Author Archives: gutsandgrowth

Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

Pediatric Pancreatitis -Working Group Nutritional Recommendations

Posted on by

Abstract Link: Nutritional Considerations in Pediatric Pancreatitis: A Position Paper from the NASPHAN Pancreas Committee and ESPHAN Cystic Fibrosis/Pancreas Working Group.

M Abu-El-Haija et al. JPGN 2018; 67: 131-43.  This working group made ~27 recommendations (summarized in Table 1) and indicated the quality of evidence supporting the recommendation as well as the agreement among team members –virtually all received at least 12 of 13 votes.

Here are the ones that grabbed my attention:

For Acute Pancreatitis (AP):

  • 1a & 1aa. Children with mild AP should be started on a regular diet –preferably via mouth as compared to nasogastric route
  • 1b. Enteral nutrition (EN) should be attempted in children with severe AP within 72 hours from presentation, once deemed hemodynamically stable.
  • 1.4 Even in severe AP, jejunal tube feeding should be reserved for those unable to tolerate oral or NG tube feeding

For Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis (ARP):

  • 2.1a & 2.1b. Children should receive a regular-fat diet in between bouts of ARP and a regular-fat diet can safely be started within 1 week after the onset of a bout of AP (except in those with very elevated triglycerids (>1000 mg/dL)
  • 2.2a & 2.3a. PERT is NOT recommended in children with ARP without eocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Antioxidants are NOT recommended (insufficient supporting evidence)

For Chronic Pancreatitis (CP):

  • 3.1b & 3.12a. Recommends routine followup every 3-6 months and a regular diet
  • 3.3a, 3.4a, & 3.5a Monitoring: recommends checking fat-soluble vitamin levels every 6 to 12 months, checking for EPI with elastase (or 72 hr fecal fat) every 6-12 months, and BMD (bone mineral density) if CP and malnutrition (especially if Vit D deficiency or hx/o fractures)

My take: This report provides a methodical approach for the care of children with these pancreatic disorders.

Related blog posts:

Tide pools and wide beach at Cumberland Island 2018

Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease

Posted on by

Briefly noted: P Singh et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 823-36. After a systemic review which selected 96 articles from a pool of 3843 published between 1991 through 2016, the authors determined a pooled global prevalence of 1.4% in 275,818 individuals based on seroprevalence (positive TTG or EMA).  Biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was noted in 0.7% in 138,792 individuals.

In their study, biopsy-proven disease was most prevalent in Argentina, Egypt, Hungary, Finland, Sweden, New Zealand, and India.

Related blog posts:

 

Serology Titers Associated with Clinical Expression of Ulcerative Colitis in Children

Posted on by

Briefly noted: A recent study (EA Spencer et al.Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24: 1335-42) examined phenotype and serology in 399 children with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis (PROTECT study).

Key findings:

  • 65% had positive serology for pANCA; 62% in those <12 and 66% in those ≥12 years
  • 19% had positive serology for anti-CBir1; 32% in those <12 and 14% in those ≥12 years
  • High titer (≥ 100)) pANCA positivity was associated with more extensive disease but not with PUCAI values or Mayo endoscopic subscores.

My take: The serology titers for IBD, in my view, have academic interest but do not routinely enhance patient care.

Related blog post:

Amelia Island

 

Pilot Study: Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Beneficial Effects on Fatty Liver Disease in Children

Posted on by

Briefly noted: A small pilot study (n=9) (SS Sundaram et al. J Pediatr 2018; 198: 67-75) showed that treatment (with home CPAP) of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with improved alanine aminotransferase levels, reduced metabolic syndrome markers and lower F(2)-isoprostanes (a marker of oxidative stress) in pediatric patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All nine of the participants were Hispanic males with a median age of 11.5 years; they had a median BMI of 29.5 and had biopsy-proven NAFLD. The improvement in NAFLD parameters occurred despite an increase in BMI. The authors note that studies in adults have shown contradictory findings with regard to whether treatment of OSA helps NAFLD.

My take: This study suggests potential beneficial liver effects of treating OSA.  Regardless, treatment of OSA could be considered a quality metric in the care of children with NAFLD as better sleep at night has additional clear benefits.

Related blog posts:

Outside Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta)

Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection

Posted on by

A recent letter (FE Juul et al. NEJM 2018; 378: 2535-6) describes the results of a small study in which fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) (n=9) was compared with metronidazole (n=11) for primary treatment of Clostridium dificille infection. The primary end point was clinical cure (firm stool consistency ≤3 BMs/day) and no evidence of recurrent C diff infeciton.

Key findings:

  • In C diff group, 5 had full primary response and an additional 3 had full response after additional antibiotics which were added in in three of the four without primary response by day 4. By day 70, 7 of 9 (78%) had full response.
  • In metronidazole group, five had full primary response.  By day 70, only five of eleven (45%) had full response.

My take: It would probably be better to compare FMT to either vancomycin of fidaxomin  (rather than metronidazole) for primary treatment.  Until more data are available, this study does not change clinical practice of using antimicrobials for C diff as primary treatment.

Lessons in Diarrhea (part 2)

Posted on by

More from the following: JR Thiagarajah et al. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 2045-59. (Senior authors/corresponding authors: Yaron Avitzur and Martin Martin).  This article provides an excellent review of persistent infantile diarrhea and provides algorithms to help in the evaluation of these disorders.  These algorithms incorporate the role of exome sequencing.

The authors divide infants with watery diarrhea/CODEs into five categories -detailed in their Table 2 which also has OMIM #, inheritance pattern, gene name, protein function:

#1 Epithelial nutrient/electrolyte transport:

  • congenital chloride
  • congenital sodium
  • glucose-galactose malabsorption (GGM)
  • primary bile acid diarrhea
  • acrodermatitis enteropathica

#2 Epithelial enzymes and metabolism

  • Congenital lactase deficiency
  • Sucrase-isomaltase deficiency
  • Trehalase deficiency
  • Enterokinase deficiency
  • DGAT1 deficiency
  • PLVAP deficiency
  • Abetalipoproteinemia
  • Hypobetalipoproteinemia
  • Chylomicron retention disease
  • Dyskeratosis congenita
  • Kabuki syndrome

#3 Epithelial trafficking and polarity

  • Microvillus inclusion disease
  • Tufting enteropathy
  • Syndromic Na diarrhea
  • Trichohepatoenteric syndrome 1 & 2
  • Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 5
  • TTC7A deficiency

#4 Enteroendocrine cell dysfunction

  • Enteric anendocrinosis
  • X-linked lissencephaly and MR
  • Proproteint convertase 1/3 deficiency
  • Mitchell-Riley syndrome

#5 Immune dysregulation-associated enteropathy (partial list)

  • IPEX
  • ICOS deficiency
  • ADAM17 deficiency
  • EGFR deficiency
  • CD55 deficiency
  • CTLA4 deficiency
  • LRBA deficiency
  • XIAP

So, to tackle this long list the authors recommend combining typical clinical evaluation along with early genetic evaluation.

Clinical evaluation of watery diarrhea:

  • Early endoscopic biopsy (EGD/Flex sig) -obtain samples for routine histology and for electron microscopy.  Disaccharidase evaluation can be helpful; though, “these enzymatic assays are often unreliable due to poor sampling or in the setting of inflammation or villus atrophy due to secondary disaccharidase deficiency.”
  • If normal villus/crypt architecture, the next step is determining whether the diarrhea improves with fasting. This could indicate GGM, sucrase-isomaltase, congenital lactase deficiency or enteroendocrine cell loss.  The first three can be elucidated by offering specific dietary challenges using either a feeding trial with carbohydrate-free or fructose-based formula.
  • If normal villus/crypt architecture, and if the diarrhea does not improve with dietary manipulation, consider congenital chloride diarrhea, congenital sodium diarrhea, primary bile acid mediated diarrhea, and hormone-induced diarrhea.
  • If normal villus/crypt architecture, and there is hypoalbuminemia/PLE, consider DGAT1 deficiency, CD55 deficiency, and lymphangiectasia.
  • If abnormal villus/crypt architecture, then this is likely either a postinfectious/autoimmune disorder or due to an epithelial structural defect like tufting enteropathy, microvillus inclusion disease, TTC7A deficiency or SKIV2L defect

When one looks at the magnitude of disorders that could result in CODEs and their potential clinical importance, it is not surprising that the authors state emphatically:

“In cases of a suspected CODE, where the diagnosis based on clinical evaluation is unclear, it is now standard of care to perform whole-exome sequencing to identify a possible causative genetic mutation.”

My take: This article provides a great deal of information in tackling a difficult problem.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Little Talbot State Park (near Amelia Island)

Lessons in Diarrhea (part 1)

Posted on by

One of the most influential medical articles that I’ve read this year: JR Thiagarajah et al. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 2045-59. (Senior authors/corresponding authors: Yaron Avitzur and Martin Martin).  This article provides an excellent review of the terminology and provides algorithms to help in the evaluation of chronic diarrhea in infants.  These algorithms incorporate the role of exome sequencing.

The first part of this review focuses on terminology:

  • For those with persistent and severe diarrhea that is not due to an acquired short bowel syndrome (eg. from necrotizing enterocolitis, gastroschisis, or volvulus), the authors use the term congenital diarrhea and enteropathies (CODEs).  They suggest using CODEs in place of intractable or protracted diarrhea of infancy.
  • Instead of osmotic diarrhea, the authors prefer diet-induced diarrhea since all diarrhea involves osmotic forces.  Typically, with this type of diarrhea, stool osmotic gap is >100 mOsm.
  • Secretory diarrhea “is also imprecise…We prefer to use the term electrolyte-transport-related diarrhea” (eg. congenital sodium or congenital chloride diarrhea)

Key points:

  • Most acquired diarrhea is related to infectious agents and to allergic disorders. Though, persistent diarrhea after an infection could be an early sign of a primary immunodeficiency.
  • Stool osmotic gap: = 290 – 2 x (Stool Na + Stool K).  Osmotic gap >100 mOsm is high, <50 mOsm is low.
  • Stool osmolality in almost all cases is isomolar to serum (~290).  If there is suspicion of improper collection or tampering, then this can provide objective evidence of this.
  • Reducing substances >0.5% indicates malabsorption of monosaccharides. Low pH (<5.3) is indicative of carbohydrate malabsorption (due to abundance of short-chain fatty acids that are products of fermentation)
  • Elastase is “unchanged by intestinal proteases and if low can imply pancreatic insufficiency.”  Falsely-low values can occur due to dilution in high-volume diarrhea.
  • Alpha-one-antitrypsin is largely resistant to intestinal proteases and elevation indicates excess enteric protein loss (eg. protein-losing enteropathy)

Diagnostic evaluation:

  • See figure 1 in review.  Initial evaluation after exclusion of acquired diarrheas (eg infection/allergic): History, Blood tests (CBC, CMP, CRP, ESR, IgG, lipid panel), Stool tests (electrolytes, reducing substances, elastase, fecal fat, A1AT, pH, calprotectin/lactoferrin).
  • Determining stool output may require a “urine catheter for a few days” for accuracy and help elucidate the effect of fasting on stool output.
  • Figure 2 divides evaluation based on type of diarrhea: watery, fatty, and bloody.
  • Fatty diarrhea may be due to pancreatic insufficiency, abetalipoproteinemia and chylomicron retention disease.  The latter two disorders typically are indicated by fat-laden enterocytes in histologic sections
  • Bloody diarrhea “should precipitate investigation for very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune enteropathy, or primary immunodeficiency”
  • Watery diarrhea –see tomorrow’s post.  Before undergoing extensive evaluation, the authors recommend obtaining an UGI/SBFT to exclude congenital short bowel syndrome.

My take: after initial exclusion of common causes for diarrhea in infancy, early endoscopy is needed along with early use of genetic testing.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Little Talbot State Park

 

Bone Health, Especially for IBD and Short Gut

Posted on by

Several colleagues with birthdays this week and next–Happy Birthday!

At our ICN population management meeting (as well as at a recent nutrition colloquium), Dr. Karen Loechner provided a timely update on bone health for our group.  Some of her slides are pictured below and a link to full slides follows.

Some of the points that I found interesting:

  • New hologic scans are much quicker (as little as 15 secs for some images) than typical DXA scans
  • While sodas have been associated with weaker bones, the main mechanism is likely displacement of milk from diet rather than direct effects
  • Adjust DXA results for height age
  • Think about vertebral compression fractures in children with mobility problems and painful symptoms

 

 

Full Link: Sticks and Stones Pediatric Osteoporosis

 

Creatine Kinase Levels Often Increased with Infliximab

Posted on by

E Theodoraki et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24: 1266-71.  This study with 82 infliximab-treated patients with a mean age of 44 years found elevated CK levels (>180 U/L) in 30.5%, compared with 11% of control group (IBD patients not receiving biologic therapy).  The median CK value in the IFX group was 123.5 U/L compared with 81 U/L in the control group (P<0.0001). All patients had at least 3 CK measurements.  The authors recommend: “Based on our results, we recommend monitoring CK levels and clinical symptoms of muscle pain and weakness in IBD patients on IFX treatment.”

In the associated commentary (pg 1272-3), the authors note that CK is found in mitochondria, mainly in cardiac muscle, brain, skeletal muscle and other visceral tissues. The 2 subunits may create 3 isoenzymes: CK-MB (myocardium), CK-MM (skeletal muscle), and CK-BB (neurons).  CK can be elevated in health and disease but “in the absence of symptoms, usually do not require any further investigations.” In a small number of individuals, elevated CK can be due to macro-CK (macrocretin) due to measurement difficulties with macroenzymes.

My take: This study suggests that elevated CK levels are common in adults receiving IFX and to avoid overreaction.

Sunrise at Amelia Island

“The Fruit Juice Delusion”

Posted on by

From NY Times: The Fruit Juice Delusion

A recent commentary revisits the common misconception of fruit juice being healthy.

Key points:

  • “Americans drink a lot of juice…children consume on average 10 ounces per day, more than twice the amount recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.”
  • “One 12-ounce glass of orange juice contains 10 teaspoons of sugar.”
  • Eating whole fruit is “associated with a reduced risk of diabetes, drinking fruit juice is associated with the opposite.”
  • “Juice may also be a ‘gateway beverage’–[to drink] more soda in their school-age years
  • “There is no evidence that juice improves health…Parents should instead serve water and focus on trying to increase children’s intake of whole fruit.”

My take (borrowed from authors): “we have succeeded in recognizing the harm of sugary beverages like soda. We can’t keep pretending that juice is different.”

Related blog posts: