The Expanding Adalimumab Options

S White, R Morrow, I Pan, EF de Zoeten. JPGN 2023; 76: 701-703.
Riding the Wave of Adalimumab Biosimilars: Considerations for Pediatric Gastroenterologists

This article is a very handy update on approved adalimumab biosimilars, though even more biosimilars are expected to become available soon. The table below which is similar to a table in the article outlines the similarities and differences in these products compared to the reference product.

These biosimilars are FDA-approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 and older with Crohn disease. “However, the biosimilar products are only approved for treatment of adult patients” (18 and older) with ulcerative colitis. “This may be due to the recent change in pediatric ulcerative colitis Humira FDA-approved dosing.”

My take (borrowed in part from authors): Insurance coverage decisions are likely to overlook some of these factors which are very important for pediatric patients. “The adalimumab biosimilars will likely provide a clinically effective, cost saving option for our patients, but consideration of a number of factors will be key when selecting between” them.

Related posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Which is a More Effective First-Line for Crohn’s Disease: Ustekinumab or anti-TNF agents?

P Riviere et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 923-931. Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF Agent as First-Line Biological Therapy in Luminal Crohn’s Disease: A Retrospective Study From 2 Referral Centers

A previous study (SEAVUE) has suggested similar efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab in biologic-naive patients (post: SEAVUE: Head-to-Head Ustekimumab vs. Adalimumab) with ~60-65% clinical response at 52 weeks and ~30% endoscopic remission.

This current retrospective study sought to obtain ‘real-world’ data comparing anti-TNF agents (95 adalimumab, 61 infliximab) to ustekinumab (n=50). In the anti-TNF group, 44% (n=68) received concomitant immunomodulator therapy. Key findings:

  •  At 3 months, clinical response rates were 86% in anti-TNF groups and 64% in the ustekinumab.
  • At 12 months, in adjusted multivariate analysis, clinical remission (based on Harvey-Bradshaw Index) was independently associated with the biological therapy received (odds ratio, 2.6 for anti-TNF agent vs ustekinumab; P = .02).
  • “In our sensitivity analysis, a significant difference in terms of efficacy was only found between infliximab and ustekinumab.”
  • In those with ileocolonoscopy, endoscopic healing was similar (between 6-18 months): 58% of anti-TNF group and 61% of ustekinumab group.
  • 2% of patients in the anti-TNF group had severe adverse events compared to none in the ustekinumab group; among patients receiving adalimumab, 1 patient had cerebral aspergillosis, 1 had a postinfectious macrophage activation syndrome, and 1 had severe folliculitis needing abscess drainage.
  • Drug persistence at 12 months was 87% in anti-TNF group and 88% in ustekinumab group.

The discussion notes that ‘real-world’ data is important as only ~30% of patients in a regular practice would fulfill the criteria to be included in clinical trials. However, in this retrospective (non-randomized) study, there were differences in the patient population that could affect response to treatment, including a higher rate of smokers in the anti-TNF group (29% compared to 12% in the ustekinumab group).

My take: While anti-TNF therapy, particularly infliximab, may be a little better based on clinical remission, the most objective marker of efficacy, endoscopic healing, was similar. Thus, it is not clear if anti-TNF therapy is more effective than ustekinumab. To achieve optimal results, many in the anti-TNF group received immunomodulator cotherapy and dose escalation.

Related blog posts:

Joel Andres, Chef & Philanthropist, World Central Kitchen

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

A Treatment For Gastroparesis with a 30% Response: Placebo

JL Wise et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 1447-1461. Open Access! Response and Adverse Event Rates With Placebo in Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

In this meta-analysis, the key findings:

  • The pooled placebo response rate was 29.3% (95% CI, 23.7%–35.2%) in 23 trials (n=1011)
  • Pooled placebo response rates were higher in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (34.2% vs 28.1%).
  • Pooled responses were also higher in RCTs of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 32.6% vs ≥9 weeks, 23.2%) and in trials that did not use validated symptom questionnaires (31.2% vs 27.4%)
  • Adverse events occurred in 33.8% (95% CI, 26.4%–41.8%) of patients with placebo, in 27 trials, and were less common in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (17.9% vs 43.4%)

My take: The relatively high placebo response joins the list of factors which make the management of gastroparesis difficult. This list includes trouble with diagnosis/variable results with gastric emptying studies and limited response to current treatments.

Related blog posts:

Harbor in Nice, France

Early Postoperative Anti-TNF Therapy

JE Axelrad et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 888-897. Early Initiation of Antitumor Necrosis Factor Therapy Reduces Postoperative Recurrence of Crohn’s Disease Following Ileocecal Resection

This retrospective cohort study identified 1037 patients with Crohn’s disease who underwent ileocecal resection (ICR). Only 5.4% were younger than 18 yrs at the time of surgery. In this cohort, 278 (26%) received a biologic agent as prophylaxis to prevent recurrence with 80% receiving an anti-TNF agent. In those receiving an anti-TNF agent, 35% were started on therapy within 4 weeks of surgery and 65% were started between 4 and 12 weeks. Recurrence was defined by endoscopy (≥ i2b Rutgeerts score) or radiography (active inflammation in neoterminal ileum). Key findings:

  • After adjusting for factors associated with postoperative recurrence (POR), compared with no biologic prophylaxis, the initiation of an anti-TNF agent (n=223) within 4 weeks following an ICR was associated with a reduction in POR (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.61).
  • Prophylaxis after 4 weeks following an ICR or with vedolizumab or ustekinumab was not associated with a reduction in POR compared with those who did not receive prophylaxis –though sample size with vedolizumab (n=27) and ustekinumab (n=28) was very limited
  • Most patients receiving biologic prophylaxis had prior anti-TNF exposure including 73% of the anti-TNF group, 96% of the vedolizumab group, and 93% of the ustekinumab group.

In their discussion, the authors note that their findings reinforce previous studies which showed beneficial effects of anti-TNF therapy for POR, including the PREVENT trial. This randomized controlled trial with infliximab initiation within 45 days postoperatively in high risk individuals reduced endoscopic recurrence at 18 months (22.4% compared with 51% in placebo group).

My take: Anti-TNF therapy, even in those with prior exposure, likely improves outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease following ileocecal resection. This study indicates that starting therapy within the first 4 weeks is more beneficial.

Related blog posts:

Watersound, FL

Why Do Children Taking Adalimumab Benefit from Methotrexate Dual Therapy?

MD Kappelman et al. Gastroenterology. 2023: 165: 149-161. Open Access! Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-TNF in Combination With Low-Dose Methotrexate vs Anti-TNF Monotherapy in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial

This study enrolled 297 children with Crohn’s disease starting anti-TNF therapy.  Patients initiating infliximab or adalimumab were randomized in 1:1 allocation to methotrexate or placebo and followed for 12–36 months. 

Methotrexate dosing: For those in the active arm, oral methotrexate was administered with a weekly dose of 15 mg for children ≥40 kg, 12.5 mg for children 30 to <40 kg, and 10 mg for children 20 to <30 kg. All participants received pretreatment with ondansetron 4 mg (or placebo) to prevent nausea and folic acid (1 mg/d).

Key findings:

  • For treatment failure: among infliximab initiators, there were no differences between combination and monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.55–1.56)
  • For treatment failure: among adalimumab initiators, combination therapy was associated with longer time to treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19–0.81).
  • A trend toward lower anti-drug antibody development in the combination therapy arm was not significant (infliximab: odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49–1.07; adalimumab: odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.24–2.07).
  • In our study, only 38% of participants underwent colonoscopy during follow-up (41% had calprotectin measurement). 

My thoughts on this study:

My take: Given the increased difficulty monitoring the kids on adalimumab, they are probably better off on dual therapy.  My suspicion, though, is that if they had optimized levels, the benefit of dual therapy is probably small and would mirror the findings with IFX.

Do We Know How To Dilate Strictures Associated With Pediatric Crohn’s Disease?

O Ledder et al. JPGN 2023; 76: 799-806. Approach to Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in Pediatric Stricturing Crohn Disease: A Position Paper of the Endoscopy Special Interest Group of ESPGHAN

This position paper regarding dilatation of strictures in Crohn’s disease provides mostly vague advice.

Here are a few examples:

  • Imaging: “The need for fluoroscopy is dependent on the stricture phenotype and the treating team…The advantage of live imaging is obvious: it provides greater certainty of balloon position and dilatation success; however, it is difficult and impractical in some centers…In simple strictures, where balloon passage and deployment can be performed with reasonable confidence under direct vision,…it is reasonable to dispense with imaging.”
  • Dilatation Size: “In the recent pediatric case series…a median of 15 mm was used” as a target dilatation….”It is wise to set reasonable goals for dilatation…Inherited wisdom recommended limiting esophageal dilatation to no more than 3 mm per session. However,…subsequently challenged in several studies demonstrating safe dilatation up to 5 mm per session…As an informal rule, the authors limit dilatation to 2 balloon sizes per session which roughly translates to 5-6 mm. An alternative approach…is to dilate to a maximum of three times the initial stricture diameter; however, neither of these approaches are based on any robust data.”

The main clear cut recommendations are to obtain careful consent, expecting a complication rate of ~4% (eg. bleeding, sepsis, perforation), and to have surgical backup.

My take: This “position paper” offers very few positions on management advice and gives little clear guidance in terms of dilating strictures in Crohn’s disease.

