Category Archives: Gastroenterology

Study: PPIs Did Not Cause Dementia in Older Adults

Posted on by

Thanks to Ben Gold for encouraging me to review this article:

RS Mehta et al. Gastroenterol 2023; ; 165: 564-572. Open Access! Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use With Incident Dementia and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study

The authors used data from ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized prospective trial of aspirin in the United States and Australia, including 18,934 community-based adults ≥65 years of all races/ethnicities (enrollment 2010-2014). Final cognitive testing was done in 2017. Key Findings:

  • Baseline PPI use vs nonuse was not associated with incident dementia (multivariable hazard ratio, 0.88, cognitive impairment without dementia (multivariable hazard ratio, 1.00), or with changes in overall cognitive test scores over time.
  • Also, no associations were observed between H2RA use and all cognitive endpoints.

My take: ” These data provide reassurance about the safety of long-term use of PPIs among older adults.” PPIs are unlikely to have negative effects on cognition.

Related blog posts:

When Patients Have an IBD Flare, It Might Be Something Else -Case in Point

Posted on by

R Paknikar et al. NEJM 2023; 389: 1321-1326. Digging into the Histology

In this case report, a 33-year-old man (from the midwest) with ulcerative colitis (diagnosis seven years prior) who was receiving treatment with tofacitinib (a Janus kinase inhibitor) presented to the hospital with fatigue (x 8 months) and bloody diarrhea. He also had had fevers (x 4 months), 23 lb weight loss, and drenching night sweats. Before tofacitinib, treatment had included adalimumab and azathioprine. He had undergone a sigmoidoscopy two months prior to presentation.

His workup included a CXR showing diffuse reticulonodular opacities, a CT scan showing thickening in the colon and extensive infection workup. On the third hospital day, he had a perforation and resection which led to the diagnosis of invasive histoplasmosis.

My take: This article is useful for understanding how to workup secondary infections in IBD patients on long-term immunosuppressive agents.

One example: “testing for 1,3-β-d-glucan can serve as an adjunctive test for invasive fungal infections caused by fungi expressing 1,3-β-d-glucan in their cell walls, including candida, aspergillus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Histoplasma capsulatum, and coccidioides; such testing has a high negative predictive value for infection with these organisms. In contrast, cryptococcus and blastomyces produce very low levels of 1,3-β-d-glucan in their cell walls and are therefore not readily detected by serum testing for the cell-wall antigen.”

CT showed  shows diffuse wall thickening in the rectosigmoid colon and extravasation of extraluminal contrast material (arrow) into the area adjacent to the sigmoid colon, with layering of the contrast material, findings that are thought to indicate a perforation.

Related blog posts:

Long Term Benefits of Helicobacter Eradication in U.S.

Posted on by

D Li et al . Gastroenterol 2023; 165: 391-401. Open Access! Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy on the Incidence of Noncardia Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Large Diverse Population in the United States

The authors examined a retrospective cohort study of Kaiser Permanente Northern California members (716,567 individuals) who underwent testing and/or treatment for H pylori between 1997 and 2015 and were followed through December 31, 2018. Key findings:

  • The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios of NCGA for H pylori–positive/untreated and H pylori–positive/treated individuals were 6.07 and 2.68, respectively, compared with H pylori–negative individuals.
  • When compared directly with H pylori–positive/untreated individuals, subdistribution hazard ratios for NCGA in H pylori–positive/treated were 0.95 at <8 years and 0.37 ≥8 years of follow-up.

My take (borrowed from authors):  H pylori eradication therapy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of gastric cancer after 8 years compared with no treatment. The risk among treated individuals became lower than the general population after 7 to 10 years of follow-up. The findings support the potential for substantial gastric cancer prevention in the United States through H pylori eradication.

Related blog posts:

FLIP Patterns for Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

DA Carlson et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 165: 552-563. Open Access! A PhysioMechanical Model of Esophageal Function in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

215 adults with EoE who completed FLIP during endoscopy were included in a cross-sectional study. FLIP helped separate the physiomechanical properties of esophageal function in this cohort. The criteria used to define the PhysioMechanical classification in EoE with a representative FLIP panometry image for each classification. Normal compliance was defined as a DP >17 mm and body compliance >450 mm3/mm Hg; reduced compliance (fibrostenosis) was defined by DP ≤17 mm or compliance ≤450 mm3/mm Hg. Normal EGJ opening was defined as a maximum EGJ diameter ≥16 mm; reduced as maximum EGJ diameter <16 mm. ∗Spastic-reactive contractile response (SRCR) with normal body distensibility and normal EGJ opening was assigned as “achalasia pattern” (n = 1 in this cohort).

Key findings:

  • FLIP was normal in 50 (23%), weak pattern in 7 (3%), IsoEGJOO stricture pattern in 27 (13%), IsoEGJOO achalasia pattern in 26 (12%), Fibrostenosis with normal reactivity in 61 (28%), spastic reactive fibrostenosis with normal reactivity in 30 (14%), and noreactive fibrostenosis in 14 (7%)

My take: FLIP testing helps define the mechanism of esophageal dysfunction in patients with EoE. Longer duration of symptoms was associated with more severe esophageal dysfunction.

Related blog posts:

Management of Ostomies

Posted on by

TL Hedrick et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 2473-2477. Open Access! AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Ostomies: Commentary

This article is a helpful review on ostomy care. The article reviews approaches to common problems including early high ostomy output, ostomy leakage, stoma retraction, mucocutaneous separation, dermatological problems, chronic high ostomy output, parastomal hernia, and stoma prolapse. A few of their comments:

  • “An estimated 750,000 Americans live with an ostomy and 130,000 new ostomy surgeries occur in the United States annually.1“
  • “Reversal [of ostomy] before 6 weeks of the index surgery is associated with an increased risk of complications”
  • For leakage of ostomy: “Management steps involve thickening the stool with antidiarrheals to facilitate a more solid effluent and pouching techniques to bolster the height of the stoma off the peristomal skin (eg, convex appliance, ostomy belt, paste, or barrier rings). Each of these items is available through the patient’s medical equipment supplier. Additional pearls include heating the appliance with a hair dryer before application, lying flat for several minutes after application, ensuring the peristomal skin is dry before application, and use of a fine dusting of stomal powder followed by skin sealant on the peristomal skin before application.”
  • Stoma prolapse: “The rate of stomal prolapse is 5% to 10%.12 Acute prolapse can lead to incarceration and ischemia, which presents as pain, obstipation, and purple/black discoloration of the stoma…In the absence of ischemia, the prolapse may be reduced by laying the patient in a relaxed position and gently squeezing the ostomy back into the abdomen. If the stoma cannot be reduced with pressure alone, a cup of sugar applied directly to the stoma and left in place for 20 minutes can reduce stomal swelling and facilitate reduction of the prolapse. Surgery can be avoided if the prolapse is mild, easily reducible, and does not interfere with pouching.”
  • Medications for High Ostomy Output include bulking agents (fiber, guar gum, marshmellows), antimotility agents (eg. loperamide, diphenoxylate/atropine), and antisecretory agents (PPIs, Octreotide). Treatment of specific underlying disease may help, such as anti-inflammatory agents for IBD and GLP-2 analogues for short bowel.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 5

Posted on by

Another very good review by David Schwartz on The Daunting Duo: Management of Stictures and Fistula. Below are some of my notes and some slides; my notes may contain errors in transcription or omission. Can get access to all 49 slides here: IBD Pro CCFA 2023 Atlanta

  • Fistula healing rates are poor
  • 78% have complex fistulas
  • Long-term healing: 67% with simple fistulas but only 37% with complex fistulas
  • Seton placement prior to biologic therapy increases likelihood of better outcomes
  • Antibiotic therapy recommended until Seton removed (not short-term treatment) –improved healing rates along with medical therapy
  • Anti-TNF therapy effective in ~40% long-term; higher rates of healing with higher anti-TNF levels
  • MRI and/or EUS helpful in improving fistula healing rates
  • Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab both had fistula healing rates ~40%
  • Adipose derived stem cells with ~50% healing rates (study with high placebo healing rate too ~37%); changes local cytokine profile, cells gone in about 2 weeks but goal for changing trajectory

Strictures

  • 5-24% with stricturing phenotype
  • No effective medical treatments
  • Endoscopic balloon dilatation in shorter strictures (<5 cm) without associated abscess or fistula (needs imaging prior)
  • One-third of balloon dilated strictures will still wind up needing surgery despite dilatation. 5-10% risk of complication. Goal is 15 mm or more (Dr. Schwartz typically does not increase by more than 3 sizes from baseline in one session)

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 3

Posted on by

This is third day summarizing some of the talks at the regional CCFA conference. Erin Forster presented on Treatment with Oral Advanced Therapy. Below are my notes and some of the slides; my notes may have errors of omission or transcription. Can get access to full slide set: (n=22) here: Treatment with Oral Advanced Therapy

  • JAK inhibitors (Tofacitinib, Upadacitinib) have rapid onset of action and are taken orally
  • Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) -concern about cardiovascular events was derived from elderly rheumatologic patients.  Cardiovascular events are rare. Higher dose (TID) (in the hospital) associated with lower colectomy rates in acute severe ulcerative colitis.
  • Upadacitinib (Rinvoq) -now approved for CD and UC. Higher dosing could affect liver function (especially if underlying liver disease).  Also, JAK inhibitors as a class have similar safety concerns: increased herpes zoster and concerns for cardiovascular concerns (esp if >50 years)..
  • S!P receptor modulators: Oznaimod, Etrasimod & Amiselimod. Can cause bradycardia -have to check EKG prior.
  • None of the oral agents are safe in pregnancy

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 2

Posted on by

There were a bunch useful lectures at CCFA 2023 regional conference in Atlanta. Here are some of my notes and slides from Doug Wolf‘s lecture; my notes may have errors of omission or transcription. Can get access to full slide set (n=37) here: Dose Escalation of Biologic Therapy and Dual Biologic Therapy

  • If loss of response to anti-TNF, consider dose escalation by either re-induction or increasing (doubling) dose. Re-induction is less costly
  • Dose escalation generally not effective for vedolizumab
  • Dose escalation (increased frequency) with ustekinumab can be effective.  Therapeutic drug monitoring can provide guidance.  Re-induction can also be effective in half of patients (especially in patients with either no prior biologics or one prior biologic)
  • Risankizumab can still work in patients who had not responded by 12 weeks (delayed responders)
  • Discussed several combination treatments -no large studies thus far

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) -Part 1

Posted on by

I recently attended a regional CCFA conference. David Rubin gave several terrific lectures. Here are some of my notes and some slides from this lecture. My notes may contain transcription errors as well as important omissions. Can get access to full set of slides here: Biologics and Their Biosimilars

“Biologics and Their Biosimilars“

What is a Biologic Therapy?

Dr. Rubin makes a point of explaining the term to patients.  It is a protein made in a living cell that targets another protein.  Term “biologic” can sound scary to patients.  Usually given IV because they cannot be absorbed through the small bowel.

IBD Treatment Revolutions

  • Steroids -overnight changed mortality in IBD
  • Anti-TNF Therapy in IBD -taught many lessons. Treat earlier –>better outcomes. 

Anti-TNF Therapy

  • Frequent loss of response.
  • Earlier treatment with biologics result in better outcomes.
  • Immunogenicity is mainly an issue with anti-TNF agents and not much of an issue with other biologics. Episodic therapy is a big risk factor for anti-drug antibodies. 
  • If staying with in-class medication, after anti-drug antibodies, need to take additional measures to prevent anti-drug antibodies (eg. Immunomodulators).
  • Combination therapy is more effective (SONIC, UC SUCCESS trials).  This is due to using multiple mechanisms of disease control, reduction in anti-drug antibodies, and elevated serum drug levels.
  • Good therapeutic levels appears to deliver similar results as combination therapy
  • Pre-week 6 level of 17 or greater, associated with good response in maintenance.  If level is low, presumption is that higher dosing will be beneficial.
  • Higher levels of infliximab trough levels needed for perianal fistula healing (improved with ciprofloxacin).  Higher levels could be causally-related to healing or could be a marker that there is less inflammation and a patient is responding.
  • Anti-TNFs do not appear to increase risk of infections (see PUCCINI study)

Anti-23 and Anti-IL-12/IL-23

  • Tissue selective targeted therapy –>excellent safety profile
  • IV loading and SC maintenance
  • Excellent for bowel and skin
  • IL-23 is not expressed in joints
  • Ustekinumab is effective for perianal disease and ulcerative colitis
  • Risankizumab is superior to ustekinumab in plaque psoriasis.  If loss of response to ustekinumab, can still respond to Risankizumab

Anti-Integrins:

  • Natalizumab (not used frequently in IBD)
  • Vedolizumab.  Affects mucosa (can explain frequent nasopharyngitis)
  • Vedolizumab -terrific safety profile.  No PML, no malignancy risk

Biosimilars:

  • If biosimilar found effective for one approved condition, extrapolation given to all indications
  • IBD switching studies have NOT shown increased loss of response.  Consider reassess prior to switch to help determine if patient truly in remission prior to switch. Switching often blamed for loss of response when many times the disease was not under good control prior to switch
  • Interchangeable indicates that the drug can be switched by pharmacists
  • Biosimilars are saving insurers money but no proof that this is saving patients money
  • Anti-drug antibodies will cross-react to biosimilars

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.