Tag Archives: Proton pump inhibitors

PPIs and Associated Heart Risk

Posted on by

A NY Times review PPIs and Heart Attacks of PLos One study showing an association between PPI usage (eg. prilosec, prevacid, and nexium) and heart attacks -this study does not prove any causality, but is likely to spark some questions. Excerpt:

The widely used drugs known as proton pump inhibitors, or P.P.I.’s — gastric reflux preventives like Prilosec and Prevacid — may increase the risk for heart attack, according to analysis of data involving almost three million people.

A significant limitation of the study, in PLOS One, is that P.P.I. usage may be a marker of a sicker patient population, more subject to heart disease in any case.

Here’s NPR’s take on the same study: Data Dive -Possible Link Between PPIs and Heart Attacks

“The increase in risk is about 16 to 20 percent, depending on the particular drug involved”…

Someone with a low risk of heart attack doesn’t have much to worry about. “If your risk of a cardiovascular event or a heart attack is one in a million, now it is 1.2 in a million,” [Nigham] Shah [one of the authors] says.

“The problem is, it’s very easy to do studies of this sort that lead to conclusions that can be misleading,” says Dr. David Juurlink, a drug-safety researcher at the University of Toronto…

“Having a bad diet, drinking too much alcohol, smoking and all sorts of other things … might lead people to be on a PPI,” Juurlink says. One would expect those people to be at higher risk of heart attack, which leads Juurlink to think the medicine is likely not to blame.”

 

Also noted:

No Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Irritability on Crying in Infants

Posted on by

While the title of this blog will come as no surprise to most pediatric gastroenterologists, many parents would be surprised that a systemic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed` that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are ineffective for crying infants (J Pediatr 2015; 166: 767-70).

In this review, only five trials (with 430 infants) met the prespecified inclusion criteria.  While some trials showed a decrease in crying/irritability form baseline to the end of the intervention, a similar effect was evident in the control group.  The authors found that one trial reported a higher risk of lower respiratory tract infections in the PPI group and note that “administration of PPIs is not without risk.”

Take-home message: “the limited data available suggest that PPIs are not effective for the management of crying/irritability in infants.”

Another PPI citation: Rosen R et al. J Pediatr 2015; 166: 917-23.  In this study, the authors prospectively showed that PPI use was associated with differences in gastric, lung, and oropharyngeal microflora (n=116 children with 59 receiving PPIs)

Related blog posts:

How Proton Pump Inhibitors Can Cause Infections

Posted on by

In yesterday’s blog, the editorial on “Acid-reducing agents in infants and children: friend or foe?” also commented on an additional study (JAMA Pediatr. 2014. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.696) which addresses the issue of how proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may contribute to an increased risk of infections.  It is well-known that use of PPIs (and to a lesser extent histamine-2 receptor antagonists) contribute to a significant increased risk of community-acquired pneumonias and gastrointestinal infections (probably including necrotizing enterocolitis in infants).

In this study, (from the editorial) “acid suppression was associated with a positive gastric culture (P =.003) and increased median concentration of gastric bacteria (P<.001). Full-column nonacid reflux was associated with higher concentrations of bacteria in the lung.”

In this era of pioneering microbiome research, it is not surprising that chronic changes in gastric acid production could cause these results.  This is something to consider when calculating risks and benefits, particularly in situations where the benefits are quite minimal.

Here’s the abstract:

Importance  The use of acid suppression has been associated with an increased risk of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in the outpatient setting but the mechanism behind this increased risk is unknown. We hypothesize that this infection risk results from gastric bacterial overgrowth with subsequent seeding of the lungs.

Objectives  To determine if acid-suppression use results in gastric bacterial overgrowth, if there are changes in lung microflora associated with the use of acid suppression, and if changes in lung microflora are related to full-column nonacid gastroesophageal reflux.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A 5-year prospective cohort study at a tertiary care center where children ages 1 to 18 years were undergoing bronchoscopy and endoscopy for the evaluation of chronic cough. Acid-suppression use was assessed through questionnaires with confirmation using an electronic medical record review.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Our primary outcome was to compare differences in concentration and prevalence of gastric and lung bacteria between patients who were and were not receiving acid-suppression therapy. We compared medians using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and determined prevalence ratios using asymptotic standard errors and 95% confidence intervals. We determined correlations between continuous variables using Pearson correlation coefficients and compared categorical variables using the Fisher exact test.

Results  Forty-six percent of patients taking acid-suppression medication had gastric bacterial growth compared with 18% of untreated patients (P = .003). Staphylococcus (prevalence ratio, 12.75 [95% CI, 1.72-94.36]), Streptococcus (prevalence ratio, 6.91 [95% CI, 1.64-29.02]), Veillonella (prevalence ratio, 9.56 [95% CI, 1.26-72.67]), Dermabacter (prevalence ratio, 4.78 [95% CI, 1.09-21.02]), and Rothia (prevalence ratio, 6.38 [95% CI, 1.50-27.02]) were found more commonly in the gastric fluid of treated patients. The median bacterial concentration was higher in treated patients than in untreated patients (P = .001). There was no difference in the prevalence (P > .23) of different bacterial genera or the median concentration of total bacteria (P = .85) in the lungs between treated and untreated patients. There were significant positive correlations between proximal nonacid reflux burden and lung concentrations of Bacillus (r = 0.47, P = .005), Dermabacter (r = 0.37, P = .008), Lactobacillus (r = 0.45, P = .001), Peptostreptococcus (r = 0.37,P = .008), and Capnocytophagia (r = 0.37, P = .008).

Conclusions and Relevance  Acid-suppression use results in gastric bacterial overgrowth of genera including Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. Full-column nonacid reflux is associated with greater concentrations of bacteria in the lung. Additional studies are needed to determine if acid suppression–related microflora changes predict clinical infection risk; these results suggest that acid suppression use may need to be limited in patients at risk for infections.

Related blog posts:

The Latest on EoE and PPI-REE

Posted on by

A recent study shows similar clinical, endoscopic and histologic findings between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) (Aliment Pharmacol There 2014; 39: 603-08 -thanks to Seth Marcus for this reference).

The authors used two databases: one from Walter Reed and one from the Swiss EoE database.  All of these patients were >/=18 years.  Response to PPI was defined as achieving less than 15 eos/hpf and a 50% decrease from baseline following at least 6-weeks of PPI treatment.

Demographics: 63 EoE patients, 40 PPI-REE, mean age 40 years (75% male, 89% Caucasian).

Findings:

  • Similar dysphagia 97% vs. 100% (in EoE and  of PPI-REE cohorts)
  • Similar food impaction 43% vs. 35% (in EoE and  of PPI-REE cohorts)
  • Similar heartburn 33% vs. 32% (in EoE and  of PPI-REE cohorts)
  • Similar duration of symptoms: 6.0 years vs 5.8 years (in EoE and  of PPI-REE cohorts)
  • Similar endoscopic findings too: rings 68% in both groups, furrows 70% in both groups, strictures 49% vs 30% (in EoE and  of PPI-REE cohorts)
  • Similar histology: proximal esophagus 39 vs 38 eos/hpf and distal esophagus 50 vs 43 eos/hpf

Take-home message: EoE and PPI-REE are very similar in presentation and indistinguishable without a PPI trial.

Related blog posts:

 

 

Why is Celiac Disease Becoming More Prevalent?

Posted on by

A recent editorial helps provide some answers and even explains the term “protopathic bias.”  Ostensibly, the editorial’s task is to explain the potential interaction of maternal serum iron ingestion and the risk of celiac disease (see previous blog post: Is There a Link Between Maternal Iron Supplementation and …).  However, the editorial provides an explanation for the Swedish epidemic and the ongoing slower, wider epidemic.

Here’s the link, http://ow.ly/vQGQ7, and here’s an excerpt:

The Swedish epidemic of CD of 1985–1994 has been extensively documented, and resulted in the development of hypotheses regarding environmental risk factors for this disorder.7 This epidemic was restricted to children younger than 2 years; in that age group, the incidence of diagnosed CD rose from 65 cases per 100,000 person-years to 198 cases per 100,000 person-years. In contrast, incidence data for older children were relatively flat during this period. The epidemic abruptly ended in 1995, although children born during the period of the epidemic have an ongoing increased risk of developing CD. Subsequent investigation led to the hypothesis that infant feeding practices affect the risk of CD in young children. The epidemic occurred during a period of relatively low rates of breastfeeding at the age of 6 months and during the same period of time, the quantity of gluten in infant formula greatly increased. Although it is difficult to separate the relative importance of each feeding practice, it seemed that high quantity of initial gluten intake without overlapping with breastfeeding was responsible for this epidemic. Although a systematic review of the issue has concluded that breastfeeding has not been definitively proved to be associated with risk of CD,8 subsequent research has indicated that the timing of gluten introduction is important in determining risk.9PreventCD, a prospective randomized trial of infants with a family history of CD, is testing specifically whether the introduction of small quantities of gluten beginning at age 4 months of age will induce tolerance to gluten in this high-risk group.

The second epidemic is more diffusely spread over time and space. Studies from the United States and elsewhere have shown that the seroprevalence of CD (as defined by positive tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies) has increased markedly in recent decades. An analysis of stored serum from military recruits at the Warren Air Force Base in the years spanning 1948–1954 found a CD seroprevalence of 0.2%, whereas 2 recent cohorts from Olmsted County (spanning the years 2006–2008) matched by year of birth and age at sampling found a seroprevalence of 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively.11 An analysis of another cohort in this country found a doubling in seroprevalence during adulthood from 1974 (0.21%) to 1989 (0.45%).12 The mode of presentation of CD has changed in the past generation, with rising numbers of patients presenting without diarrhea.13 Patients presenting with anemia may have more severe disease expression (as measured by the degree of villous atrophy and the presence of metabolic bone disease) than patients presenting with diarrhea.14 Because most individuals in the United States with CD are undiagnosed,15 this is largely a hidden epidemic, but there is no reason to believe that the prevalence has peaked. In Finland, which had a higher prevalence of CD than the United States to begin with, the seroprevalence of CD doubled between the years 1978 (1.05%) and 2000 (1.99%).16 It is not known whether this epidemic will subside or if the prevalence of CD will continue to rise to a new set-point. But given the morbidity associated with CD17 and the cost and difficulty of the gluten-free diet18, 19 these data have sparked interest in identifying the cause of this less visible epidemic.

Certain infections (eg, rotavirus among infants20 and Campylobacter among adults21) have recently been shown to be associated with a increased risk of CD, but rates of these infections have not increased markedly, and so are not likely to be driving this epidemic. In contrast, a lack of exposure to certain microbes is a hallmark of modern times, and the increase in CD disease is congruent with the hygiene hypothesis, which states that decreased exposure to microbes may be driving the rise in autoimmune and atopic conditions. This hypothesis is particularly compelling in light of a recent study that found a dramatically different seroprevalence of CD in Finland (1.4%) and the Russian Karelia (0.6%), geographically proximate areas with a similar prevalence of HLA DQ2 and DQ8 but with major differences in economic development.22

Further evidence implicating the modern relationship with microbes is now accumulating. Children who were born by elective cesarean section are at increased risk of developing CD, whereas those born by emergent cesarean section (and may have had contact with the birth canal) are not.23 In addition, there seems to be an inverse relationship between Helicobacter pylori colonization and CD.24 Drugs are another modern innovation that may be affecting the CD epidemic. Population-based studies from Sweden have shown that prescription of antibiotics25 and proton pump inhibitors26 are each associated with an increased risk of the subsequent development of CD.

The associations identified in these studies are not necessarily causal. Studies of drug exposure in particular may be prone to protopathic bias, wherein early symptoms of the outcome of interest (CD) may lead to the prescription of the exposure (eg, antibiotics or proton pump inhibitors).

From the NY Times: Gluten-free, veggie snacks, vegan desserts, spring salads. They’re all in our new recipe finder.

Risk of Vitamin B12 Deficiency with Persistent PPI Usage

Posted on by

From NY Times, nyti.ms/1kwQHPF :

People who use certain acid-suppressing drugs for two years or longer are at increased risk of vitamin B12 deficiency, which can lead to anemia, neurological problems or dementia, researchers reported on Tuesday.

The drugs in question are called proton-pump inhibitors, or P.P.I.’s, and histamine 2 receptor antagonists, and they are available by prescription and over the counter under brand names like Prevacid, Prilosec and Nexium. Nearly 157 million prescriptions were written for P.P.I.’s alone last year.

“People who are taking these medications are more likely than the average person to be vitamin B12 deficient, and it’s a potentially serious problem,” said Dr. Douglas A. Corley, senior author of the new study, published in The Journal of the American Medical Association. “This raises the question of whether people taking these medications for long periods should be screened for vitamin B12 deficiency.”

Dr. Corley has received funding from Pfizer, which makes a P.P.I. called Protonix.

He and his colleagues at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, Calif., examined the medical records of 25,956 adults who received vitamin B12 deficiency diagnoses between 1997 and 2011, comparing them with 184,199 patients without B12 deficiency during that period.

Patients who took P.P.I’s for more than two years were 65 percent more likely to have a vitamin B12 deficiency, the researchers found. Higher doses of P.P.I’s were more strongly associated with the vitamin deficiency, as well.

Twelve percent of patients deficient in vitamin B12 had used P.P.I.’s for two years or more, compared with 7.2 percent of control patients. The risk of deficiency was less pronounced among patients using H2RA’s long term: 4.2 percent, compared with 3.2 percent of nonusers.

The new study is the largest to date to demonstrate a link between taking acid suppressants and vitamin B12 deficiency across age groups. Earlier small studies focused primarily on the elderly.

Robert J. Valuck, a professor of pharmacy at the University of Colorado in Aurora, was surprised that the association in the new report was strongest in adults younger than age 30. “It’s not safe to assume vitamin B12 deficiency is only an issue in the elderly,” he said.

Bottomline: patients (not just elderly) on chronic PPIs may need to be tested for vitamin B12 deficiency.

Related blog entries:

Are we missing Vitamin B12? | gutsandgrowth

Predicting Severe Clostridium Difficile

Posted on by

According to a recent publication (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1466-71), the most important risk factors for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are the following:

  • Peripheral leukocytosis (WBC >15,000)
  • Elevated serum creatinine >1.5 times baseline
  • Narcotic use
  • Acid-blocking medications
  • Older age

This study reviewed the records of inpatient cases at the Mayo clinic between 2007-2010. In total, 487 of 1446 patients had severe CDI, defined as ICU admssion (26.7%), colectomy (2.7%) or death (8.9%) within 30 days of diagnosis.

Patients with these risk factors may need to be treated more aggressively.

Also, noted: Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1794-1801. (Thanks to Ben Gold). Using electronic medical records, the authors identified 894  adult inpatients with a first-time CDI (2009-2012).  Receipt of PPIs concurrent with CDI treatment was not associated with CDI recurrence.

Related blog posts:

Endoscopy Module -Postgraduate Course Notes

Posted on by

Advances in Hemostasis for Upper GI Bleeding —Brad Barth, MD, MPH  (page 77)

Upper GI Bleeding

Effect of IV PPI on patients with UGI bleeding PRIOR to EGD

  • 6 trials including 2223 patients
  • No significant difference in mortality, rebleeding or need for surgery compared to controls
  • DID significantly reduce rates of high risk stigmata identified on EGD
  • DID significantly decrease the need for endoscopic therapy
  • Reference: Sreedharan A, Martin J, Leontiadis G, et al. Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010

 

Upper GI Bleeding – Proton Pump Inhibitors/Prokinetics

  • Omeprazole 1 mg/kg q 12 hours  (Solana, et al. J Pediatr 2013:162:776-82)
  • Proposed PPI drip dose: 1 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.1 mg/kg/hour infusion
  • IV erythromycin or metoclopramide; infuse 20-120 minutes prior to endoscopy in patients with acute UGIB; decreased need for repeat endoscopy to determine cause and site of bleeding. Prokinetic did NOT affect transfusion requirements, duration of stay, need for surgery. Reference: Barkun et al. Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding:a metaanalysis. GIE 2010;17:126-132

Upper GI Bleeding —Other points:

  • Epinephrine alone is RARELY enough
  • Non bleeding adherent clot has 8-35% chance of rebleeding in adults. Consider removing it CAREFULLY!
  • A conservative transfusion strategy is usually appropriate

Useful References

Surveillance Endoscopies: The established, the debated, and the unknown –Mitchell Shub, M.D. (page 85)

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.” —George Bernard Shaw

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Surveillance protocol: Age of initial evaluation/Type of procedure/Frequency

  • Colon 10 – 12 y of age (Sooner: family h/o aggressive disease) -Flex sig or Colonoscopy, 1 – 2 y
  • Upper GI tract 20 – 25 y or at initial colonoscopy
  • EGD and side viewing scope, 1 – 3 y
  • Post-colectomy (pouch) 6 – 12 mo. after surgery, Flex sig 1 y (6 mo. If retained rectum)
  • Small bowel: capsule or MRI, frequency unknown

Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome: begin screening at age 8 years or when symptomatic with colonoscopy, EGD, and small bowel imaging (?capsule vs alternatives); then every 2-3 years

Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome: begin screening at age 10-15 years or when symptomatic with colonoscopy, EGD, and  possibly small bowel imaging (?capsule vs alternatives); then every 1-3 years

Discussed guidelines for IBD cancer surveillance and for Barrett’s esophagus

  • For UC, start surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis.
  • For Crohn’s with ~1/2 colon (or more) involvement, follow same guidelines
  • For coexisting PSC, annual surveillance
  • Barrett’s esophagus in children: adenocarcinoma very rare, evidence lacking to develop surveillance schedule

Expanding the view: Update on Upper GI Strictures —Mark A. Gilger, M.D. (page 95)

Why balloons for kids (for dilatation)?

You can see what you’re doing

  • Blind pouches
  • