Tag Archives: Risankizumab

How Quickly Does Upadacitinib Work for Crohn’s Disease Symptoms?

Posted on by

JF Colombel. et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 1668-1677. Open Access! Upadacitinib Reduces Crohn’s Disease Symptoms Within the First Week of Induction Therapy

This study was a post hoc analysis included pooled data from 2 phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, 12-week induction trials (U-EXCEL and U-EXCEED) and 1 maintenance trial (U-ENDURE). The study included 1021 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (n = 674 UPA45; n = 347 PBO).

Key findings:

  • Upadacitinib 45 mg taken once daily resulted in rapid relief from CD symptoms within 5 to 6 days of treatment initiation and improved clinical outcomes starting at week 2.
  • The present analysis demonstrates symptomatic relief as early as day 5 to 6 for patients receiving UPA, with 16.7% of patients experiencing daily SF/APS clinical remission by day 5. 
  • The first achievement of daily stool frequency/abdominal pain score (SF/APS) clinical remission occurred earlier with UPA45 (median, 13 d) vs PBO (median, 32 d)
  • Patients treated with UPA45 showed improved rates of SF/APS clinical remission (21.1% UPA45 vs 8.9% PBO) and clinical response (58.8% UPA45 vs 37.9% PBO) starting at week 2 (both P ≤ .01).

In their discussion, the authors note that time to response to treatment with upadacitinib compares favorably to other advanced therapies:

“Vedolizumab resulted in symptomatic improvement within 2 to 4 weeks of treatment initiation16; ustekinumab led to clinical response and remission at week 3 or 6, depending on the dose.17 Similarly, of the time points analyzed, clinical response and/or clinical remission was observed as early as week 2 for risankizumab, 5 infliximab,18 and certolizumab pegol,19 and as early as week 1 for adalimumab.20,21“

My take: The rapid response seen in many patients indicate that upadacitinib can be a steroid-sparing therapy in patients with Crohn’s disease.

Unrelated article: E Louis et al. JAMA 2024; doi:10.1001/jama.2024.12414. Risankizumab for Ulcerative Colitis: Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Key findings:  Among the 975 patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, analyzed in the induction trial, 1200 mg of risankizumab significantly increased the rates of clinical remission at 12-week follow-up compared with placebo (20.3% vs 6.2%, respectively). Among 548 patients included in the primary efficacy analysis for the maintenance trial, 180 mg of risankizumab and 360 mg of risankizumab significantly increased the rates of clinical remission (40.2% and 37.6%, respectively) compared with placebo (25.1%).

Related blog posts:

Risankizumab Outperforms Ustekinumab

Posted on by

L Peyrin-Biroulet et al. NEJM 2024; 391:213-223. Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease

Background: “Interleukin-23 is a heterodimeric proinflammatory cytokine comprising a p40 subunit shared with interleukin-12 and a unique p19 subunit that plays a key role in skin, joint, and gastrointestinal inflammation.16 Ustekinumab and risankizumab are humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibodies; ustekinumab selectively binds p40, and risankizumab selectively binds p19…In head-to-head trials directly comparing their efficacy in psoriasis, risankizumab was superior to ustekinumab, which suggests greater efficacy with p19 blockade than with p40 blockade.”

This “SEQUENCE” trial was a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with 527 patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease who either had an inadequate response or had intolerance to anti-TNF agents, received either risankizumab or ustekinumab.

Key Findings:

  • A higher percentage of patients in the risankizumab group than in the ustekinumab group completed all the assigned treatment (90.2% [230 of 255 patients] vs. 72.8% [193 of 265 patients]).  The primary reason for discontinuation of risankizumab was an adverse event (3.1% [8 of 255 patients]), and the primary reason for discontinuation of ustekinumab was lack of efficacy (13.2% [35 of 265 patients]
  • Clinical remission at 48 weeks was 60.8% with risankizumab and 40.8%% with ustekinumab (P<0.001); there were similar rates of glucocorticoid-free clinical remission, 60.8% vs 40.4% respectively. Endoscopic response at 48 weeks was 45.1% and 21.9% respectively.

My take: These head-to-head results showed the superiority of risankizumab over ustekinumab across numerous clinical and endoscopic end points, including glucocorticoid-free clinical remission and endoscopic remission. However, it is still concerning to me that endoscopic remission rates were only 32% at 1 year and that less than half had an endoscopic response.