Related blog posts:

Managing Adrenal Insufficiency in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

M Nistel et al. JGPN 2023; 76: 786-792. Impact of Dose Reduction of Topical Steroids to Manage Adrenal Insufficiency in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

In this retrospective study with 32 children with both eosiniphilic esophagitis and adrenal insufficiency (and 81 control subjects), key findings:

  • There was no steroid threshold which corresponded to an increased likelihood of AI
  • 20 of 32 had resolution of AI: 30% discontinued topical steroids, 50% reduced the steroid dose, 20% discontinue ER budesonide. With larger steroid dose reduction, there was an increased likelihood of AI resolution

One of the more useful parts of this publication is the authors provided their standardized approach in identifying AI: “our standard practice is to obtain a morning cortisol level 4-6 months after initiation of STS [swallowed topical steroids]. Subjects with morning cortisol <5 mcg/dL on 2 occasions (due to concerns with assay variation, patient compliance with fasting and holding steroids prior to testing) are then referred to endocrinology for further evaluation.”

My take: This article lays out a good approach for identifying AI in kids with EoE and then provides data on how effective reducing steroids are in resolving AI. It is noted that the peak eosinophil count tended to increase when STS doses were decreased.

Related posts:

Unrelated article from NPR (not from The Onion): Harvard professor who studies dishonesty is accused of falsifying data (June 26, 2023)

Lego turtle above and polar bear below at Tucson Botanical Gardens

Infliximab Home Infusions

SR Gupta et al. JPGN 2023; 76: 776-781. Outcomes for Standardized Home and Hospital-Based Infusions of Infliximab for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In this retrospective study with 102 children, key findings:

  • There were similar outcomes among carefully-selected children receiving home infusions (HI), “drug durability, AOs [adverse outcomes], and laboratory values were similar between HI and hospital-based infusions.” 30% of eligible patients received HI.
  • Within 2 years, only 19% remained on 5 mg/kg every 8 week dosing and the remainder required increased dosing or decreased interval.  (Further supporting data showing that 5 mg/kg every 8 week dosing is inadequate in ~80%)

The authors note that HI were arranged with a single home health company with pediatric PALS-trained nurses. In addition, there was “direct communication between the home health nurse and IBD nurse after each infusion.”

Prior studies of HI have shown increased AOs in patients receiving HI including stopping therapy, ER visits, and hospitalizations (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 257-258, Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 1698-1706, JAMA New Open 2021; 4: e2110268).

My take: If set up properly, home infusions could be a reasonable alternative to hospital-based or office-based infusions.

In this article, from May 31, 2023: Sick Workers Tied to 40% of Food Poisoning Outbreaks, C.D.C. Says

“Each year, 48 million people become sick from a food-borne illness, according to C.D.C. estimates. Of those, 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 die.”

You Can Do Anorectal Manometry in Your Sleep, But Should You?

DF Baaleman et al. JPGN 2023; 76: 731-736. Open Access! Accuracy of Anorectal Manometry to Detect the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex in Children: Awake Versus Under General Anesthesia

In this retrospective review from a tertiary referral center with 34 children.

Background: “The RAIR is an involuntary anal reflex mediated by a complex intramural neuronal plexus that results in a decrease of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) pressure following distension of the rectum. Such distension can be caused by gas, feces, or an inflated balloon during ARM testing (3). In patients with Hirschsprung disease, the RAIR is absent due to an abnormal development of the enteric nervous system resulting in the absence of ganglion cells (4). Additionally, the RAIR is occasionally found to be absent in children with normal presence of ganglion cells who are then diagnosed with internal anal sphincter achalasia (IASA) (5,6). The clinical significance of this diagnosis is still unclear (5).”

Key findings:

  • In 9 of 34 (26%) children the RAIR was solely identified during ARM under general anesthesia (GA) and not during ARM while awake.
  • In 4 of 34 (12%) children, assessment of the RAIR was inconclusive during ARM under GA due to too low, or loss of anal canal pressure.  In 2 of those children, ARMs while awake showed presence of a RAIR.
  • In the entire cohort, 2 children were diagnosed with Hirschsprung disease. 1 had an inconclusive study while awake and absence of RAIR while under GA. 1 had absence of RAIR while awake and under GA.
  • Other findings among the 34 children: 13 (38%) were diagnosed with pelvic floor dyssynergia, 3 (9%) were diagnosed with IASA, 2 (6%) were diagnosed with IASA and pelvic floor dyssynergia

Discussion:

The authors note that in patients with absent RAIR while awake but present while under GA, could result in “incorrect identification of an absent RAIR [and] may result in the unnecessary performance of rectal biopsies and the incorrect diagnosis of IASA…. Still, the ARM while awake more likely represents what they experience when they try to defecate during the day. Therefore, one could argue that these children may experience obstructive symptoms in daily life similar to a child diagnosed with IASA… In our sample, 9 children would have been misdiagnosed with IASA if they would not have undergone a repeat ARM (5).”

My take: It is interesting that about a quarter of children had RAIR identified only while under GA. Given the uncertainty regarding the clinical significance of a IASA diagnosis, in many centers the next step would be arranging a rectal biopsy rather than repeating a study under GA.

Related blog posts: