Author Archives: gutsandgrowth

Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

U.S. Health System: ‘World Leader in Amputations’

Posted on by

NY Times 8/17/23, Nicholas Kristof: How Do We Fix the Scandal That Is American Health Care?

“It’s not just that life expectancy in Mississippi (71.9) now appears to be a hair shorter than in Bangladesh (72.4). Nor that an infant is some 70 percent more likely to die in the United States than in other wealthy countries….

All that is tragic and infuriating, but to me the most heart-rending symbol of America’s failure in health care is the avoidable amputations that result from poorly managed diabetes…A toe, foot or leg is cut off by a doctor about 150,000 times a year in America, making the United States a world leader of these amputations.

America’s dismal health care outcomes are a disgrace. They shame us. Partly because of diabetes and other preventable conditions, Americans suffer unnecessarily and often die young. It is unconscionable that newborns in India, Rwanda and Venezuela have a longer life expectancy than Native American newborns (65) in the United States. And Native American males have a life expectancy of just 61.5 years — shorter than the overall life expectancy in Haiti.“

The article recommends

  1. Expanding Access to Health Care
  2. Work on improving health behaviors: “smoking, eating habits and exercise — affect life expectancy even more than access to health care”…
  3. Work on poverty and education: “America’s health dysfunction is rooted in a broader national dysfunction, including deep intergenerational poverty and despair. The medical system can efficiently amputate a foot, but an improvement in self-care of diabetes sometimes requires an injection of hope and improvements in education, job training, earnings and opportunity.”

Related blog posts:

Infliximab: Reach Higher and Be Stronger

Posted on by

M Gibson et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 207-213. Safety and Durability of Accelerated Infliximab Dosing Strategies in Pediatric IBD: A Single Center, Retrospective Study

This pediatric retrospective study (n=291, 2010-2020) showed a high response to infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (n=234 Crohn’s disease (CD), n=53 ulcerative colitis (UC)) over a 10-period. Mean duration of treatment among study participants was 2.9 years. Key findings:

  • 53% (n=135) started with doses of 10 mg/kg and 64% (n=87) of those who started on 5 mg/kg were dose-escalated; thus, approximately 76% of patients in their cohort needed doses of 10 mg/kg.
  • Only 12% of patients discontinued treatment over the observed timeframe.
  • Patients with UC (P ≤ 0.01) and patients with extensive disease (P = 0.01) had lower durability, despite a higher starting dose of IFX (P = 0.03).  Figure 2 indicated that durability in CD was ~93% compared to ~60% for UC with HR of 5.12. The HR for extensive disease (n=77) was 3.74 compared to those with limited disease (n=108). Still, ~75% of those with extensive disease continued on treatment
  • Common adverse events included 18 with skin findings (14 with psoriasis, 3 nonspecific rash, 1 with lupus), 23 with infusion reactions, 7 with AST/ALT >3 times ULN (or >120 IU/L), and 3 with serious infections.

Like the theme song from the 1996 Olympics (Reach, Gloria Estefan) reaching higher (dosing) resulted in being stronger (i.e.. better outcomes).

My take: This study showed really good outcomes associated with “accelerated” infliximab dosing.

Related blog posts:

The view before starting a climb at NRocks (Circleville, WV)
Highest point of our climb

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Flying “Fecal Fiasco”

Posted on by

9/5/23 CNN: Delta flight forced to turn around because of diarrhea incident ““It’s just a biohazard issue, we had a passenger who had diarrhea all the way through the airplane so they want us to come back to Atlanta,” a DL 194 pilot said to air traffic control.”

When a family member saw this, he wondered if someone on the plane yelled: “Is There a Gastroenterologist on This Plane?”

My take: In this case, as with a lot of GI symptoms, having a good cleaning crew is usually more important than having a good physician. And, what a terrible situation!

Related comedy (TikTok, 1 minute): Spirit Airlines Medical Emergency

Giving Tacrolimus Another Look for Severe Colitis

Posted on by

The retrospective study by Zimmerman et al involved 170 pediatric patients (IFX (n = 84) and TAC (n = 86)) with acute severe colitis (ASC) form 2005 to 2017; TAC was generally used prior to 2014 and patients were more likely to be receiving 6MP as a long-term maintenance agent; the mean TAC level was 10.7 ng/mL. The mean dose of infliximab (IFX) initially was 7 mg/kg. Key findings:

  • The rate of colectomy 6 months from rescue therapy was similar whether patients received IFX or TAC (22.6% vs 26.7%, respectively, P = 0.53).
  • The mean decline in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index scores from admission to discharge in those treated with IFX (31.9) or TAC (29.8) was similar (P = 0.63).
  • Similar rates of adverse effects were seen. 4 patients in the TAC group experienced neurologic symptoms.
  • About half of the steroid-refractory ASC patients failing either agent as initial rescue therapy required colectomy, even if they switched to the alternative agent.
  • 17.9% of patients receiving high-dose IFX required colectomy by 6 months compared to 25% in the “typical” IFX dosing group; this was not statistically significant, likely due to limitations of sample size.

In the systematic review/meta-analysis study by Bolia et al., the authors identified 7 studies with 166 children (111 steroid-refractory, 52 steroid-dependent, 3 no steroids). The majority of cases (150/166 [90%]) were naïve to biologics. None of the participants in these studies have been treated recently (only 10 patients since 2014 and none after 2016). The two most recently published studies in 2018 and 2019 had enrollment in 2014-2016 and 2000-2012, respectively. Key findings:

  • An initial response to tacrolimus therapy was seen in 84% 
  • No difference was observed between children with high (>10 ng/mL) or low tacrolimus levels (127/150 [85%] vs 12/16 [75%], P = 0.3).
  • The pooled frequency of 1-year colectomy-free survival in children treated with initial oral tacrolimus was 64% (95% CI: 53%–75%). Twelve (7.2%) patients required cessation of therapy because of side effects.

My take: Both of these studies indicate that tacrolimus could be a useful agent for ASC and may find a role as a bridge therapy for biologic agents with slower onset of action.

Related blog posts:

NRocks Climb in Circleville, WV

AAP GI Review Articles: GI Bleeding in the Neonate, Cystic Fibrosis in Neonates, and Intestinal Transplantation in Children

Posted on by

A couple good review articles (though behind paywall):

PT Reeves, L James-Davis, M Khan. Neoreviews 2023;24(7):e403-e413. Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Neonate: Updates on Diagnostics, Therapeutics, and Management This reviews covers the most important etiologies of GI bleeding in the neonate. A few interesting points were the potential use of calprotectin as a potential screen for necrotizing enterocolitis; “the median fecal calprotectin levels in infants with NEC were between 210 and 400 mg/g of stool.” The authors also point out that there is “limited evidence for performing endoscopy in infants with GIB…][In one study] Only 3 of 56 infants underwent therepeutic intervention during endoscopy. Five percent (n=3) of these neonates exhibited gastrointestinal perforation in the acute postoperative period after endoscopy.”

Related blog posts:

JT Duong, ZM Sellers. Neoreviews (2023) 24 (7): e414–e430. Cystic Fibrosis-Associated Gastrointestinal Disease in Neonates

Associated slides (13 slides) and presentation (~7 minutes ): Cystic Fibrosis-Associated Gastrointestinal Disease in Neonates

The article notes that meconium is typically passed in 24 to 48 hours after gastrograffin enema and recommends abdominal imaging every 8 to 12 hours after enema administration to exclude perforation along with adequate intravenous hydration (“at least 150 mL/kg per day”).

The actual article has many other useful points. For example:

  • CFTR is not expressed in hepatocytes; “however, liver injury may occur patients with CF due to proximity to cholangiocytes (which may be inflamed) and/or through increased intestinal permeability.”
  • Elastase levels are not affected by exogenous pancreatic enzyme supplementation and is expected to display levels within the normal adult range by 2 weeks of age.
  • Sodium deficiency is common and needs to be prevented with sodium supplementation in first 12 months of life (one-eighth teaspoon (= 12.5 mEq) of salt in first 6 months, and one-fourth teaspoon (=25.2 mEq) from 6-12 months)
  • The newest CFTR modulator, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is approved for children 2 years of age and older
  • There are case reports of in utero exposure to CFTR modulators associated with resolution/prevention of disease (eg. pregnant women starting CFTR-targeted treatment at 32 weeks gestation which resolved meconium ileus).

Related blog posts:

K McNelis, ME Rogers, S Kocoshis. Neoreviews. 2023 Jul 1;24(7):e431-e439. Pediatric Intestinal Transplantation Management and Outcomes This is another useful review for pediatricians. Pediatric intestinal transplantation is most commonly (65%) related to short bowel syndrome, 20% due to motility disorders, 9% due to mucosal diseases, 5% due to retransplantation and 1% are due to a variety of causes. The evaluation and management of patients needing intestinal transplantation is succinctly summarized. “Overall, survival of pediatric patients after intestinal transplantation is 72.7% at 1 year and 57.2% at 5 years. The most common causes of death are sepsis/multiorgan system failure and cardiovascular/stroke (Fig 2).” Also, “current statistics about organ transplantation can be publicly accessed by health care team members, patients, and families at srtr.transplant.
hrsa.gov.” This site also includes data on transplantation for kidney, pancreas, heart, lung and liver.

Related blog posts:

Briefly Noted: Male Reproductive Safety with IBD Medications

Posted on by

J Gubatan et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 2222-2238. Paternal Medications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Male Fertility and Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

After a literature review, the authors included 10 studies reporting semen parameters (268 patients with IBD) and 16 studies reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes (over 25,000 patients with IBD). Key findings:

  • Biologic, thiopurine, or methotrexate use were not associated with decreased sperm count, motility, or abnormal morphology compared with nonexposed patients.
  • Biologic, thiopurine, or methotrexate use among male patients with IBD are not associated with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes
Cap D’Ail Trail near Monaco

Nonspecific Duodenal Histologic Findings Common in Children with Trisomy 21

Posted on by

E Alexander et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 184-190. The Spectrum of Duodenal Histologic Findings in Patients With Trisomy 21: A Multicenter Study

This retrospective study of patients with trisomy 21 (T21) who underwent EGD between 2000-2020. Key findings:

  • Among 836 patients with T21, 419 (50.1%) of whom had duodenal histologic abnormalities.
  • 290 of 419 had villous atrophy (VA) and of those, 172 of 290 met celiac disease (CD) diagnostic criteria, while 118 of 290 did not meet CD criteria (nonspecific VA).
  • Only one of the 118 with nonspecific VA had markedly abnormal celiac serology (TTG IGA >10 times ULN) but had no IELs on biopsy and did not respond to GFD. Four patients with nonspecific VA were later diagnosed with celiac disease over a median of 2.5 years with conversion to abnormal celiac serology.
  • Among the 129 with duodenitis without villous atrophy, 38 (29%) had increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and two patients were diagnosed with CD many years later (development of VA and positive celiac serology.

The authors offer an algorithm (Figure 2) to assist clinical approach based on biopsy results in this population.

  • In those with no villous atrophy, if Marsh score of 0/1, biopsies not consistent with celiac disease. In those with Marsh score of 2 (which is rare), consider as consistent with celiac disease (see next bullet point).
  • In those with villous atrophy consistent with celiac disease, assess response to gluten free diet (GFD). In those without a response, consider RD consult to evaluate exposures and HLA-typing as next steps.
  • In those with villous atrophy NOT consistent with celiac disease, obtain serology (TTG IgA, EMA, IgA, DGP IgG). If serology is negative, consider peptic duodenitis or SIBO treatments and assess/discontinue medications for potential for mucosal damage. If serology is positive, consider HLA-typing, review pathology slides, assess for competing disorders, and could need f/u endoscopy.

My take: Overall, ~20% of patients with T21 undergoing endoscopy, will have pathology consistent with celiac disease; this represents ~40% of those with abnormal histology. In the other 60% with abnormal histology, many have alternative explanations for the histologic findings (like peptic duodenitis). Some will evolve to meeting the diagnostic criteria for CD with time indicating need for ongoing monitoring. This study highlights the diagnostic uncertainty in those with potential for seronegative celiac disease.

Related blog posts:

Why Carvedilol Is Considered Best Pharmaceutical Agent to Prevent Variceal Bleeding (in Adults)

Posted on by

M Jachs et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 2318-2326. Open Access! Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis

Associated editorial: J Bosch. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:2195-2196. Open Access! Carvedilol as Best β-Blocker for Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding: Are We There, or Not Yet?

Key findings:

  • In a retrospective cohort comprising 87 adult patients receiving NSBB (non-selective beta blocker) in addition to band ligation after variceal bleeding, carvedilol induced more profound decreases in hepatic venous pressure gradient compared with propranolol. The higher rate of chronic hepatic venous pressure gradient response to carvedilol (53.3% vs 28.6%; P = .034) was paralleled by lower rates of variceal rebleeding, liver-related death, and further nonbleeding decompensation.

In the discussion and the editorial, it is noted that there is high-quality evidence that carvediol is superior for primary variceal prophylaxis in adults. “Carvedilol increasingly is used for the prevention of variceal bleeding, 2 and, based on the recent landmark PREDESCI study, overall hepatic decompensation/ascites3 in compensated cirrhosis, because it induces HVPG response (a ≥10% decrease in HVPG is sufficient in primary prophylaxis17) in up to 75% of patients vs 50% when using propranolol. However, it induces more pronounced decreases in blood pressure, which may be detrimental in patients with (refractory) ascites.15“

Though there are concerns about dropping blood pressure, the editorial notes that “up to two-thirds of patients with compensated cirrhosis” have high blood pressure. The editorial concludes that “the study still strongly suggests that carvedilol is at least as safe as propranolol…. I am in complete agreement with the authors in suggesting that carvedilol is likely to represent the best NSBB in the treatment of portal hypertension regardless of the clinical scenario, including prevention of decompensation, ascites, first bleeding, or recurrent bleeding.” The author notes that the “recent Baveno VII recommendations declare carvedilol as the preferred NSBB, and support its use in all compensated patients with direct (HVPG ≥10 mm Hg) or indirect signs of clinically significant portal hypertension.”(J Hepatol. 2022; 76: 959-974. Baveno VII: renewing consensus in portal hypertension)

My take: In adults, Carvediol is the best NSBB for portal hypertension. In children, who may be more prone to hypotension, more data is needed.

Related blog posts:

Juan-Les-Pins, France

How Many Cases of Celiac Disease Are We Missing?

Posted on by

A Bhattacharjee et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 240-243. Clinical Features of Children With Serology Negative, Biopsy Positive Celiac Disease

At the start of my training in pediatric gastroenterology, the serological testing was not reliable and as a result, very few cases of children who did not have a ‘classical’ phenotype (eg. abdominal distention, poor growth, anemia) were diagnosed. The main exception was the diagnosis in children already recognized as high risk (eg. children with type 1 diabetes).

This recent retrospective study indicates that even with improvement in celiac serology, there are cases of seronegative celiac disease (SN-CD) that are difficult to diagnose. In this study, SN-CD diagnosis required clinical correlation and either confirmatory genetics or follow up endoscopy on a gluten-free diet. Key findings:

  • Of the 424 patients who met celiac disease (CD) criteria, 4.7% (n = 20) fulfilled the criteria for SN-CD
  • Nearly 65% of SN-CD were IgA sufficient compared with 98.4% in the seropositive group
  • All SN-CD patients were symptomatic whereas 82% of seropositive group was symptomatic

The discussion notes that it has been understood that the sensitivity of TTG IgA is about 95% and specificity about 96%. However, the authors caution that this may be “largely overestimated due to failure to account for verification bias. Only 3.6% of IgA-ATTG negative individuals were referred for biopsy” in Hujoel et al meta-analysis (J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55: 327-334); thus, the sensitivity could be as low as 57% based on this meta-analysis. In addition, gluten restriction prior to serological testing can further reduce the sensitivity of serological tests.

An important limitation of the study is proving that SN-CD was in fact SN-CD and not one of the mimics for CD (eg. inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune disorders, medication effect). However, they noted that their cohort had followup over 6-9 years and with symptom resolution with a gluten free diet.

My take: Identifying SN-CD is difficult since so many children have similar digestive symptoms unrelated to celiac disease. Most children with vague digestive complaints do not need to undergo endoscopy; as such, SN-CD can be easily overlooked.

Related blog posts:

Pilot Study of Elafibranor in Children with NASH (MASH)

Posted on by

NP Goyal et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 160-165. An Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Elafibranor in Children With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Ten males [mean 15.1 years, standard deviation (SD) 2.2] with NASH were randomized to once daily treatment with Elafibranor: 80 mg (n = 5) or 120 mg (n = 5). Elafibranor, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/δ agonist, has been proposed as a treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, aka Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)). Key findings:

  • End of treatment mean ALT was 52 U/L (SD 20) for the 120 mg group, with a relative mean ALT change from baseline of −37.4% (SD 23.8%) at 12 weeks.
  • Elafibranor was rapidly absorbed and well tolerated.

My take: I think we are on the verge of identifying medications which will be able to improve outcomes for those with steatotic liver disease.

Related blog posts:

Rock Jumping -from Cap D;Ail Trail (near Eze, France)