Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder

Why CDC is Drafting New Guidelines for Screening Children for Perinatally-Acquired Hepatitis C Infection

Posted on by

EW Hall et al. J Pediatr 2023; 258: 113409. Open Access PDF! Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Identify Children with Perinatally Acquired Hepatitis C Infection

In this study, the authors modeled three strategies for screening for Hepatitis C infection in children and compared to baseline testing (current approach): : anti-HCV with reflex to HCV RNA at 18 months among children known to be perinatally exposed.

New strategies:

  • #1: HCV RNA testing at 2-6 months among infants known to be perinatally exposed
  • #2 universal anti-HCV with reflex to HCV RNA at 18 months among all children
  • #3 universal HCV RNA testing at 2-6 months among all infants

Key findings:

  • Each of the 3 alternative testing strategies resulted in an increased number of children tested and improved health outcomes. HCV RNA testing at 2-6 months (test strategy 1) was cost-saving and resulted in a population-level difference in cost of $469 671.
  • More testing in each of the universal comparison strategies resulted in increased QALYs, but also over $38 million to over $129 million

In the discussion, the authors elaborate on why testing at 2-6 months is now the best approach:

  • “Factors driving these results include pediatric loss to follow up at older ages, high attendance at well-child visits in the first 6 months of life, and highly sensitive nucleic acid testing with reliable results starting at age 2 months.”
  • “One study assessing >150 000 children at 2 health networks spanning 20 states determined children rarely missed 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month well-care visits, whereas 15-month and 18-month visits were attended by less than one-half of publicly insured children”
  • Current recommendations are for all pregnant women receive HCV screening, though currently it is below 50%. The universal testing strategy becomes more cost prohibitive as more women receive HCV testing in pregnancy

The CDC has undertaken a review and is likely to implement the 2-6 month old testing strategy as a recommendation. The authors of this study are involved in this process. A slide set reviewing the draft recommendations from 12/6/22:

Link 40 Slides: Overview of draft CDC recommendations for perinatal hepatitis C testing

Some selected slides:

My take (borrowed from authors): Testing of perinatally exposed infants at age 2-6 months with a single HCV RNA test will reduce costs and improve health outcomes.

Related blog posts:

Does a Liver Transplantation Improve the Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

Posted on by

AR Safarpour et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 973-985. Alterations in the Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The authors identifed 25 studies which met inclusion criteria. Key findings:

  • In the analysis of studies with 3-category outcomes (n = 13), the pooled frequencies of patients (n=646) with improved, unchanged, or aggravated IBD course after LT were 29.4%, 51.4% (, and 25.2%.
  • Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), younger age at LT, or shorter duration of follow-up were more likely to have an improved disease course.
  • In the analysis of studies with 2-category outcomes (n = 12), the pooled frequencies of patients (n=672) with improved/unchanged or aggravated IBD course were 73.6% and 24.1%, respectively

My take: Despite the intensification of immunosuppression, most often the course of IBD is unchanged in patients following a liver transplantation.

Related blog posts:

View from L’Jaardin Exotique in Eze, France

Only 30% Ready for Transition from Pediatric IBD to Adult Practice

Posted on by

A Foster et al. J Pediatr 2023; 258: 113403. Transition Readiness in Youth with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In this cross-sectional multicenter study evaluating transition readiness in individuals (n=186, prospectively recruited ) with IBD 16-19 years old, the authors used the validated ON Taking Responsibility for Adolescent to Adult Care (ON TRAC) questionnaire. 

Key findings:

  • ON TRAC scores determined that 26.6% of AYAs at pediatric and 40.4% at adult centers reached the threshold of readiness. The findings are limited by potential nonresponse & sampling bias.
  • Disease remission negatively (P = .03) associated with ON TRAC scores.
  • A significant percentage of AYAs reported moderate-to-severe depression (21.7%) and generalized anxiety (36%); however, neither were significantly associated with ON TRAC scores

The authors suggest that a joint clinic with adult/pediatric providers may be helpful to improve transition.

MB Cohen. J Pediatr 2023; 258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113556 Are You Ready to Transition? In commentary on this article, Dr. Cohen writes the following: “a novel finding was that transition readiness was inversely related to disease remission; this confirms what had been previously suggested.1 Patients who are doing well may not be as engaged in developing skills for transition readiness and knowledge about their chronic illness, unlike those with more significant disease or symptoms.”

My take: Many studies show that adolescents and young adults with IBD are not fully prepared to transition to adult medical practices. In my view, it would be better to encourage the young adult to continue engaging with his/her parents until readiness is achieved rather than try to change to a multispecialty clinic.

Related blog posts:

Castle Hill Park, Nice France

Infliximab Injections Coming Soon

Posted on by
  1. L Gianolio et al JPGN 2023; 77(2):p 235-239, August 2023. Effectiveness of Switching to Subcutaneous Infliximab in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients on Intravenous Maintenance Therapy

Key findings: After switching from IV infliximab to SC 120 mg every other week, 6 of 7 patients remained in clinical remission with no significant changes in laboratory markers and median infliximab trough levels (12.3 µg/mL at baseline; 13.9 and 14.0 µg/mL at 6 and 40 weeks respectively). 

2. Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News (7/31/23) Safety, Efficacy of Subcutaneous Infliximab Supported by Trial

Excerpt:

In this multinational trial, called LIBERTY-CD, the median trough level was 16 mcg/mL, which is higher than that typically associated with IV dosing, according to Dr. Hanauer, who presented the results at Digestive Disease Week 2023 (abstract 1028)… “most professional societies to recommend a trough of 10 mcg/mL,” Dr. Hanauer said….

All patients received induction doses of infliximab by IV at weeks 0, 2 and 6. Those who achieved at least a 100-point reduction in the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), which accounted for 86% of the 396 patients initially enrolled, were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 120 mg of subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13) or placebo every two weeks.

The proportion of patients meeting the end point of clinical remission, defined on the basis of CDAI, was 62.3% for active therapy and 32.1% for placebo (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients in the active treatment arm achieving an endoscopic response was nearly three times higher than the proportion in the placebo arm (51.1% vs. 17.9%; P<0.0001).

My take: This study shows that SC infliximab (after IV induction) should be effective. A study showing that the SC product is not inferior to the IV dosing would be helpful. It is likely that vedolizumab will receive approval in U.S. for a similar IV induction followed by maintenance subcutaneous therapy in the next year.

Eze, France

What I Don’t Like About a “Multidisciplinary Approach” for Infants with GERD-Like Symptoms

Posted on by

MH Fishbein et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 39-46. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Infants With GERD-Like Symptoms: A New Paradigm

This was a retrospective study (2011-2019) with 174 full-term infants (<6 months of age). The physician in the study decided which infants needed evaluation by SLP and/or OT.

Key findings:

  • “GERD-like symptoms” were present in 109 with 46 having concerns for dysphagia, 37 having colic/unsettledness, and 26 with concerns combined for dysphagia/colic. 65 were determined to have uncomplicated GER.

The authors conclude that “a multidisciplinary approach, including SLP and OT, is recommended for the evaluation of infants with GERD-like symptoms.” Of note, all but one of the authors are either OTs or SLPs. The authors also promote their AAP book: The CALM Baby Method: Solutions for Fussy Days and Sleepless Nights as a resource for pediatricians and families

Here’s what I don’t like about the recommendations:

  • If taken literally, the authors essentially advocate that a huge percentage of infants need to be seen by OT and SLP as many infants have GERD-like symptoms. The authors cite a review that indicated that 10-25% of infants have GERD symptoms at 1 month; however, other studies have found much higher numbers.
  • While this article stresses the fact that medications are not helpful for GERD symptoms and the importance of not overlooking dysphagia, in my experience many SLPs and OTs are frequently advocating for infants to be placed on GERD medications. In addition, many SLPs and OTs attribute a variety of infant (non-reflux) behaviors to GERD.
  • In many infants with dysphagia, the clinical evaluation by SLP does not have a high sensitivity due to silent aspiration. As such, SLP involvement could be focused on those with objective evidence of dysphagia.

My take: Most infants with GERD-like symptoms do not need to be seen by SLPs or OTs. Dysphagia symptoms (eg. choking, cough with eating, stridor, congestion, poor feeding) need to be evaluated.

Related blog posts:

Coastal Trail, Cap d’Ail, France

Population-Based Study: Prevalence of Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction in Early Childhood (Good Bowel Control is Happening Later)

Posted on by

SJ Verkuijl et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 47-54. Open Access! The Prevalence of Bowel and Bladder Function During Early Childhood: A Population-Based Study

Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire study (n=791 Dutch children) up to age 7 yrs of age.

Key findings:

  • The mean age at which parents/caregivers considered their child fully toilet-trained was 5.1 ± 1.5 years. “Compared to studies performed 15 years ago, we found toilet training to be completed at an older age (23,26–28).”
  • Prevalence of fecal incontinence among toilet-trained children was 12%.
  • Prevalence of constipation was 14%, with excessive stool retention (75.9%) and painful/hard stools (78.7%) as the 2 most common symptoms.
  • The prevalence of urinary incontinence among all toilet-trained children was 40%. The majority of these urinary incontinent children suffered from daytime incontinence (56%). Enuresis occurred in 22% and the other 22% suffered from combined daytime incontinence and enuresis.
  • There were significant associations between fecal incontinence and constipation [odds ratio (OR) = 3.88], fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence (OR = 5.26), and constipation and urinary incontinence (OR = 2.06)
  • Half of the children with constipation and almost all the children with fecal incontinence remained untreated.
Stool Frequency by age (Figure 1 B)

In the discussion, the authors note “treatment of constipation and/or fecal incontinence often leads to the resolution of urinary incontinence (34).”

In my experience, many families sent by urologists have been told that the constipation is causing urinary incontinence. For many children, the explanation is more complicated; association of constipation does not indicate causation. A lot of children have limited sensation of response to both bowel and bladder, rather than the rectum pushing on the bladder. Most children that I see with constipation/encopresis do not have urinary incontinence. However, behavior approaches to toileting can be helpful for both.

My take: This is a useful study providing an updated view on when to expect good toileting and highlighting the frequency of bowel/bladder dysfunction (which is often untreated).

Related blog posts:

Understanding Reflux/Airway Disease and Potential Role of Airway Impedance

Posted on by

A recent blog post, Airway Impedance to Objectively Assess Airway Mucosal Integrity, reviewed a study by Rosen et al (R Rosen et al. J Pediatr 2023; 256: 5-10) which used a novel approach in assessing airway disease using airway impedance.

This month’s Journal of Pediatrics provides a terrific commentary by my partner, Jose Garza. Open Access: Airway Impedance: In Search of a New Tool (DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.01.007).

The article first describes the history of identifying gastroesophageal reflux: “the first attempt to detect GER was in 1884 by Reichman, who lowered a sponge into the esophagus of a patient with heartburn and showed that it contained acid when retrieved. He found that fluid expressed from the sponge was acidic in persons with heartburn and alkaline in normal controls. The first in situ measurement of acid reflux in the esophagus is credited to Tuttle and Grossman 2 in 1958.”

With the development of multi-channel impedance, the concept of reflux has shifted in young children: “non-acid reflux events are more important to the development of symptoms than acid events.”

With regard to Rosen et al, the commentary reiterates that “measuring laryngeal mucosal integrity [using impedance] is safe and feasible in children with extraesophageal symptoms.” The study showed “no correlation between otolaryngology airway inflammation scores with airway impedance, further emphasizing the fact that we need to move away from these scores, as they have failed to show correlation with GERD and with laryngeal mucosal integrity.”

“The authors did find a decrease in airway impedance in patients with history of aspiration; those who aspirated more textures had lower median airway impedance. Therefore, not all airway inflammation is the result of reflux and oropharyngeal dysphagia–associated aspiration can cause GER-like symptoms and airway inflammation. Aspiration can be silent, and if we do not look for it, we are not going to find it.”

“Another group of patients with low airway impedance comprised patients receiving PPIs, which makes it clear that acid is not what is affecting the airway. Otherwise, PPIs would improve airway impedance.” 

My take (borrowed from author): “It is not yet clear whether measuring airway impedance will eventually become a widespread test with clinical applicability. However, the concepts advanced in this report are clearly a step in the right direction.”

Place Massena, Nice, France

Understanding Racial Differences in Response to IBD Treatment — Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

R Greywoode et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 843-849. Open Access! Racial Difference in Efficacy of Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis

The authors analyzed pooled individual-level data (n=1066) from induction and maintenance trials of golimumab in adults with moderate-to-severe UC. Key findings:

  • Compared with White participants, participants from racial minority groups had significantly lower clinical response (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.43), clinical remission (aOR, 0.41), and endoscopic healing (aOR, 0.48) at week 6.
  • Participants from racial minority groups also had significantly lower clinical remission (aOR, 0.46) and endoscopic healing (aOR, 0.63) at week 30.
  • There were no racial differences in placebo response rates.

Discussion:

This is a fascinating study. Most of the differences in response to IBD treatment have been attributed to social determinants of health including access to care (geography, insurance), and adherence to medical care. This study implicates biological factors rather than social factors for driving the difference in response. “There is also a growing body of research uncovering differences in the frequencies of genetic variants in diseases, which may contribute to differences in observed health outcomes among divergent ancestral populations.32,33“

“One of the challenges in further understanding how race may affect response to IBD biologic drugs is the relatively small number of participants from racial minority groups included in clinical trials. There is a longstanding disparity in clinical trial participation in the United States, whereby racial and ethnic minority groups have disproportionately low representation.34-37“

While the differences in the disease phenotype may account for the response to treatment, there may be other factors as well. With hepatitis C infection, those of us who remember the frequent use of Peg-interferon therapy will recollect that specific mutations in Interleukin-28B (IL28B) gene predicted lower response rates in African-American populations (related post: Understanding IL28B).

My take: Most of the changes in outcomes to treatment are likely driven by socioeconomic factors. This study is a good reminder that biological factors play a big role as well.

This figure shows the treatment responses compared to 1.00 (white population)

Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist for Obesity: Orforglipron

Posted on by

S Wharton et al. NEJM 2023; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302392. Daily Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Orforglipron for Adults with Obesity

In this phase 2 randomized, double-blind trial with 272 adults with obesity (mean weight at baseline 108 kg), participants were randomly assigned to receive orforglipron at one of four doses (12, 24, 36, or 45 mg) or placebo once daily for 36 weeks. “The pharmacokinetic profile of orforglipron, with a half-life of 29 to 49 hours, supports once-daily oral administration.”

Key findings:

  • At week 36, the mean change ranged from −9.4% to −14.7% with orforglipron and was −2.3% with placebo.
  • A weight reduction of at least 10% by week 36 occurred in 46 to 75% of the participants who received orforglipron, as compared with 9% who received placebo.
  • Adverse events reported with orforglipron were similar to those with injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Weight reduction of at least 10% at week 36:

My take: This is an exciting time for drug development for obesity. Given the low success rates of traditional ‘lifestyle’ management approaches, these medications have the potential to reduce a great deal of morbidity. Oral agents, rather than injections, would hasten the use of these agents more broadly. Long term outcomes are still unclear.

Related blog posts:

When to Use Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Multispecialty Guidelines

Posted on by

SS Aceves et al. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. 2023; 130: 371-378. Open Access! Clinical guidance for the use of dupilumab in eosinophilic esophagitis

This article summarizes updated recommendations for eosinophilic esophagitis from the Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy Asthma Immunology and American College of Allergy Asthma Immunology and the American Gastroenterology Association (JTF-AGA). It offers a good number of recommendations regarding when using dupilumab should be considered.

Other Key Points:

  • “Dupilumab can be considered as first-line therapy in patients presenting with severe EoE”and in patients with multiple atopic diseases.
  • In addition, it recommends “performing a repeat EGD, along with obtaining biopsies, 5 to 6 months after either starting dupilumab therapy or whenever adjusting the dupilumab dose.” In some cases, like stricture dilatation, the authors indicate that earlier EGD may be appropriate.
  • The advantages/disadvantages of current treatment options are summarized in Table 3. For dupiliumab, the disadvantages include its high price of dupilumab and weekly injections. Conjunctivitis has been an adverse effect identified in its usage with other indications.

My take: Dupilumab is a major advance for patients with EoE. Due to the need for weekly injections and its costs, it is likely a 2nd line agent for most kids with EoE.

Related blog posts: