report from ENDURE-3 analyzed data on 502 patients (though findings were nearly identical). EV Loftus et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1966-1980 (Related post: Landmark Study: Oral Biologic for Crohn’s –Upadacitinib)

Key findings:

  • At week 52, more upadacitinib-treated vs placebo patients achieved CDAI clinical remission (upadacitinib 15 mg, 36.2% and upadacitinib 30 mg, 51.5% vs placebo, 15.2%)
  • The rates of endoscopic response were 27.3% for upadacitinib 15 mg and 40.7% for upadacitinib 30 mg vs 7.2% for placebo
  • Herpes zoster infections occurred more frequently in the upadacitinib groups compared with placebo; all were nonserious, and most involved a single dermatome
  • In U-ENDURE, no dose-dependent risk for MACE, VTE, or malignancy (excluding NMSC) was observed during the 52-week maintenance period

My take: Upadacitinib is a effective in a good number of patients with with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease who have been refractory to other advanced therapies.

Related blog posts:

What Caught My Eye in a Recent Anti-IL23 Commentary

Posted on by

This recent commentary on the all-subcutaneous induction and maintenance treatment with guselkumab, an anti-IL23 agent, reviewed the GRAVITI study. Related post: Guselkumab for Crohn’s Disease: Pivotal GRAVITI Study

However, what captured my attention was the last sentence: “The convenience of subcutaneous induction enhances patient friendliness, positioning guselkumab as a strong market contender. Could an oral anti–IL-23 formulation be the next game changer?14“

“Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) today announced positive topline results from ANTHEM-UC, a Phase 2b study of icotrokinra (JNJ-2113), the first investigational targeted oral peptide that selectively blocks the IL-23 receptor, in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC)…

In the ANTHEM-UC study (n=252), three doses of once daily icotrokinra were tested with all meeting the primary endpoint of clinical response at Week 12. A response rate of 63.5% for patients treated with the highest dose of icotrokinra was achieved at Week 12 versus 27% for placebo (p<0.001). Further, 30.2% of patients treated with the highest dose of icotrokinra demonstrated clinical remission at Week 12 versus 11.1% of patients who received placebo (p<0.01). Remission and response rates continued to improve through Week 28.

  • Clinical response is defined as decrease from baseline in the modified Mayo score by greater than or equal to (>=) 30 percent (%) and >=2 points, with either a >=1-point decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
  • Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and not increased from induction baseline, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1 with no friability present on the endoscopy.”

My take: It would be terrific for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (and other immune-mediated diseases) to have another excellent oral therapy. A prior study of plaque psoriasis indicated that an oral IL-23 medication is feasible (Related post: In Trials: An Oral IL-23 Antagonist Peptide).

Related joke (regarding “caught my eye” in the title of this post):

A man who lived in a block of apartments thought it was raining and put his head out the window to check.  As he did so a glass eye fell into his hand. He looked up to see where it came from in time to see a young woman looking down. “Is this yours?” he asked.

She said, “Yes, could you bring it up?” and the man agreed. On arrival she was profuse in her thanks and offered the man a drink. Shortly afterwards she said, “I’m about to have dinner.  There’s plenty; would you like to join me?” He readily accepted her offer and both enjoyed a lovely meal. As the evening was drawing to a close the lady said, “I’ve had a marvelous evening.  Would you like to stay the night?”  The man hesitated then said, “Do you act like this with every man you meet?”

“No,” she replied, “only those who catch my eye.”

The Manneporte by Claude Monet (at the Metropolitan Museum of Art)