Related blog posts:

Crohn’s Disease: Risankizumab Real-World Data

Posted on by

A Zinger et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 1336-1338. Risankizumab Effectiveness and Safety in Crohn’s Disease: Real-world Data From a Large Tertiary Center

In a group of 80 patients with Crohn’s disease with evidence of active disease, the authors examined the effectiveness of risankizumab with prospectively-collected data. Patients received 600 mg intravenously at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. Only 6 patients (8%) were unexposed to prior advanced therapy; 44 patients (55%) had prior ustekinumab (UST) therapy.

Key findings:

  • Clinical remission was 78% in patients without prior ustekinumab therapy and 64% in those with prior ustekinumab therapy
  • Steroid-free clinical remission was 75% and 52%, respectively in patients without and with prior ustekinumab therapy. Overall, 63% of patients achieved a steroid-free clinical remission

My take: This study shows that risankizumab, a selective IL23 inhibitor, has good effectiveness, even in patients previously treated with a IL12/23 inhibitor. It highlights our need to better understand the reasons why a more selective agent is able to work after patients failed to respond to UST treatment.

Unrelated article: KA Chien et al. JPGN 2024; 79: 10-17. (Kudos to the authors including my partner Dr. Ben Gold). This article detailed the median work RVUs target for practices and composition of healthcare team to provider ratios: Nursing 0.80, MA 0.29, dietician 0.29, social worker 0.14, and psychologist 0.13. The article reviews salary structure/incentives and wellness initiatives as well.

Related blog posts:

Comparative Evidence and Positioning Advance Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

PS Dulai et al. Gastroenterol 2024; 166: 396-408. Open Access! Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

“In this review, we provide a framework for clinicians and researchers to understand key differences in sources of evidence, how different methodologies are applied to study the comparative effectiveness of advanced medical therapies in IBD, and considerations for how these sources of evidence can be used to better integrate current guideline recommendations.”

This article explains the use of randomized controlled trials, “real-world evidence”/observational comparative studies, network meta-analysis, and post-hoc comparisons from randomized studies.

“The authors advocate for “”Given the rapidity with which new advanced medical therapies are becoming available in IBD, which quickly make current guidelines obsolete, living guidelines may offer a unique consideration to ensure applicability to routine care.”

My take: This article provides a useful update of current advanced therapies and information in positioning these advanced therapies. It would be a great service if the IBD community could create something similar to HCVguidelines.org. The latter was a coordinated effort by the AASLD and IDSA to help provide expert advice during a deluge of amazing advances in HCV. And just like HCVguidelines, it is important to address “special” populations including pediatric patients and patients with very early onset IBD.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

In Trials: An Oral IL-23 Antagonist Peptide

Posted on by

R Bissonnette et al. NEJM 2024; 390: 510-521.An Oral Interleukin-23–Receptor Antagonist Peptide for Plaque Psoriasis

While this study shows that an oral IL-23 antagonist was effective for plaque psoriasis, this is exciting news for the GI physicians as biologic agents that target IL-23 have been shown to be very effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (eg. Ustekinumab, Risankizimab, Mirikizumab). This “FRONTIER” study shows how to achieve similar results as these biologic therapies.

Biologics are large monoclonal antibodies which cannot be orally absorbed and must be administered either intravenously or as an injection. However, “JNJ-77242113 is an oral interleukin-23–receptor antagonist peptide that selectively and potently blocks interleukin-23 proximal signaling and the production of downstream cytokines such as interleukin-17.” This medication needs to be taken on an empty stomach (this could effect real-world results).

My take: I am expecting that this medication will undergo trials for IBD and suggests that an oral effective therapy is in the therapeutic pipeline.

Impressive Results for Risankizumab in Refractory Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

D Alsoud et al Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; izad315, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad315. Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Multirefractory Crohn’s Disease: A Belgian Multicentric Cohort Study

Methods: Data from consecutive adult CD patients who started risankizumab before April 2023 were retrospectively collected at 6 Belgian centers. A total of 69 patients (56.5% female, median age 37.2 years, 85.5% exposed to ≥4 different advanced therapies and 98.6% to ustekinumab, 14 with an ostomy) were included.

Key findings:

  • At week 24, 61.8% (34 of 55) and 18.2% (10 of 55) of patients without an ostomy achieved steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively.
  • At week 52, these numbers were 58.2% (32 of 55) and 27.3% (15 of 55), respectively. Endoscopic data were available in 32 patients, of whom 50.0% (16 of 32) reached endoscopic response within the first 52 weeks.
  • Results in patients with an ostomy were similar (steroid-free clinical response and remission, 42.9% and 14.3%, respectively).
  • 20.3% (14 of 69) of patients underwent CD-related intestinal resectionsand 18.8% (13 of 69) of patients discontinued risankizumab during followup (median 68 weeks).
  • Risankizumab was well tolerated with no safety issues.

Discussion points: “98.6% of patients in the current study were exposed to ustekinumab compared with less than 20% in the registration trials. This indicates that a previous lack or loss of response to the inhibition of the p40 subunit common to IL-12 and IL-23 does not preclude a potential response from subsequent selective inhibition of IL-23. “

My take: This study shows that risankizumab can be effective in refractory patients, even in those who have received similar type medications (eg. ustekinumab).

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Is Risankizumab More Effective for Crohn’s Disease Than Ustekinumab?

Posted on by

M Dubinsky et al. Adv Ther. 2023; 40(9): 3896–3911. Open Access! Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Between Risankizumab and Ustekinumab for Induction and Maintenance Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease

Background/Methods: Risankizumab (RZB) and ustekinumab (UST), interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12/23 inhibitors, respectively, are approved treatments for moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD); direct comparison between the two is ongoing. The authors indirectly compared efficacy of RZB versus UST using data from phase 3 trials (three trials for each medication):

Key findings:

Induction: Higher proportions of patients achieved clinical and endoscopic outcomes with RZB vs. UST, resulting in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater percent differences between groups for CDAI remission (15%) and endoscopic response (26%) and remission (9%)

Rates of response and remission following induction therapy with RZB (600 mg) or UST (6 mg/kg). *p ≤ 0.05 for RZB versus UST. Relative effect measures are shown as the percent difference between treatment groups; absolute effect measures are the proportions of patients achieving each outcome in each treatment group. BF biologic failure, CCF conventional care failure, CDAI Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, IV intravenous, PBO placebo, RZB risankizumab, UST ustekinumab

Maintenance: rates of CDAI remission were similar (range − 0.3% to − 5.0%) for RZB vs. UST; however, endoscopic response and remission rates appeared more favorable (see Figure 2 below)

Rates of response and remission following maintenance therapy with RZB (180 mg or 360 mg) or UST (90 mg Q8W). *p ≤ 0.05 for RZB versus UST. Relative effect measures are shown as the percent difference between treatment groups; absolute effect measures are the proportions of patients achieving each outcome in each treatment group. BF biologic failure, CCF conventional care failure, CDAI Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, PBO placebo, Q8W every 8 weeks, Q12W every 12 weeks, RZB risankizumab, SC subcutaneous, UST ustekinumab

My take: Since this was not a direct randomization trial, these results are not definitive. However, in this indirect analysis, risankizumab appears to be superior to utekinumab in effectiveness of for Crohn’s disease.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 2

Posted on by

There were a bunch useful lectures at CCFA 2023 regional conference in Atlanta. Here are some of my notes and slides from Doug Wolf‘s lecture; my notes may have errors of omission or transcription. Can get access to full slide set (n=37) here: Dose Escalation of Biologic Therapy and Dual Biologic Therapy

  • If loss of response to anti-TNF, consider dose escalation by either re-induction or increasing (doubling) dose. Re-induction is less costly
  • Dose escalation generally not effective for vedolizumab
  • Dose escalation (increased frequency) with ustekinumab can be effective.  Therapeutic drug monitoring can provide guidance.  Re-induction can also be effective in half of patients (especially in patients with either no prior biologics or one prior biologic)
  • Risankizumab can still work in patients who had not responded by 12 weeks (delayed responders)
  • Discussed several combination treatments -no large studies thus far

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) -Part 1

Posted on by

I recently attended a regional CCFA conference. David Rubin gave several terrific lectures. Here are some of my notes and some slides from this lecture. My notes may contain transcription errors as well as important omissions. Can get access to full set of slides here: Biologics and Their Biosimilars

“Biologics and Their Biosimilars“

What is a Biologic Therapy?

Dr. Rubin makes a point of explaining the term to patients.  It is a protein made in a living cell that targets another protein.  Term “biologic” can sound scary to patients.  Usually given IV because they cannot be absorbed through the small bowel.

IBD Treatment Revolutions

  • Steroids -overnight changed mortality in IBD
  • Anti-TNF Therapy in IBD -taught many lessons. Treat earlier –>better outcomes. 

Anti-TNF Therapy

  • Frequent loss of response.
  • Earlier treatment with biologics result in better outcomes.
  • Immunogenicity is mainly an issue with anti-TNF agents and not much of an issue with other biologics. Episodic therapy is a big risk factor for anti-drug antibodies. 
  • If staying with in-class medication, after anti-drug antibodies, need to take additional measures to prevent anti-drug antibodies (eg. Immunomodulators).
  • Combination therapy is more effective (SONIC, UC SUCCESS trials).  This is due to using multiple mechanisms of disease control, reduction in anti-drug antibodies, and elevated serum drug levels.
  • Good therapeutic levels appears to deliver similar results as combination therapy
  • Pre-week 6 level of 17 or greater, associated with good response in maintenance.  If level is low, presumption is that higher dosing will be beneficial.
  • Higher levels of infliximab trough levels needed for perianal fistula healing (improved with ciprofloxacin).  Higher levels could be causally-related to healing or could be a marker that there is less inflammation and a patient is responding.
  • Anti-TNFs do not appear to increase risk of infections (see PUCCINI study)

Anti-23 and Anti-IL-12/IL-23

  • Tissue selective targeted therapy –>excellent safety profile
  • IV loading and SC maintenance
  • Excellent for bowel and skin
  • IL-23 is not expressed in joints
  • Ustekinumab is effective for perianal disease and ulcerative colitis
  • Risankizumab is superior to ustekinumab in plaque psoriasis.  If loss of response to ustekinumab, can still respond to Risankizumab

Anti-Integrins:

  • Natalizumab (not used frequently in IBD)
  • Vedolizumab.  Affects mucosa (can explain frequent nasopharyngitis)
  • Vedolizumab -terrific safety profile.  No PML, no malignancy risk

Biosimilars:

  • If biosimilar found effective for one approved condition, extrapolation given to all indications
  • IBD switching studies have NOT shown increased loss of response.  Consider reassess prior to switch to help determine if patient truly in remission prior to switch. Switching often blamed for loss of response when many times the disease was not under good control prior to switch
  • Interchangeable indicates that the drug can be switched by pharmacists
  • Biosimilars are saving insurers money but no proof that this is saving patients money
  • Anti-drug antibodies will cross-react to biosimilars

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Risankizumab Receives FDA Approval for Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

Abbvie Press Release: SKYRIZI® (risankizumab-rzaa) Receives FDA Approval as the First and Only Specific Interleukin-23 (IL-23) to Treat Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease in Adults

– Third approved indication for SKYRIZI (risankizumab-rzaa) is supported by safety and efficacy data from two induction and one maintenance clinical trials evaluating SKYRIZI in moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease, ADVANCE, MOTIVATE and FORTIFY1-4

– As early as week 4 in the induction studies, clinical response and clinical remission were achieved by significantly more subjects treated with SKYRIZI versus placebo, as were co-primary endpoints of endoscopic response and clinical remission at week 12 and week 521-4

About SKYRIZI® (risankizumab-rzaa)
SKYRIZI is an interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor that selectively blocks IL-23 by binding to its p19 subunit.9,10 IL-23, a cytokine involved in inflammatory processes, is thought to be linked to a number of chronic immune-mediated diseases, including Crohn’s disease.10 The approved dose to treat adults with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease is 600 mg administered by intravenous infusion over at least one hour at week 0, week 4, and week 8, followed by 360 mg administered by subcutaneous injection at week 12, and every 8 weeks thereafter.4 SKYRIZI is also approved in the U.S. to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, as well as to treat active psoriatic arthritis in adults, and the recommended dosage is 150 mg administered by subcutaneous injection at week 0, week 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter.4 Phase 3 trials of SKYRIZI in psoriasis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and psoriatic arthritis are ongoing

Related blog posts: