Tag Archives: Ulcerative colitis

IBD Updates: Dual Advanced Therapies in Pediatrics, IL23 agents/Psoriasis

Posted on by

A Yerushalmy-Feler et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 159–166. Open Access! Dual Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy in Refractory Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DOUBLE-PIBD): A Multicenter Study from the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN

In this retrospective study with 62 children (35 Crohn’s disease, 27 ulcerative colitis) with extensive and severe IBD that was refractory to various therapies, the authors examined the outcomes of combination therapies: the dual therapy included an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent and vedolizumab in 30 children (48%), anti-tumor necrosis factor and ustekinumab in 21 (34%) children, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in 8 (13%) children, and tofacitinib with a biologic in 3 (5%) children.

Key findings:

  • Clinical remission was observed in 21 (35%), 30 (50%), and 38 (63%) children at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.
  • Normalization of C-reactive protein and decrease in fecal calprotectin to <250 µg/g were achieved in 75% and 64%, respectively, at 12 months 
  • Twenty-nine (47%) children sustained adverse events, 8 of which were regarded as serious and led to discontinuation of therapy in 6.
  • Among the 43% that were receiving steroids at the start of dual therapy, twenty (74%) of them could be successfully weaned within 3 months after the initiation of dual therapy.
  • Only 2 of 23 (8.7%) had endoscopic healing

My take (borrowed partly from authors):

  1. “Dual biologic therapy may be effective in children with refractory IBD. The potential efficacy should be weighed against the risk of serious adverse events” and affordability.
  2. “There are currently no data for identifying the patients that are more likely to benefit from dual therapy….The ideal selection of dual biologic regimens remains to be determined.”

A Al-Janabi et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2024;160(1):71-79. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4846 Open Access! Risk of Paradoxical Eczema in Patients Receiving Biologics for Psoriasis

This study examined more than 13,000 patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register for adults treated with biologics for plaque psoriasis.

Key findings:

  •  A total of 273 exposures (1%) were associated with paradoxical eczema.
  • The adjusted incidence rates were 0.94 per 100 000 person-years for TNF inhibitors, 0.80 per 100 000 person-years for IL-12/23 inhibitors, and 0.56 per 100 000 person-years for IL-23 inhibitors.  IL-23 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of paradoxical eczema (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39)

My take (from authors): The overall incidence of paradoxical eczema was low in biologic-treated patients with psoriasis. The risk was lowest in patients receiving IL-23 inhibitors. Increasing age, female sex, and history of AD or hay fever were associated with higher risk of paradoxical eczema.

Chattahoochee River in Sandy Springs, GA

AGA Guideline on Pouchitis Management

Posted on by

Key recommendations

  • AGA recommends metronidazole and/or ciprofloxacin as preferred treatment of pouchitis with duration of treatment 2-4 weeks.
  • For Crohn’s-like disease of the pouch, AGA guideline recommends using either ileal-release budesonide or advanced immunosuppressive agents (eg. Biological therapies and small molecule therapies)
  • “In patients with cuffitis, topical therapies should be the first-line therapy, such as mesalamine suppositories, corticosteroid suppositories, or corticosteroid ointment applied directly to the cuff. Biological therapies and small molecule therapies are recommended in refractory cases

Related blog posts:

Increased Risk of Suicide in Patients with IBD

Posted on by

At a lot of IBD conferences, there is often a lot of focus on health maintenance including discussions on optimizing immunization levels and nutrition. It is often striking how, in comparison, so little attention is focused on emotional health which seems to cause a much greater health burden.

CS Tse et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30: 150-153. Increased Risks for Suicide, Self-Harm, Substance Use, and Psychiatric Disorders in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Study in the United States From 2007 to 2017

Background: Patients with IBD are also at an increased risk for chronic opioid use, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and disease-related disability (eg, unemployment), all known risk factors for suicide

Methods: This cross-sectional study uses the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) as a public domain representing 80% of the U.S. population. This analysis included more than 260 million emergency department visits across the United States from 2007 to 2017.

Key findings:

  • Inflammatory bowel disease conferred >10-fold risk for suicide deaths, self-harm, substance use, and psychiatric disorders.
  • The absolute numbers of self-harm rates were low (<1% of all-cause inflammatory bowel disease emergency department visits; total 56 suicide deaths). This amounts to about 5 suicide deaths per year (compared to 0.5 per year for patients with celiac disease.
  • The risk of self-harm was higher in patients with Crohn’s disease than ulcerative colitis (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4), though the suicide risk was not statistically different (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8-4.5).
From Table 2: RR of self-harm, suicide, psychiatric disorders, and substance use of adults with inflammatory bowel disease compared with celiac disease in the United States from 2007 to 2017. 
The authors found that rates of self-harm and suicide were the same for patients with celiac disease as the general population (RR 1.0).

My take: Attention to mental health is important component of good care for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Related blog posts:

Immune Mediated Disorders Associated with TNF Inhibitors Can Involve the Liver Too

Posted on by

Yesterday’s post highlighted immune-mediated disorders likely caused by anti-TNF therapy; this includes rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Anti-TNF inhibitors can be the reason for drug-induced liver disease (DILI) including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as well. 

  • In one study, 8% of children receiving anti-TNF therapy developed a new elevation in ALT.
  • Most often liver enzyme elevation is mild and transient
  • Differential diagnosis for persistent elevation can be due to DILI, autoimmune liver disease (eg. PSC, AIH), or rarely due to a combination (autoimmune drug-induced liver disease). The latter can improve with drug cessation and with corticosteroid treatment.

Some slides on this topic (courtesy of William. Balistreri):

My take: Serious liver injury related to anti-TNF therapy is rare. When liver enzymes are persistently elevated, consider DILI including anti-TNF agents.

Related blog posts:

Is PPI Use Detrimental Before or After a Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

Posted on by

N Singh et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 1871-1878. Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Before and After a Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The authors retrospectively utilized the University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database includes all Manitobans diagnosed with IBD between 1984 and 2018 (n=5920). Key findings:

  • Rates of PPI use in control subjects increased gradually from 1.5% to 6.5% over 15 years
  • Persons with IBD had a higher rate of PPI use, peaking up to 17% within 1 year of IBD diagnosis with a rate ratio (RR) of 3.1

The authors noted an abrupt increase in PPI use within 6 months of an IBD diagnosis which could indicate that IBD-related symptoms are being mistakenly treated with a PPI or that IBD may increase reflux-related symptoms. Given the higher rate of PPI use in pre-IBD diagnosis patients, compared to controls, the authors note that “it is possible that their [PPI] use enhances the likelihood of an IBD diagnosis by their role in altering the gut microbiota.” In addition, they note that “a case-control study found that PPIs were associated with an increased risk of pediatric IBD” (NR Schwartz et al. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2019; 24: 489-496).

My take: PPIs are being used more frequently. Whether PPIs are detrimental before or after a diagnosis with IBD is not clear.

Chattahoochee River at Island Ford

IBD Updates

Posted on by
  1. Allopurinol makes thiopurines more effective. A Vasudevan et al. AP&T 2023; https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17831 Clinical trial: Combination allopurinol-thiopurine versus standard thiopurine in patients with IBD escalating to immunomodulators (the DECIDER study)

This was  a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of thiopurine-allopurinol versus thiopurine with placebo for adults commencing a thiopurine for IBD in 102 patients. Allopurinol was dosed at 100 mg. Key findings:

  • A higher proportion achieved the primary outcome (improved clinical score and fecal calprotectin <150) in the thiopurine-allopurinol group (50% vs 35%, p = 0.14) and fewer participants stopped their allocated therapy due to adverse events (11% vs 29%, p = 0.02

Related blog posts:

2. Newer treatments and lower colectomy rates in pediatric UC. D Ley et al. AJG 2023; 118:1997-2004 New Therapeutic Strategies Are Associated With a Significant Decrease in Colectomy Rate in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis. Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference.

Medication exposure and disease outcomes were compared between 3 diagnostic periods: 1988 to 1993 (period [P] 1; pre-IS era), 1994 to 2000 (P2; pre-anti-TNF era), and 2001 to 2011 (P3; anti-TNF era).

  • Key finding: The risk of colectomy at 5 years decreased significantly over time (P1, 17%; P2, 19%; and P3, 9%; P = 0.045, P-trend = 0.027) and between the pre-anti-TNF era (P1 + P2, 18%) and the anti-TNF era (P3, 9%) (P = 0.013). 

Related blog posts:

3. More data indicating that anti-TNF therapy does not increase post-operative complications. D Bajzat et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 1971-1980. Safety Analysis of Preoperative Anti-TNF-α Therapy in Pediatric IBD After Intestinal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

In this systematic review, the authors identified 8 eligible articles with 526 pediatric patients with IBD. Key finding: “There is no significant association between preoperative anti-TNF-α therapy and postoperative complications in children with IBD after intestinal resection.”

Related blog posts:

Pics from Island Ford/Chattahoochee River

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Vedolizumab and Infliximab: Expected Dosing When Switching From IV to SC Routes

Posted on by

Z Wang et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 3188-3190. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Can Guide the Intravenous-to-Subcutaneous Switch of Infliximab and Vedolizumab: A Simulation Study

The authors performed population pharmacokinetic (popPK) simulations to determine optimal dosing recommendations.

Key points:

  • Infliximab: “The Q2W SC dosing regimen of infliximab has been selected with the purpose of exceeding a C,trough,ss of 5 mg/L.” This tends to align with 5 mg/kg Q8W IV dosing.
  • Infliximab: “Patients on Q6W or Q8W IV infliximab can safely switch to Q2W SC infliximab…only patients on Q4W IV infliximab need Q1W SC dosing”
  • Vedolizumab: “Only patients on Q4W IV vedolizumab should switch to Q1W SC dosing”
  • Both agents: “Switching 4 instead of 8 weeks after the last IV dose can hit SS[steady state] faster, thereby avoiding the risk of temporary underexposure.”

My take: It is still important to see how switching from IV to SC route affects clinical outcomes in real-world cohorts. This study, though, does provide a good starting point when trying to provide the right dose frequency to achieve good therapeutic troughs.

Related blog posts:

Japanese Maple tree

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

New IBD Medication: Guselkumab for UC (QUASAR study)

Posted on by

Previous work has established Guselkumab, a IL-23p19 subunit antagonist for Crohn’s disease (Guselkumab: Expanding the GALAXI of Treatments for Crohn’s Disease).

Peyrin-Biroulet et al now provide data showing its efficacy for ulcerative colitis (UC): Gastroenterol 2023; 165: 1443-1457. Open access! Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study

Background/Methods: The QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior inadequate response and/or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and/or advanced therapy. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, induction study, adult patients (n=313), with median disease duration of 7.5 years, were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous guselkumab 200 or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0/4/8.

Key findings:

  • Week-12 clinical response percentage was greater with guselkumab 200 mg (61.4%) and 400 mg (60.7%) vs placebo (27.6%; both P < .001). (Patients received IV induction at 0,4, and 8 weeks)
  • Greater proportions of guselkumab-treated vs placebo-treated patients achieved all major secondary endpoints (clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization) at week 12
  • Among guselkumab week-12 clinical nonresponders, 54.3% and 50.0% of patients in the 200- and 400-mg groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 24 (after another dose of guselkumab (2nd dose SC). Thus, by week 24, 80.2% (81/101) of patients in the 200 mg IV induction and 78.5% *84/107) in the 400 mg IV induction had a clinical response.
  • Clinical response was noted as early as 2 weeks (first timepoint assessed)
  • Safety was similar among guselkumab and placebo groups.

My take: This is an era with rapidly expanding medical treatments for inflammatory bowel disease; it should help reduce the problem of individuals who are refractory to available treatments.

FDA Approves Etrasimod for Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

GI & Hepatology News, November 2023: FDA OKs two new treatments for UC

An excerpt:

In October, the FDA approved etrasimod (Velsipity, Pfizer) for moderate to severe active UC in adults. Etrasimod, an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor, binds with high affinity to receptors 1, 4, and 5. It is the second agent in the S1P class approved for UC. The other agent, ozanimod (Zeposia, Bristol-Myers Squibb), which was approved for moderate to severe active UC in May 2021, is an S1P receptor modulator that is selective for the S1P1 and S1P5 receptors located on endothelial cells and oligodendrocytes, respectively.

Etrasimod’s approval was based on safety and efficacy data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials ― ELEVATE UC 52 trial, and ELEVATE UC 12 trial. The Lancet published full results from the two trials on March 2. Both trials enrolled patients with UC who had previously failed or were intolerant of at least one conventional, biologic, or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.

In ELEVATE UC 52, clinical remission at 12 weeks occurred in 27% of patients taking etrasimod, vs 7% of patients taking a placebo (20% difference; P ˂.001). At week 52, remission rates were 32% with active treatment, vs. 7% with placebo (26% difference;
P ˂ .001).

In ELEVATE UC 12, clinical remission was achieved among 26% of patients who received etrasimod, vs 15.0% of patients who received placebo (11% difference; P < .05).

The approved recommended dose is 2 mg once daily. The most common side effects of etrasimod are headache, elevated values on liver tests, worsening of UC, SARS-CoV-2 infection, dizziness, pyrexia, arthralgia, abdominal pain, and nausea

Reference: WJ Sandborn et al. The Lancet 2023; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00061-2. Open Access! Etrasimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (ELEVATE): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies

My take: It is not exactly clear where etrasimod or ozanimod should be positioned for ulcerative colitis therapy as several other drug classes have much higher response rates.

Related blog posts:

Next time someone says that they are receiving therapy, perhaps I will be able to say ‘me too.’