Briefly noted: Using a Dutch database to identify 449 patients with autoimmune hepatitis, a recent study (FF van den Brand et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 940-7) found that having associated cirrhosis increased the mortality rate over a 10-year followup. In this circumstance, the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.9. In contrast, if cirrhosis was not present, there was no significant increase in SMR (1.2). Patients with overlapping PSC had the greatest increase in mortality with an SMR of 4.7.
How Often Do Children with Obesity Have a Fatty Liver?
According to a recent study (EL Yu et al. J Pediatr 2019; 207: 64-70), about one-third of boys and one-fourth of girls with obesity have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
This study from San Diego with 408 children aged 9-17 years (mean 13.2 years) with obesity evaluated for NAFLD with laboratories (to exclude other etiologies) and with liver MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), with ≥5% considered the threshold for NAFLD.
Key findings:
- Prevalence of NAFLD was 26% in this population, with 29.4% in males and 22.6% in females
- The optimal cut offs of ALT for detecting NAFLD in this study were ≥30 U/L for females and ≥42 U/L for males. These are much lower than NASPGHAN guidelines which proposed ≥80 U/L or twice the ULN as thresholds for further investigation. (The NASPGHAN recommendations are likely to have higher specificity in identifying children at greater risk for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).)
Limitations:
- 77% of this cohort were hispanic, thus prevalence may vary significantly in other populations.
- MRI-PDFF -the exact cut off is unclear. The authors note that if 3.5% were chosen, the NAFLD prevalence jumped to 49.3% (according to Table II –though the discussion stated 53.2%)
My take: Understanding the likelihood of NAFLD in children at risk is a helpful first step. This study points to the growing use of non-invasive diagnosis with MRI.
On a related topic, briefly noted: “Obesity in Adolescents and Youth: The Case for and against Bariatric Surgery” (A Khattab, MA Sperling. J Pediatr 2019; 207: 18-22). In this review, the authors refer frequently to endocrine society guidelines (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102: 709-57). These guidelines generally recommend bariatric surgery only under specific conditions (eg. completion of Tanner 4 or 5 along with a BMI of 40 kg/m-squared or BMI of 35 with significant extreme comorbidities after failure of lifestyle modifications & without untreated psychiatric illness). This review predicts increasing use of bariatric surgery in adolescents “as more data on long-term outcomes in larger cohorts become known.”
Related blog posts on fatty liver disease:
- Pediatric NAFLD: You Don’t Have to Be Obese/Overweight to Have Fatty Liver Disease (But It Helps)
- NAFLD Guidance from AASLD
- Pediatric NAFLD Guidelines 2017
- Concise Review: Fatty Liver in Pediatrics
- Ultrasound Unreliable to Exclude Fatty Liver
- A liver disease tsunami | gutsandgrowth
- Increasing prevalence of pediatric NAFLD | gutsandgrowth
Related blog posts on bariatric surgery:
- Should teenagers with severe NAFLD undergo bariatric surgery?
- Reaching Consensus on Bariatric Intervention in Children …
- 12 Year Data on Bariatric Surgery: Pros and Cons
- Is a Three Year-Old Too Young for Bariatric Surgery …
- Treating diabetes with surgery | gutsandgrowth
New Way to Diagnose Biliary Atresia
Case report: Recently, our group consulted on a 3 week old infant (ex34 week) who weighed 2.8 kg and had cholestasis. In addition, he had a GGT in the 400s and an ultrasound notable for a “small” gallbladder. Due to the patient’s small size, he underwent a HIDA (no excretion). The GGT was actually improving but the clinical situation was concerning for biliary atresia.
Instead of arranging a liver biopsy, we were able to perform a MMP-7 (Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-7) assay which will be commercially available soon. The result, which returned in 48 hours, indicated that the child had a >95% likelihood of biliary atresia. Subsequently, this infant is recovering from a hepatoportoenterostomy. No liver biopsy was needed prior to surgery.
My take: The MMP-7 assay is a remarkable test which is going to rapidly change the approach to infants with cholestasis. I expect that this test will be ordered along with a serum alpha-one antitrypsin phenotype and an ultrasound. In those with persistent cholestasis with negative initial testing, it is likely that, in the majority, a genetic cholestasis panel would be pursued rather than a liver biopsy.
Related blog posts:
- Blood Test is Better Than a Liver Biopsy for Bilary Atresia
- Will We Still Need a Liver Biopsy to Diagnose Biliary Atresia in a Few Years?
- Helpful Review on Biliary Atresia | gutsandgrowth
- Newborn bilirubin measurements for biliary atresia
- Neonatal cholestasis for neonatologists
- Guideline links for TEF and Infant Cholestasis
- Neonatal Cholestasis Lecture
- Diagnosing biliary atresia earlier | gutsandgrowth
Tofacitinib Case Reports for Acute Severe UC and Pyoderma Gangrenosum
Two recent case reports indicate that Tofacitinib may be useful in refractory cases of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) (JA Berinstein et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 988-90) and for pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) (B Kochar et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 991-93)
The case report for ASUC described 4 patients who received off-label high-intensity tofacitinib. Initially dosing was 10 mg 3 times a day for 9 doses with subsequent transition to standard dosing. All four patients had a rapid improvement, though one patient required a colectomy 6 months later and one patient required urgent colectomy after rapid return of symptoms when tofacitinib dose was reduced.
The case report for PG involved 3 patients -two healed with tofacitinib and one improved considerably; the latter patient required dose escalation to 10 mg twice a day. To understand the mechanism of action further, the authors performed immunohistochemical staining from skin biopsy specimens from two patients and detected “strong staining of phosphorylated JAK-1, phosphorylated JAK-2, phosphorylated JAK-3…in the epidermis.” Tofacitinib is an oral JAK-1/JAK-3 inhibitor. In all of these patients, inflammatory arthritis was the indication for tofacitinib.
My take: Due to tofacitinib’s rapid onset of action as well as its rapid clearance, it is a promising agent for both acute severe ulcerative colitis and pyoderma gangrenosum. More clinical trials are needed.
Related blog posts -Tofacitinib:
- Tofacitinib: Where does it Fit in UC Treatment Algorithm?
- AGA Guidelines on the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis
- Tofacitinib for Induction and Maintenance of Ulcerative Colitis
- Latest on Tofacitinib for Refractory Ulcerative Colitis
- Tofacitinib –a JAK Inhibitor for UC
- Tofacitinib -Risks and Benefits in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Related blog posts -ASUC:
- Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- Oral Antibiotics For Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease | gutsandgrowth
- Management of Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis -ECCO Recommendations
- Tofacitinib -Where Does it Fit in Treatment Algorithm for Ulcerative Colitis?
- An Overlooked Finding in A Recent Severe Colitis Study
- Infliximab for children with Ulcerative Colitis
- Accelerated Infliximab Dosing in Acute … – gutsandgrowth
- Predictors of colectomy in pediatric UC | gutsandgrowth
Related blog posts -PG:
Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
Image below is from an unrelated tweet.
How Hepatitis C Therapy Affects Cardiovascular Outcomes
Briefly noted: A recent retrospective study (AA Butt et al. Gastroenterol 2019; 156: 987-96) utilized a Veterans HCV database (n=242,680) and determined that HCV therapy improved cardiovascular outcomes.
Key finding: Treatment with a direct-acting antiviral regimen lowered the risk of cardiovascular events by more than 40% (hazard ratio of 0.57) compared to no treatment.
This finding is limited based on the reliance of a retrospective study and not being able to control for factors that may have led some patients to not receive treatment.
Related blog posts:
Transient Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency or Misleading Tests?
A recent retrospective study (J Garah et al. JPGN 2019; 68: 574-77) showed that many cases of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, based on a low fecal elastase (<200), resolved over ~6 months.
Background:
- 17 of 43 children had adequate data and no other recognized comorbidities which could explain low elastase levels
- In these 17 children the median age was 3 years
- Presenting symptoms were failure to thrive, or diarrhea. Children with known etiologies (eg. cystic fibrosis, Shwachman-Diamond, cholestatic liver disease) were excluded.
- Median elastase at time of diagnosis was 71
Key findings:
- Median time for normalization of elastase was 6 months. Patients received pancreatic supplements until elastase normalized.
- 11 of the 17 had values of elastase <100, and an additional two had values of 105.
- In all 17 children without identifiable underlying diseases, the pancreatic insufficiency was transient.
- Only two children had fat soluble vitamin deficiency associated with pancreatic insufficiency
The article discusses the use of elastase for diagnosis of pancreatic insufficiency in comparison to more direct/invasive testing which can be difficult to perform. It is important to recognize that elastase values are often unreliable in the presence of diarrhea or if diluted by urine. Repeated assays may be needed to have confidence that elastase
My take: This report identifies “transient pancreatic insufficiency” as a frequent explanation for many children and may represent a postinfectious etiology. Thus, if no comorbidity is identified, the prognosis is favorable in most children.
AGA Practice Guidelines for Celiac Disease
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Monitoring of Celiac Disease—Changing Utility of Serology and Histologic Measures: Expert Review (S Husby et al. Gastroenterol 2019; 156: 885-89)
Best Practice Advice 1: Serology is a crucial component of the detection and diagnosis of CD, particularly tissue transglutaminase–immunoglobulin A (TG2-IgA), IgA testing, and less frequently, endomysial IgA testing.
Best Practice Advice 2: Thorough histological analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry is important for diagnosis as well as for differential diagnosis.
Best Practice Advice 2a: TG2-IgA, at high levels (> ×10 upper normal limit) is a reliable and accurate test for diagnosing active CD. When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for CD is virtually 100%. In adults, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and duodenal biopsies may then be performed for purposes of differential diagnosis.
Best Practice Advice 3: IgA deficiency is an infrequent but important explanation for why patients with CD may be negative on IgA isotype testing despite strong suspicion. Measuring total IgA levels, IgG deamidated gliadin antibody tests, and TG2-IgG testing in that circumstance is recommended.
Best Practice Advice 4: IgG isotype testing for TG2 antibody is not specific in the absence of IgA deficiency.
Best Practice Advice 5: In patients found to have CD first by intestinal biopsies, celiac-specific serology should be undertaken as a confirmatory test before initiation of a gluten-free diet (GFD).
Best Practice Advice 6: In patients in whom CD is strongly suspected in the face of negative biopsies, TG2-IgA should still be performed and, if positive, repeat biopsies might be considered either at that time or sometime in the future.
Best Practice Advice 7: Reduction or avoidance of gluten before diagnostic testing is discouraged, as it may reduce the sensitivity of both serology and biopsy testing.
Best Practice Advice 8: When patients have already started on a GFD before diagnosis, we suggest that the patient go back on a normal diet with 3 slices of wheat bread daily preferably for 1 to 3 months before repeat determination of TG2-IgA.
Best Practice Advice 9: Determination of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 has a limited role in the diagnosis of CD. Its value is largely related to its negative predictive value to rule out CD in patients who are seronegative in the face of histologic changes, in patients who did not have serologic confirmation at the time of diagnosis, and in those patients with a historic diagnosis of CD; especially as very young children before the introduction of celiac-specific serology.
Management
Best Practice Advice 10: Celiac serology has a guarded role in the detection of continued intestinal injury, in particular as to sensitivity, as negative serology in a treated patient does not guarantee that the intestinal mucosa has healed. Persistently positive serology usually indicates ongoing intestinal damage and gluten exposure. Follow-up serology should be performed 6 and 12 months after diagnosis, and yearly thereafter.
Best Practice Advice 11: Patients with persistent or relapsing symptoms, without other obvious explanations for those symptoms, should undergo endoscopic biopsies to determine healing even in the presence of negative TG2-IgA.
Related blog posts:
- False-positive serology for Celiac disease
- 99% Accuracy in Non-Biopsy Diagnosis of Celiac Disease
- Followup Biopsies in Pediatric Celiac Disease?
- Are followup biopsies necessary in celiac disease? Look beyond the headlines
- To biopsy or not to biopsy -that is the question (for Celiac disease)
- UPSTF Takes Neutral Stance on Celiac Disease Screening in Asymptomatic Individuals
- Should Patients with IBS be Screened for IBS?
- Is it Helpful to Check Celiac Serology Three Months After Gluten Free Diet?
- How Accurate is Serology at Predicting Mucosal Healing in Pediatric Celiac Disease?
- Closer followup for Celiac disease & pediatric guidelines
- Celiac serology normalization
- How Slow Do Objective Markers of Celiac Change After Treatment? | gutsandgrowth
- Expert review: Celiac disease
Tweet Updates: Nutrients Helpful in Foods Rather Than Supplements, More ID Doctors Needed
Bad Diets –>High Mortality
A recent article in Lancet (“Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017:
a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017″ -open access) estimated that bad diets lead to 11 million deaths per year. Thanks to Ana Ramirez for sending me this article. “High intake of sodium, low intake of whole grains, and low intake of fruits were the leading dietary risk factors for deaths and DALYs globally and in many countries.”
A summary of this study was reported on NPR: Bad Diets Are Responsible For More Deaths Than Smoking, Global Study Finds
An excerpt:
About 11 million deaths a year are linked to poor diet around the globe…
As part of a new study published in The Lancet, researchers analyzed the diets of people in 195 countries using survey data, as well as sales data and household expenditure data. Then they estimated the impact of poor diets on the risk of death from diseases including heart disease, certain cancers and diabetes. (They also calculated the number of deaths related to other risk factors, such as smoking and drug use, at the global level.)…
“Generally, the countries that have a diet close to the Mediterranean diet, which has higher intake of fruits, vegetables, nuts and healthy oils [including olive oil and omega-3 fatty acids from fish] are the countries where we see the lowest number of [diet-related] deaths,” …
What would happen if everyone around the globe began to eat a healthy diet, filling three-fourths of their plates with fruits, vegetables and whole grains? We’d run out…
Improving diets won’t be easy: A range of initiatives may be needed, including nutrition education and increased access to healthy foods, as well as rethinking agricultural production.
Related blog posts:
IBD Update April 2019
Briefly noted:
Link (from KT Park’s twitter feed): What New Treatments for Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative Colitis Are Being Developed?
R Wittig et al. JPGN 2019; 68: 244-50. This study from Germany, using health insurance data, identified an overall pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) incidence of 17.41 per 100,000 in 2012 compared to 13.65/100,000 in 2009. This is one of the highest incidence rates reported and agrees with other data suggesting increasing rates of IBD in pediatric populations.
B Christensen et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 486-93. This study provides data from 20 patients (CD =9, UC =11) who were treated with a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and vedolizumab. The calcineurin inhibitor was used as a ‘bridge’ treatment until the slower acting vedolizumab could be effective. After 52 weeks of treatment, 33% of the CD patients and 45% of the UC patients were in steroid-free clinical remission. Three serious adverse events associated with calcineurin treatment.
G Pellet et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 494-501. Retrospective study of calcineurin inhibitor induction with vedolizumab in 39 patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (36 had failed anti-TNF Rx). 11 patients (28%) required colectomy. week 14 response and remission noted in 56% and 38% respectively. Four serious adverse events were observed.
N Nalagatla et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 494-501. In a retrospective study of 213 patients with steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis, the authors did not find lower rates of colectomy in patients who received an accelerated infliximab dosing. However, they were unable to control for confounding by disease severity. Patients who received an intial dose of 10 mg/kg had a lower colectomy rate than patients who received an initial dose of 5 mg/kg. Colectomy rates for accelerated vs standard infliximab dosing –in-hospital: 9% vs 8% respectively, at 3 months: 20% vs 14% respectively, at 12 months: 28% vs 27% respectively.
Related blog posts:
- Management of Acute Severe Colitis
- Higher Stool Infliximab Correlates with Poor Response in Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- Accelerated Infliximab dosing in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
- An Overlooked Finding in a Recent Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Study | gutsandgrowth
- Disease extent and need for higher infliximab dosing | gutsandgrowth












