Tag Archives: Crohn’s disease

Modest Benefits of Early Advanced Therapies in IBD?

Posted on by

R Lujan, R Buchuk et al. Gastroenterol 2024; 166: 815-825.Early Initiation of Biologics and Disease Outcomes in Adults and Children With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Results From the Epidemiology Group of the Nationwide Israeli Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Nucleus Cohort

Methods: All patients diagnosed with CD or UC in Israel (2005–2020) were included in the Epidemiology Group of the Israeli Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Nucleus cohort. The authors compared disease duration at biologics initiation (ie, 0–3 months, >3–12 months, >1–2 years, and >2–3 years) using the cloning, censoring, and weighting by inverse probabilities method to emulate a target trial, adjusting for time-varying confounders and selection bias.


Of the 34,375 included patients (of whom 5240 [15%] were children), 7452 of 19,264 (39%) with CD and 2235 of 15,111 (15%) with UC received biologics. To attempt to adjust for patient characteristics, “essentially, each patient was cloned 4 times and 1 clone was assigend to each treatment strategy at baseline…[they were removed] subsequently if they did not receive the biologic within the acceptable time window.” Key findings:

  • In CD, by 10 years postdiagnosis, the probability of CD-related surgery decreased gradually but modestly with earlier initiation of biologics; a significant difference was noted between >2–3 years (31%) and 0–3 months (18%; P = .02; number needed to treat, 7.7)
  •  In CD, the 10-year probability of steroid dependency for the 0–3-month period (19%) differed both from the >2–3-year (31%; P < .001) and 1–2-year periods (37%; P < .001).
  •  In UC, no significant differences in colectomy or steroid dependency rates were observed between the treatment initiation periods.
  • Similar trends were noted in the pediatric population.

Thus, overall, the study found that early initiation of biologics was associated only with a modest reduced risk of surgery and steroid dependency for Crohn’s disease. It was not found to reduce risk of colectomy or steroid dependency in UC.

My take: In my view, this study probably underestimates the benefits of early biologic therapy. Even though, lead time bias can skew interpretation, inadequately-treated disease likely leads to long-term damage. The associated editorial (pg 728) by Murphy notes that despite the sophisticated statistical methodology, all observational studies cannot fully control for unmeasured confounders.

Related blog posts:

Colorado River Near Moab, UT

This past weekend there were two fun events in Atlanta -Porchfest (Virginia Highlands) and Midtown Garden Stroll. Porchfest featured more than 50 local bands.

Here’s a couple photos from the Midtown Garden Stroll:

What is Mild Crohn’s Disease and How to Treat It

Posted on by

S Elmasry, C Ha. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 480-483. Evidence-Based Approach to the Management of Mild Crohn’s Disease

This article provides guidance on what is mild Crohn’s disease (CD) and suggested management. The authors note that there are limited randomized controlled trial data focusing on patients with mild CD.

Key points:

  • “Maintenance strategies often fall under the realm of supportive care. Therapeutic approaches need to factor clinical effectiveness, prevention of disease-related complications, risks of adverse events resulting from undertreatment or overtreatment and costs of care.”
  • For induction, the authors suggest budesonide 9 mg per day for 8 weeks with tapering, a tapering course of prednisone or sulfasalazine for colonic CD
  • In those with response to induction, the authors recommend supportive care including anti-diarrheal agents and dietary modifications. Ongoing monitoring is suggested including clinical symptoms and objective labs/biomarkers (every 12 weeks if CD activity and every year during remission)
  • In those without response or early relapse, the authors advocate for further evaluation for disease activity and alternative etiologies along with consideration of advanced therapies (f objective evidence of persistent activity)
  • “Accumulating evidence supports diets rich in fruits and vegetables with limited intake of foodstuffs containing saturated fats, ultraprocessed foods, artificial sweeteners, and emulsifiers.”
  • Advanced therapies “such as vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered owing to favorable effectiveness and safety profiles…may be too cost-prohibitive to justify use for mild CD.”

My take: As younger patients are at increased risk for disease progression, the approach recommended in this article would have very limited application in the pediatric age group.

Related blog posts:

SC Infliximab versus Vedolizumab for Crohn’s Disease and for Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

Peyrin‐Biroulet, L., Arkkila, P., Armuzzi, A. et al. BMC Gastroenterol 24, 121 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03163-5. Open Access! Comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis included in randomised controlled trials. 

Methods: Studies included in the current analysis were parallel-group, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated treatment with IFX SC, following induction therapy with IFX IV, or treatment with VDZ (either with VDZ IV or with VDZ SC [following IV induction therapy]). The authors identified three eligible CD trials and four eligible UC trials that assigned over 1200 participants per disease cohort to either IFX SC or VDZ.

Key findings:

Crohn’s disease: Intravenous induction therapy with IFX demonstrated better efficacy compared with VDZ; during the maintenance phase, IFX SC showed numerically better efficacy than VDZ. A lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year.

Comparison of IFX SC versus VDZ for key efficacy outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease

Ulcerative colitis: Efficacy profiles were similar with IFX SC and VDZ during the induction and maintenance phases, and a lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year.

Comparison of IFX SC1 versus VDZ for key efficacy outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis

Safety: In both cohorts, safety profiles for IFX SC and VDZ were generally comparable during 1 year.

Discussion Points:

  • The authors discuss some limitations of their study. “The GEMINI I, GEMINI II, and VISIBLE 1 trials were rated as being at high risk of bias for the category ‘other’ bias, because only patients who achieved a clinical response during induction went on to participate in the maintenance phase, which could potentially lead to a higher estimate of efficacy during the maintenance phase than if patients who did not achieve a clinical response were also included.”
  • The vedolizumab studies notably included a high proportion of patients who failed to respond to anti-TNFs. “All VDZ studies permitted enrolment of patients with prior TNFi failure, accounting for 47.5% of VDZ-treated patients overall.” Thus, in a true head-to-head study with patients unexposed to biologics, VDZ may achieve better results.

My take: This study indicates that SC infliximab (like IV infliximab) appears to be more effective than vedolizumab for patients with Crohn’s disease and similarly effective for ulcerative colitis, keeping in mind the aforementioned discussion points. While not evident in this study, vedolizumab has a superior safety profile.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Fundamentals for Ostomy Management

Posted on by

K Mullin, RM Rentea, M Appleby, PT Reeves. Pediatrics in Review 2024; 45: 210-224. Gastrointestinal Ostomies in Children: A Primer for the Pediatrician

Like yesterday’s article on GTs, this is another terrific review with plenty of helpful images and advice regarding ostomy management.

  • Background: “There are upwards of 1 million people living with ostomies (ostomates) in the United States.” “Approximately 75% of all ostomies in the pediatric population are created in the neonatal or infant patient.”
  • Table 1 lists the purposes and types of ostomies including gastrostomy, jejunostomy, ileostomy, appendicostomy (Malone), cecostomy, colostomy and urinary diversions (eg. Mitrofanoff).
  • Surgical considerations are reviewed including optimizing nutrition preoperatively and minimizing corticosteroids. Biologics: “The most recent evidence does not support a delay in gastrointestinal surgery for children with IBD receiving biological therapy…[and] typically, biological therapy can be resumed 14 to 28 days after the operation.” For oral small molecules (with short half-lives), these may be restarted sooner if indicated.
  • Table 2 provides pictures of the lower ostomies. For example:
  • Postoperative care is discussed including healing times, need for wound ostomy nurse input, and addressing self-image. Patients with motility disorders are “more likely to experience postoperative complications”
  • Table 4 details the products for pouch care including pouching systems, skin barriers, pouch liner, gas vent, pouch lubricant, pouch covers, and adhesive remover.
  • Table 5 summarized ostomy-related complications and treatments. Complications include stomal necrosis, stomal bleeding, stomal retraction, mucocutaneous separation, parastomal hernia, stoma prolapse (can apply cool compresses, apply osmotic agent (sugar) or manually reduce), stoma stenosis, and dermatitis.
  • Table 6 addresses medical management issues like odor, blockage, diarrhea, and constipation. This table also provides recipes for antegrade enemas (see below) and links including a very useful bowel management guide for families (28 pg from Boston Children’s) and enema ingredients and supplies (2 pg from Seattle Children’s); the latter has some overlapping information with the former.
  • At the conclusion of the article, there is further discussion of systemic and ostomy-related complications (much of which is summarized in Table 5). The article references the Ostomy Skin Tool as a metric to follow the clinical state of the ostomy. The United Ostomy Associations of America (ostomy.org) is listed as a good resource (which it is!).

My take: This is a very useful resource. Even a quick read will make clinicians appreciative of having the assistance wound ostomy nurses.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Proactive Monitoring Associated with Higher Rates of Transmural Healing

Posted on by

SR Fernades et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, izad272, https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad272 Proactive Infliximab Monitoring Improves the Rates of Transmural Remission in Crohn’s Disease: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis 

Methods: Retrospective cohort study (n=195) including consecutive CD patients starting treatment with IFX. Rates of transmural remission were compared between patients with and without therapeutic drug monitoring (target level: 5-7 µg/mL).

Key findings:

  • The rates of transmural remission were higher in patients under proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (37.2% vs 18.3%; P = .004) with similar results in the propensity score–matched analysis (34.2% vs 17.1%; P = .025). 
  • In multivariate analysis, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring was independently associated with transmural remission (odds ratio, 2.95)

My take: Proactive therapeutic monitoring is beneficial in improving outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease. Higher drug levels are likely to be particularly important to achieve adequate tissue penetration in transmural Crohn’s disease.

Related blog posts:

Ram Head Trail, St John

AGA Guidance: Nutritional Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

JG Hashash et al.Gastroenterology 166; 521-532. Open Access! AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diet and Nutritional Therapies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review

There are 12 “best practice” recommendations. Here are a few of them:

  • Best Practice Advice 1: Unless there is a contraindication, all patients with IBD should be advised to follow a Mediterranean diet rich in a variety of fresh fruits and vegetables, monounsaturated fats, complex carbohydrates, and lean proteins and low in ultraprocessed foods, added sugar, and salt for their overall health and general well-being. No diet has consistently been found to decrease the rate of flares in adults with IBD. A diet low in red and processed meat may reduce ulcerative colitis flares, but has not been found to reduce relapse in Crohn’s disease.
  • Best Practice Advice 3: Exclusive enteral nutrition using liquid nutrition formulations is an effective therapy for induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response in Crohn’s disease, with stronger evidence in children than adults. Exclusive enteral nutrition may be considered as a steroid-sparing bridge therapy for patients with Crohn’s disease.
  • Best Practice Advice 6: In patients with IBD who have an intra-abdominal abscess and/or phlegmonous inflammation that limits ability to achieve optimal nutrition via the digestive tract, short-term parenteral nutrition may be used to provide bowel rest in the preoperative phase to decrease infection and inflammation as a bridge to definitive surgical management and to optimize surgical outcomes.
  • Best Practice Advice 7: We suggest the use of parenteral nutrition for high-output gastrointestinal fistula, prolonged ileus, short bowel syndrome, and for patients with IBD with severe malnutrition when oral and enteral nutrition has been trialed and failed or when enteral access is not feasible or contraindicated.
  • Best Practice Advice 10: All patients with IBD should be monitored for vitamin D and iron deficiency. Patients with extensive ileal disease or prior ileal surgery (resection or ileal pouch) should be monitored for vitamin B12 deficiency.
  • Best Practice Advice 12: Breastfeeding is associated with a lower risk for diagnosis of IBD during childhood. A healthy, balanced, Mediterranean diet rich in a variety of fruits and vegetables and decreased intake of ultraprocessed foods have been associated with a lower risk of developing IBD.

AGA has a summary and video here: What you need to know about diet and nutritional therapies for IBD patients

Related blog posts:


Dr. YouTube for IBD Dietary Advice

Posted on by

K Gkikas et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; Volume 30, March 2024, 347–356. Open Access! YouTube as a Source of Information for Food, Diet-Related Items, and Advisory Comments for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The authors assessed videos discussing dietary aspects (food, diet-related items, and advisory comments [FODRIACs]) on YouTube. Of 1800 videos screened, a total of 160 were included in the final analysis.

Background: “Currently, the only well-established dietary treatment in IBD is exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), which is used for induction of remission mostly in pediatric CD.5,6 Over the past 2 decades, several food-based exclusion diets have been suggested as potential treatments for CD and UC, some of which demonstrated promising efficacy signals such as the CD-TREAT (Crohn’s disease treatment with eating) diet and the CDED (Crohn’s disease exclusion diet).7-9 Nonetheless, current societal guidelines do not recommend the use of any solid food–based exclusion diet as a treatment option for the induction or maintenance of clinical remission in IBD.6“

Key findings:

  • Foods pertinent to a prudent dietary pattern (ie, fish, chicken, avocado, blueberries), foods high in pre- and probiotics, and certain food exclusion diets (eg, SCD) were primarily portrayed as beneficial.
  • Foods often associated with a Western dietary pattern, including processed foods, high-sugar foods and high-fat foods, red meat, and alcohol, were considered detrimental for disease outcomes in patients with IBD.
  • Neutral opinions were expressed about fiber and vegetables.
  • There was a higher video interaction rate and number of likes in patient-generated videos compared with videos from healthcare professionals.
  • Only 3% of all patient videos and 35% of videos from healthcare professionals cited any form of scientific evidence.
  • Problems with diet advice is that extensive dietary restrictions and adherence to extreme diets may lead to the development of disordered eating as well as nutrient deficiencies (nutritionist involvement is important to avoid this). In addition, reliance on unproven diets may lead some patients to forgo proven therapies.

My take: Though there are some overlapping advice in these videos, much of the dietary advice on YouTube (and elsewhere) is conflicting. In part, this reflects the lack of evidence-based dietary guidelines for IBD. Physicians should review information on dietary therapies at diagnosis and request that families contact them (or well-qualified nutritionists) when considering dietary modifications.

Related blog posts:

IBD Updates: Newer biologics for post-op Crohn’s, Vedolizumab-exposed newborns, and Anti-TNF injections for Orofacial Granulomatosis

Posted on by

FH Mourad et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 3, March 2024, Pages 459–469. Open Access! Are the New Biologics Effective in the Management of Postoperative Crohn’s Disease?

In this  a systematic review, the authors identified 32 relevant studies. The literature review revealed some encouraging, although conflicting, results on the role of the newer biologic agents, ustekinumab and vedolizumab, in the prevention and treatment of postoperative Crohn’s disease. My take: More high-quality studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of these newer biologics at preventing recurrence disease activity after resection.

This is their recommended management algorithm:

 ¥Other factors to consider are duration of Crohn’s disease,
age of patient at diagnosis, and length of stricture.

—————————————

JH Gorodensky et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 3, March 2024, Pages 496–498. Serious Infections in Offspring Exposed in Utero to Vedolizumab

Background/Methods:  “Offspring exposed to vedolizumab in utero are born with lower blood drug (relative to maternal drug levels) compared with offspring exposed to TNFi or ustekinumab.4,5 In addition, offspring exposed to vedolizumab are known to clear the drug quickly after birth.6” In this IBM MarketScan database cohort of 8507 offspring to women with IBD, 43 offspring were exposed to vedolizumab. Key findings:

Key finding: The cumulative incidence of serious infection at 1 year was 2.3% in the vedolizumab group. This was lower than in those who had no drug exposure (3.0%) and similar to the rate in the TNFi (2.9%), traditional immunosuppressants (2.5%), and groups. Discussion: “This aligns with data from the PIANO study,5 a French retrospective cohort study,8 and the pan-European CONCEIVE study9“

My take: This article title is textbook clickbait. A more accurate title would be “Lack of Serious Infections in Offspring Exposed in Utero to Vedolizumab”

——————————————

J Lee et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 3, March 2024, Pages 499–500. Intralesional Injections of a TNF-α Inhibitor to Treat Orofacial Granulomatosis

This case report demonstrated successful injection of orofacial granulomatosis in a 24 yo with moderate-to-severe CD of the small and large intestines who presented with facial edema, painful lip sores with crusting, and tongue fissures. After numerous other failed treatments (topical steroids, adalimumab, hydroxychloroquine, prednisone, and methotrexate), the patient who had a mild treatment response to certolizumab had three injections split between thigh and lower lip (intralesional). After improvement, the patient continued to maintain response with injections into the thigh.

My take: This is an interesting case report; however, this is not an established therapy for orofacial granulomatosis.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with Ustekinumab

Posted on by

C McDonald et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, March 2024, Pages 423–428. Open Access! Higher Ustekinumab Levels in Maintenance Therapy are Associated with Greater Mucosal Healing and Mucosal Response in Crohn’s Disease: An Experience of 2 IBD Centers

This retrospective study enrolled 47 patients receiving maintenance ustekinumab (UST) for Crohn’s disease. Over one-third of patients (n = 18, 38.3%) were on higher than standard dosing of 90 mg every 8 weeks. The study utilized drug-tolerant ELISA assay for UST trough levels and drug antibody titers.

Key findings:

  • In this observational cohort of patients with CD on maintenance UST, 63.8% of patients (n = 30 of 47) had achieved mucosal healing at time of level assay, and 85.1% (n = 40 of 47) had achieved at least mucosal response.
  • Patients with mucosal healing (n = 30) had significantly higher mean serum UST levels (5.7 µg/mL, SD 6.4) compared with those with no response (1.1 µg/mL, SD 0.52; n = 7, P < .0001).
  • Patients with mucosal healing (n = 30) had significantly higher mean serum UST levels (5.7 µg/mL, SD 6.4) compared with those with no response (1.1 µg/mL, SD 0.52; n = 7, P < .0001)
  • Similarly, for patients with mucosal response (n = 40), we observed a higher mean serum UST trough level (5.1 µg/mL, SD 6.1) compared with those with no response (1.1 µg/mL, SD 0.52; n = 7, P < .0001).
  • There were no antidrug antibodies detected in the cohort.

Discussion:

Unlike anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring, “there are few data supporting a correlation between serum ustekinumab levels and MH. The STARDUST randomized control trial34 is studying standard of care compared with treat-to-target ustekinumab therapy and has reported preliminary data at 1-year showing superiority of treat-to-target approaching achieving endoscopic response.”

My take: In this study, patients with UST levels above 2.3 μg/mL had a 10-fold level higher likelihood of mucosal healing and mucosal response. UST therapeutic drug monitoring can help “determine true nonresponse rather than insufficient dosing in patients who have not responded to UST.”

Other studies have suggested higher target levels. Mayo clinic lab site: “Concentrations > or =4.5 mcg/mL are associated with mucosal healing.” Ref: Papamichael K, Cheifetz AS, Melmed GY, et al. Appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic agents for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(9):1655-1668.e3

 Mean through serum ustekinumab levels with standard deviation in patients who had achieved mucosal healing (n = 30), mucosal response (n = 40) or nonresponse (n = 7).

Related blog posts:

Delayed Commentary

Posted on by

I was a little disappointed (aka first world problem) that this commentary appeared in the February print edition of The Journal of Pediatrics about 4 months after the publication of the analyzed study. This blog commented on this study in October: Disparities Are Abundant in Pediatrics -4 Studies on IBD, SUID, Specialty Referrals and in the NICU re: J Smith et al. J Pediatr 2023; 260: 113522.

DJ Spencer. J Pediatr 2024; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113839. Open Access! Understanding Health Outcomes in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Contributing Factors that Aren’t so Black and White

“In this issue of The Journal, Smith et al report the results of an historical cohort analysis of 519 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed IBD (2013-2020)… Smith et al ask the question of whether the greater rate of complicated disease in Black patients is related more to delayed diagnosis or access to therapy rather than inherent race-based differences in response to treatment.”

Key points:

  • “In this study, Smith et al importantly identified no difference in initiating standard medical therapies based on race. Specifically, they report no difference in initial corticosteroid usage, time to initiation of maintenance therapy, or time to initiate antitumor necrosis factor therapy. In patients receiving biologics, both Black and White patients received similar loading doses and frequency of therapeutic drug monitoring.”
  • “Despite comparable disease presentation and approach to medical therapy in this study cohort, Black patients strikingly remained only one-half as likely to reach corticosteroid-free remission at 12 months compared with White patients (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.3-0.9).”
  • ” Black patients were less likely to be seen in gastroenterology specialty clinic for follow-up, more likely to present to the emergency department, and more likely to be hospitalized.”
  • “This study described poorer outcomes in Black patients despite similar treatments. However, the authors fail to arrive at a definitive answer as to why this is the case.”

My take: Black patients, even when offered similar IBD treatment, clearly experience inferior outcomes. While access and social determinants of health are important, there may be biological/phenotypic factors (eg. more aggressive disease) that are involved as well. More studies are needed. This editorial is a helpful review -the timing of the editorial in the print edition many months later, though, is a head-scratcher.

Unrelated topic: CDC COVID-19 Recommendation

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced new isolation guidance for Covid-19 this week. At the start of the pandemic, people were recommended to stay home for 10 days after testing positive. At the height of the Omicron wave, that was revised to 5 days. This week, isolation time was revised to 24 hours without a fever and symptoms improving, which is similar to the recommendations for other illnesses.

St Johns Honeymoon Beach

Related blog posts: