Author Archives: gutsandgrowth

Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

Customized Postoperative Therapy for Biliary Atresia -Does It Help?

Posted on by

S Pandurangi et al. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58: 1483-1488. Customized Postoperative Therapy Improves Bile Drainage in Biliary Atresia: A Single Center Preliminary Report

This single center retrospective study compared  20 consecutive infants underwent hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) (beginning in 2017) for biliary atresia (BA) to a historical cohort. Analysis of successful biliary drainage 3 months after HPE (defined as serum total bilirubin (TB) <2 mg/dL) was the primary endpoint; survival with native liver at 2 years was the secondary endpoint.

Protocol:

  • Cefoxitin was administered to all infants following HPE for 3-4 days.
  • Standard protocol: If the stool color normalized (pigmented), the infant received “conventional” treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole cholangitis prophylaxis, fat-soluble vitamin supplementation with DEKAsPlus or AquaADEKs (1 mL daily), and ursodeoxycholic acid (5 mg/kg twice daily).
  • Customized protocol: If the stools were acholic (or not consistently pigmented) and </=45 days, the infants received intravenous cefoxitin or piperacillin-tazobactam and methylprednisolone, initial dose 5 mg/kg/day and decreased by 1 mg/kg/day each day thru day 5; then orally treated with dose dropped 0.25 mg/kg weekly. When switched to oral steroids, IV antibiotics were stopped and infant was placed on amoxicillin-clavulanate which was continued until TB <2 mg/dL or discontinuation of corticosteroids (whichever came first).
  • If stools were acholic and infant was >45 days, then the same treatment was given if there was liver inflammation on histology.

Key findings:

  • 8 had pigmented stools after HPE and received standard protocol.
  • 12 had acholic/inconsistent stools. All of those >45 days had liver inflammation; thus, all 12 received the customized protocol. Two infants had two cycles of steroids/antibiotics who had initial response to treatment and then worsened.
  • Sixteen of 20 (80%) infants had successful bile drainage, compared to 8 of 20 (40%) infants in the historical cohort (P = 0.0225)
  • Among the sixteen who have reached two years of age, 11 (68.8%) are alive with native livers versus 10 of 20 (50%) in the historical cohort (P = 0.0970).  This did not achieve statistical significance.

The authors established their protocol based on data from Kings College in 2016 suggesting that steroids appeared effective in younger patients who underwent HPE prior to 45 days (Peg Surg Int 2016; 32: 193-200). The START study showed no significant improvement in biliary drainage between patients receiving corticosteroids and placebo. However, in the group <70 days, 72% of infants receiving corticosteroids achieved biliary drainage compared with 57% of the placebo group (P=0.36).

My take: This is a small sample size. Perhaps, this protocol will help improve outcomes. If so, we still don’t know which factor is more important —the IV antibiotics or the high dose steroids. If these agents are helpful, are there other predictive factors –microbiome? MMP-&?

Related blog posts:

Pictures from the Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild

According to the study which you would never qualify for… (2023)

Posted on by

In 2012, this blog highlighted a study which showed that “only 31.1% of 206 patients with IBD would have been eligible to participate in any of the selected RCTs.” (Post: According to the study which you would never qualify for…).

A recent study shows the same phenomenon in pediatric IBD studies: O Atia et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56 (5): 794-801. Open Access! Children included in randomised controlled trials of biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases do not represent the real-world patient mix

This study utilized data for children initiating biologics from two prospective real‐world cohorts and one retrospective cohort.

Key findings:

  • Only 62 of 164 (38%) children with moderate–to‐severe disease would have been eligible for inclusion in the original RCTs.
  • The steroid-free remission rate was higher in the eligible children (51%) than in the ineligible children (31%; OR 2.3 [95%CI 1.2–4.5]; p = 0.01)
  • The main exclusion criterion was prohibited previous therapies (47%)

My take (borrowed from authors): “Remission rates were higher among eligible children raising the concern that results presented in regulatory RCTs in paediatric IBD do not necessarily reflect the patient‐mix in the real‐world and should be interpreted with caution when applied to clinical practice.”

Pictures from VilleFranche-Sur-Mer:

Expect Costs of Liquid Omeprazole to Increase Due to FDA Approval

Posted on by

Last fall, the FDA approved a liquid version of omeprazole.

9/3/22 Drugs.com: “FDA Approves Konvomep. FDA Approves Konvomep (omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate for oral suspension) for Gastric Ulcer and Reduction of Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients

WOBURN, Mass. (September 2, 2022) – Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a pharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative dose-forms and formulations of products to serve the needs of overlooked patients, announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Konvomep (omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate for oral suspension).“

Now that this FDA approved product is available, it may be that it will be more difficult to receive a compound version. The cost of this new formulation is much higher. Here are some of the costs from GoodRx.com.

My take: The high cost of this liquid preparation is another good reason to avoid using a PPI in patients with low likelihood of benefit.

Related blog posts:

Don’t Put the Cart Before the Horse: Biliary Atresia Screening

Posted on by

R Lerer et al. JPGN Reports2023; 4(4):p e345. Open Access! Evaluation of Newborn Direct Bilirubin As Screening for Cholestatic Liver Disease

This retrospective study analyzed data from 11,965 infants who had fractionated bilirubin obtained in the nursery (2016-2019). Key findings:

  • DB of 0.6 mg/dL was chosen as the cut-off based on a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (99%) for screening newborns for CLD
  • Out of 60 infants who met criteria for DB ≥0.6 mg/dL, only 15 (25%) had a repeat level drawn after nursery discharge; 3 (5%) were eventually diagnosed with CLD (2 with BA and 1 with Alagille syndrome)

It is fairly easy to get fractionated bilirubins on infants. Many need to get a bilirubin check and in many centers, a fractionated bilirubin is automatically generated at no additional costs. The hard part is making sure that those with abnormal values receive timely followup.

My take: It is a mistake to get fractionated bilirubins in newborns unless one has developed a plan/infrastructure to make sure those with abnormal values receive appropriate followup.

Related blog posts:

Off the coast of Southern France (near Juan-Les-Pines)

Gene Therapy for Crigler-Najjar

Posted on by

L D’Antiga et al. NEJM; 2023; 389: 620-631. Gene Therapy in Patients with the Crigler–Najjar Syndrome

Methods: Five patients received a single infusion of the gene construct (GNT0003): two received 2×1012 vector genomes (vg) per kilogram of body weight, and three received 5×1012 vg per kilogram. The primary end points were measures of safety and efficacy; efficacy was defined as a serum bilirubin level of 300 μmol per liter or lower measured at 17 weeks, 1 week after discontinuation of phototherapy. The infusion protocol included administration of sirolimus adjusted for a trough of 4-12 mcg/L (starting 1 week prior to infusion) and steroids (IV day prior then oral for 8 weeks). .

Key findings

  •  By week 16, serum bilirubin levels in patients who received the lower dose of GNT0003 exceeded 300 μmol per liter.
  • The patients who received the higher dose had bilirubin levels below 300 μmol per liter in the absence of phototherapy at the end of follow-up; mean level at the final follow-up visit [week 78 in two patients and week 80 in the other], was149±33 μmol per liter.
  • No serious adverse events were reported. Mild increase in ALT levels were seen in 4 of 5 patients; this was “potentially related to an immune response against the infused vector; these patients were treated with a course of glucocorticoids.”
This figure shows the response of the serum bilirubin in patients receiving the higher dose of the infusion.

My take: This study shows that the GNT0003 increased UGT1A1 activity to levels that permitted cessation of phototherapy; this persisted for 18 months after treatment. Further studies are needed.

Related blog posts:

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 5

Posted on by

Another very good review by David Schwartz on The Daunting Duo: Management of Stictures and Fistula. Below are some of my notes and some slides; my notes may contain errors in transcription or omission. Can get access to all 49 slides here: IBD Pro CCFA 2023 Atlanta

  • Fistula healing rates are poor
  • 78% have complex fistulas
  • Long-term healing: 67% with simple fistulas but only 37% with complex fistulas
  • Seton placement prior to biologic therapy increases likelihood of better outcomes
  • Antibiotic therapy recommended until Seton removed (not short-term treatment) –improved healing rates along with medical therapy
  • Anti-TNF therapy effective in ~40% long-term; higher rates of healing with higher anti-TNF levels
  • MRI and/or EUS helpful in improving fistula healing rates
  • Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab both had fistula healing rates ~40%
  • Adipose derived stem cells with ~50% healing rates (study with high placebo healing rate too ~37%); changes local cytokine profile, cells gone in about 2 weeks but goal for changing trajectory

Strictures

  • 5-24% with stricturing phenotype
  • No effective medical treatments
  • Endoscopic balloon dilatation in shorter strictures (<5 cm) without associated abscess or fistula (needs imaging prior)
  • One-third of balloon dilated strictures will still wind up needing surgery despite dilatation. 5-10% risk of complication. Goal is 15 mm or more (Dr. Schwartz typically does not increase by more than 3 sizes from baseline in one session)

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 4

Posted on by

Another terrific lecture from David Rubin: Positioning of Advanced IBD Therapy. Here are my notes and some slides which could include errors in transcription and omission. Can get access to all 46 slides here: IBD Pro CCFA 2023 Atlanta

Many challenges in sequencing treatment -heterogeneity of diseases, loss of response, challenges in interpreting data, understudied issues (perianal disease, extra-intestinal manifestations, psychological health). 

Evolution of therapies: desperation era -limited options, step up era, top down era with anti-TNFs, treat to target era and currently evidence-based by safety era. 

  • It is possible to avoid steroids in many patients with upcoming plans to use an advanced therapy -this is probably beneficial.  This may result in patients remaining symptomatic until these therapies can be started.
  • JAK inhibitors cannot be given as first-line agent in U.S. (but is done in other countries).
  • VARSITY trial enrolled patients with prior anti-TNF exposure (but not adalimumab) which biased the study against adalimumab vs vedolizumab
  • SEAVUE study ~65% in clinical remission at 1 yr with both adalimumab and ustekinumab; though, ustekinumab had better tolerability
  • Ustekinumab better 2nd line treatment for CD after anti-TNF (Parrot et al. AP&T 2022; 55: 380-388
  • Vedolizumab is a good therapy for CD, especially in biologically-naïve
  • Risankizumab good for moderate-severe CD both in biologically-naïve and biologically-experienced
  • Dose reduction in maintenance of Jak inhibitors can result in LOR and 50-75% can achieve response after resumption of higher dosing

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 3

Posted on by

This is third day summarizing some of the talks at the regional CCFA conference. Erin Forster presented on Treatment with Oral Advanced Therapy. Below are my notes and some of the slides; my notes may have errors of omission or transcription. Can get access to full slide set: (n=22) here: Treatment with Oral Advanced Therapy

  • JAK inhibitors (Tofacitinib, Upadacitinib) have rapid onset of action and are taken orally
  • Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) -concern about cardiovascular events was derived from elderly rheumatologic patients.  Cardiovascular events are rare. Higher dose (TID) (in the hospital) associated with lower colectomy rates in acute severe ulcerative colitis.
  • Upadacitinib (Rinvoq) -now approved for CD and UC. Higher dosing could affect liver function (especially if underlying liver disease).  Also, JAK inhibitors as a class have similar safety concerns: increased herpes zoster and concerns for cardiovascular concerns (esp if >50 years)..
  • S!P receptor modulators: Oznaimod, Etrasimod & Amiselimod. Can cause bradycardia -have to check EKG prior.
  • None of the oral agents are safe in pregnancy

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 2

Posted on by

There were a bunch useful lectures at CCFA 2023 regional conference in Atlanta. Here are some of my notes and slides from Doug Wolf‘s lecture; my notes may have errors of omission or transcription. Can get access to full slide set (n=37) here: Dose Escalation of Biologic Therapy and Dual Biologic Therapy

  • If loss of response to anti-TNF, consider dose escalation by either re-induction or increasing (doubling) dose. Re-induction is less costly
  • Dose escalation generally not effective for vedolizumab
  • Dose escalation (increased frequency) with ustekinumab can be effective.  Therapeutic drug monitoring can provide guidance.  Re-induction can also be effective in half of patients (especially in patients with either no prior biologics or one prior biologic)
  • Risankizumab can still work in patients who had not responded by 12 weeks (delayed responders)
  • Discussed several combination treatments -no large studies thus far

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) -Part 1

Posted on by

I recently attended a regional CCFA conference. David Rubin gave several terrific lectures. Here are some of my notes and some slides from this lecture. My notes may contain transcription errors as well as important omissions. Can get access to full set of slides here: Biologics and Their Biosimilars

“Biologics and Their Biosimilars“

What is a Biologic Therapy?

Dr. Rubin makes a point of explaining the term to patients.  It is a protein made in a living cell that targets another protein.  Term “biologic” can sound scary to patients.  Usually given IV because they cannot be absorbed through the small bowel.

IBD Treatment Revolutions

  • Steroids -overnight changed mortality in IBD
  • Anti-TNF Therapy in IBD -taught many lessons. Treat earlier –>better outcomes. 

Anti-TNF Therapy

  • Frequent loss of response.
  • Earlier treatment with biologics result in better outcomes.
  • Immunogenicity is mainly an issue with anti-TNF agents and not much of an issue with other biologics. Episodic therapy is a big risk factor for anti-drug antibodies. 
  • If staying with in-class medication, after anti-drug antibodies, need to take additional measures to prevent anti-drug antibodies (eg. Immunomodulators).
  • Combination therapy is more effective (SONIC, UC SUCCESS trials).  This is due to using multiple mechanisms of disease control, reduction in anti-drug antibodies, and elevated serum drug levels.
  • Good therapeutic levels appears to deliver similar results as combination therapy
  • Pre-week 6 level of 17 or greater, associated with good response in maintenance.  If level is low, presumption is that higher dosing will be beneficial.
  • Higher levels of infliximab trough levels needed for perianal fistula healing (improved with ciprofloxacin).  Higher levels could be causally-related to healing or could be a marker that there is less inflammation and a patient is responding.
  • Anti-TNFs do not appear to increase risk of infections (see PUCCINI study)

Anti-23 and Anti-IL-12/IL-23

  • Tissue selective targeted therapy –>excellent safety profile
  • IV loading and SC maintenance
  • Excellent for bowel and skin
  • IL-23 is not expressed in joints
  • Ustekinumab is effective for perianal disease and ulcerative colitis
  • Risankizumab is superior to ustekinumab in plaque psoriasis.  If loss of response to ustekinumab, can still respond to Risankizumab

Anti-Integrins:

  • Natalizumab (not used frequently in IBD)
  • Vedolizumab.  Affects mucosa (can explain frequent nasopharyngitis)
  • Vedolizumab -terrific safety profile.  No PML, no malignancy risk

Biosimilars:

  • If biosimilar found effective for one approved condition, extrapolation given to all indications
  • IBD switching studies have NOT shown increased loss of response.  Consider reassess prior to switch to help determine if patient truly in remission prior to switch. Switching often blamed for loss of response when many times the disease was not under good control prior to switch
  • Interchangeable indicates that the drug can be switched by pharmacists
  • Biosimilars are saving insurers money but no proof that this is saving patients money
  • Anti-drug antibodies will cross-react to biosimilars

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.