RM Najarian et al. JPGN 2019; 68: 835-40. This retrospective study found microscopic/’backwash’ ileitis in 16% (17/105) of patients with new-onset ulcerative colitis. This occurred predominantly in patients with pancolitis (82%). The authors note that the term “backwash ileitis” was derived from an unproven hypothesis that the inflammation was related to retrograde contact with inflammatory substances, though some now consider ileal involvement as a secondary involvement “akin to the upper tract inflammation that can be seen in a subset of patients with UC.” The authors recommend that isolated histologic inflammation of the ileum should “not be construed as being diagnostic of either ‘indeterminant colitis’ or CD [Crohn’s disease].”
K van Hoeve et al. JPGN 2019; 68: 847-53. This retrospective study of 35 children found that higher infliximab levels during induction was associated with higher rates of clinical and biologic remission at 52 weeks. Groups at risk for lower troughs included patients with a lower weight and/or lower hemoglobin level.
Rafaela Flores Calderon by Antonio Maria Esquivel, Museo del Prado (Image in Public Domain)
Some of the SuperPoopers at this year’s Atlanta CCFA Take Steps Walk
A recent population-based cohort study (MS Kristensen et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25: 886-93) indicates that antidepressants are likely to be beneficial for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and could lower disease activity in addition to improving mood.
This study population, n=42,890, with prospectively collected data comprised all patients in the Danish National Patient Registry from 2000-2017 with ICD diagnoses of ulcerative colitis (UC, 69.5%) or Crohn’s disease (CD, 30.5%). Outcome measures included markers of disease relapse:
- hospitalizations with IBD as primary diagnosis
- surgery with IBD as primary operation code
- step-up medications with corticosteroids or anti-TNF treatment
- After adjusting for confounders, lower incidence rate of disease activity was found among antidepressant users than nonusers.
- For CD, the incidence rate ratio was 0.75 (CI 0.68-0.82).
- For UC, the incidence rate ratio was 0.90 (CI 0.84-0.95).
- For CD patients without prior use of antidepressants before diagnosis of CD, there was markedly lower incidence rate ratio of 0.51 (CI 0.43-0.62).
- 28% of the study population redeemed at least 1 prescription for an antidepressant at some point. This is similar to a Finnish study in which antidepressant use in IBD was 28% compared to 19% in general population
The authors note that anti-depressants may affect the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines which are involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. This study did not assess potential adverse effects of using anti-depressants.
My take: This study is intriguing and suggests that antidepressants may improve the disease course in IBD. Whether this is related to more favorable brain-gut interaction or whether this is related to drug effects on inflammatory agents is unclear.
Related blog post: Psychosocial Problems in Adolescents with IBD
Park Guell -Fantastic Park in Barcelona (need to buy a pass to get to some parts)
Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
A recent retrospective study (A Favale et al. Comparative Efficacy of Vedolizumab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Previously Treated With Infliximab Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, izz057, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izz057 Published: 01 April 2019) suggests that vedolizumab is more effective for ulcerative colitis with secondary infliximab failure.
Here’s the abstract:
Adalimumab (ADA) and vedolizumab (VDZ) have shown efficacy in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who failed infliximab (IFX). Although, a comparative efficacy evaluation of ADA and VDZ in this clinical setting is currently missing.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ADA and VDZ in patients affected by UC who failed IFX.
Clinical records of UC patients from 8 Italian IBD referral centers who failed IFX and were candidates to receive either ADA or VDZ were retrospectively reviewed. The primary end point was therapeutic failure at week 52. Secondary end points included therapy discontinuation at weeks 8, 24 and 52, the discontinuation-free survival, and safety.
One hundred sixty-one UC patients, 15 (9.2%) primary, 83 (51.6%) secondary IFX failures, and 63 (39.2%) IFX intolerants were included. Sixty-four (40%) patients received ADA and 97 (60%) VDZ as second line therapy. At week 52, 37.5% and 28.9% of patients on ADA and VDZ, respectively, had therapeutic failure (P = 0.302). However, the failure rate was significantly higher in the ADA group as compared with VDZ group among IFX secondary failures (48.0% ADA vs 22.4%VDZ, P = 0.035). The therapy discontinuation-free survival was significantly higher in the group of IFX secondary failures who received VDZ as compared with ADA at both the univariate (P = 0.007) and multivariate survival analysis (OR 2.79; 95% CI, 1.23–6.34; P = 0.014). No difference in the failure and biologic discontinuation-free survival was observed in the IFX primary failure and intolerant subgroups.
KP Quinn et la. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25: 460-71. This is a terrific review of evaluation and management of pouch disorders.
A Armuzzi et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25: 568-79. This prospective cohort study examined infliximab biosimilar in 810 patients (PROSIT cohort). This included 459 patients naive to anti-TNF therapy (group a) , 196 with previous exposure (group b), and 155 who were switched while on original infliximab (group c). At 12 months, patients without a loss of response were 71%, 64%, and 82% respectively in these three groups.
S Coward et al Gastroenterol 2019; 156: 1345-53. This study from Canada used population-based health administrative data from multiple provinces and then applied autoregressive integrated moving average regression to predict prevalence of IBD in 2030. Key point: “In 2018, 267,983 Canadians were estimated to be living with IBD, which was forecasted to increase to 402,853 by 2030.” This is approximately 1% of the population (981 per 100,000).
F Castiglione et al. Aliment Pharm Ther 2019; 49: 1026-39. This observational longitudinal study with 218 patients with Crohn’s disease who completed 2-years of anti-TNF treatment examined transmural healing via ultrasonography (≤3 mm bowel wall thickness). “Transmural healing was associated with a higher rate of steroid-free clinical remission (95.6%), lower rates of hospitalization (8.8%) and need for surgery 0%).” The authors conclude that transmural healing is associated with better long-term clinical outcomes than mucosal healing.
“Magic Fountain” Barcelona
The second study reference yesterday:
A recent study (S Hanauer et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 139-47) shows that tofacitinib can work quickly to reduce symptoms in ulcerative colitis.
In a post-hoc analyses of data from OCTAVE induction 1 and 2 (n=905 patients, n=234 placebo), the authors determined that tofacitinib reduces symptoms within 3 days.
- By day 3, there was a reduction in stool frequency (-1.06 vs. -0.27 for placebo) and a reduction in rectal bleeding subscore (-0.30 vs -0.14 for placebo)
- 28.8% of tofacitinib-treated patients had a reduction in stool frequency subscore by >1 point compared to 17.9% for placebo. For rectal bleeding subscore, tofacitinib-treated patients had a reduction by >1 point in 32% compared to 17.9% for placebo 20.1%.
My take: This study reinforces the impression that tofacitinib works rapidly.
Related blog posts:
La Boqueria, Barcelona