Yesterday’s post highlighted immune-mediated disorders likely caused by anti-TNF therapy; this includes rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Anti-TNF inhibitors can be the reason for drug-induced liver disease (DILI) including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as well.
In one study, 8% of children receiving anti-TNF therapy developed a new elevation in ALT.
Most often liver enzyme elevation is mild and transient
Differential diagnosis for persistent elevation can be due to DILI, autoimmune liver disease (eg. PSC, AIH), or rarely due to a combination (autoimmune drug-induced liver disease). The latter can improve with drug cessation and with corticosteroid treatment.
Some slides on this topic (courtesy of William. Balistreri):
My take: Serious liver injury related to anti-TNF therapy is rare. When liver enzymes are persistently elevated, consider DILI including anti-TNF agents.
Related blog posts:
Autoimmune Hepatitis Associated with Anti-TNF Therapy. Serious liver injury related to anti-TNF therapy is rare. A great place to understand the spectrum of liver problems potentially related to infliximab is the livertox website
On meta-analysis of 13 studies (3756 patients; median follow-up, 12 months; 41% with variants), HLA-DQA1∗05 variants were associated with 75% higher risk of immunogenicity compared with non-carriers (relative risk, 1.75) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 62%) (low certainty evidence).
In addition, patients with HLA-QQA1*05 variants had clinical loss of response (LOR) in 67% compared to 30% in those without this variant (wild-type); thus, a 124% higher risk of LOR.
Positive and negative predictive values of HLA-DQA1∗05 variants for predicting immunogenicity were 30% and 80%, respectively
Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring, but not concomitant use of IMMs, IMIDs, and TNF-α antagonist-type, modified this association.
My take:
The ~40% of individuals with HLA-DQA1*05 variants are at higher risk of LOR and are more likely to benefit from both therapeutic drug monitoring and probably from use of combination (with immunomodulator) therapy.
The positive predictive value (30%) is low indicating that the majority of patients with these variants will not develop anti-drug antibodies within 12 months.
In those with negative testing for HLA-DQA1*05 (~60%), the higher negative predictive value indicates a patient is more likely to do well with monotherapy.
HLA-DQA1*05 testing is available commercially (usually part of Celiac HLA typing).
This is the Initiation Well at Quinta da Regaleira in Sintra, Portugal. It is pretty cool because it seems to start at ground level and then goes down many floors. There is an exit to a number of tunnels at the lower level.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted from August 1999 to July 2021 for studies (50 studies identified) reporting loss of response and dose escalation during infliximab and/or adalimumab use in ulcerative colitis patients with primary response
Key findings:
Annual loss of response was 10% for infliximab and 13% for adalimumab, with higher rates during the first year.
The annual LOR incidences were higher during the first 65 weeks of treatment for both IFX (14%) and ADA (23%).
Annual dose escalation rates were 14% (infliximab) and 21% (adalimumab), with clinical benefit in 72% and 52%, respectively
Key finding: 4 patients (age 18-25 yrs) received upadacitinib for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) after failing to respond to infliximab and IV steroids. 3 of 4 responded to treatment (45 mg/day) between 4 to 8 days. Three months later, two of these patients were in steroid-free clinical-endoscopic remission and one had maintained a clinical response.
In their discussion, the authors note a similar response rate to tofacitinib, another JAK inhibitor, for ASUC; though, the authors speculate that upadacitinib may be efficacious.
In a a prospective cohort study of 133,137 individuals between the ages of 20 and 80 from 24 countries, the authors examined the relationship between exposures to antibiotics, NSAIDs and hormonal therapies with the development of IBD over a median 11 year period.
Key findings:
Incident IBD was associated significantly with baseline antibiotic (aOR, 2.81; P = .0001) and hormonal medication use (aOR, 4.43; P = .001).
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users also were observed to have increased odds of IBD (aOR, 1.80 P = .002), which was driven by long-term use (aOR, 5.58; P < .001)
In this prospective cohort with 369 patients, treatment included the following 113 infliximab, 133 vedolizumab, and 123 ustekinumab. All patients received standard dosing (eg. 5 mg/kg/dose every 8 weeks with infliximab). Per Table 1, dose of thiopurine was 100 mg (range 50-150, “using a 2:1 ratio of azathioprrine and mercaptopurine”); most patients received methotrexate at a dose of 12.5 mg. Key findings:
Infliximab levels were much improved in patients receiving combination therapy with either a thiopurine or methotrexate. In those patients receiving a thiopurine, a threshold of 6-TGN ≥146 was considered optimal.
Patients receiving combination therapy with methotrexate or a thiopurine and a 6-TGN concentration ≥146 pmol per 8 × 108 RBCs, and those with baseline infliximab level ≥12.3 μg/mL had a lower rate of secondary nonresponse when compared with those on monotherapy, thiopurine with 6-TGN <146 pmol per 8 × 108 RBCs, and baseline infliximab level <12.3 μg/mL (88.2 vs 11.8% [P = .04], 71.2 vs 45.5% [P = .04])
Ustekinumab and vedolizumab levels were NOT increased in patients receiving an immunomodulator
My take: This study reinforces the idea that there are pharmacokinetic benefits of combination therapy with infliximab (and extrapolated to other anti-TNF agents); there is a lack of benefit for most patients receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Even with ustekinumab and vedolizumab, it is possible that patients with more severe disease may still benefit independent of pharmacokinetic effects on biologic agent.
Higher doses of infliximab monotherapy with therapeutic drug monitoring may achieve similar results as combination therapy. However, patients switching from one anti-TNF to another due to immunogenicity/antidrug antibodies are particularly likely to benefit from combination therapy. In addition, a recent ImproveCareNow study showed better outcomes for pediatric patients who received methotrexate with adalimumab (see below).
Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
I recently attended a regional CCFA conference. David Rubin gave several terrific lectures. Here are some of my notes and some slides from this lecture. My notes may contain transcription errors as well as important omissions. Can get access to full set of slides here: Biologics and Their Biosimilars
“Biologics and Their Biosimilars“
What is a Biologic Therapy?
Dr. Rubin makes a point of explaining the term to patients. It is a protein made in a living cell that targets another protein. Term “biologic” can sound scary to patients. Usually given IV because they cannot be absorbed through the small bowel.
IBD Treatment Revolutions
Steroids -overnight changed mortality in IBD
Anti-TNF Therapy in IBD -taught many lessons. Treat earlier –>better outcomes.
Anti-TNF Therapy
Frequent loss of response.
Earlier treatment with biologics result in better outcomes.
Immunogenicity is mainly an issue with anti-TNF agents and not much of an issue with other biologics. Episodic therapy is a big risk factor for anti-drug antibodies.
If staying with in-class medication, after anti-drug antibodies, need to take additional measures to prevent anti-drug antibodies (eg. Immunomodulators).
Combination therapy is more effective (SONIC, UC SUCCESS trials). This is due to using multiple mechanisms of disease control, reduction in anti-drug antibodies, and elevated serum drug levels.
Good therapeutic levels appears to deliver similar results as combination therapy
Pre-week 6 level of 17 or greater, associated with good response in maintenance. If level is low, presumption is that higher dosing will be beneficial.
Higher levels of infliximab trough levels needed for perianal fistula healing (improved with ciprofloxacin). Higher levels could be causally-related to healing or could be a marker that there is less inflammation and a patient is responding.
Anti-TNFs do not appear to increase risk of infections (see PUCCINI study)
Vedolizumab -terrific safety profile. No PML, no malignancy risk
Biosimilars:
If biosimilar found effective for one approved condition, extrapolation given to all indications
IBD switching studies have NOT shown increased loss of response. Consider reassess prior to switch to help determine if patient truly in remission prior to switch. Switching often blamed for loss of response when many times the disease was not under good control prior to switch
Interchangeable indicates that the drug can be switched by pharmacists
Biosimilars are saving insurers money but no proof that this is saving patients money
Anti-drug antibodies will cross-react to biosimilars
Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
There is limited head-to-head data comparing the effectiveness of the biologics used for inflammatory bowel disease. In this study, the authors used a “series of propensity score (PS)-matched cohort studies comparing TNF-α antagonists vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab in a large, diverse, multicenter, electronic health record (EHR)-based cohort.”
This graphical abstract summarizes the findings, though the first cohort (ustekinumab vs TNFalpha population is actually 1545 not 1030):
Key findings:
Ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 515) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36), without any difference in the risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.99) or surgery (HR, 1.08) -compared to patients receiving TNF alpha antagonists (n=1030)
Ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (HR, 0.20), without significant differences in risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.76) or surgery (HR, 1.42) -compared to vedolizumab-treated patients (n=221)
Compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 442), vedolizumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) had a similar risk of serious infections (HR, 1.53), hospitalization (HR, 1.32), and surgery (HR, 0.63).
The increase rate of infections with vedolizumab compared to ustekinumab could be an indication of lower efficacy with vedolizumab as the medication itself has a high safety profile.
In the discussion, the authors comment further on head-to-head studies and lack of these as well. “Biemans et al23 observed that ustekinumab-treated patients were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-free clinical remission (69 patients in each arm, vs vedolizumab; 46.4% vs 29.0%; P = .04) and biochemical remission (42.1% vs 13.2%; P = .01) at 12 months, although these rates were not significant at earlier time points.”
My take: This study provides further evidence that ustekinumab is a good option for Crohn’s disease with regard to both safety and efficacy.
This article is a very handy update on approved adalimumab biosimilars, though even more biosimilars are expected to become available soon. The table below which is similar to a table in the article outlines the similarities and differences in these products compared to the reference product.
These biosimilars are FDA-approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 and older with Crohn disease. “However, the biosimilar products are only approved for treatment of adult patients” (18 and older) with ulcerative colitis. “This may be due to the recent change in pediatric ulcerative colitis Humira FDA-approved dosing.”
My take (borrowed in part from authors): Insurance coverage decisions are likely to overlook some of these factors which are very important for pediatric patients. “The adalimumab biosimilars will likely provide a clinically effective, cost saving option for our patients, but consideration of a number of factors will be key when selecting between” them.
Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
A previous study (SEAVUE) has suggested similar efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab in biologic-naive patients (post: SEAVUE: Head-to-Head Ustekimumab vs. Adalimumab) with ~60-65% clinical response at 52 weeks and ~30% endoscopic remission.
This current retrospective study sought to obtain ‘real-world’ data comparing anti-TNF agents (95 adalimumab, 61 infliximab) to ustekinumab (n=50). In the anti-TNF group, 44% (n=68) received concomitant immunomodulator therapy. Key findings:
At 3 months, clinical response rates were 86% in anti-TNF groups and 64% in the ustekinumab.
At 12 months, in adjusted multivariate analysis, clinical remission (based on Harvey-Bradshaw Index) was independently associated with the biological therapy received (odds ratio, 2.6 for anti-TNF agent vs ustekinumab;P = .02).
“In our sensitivity analysis, a significant difference in terms of efficacy was only found between infliximab and ustekinumab.”
In those with ileocolonoscopy, endoscopic healing was similar (between 6-18 months): 58% of anti-TNF group and 61% of ustekinumab group.
2% of patients in the anti-TNF group had severe adverse events compared to none in the ustekinumab group; among patients receiving adalimumab, 1 patient had cerebral aspergillosis, 1 had a postinfectious macrophage activation syndrome, and 1 had severe folliculitis needing abscess drainage.
Drug persistence at 12 months was 87% in anti-TNF group and 88% in ustekinumab group.
The discussion notes that ‘real-world’ data is important as only ~30% of patients in a regular practice would fulfill the criteria to be included in clinical trials. However, in this retrospective (non-randomized) study, there were differences in the patient population that could affect response to treatment, including a higher rate of smokers in the anti-TNF group (29% compared to 12% in the ustekinumab group).
My take: While anti-TNF therapy, particularly infliximab, may be a little better based on clinical remission, the most objective marker of efficacy, endoscopic healing, was similar. Thus, it is not clear if anti-TNF therapy is more effective than ustekinumab. To achieve optimal results, many in the anti-TNF group received immunomodulator cotherapy and dose escalation.
Joel Andres, Chef & Philanthropist, World Central Kitchen
Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
Methods: The authors analyzed pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) data from the ImproveCareNow Network registry (n= 17,649) between May 2006 and September 2016, including time to biologic initiation, choice of first subsequent biologics, biologic durability, and reasons for discontinuation
Key findings:
7585 (43%) were treated with a biologic agent before age 18. 50% of children with Crohn’s disease (CD) received a biologic compared to 25% of children with ulcerative colitis (UC)
First biologic agents for all patients were anti-tumor necrosis factor agents (88% infliximab, 12% adalimumab)
Probability of remaining on first biologic in patients with CD: 93% at 6 months, 85% at 12 months, 79% at 24 months, and 74% at 36 months
Probability of remaining on first biologic in patients with UC: 84% at 6 months, 75% at 12 months, 66% at 24 months, and 55% at 36 months
First biologics were discontinued because of loss of response (39%), intolerance (23%), and nonresponse (19%).
My take: This is an important study that shows that anti-TNF therapy durability was 79% in patients with CD and 66% in patients with UC at 2 years. This pediatric-specific information will help with counseling families when starting biologic therapy. There was improvement in durability after 2013 compared to prior -so perhaps perhaps even better durability is occurring in 2023. It is a little ironic that this study is from ImproveCareNow given that the results are quite dated. There have been a lot of changes in the last seven years. These include the widespread use of dose optimization/therapeutic drug levels and the approval of several new classes of targeted medications.
Methods: Retrospective study with 980 patients at 5 centers participating in the Swedish IBD Quality Register. Serious infections, defined as infections requiring in-patient care, the year before and after the start of anti-TNF treatment were evaluated.
A decline in the incidence rate can first be seen beyond 1 year of treatment with anti-TNF, with an incidence rate of 1.22 (95% CI, 0.90-1.66) events per 100 person year compared with 2.19 (95% CI, 1.43-3.36) events per 100 person year the year before treatment. This is a significant reduction of infections, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.33-0.95; P = .030).
Key findings:
A 72.0% reduction in the incidence rate of perianal abscesses and intra-abdominal abscesses during treatment with anti-TNF was found compared with before treatment.
Figures 2 & 3 show than most infection rates decreased with treatment. CMV infection did not change significantly with 0.10 per 100 person-years prior to treatment and 0.14 per 100 person-years after starting anti-TNF therapy
” In the current study, patients younger than 20 years old experienced a substantial decrease of infection incidence rate ratio (0.11) with the introduction of anti-TNF treatment. The results could be explained by the fact that young patients have a more active disease with increased risk of infection before treatment with anti-TNF.”
“The most common type of infection after anti-TNF treatment was pneumonia. The high incidence of pneumonia confirms earlier data.9,36,37” However, the authors show that the rate of pneumonia dropped from 0.51 to 0.27 per 100 person-years after starting anti-TNF therapy.
The authors note that a prior study by “Zabana et al showed that patients with IBD had an increased risk for serious infection after starting immunosuppressive treatment compared with before treatment (median follow-up 3 years before and 5 years after)… the discrepancy in the result may be explained by selection bias. We included all patients starting anti-TNF treatment. However, Zabana et al included only patients who suffered from infections during immunosuppressive treatment and retrospectively examined the risk of infection before start of treatment.24“
Limitations of study: several other important factors affecting infections were not captured in this study including steroid exposure and nutritional status.
My take (from authors): “The incidence rate of serious infection among IBD patients did not increase with anti-TNF therapy. Instead, serious infections seemed to decrease more than 1 year after initiation of anti-TNF treatment.”
gutsandgrowth 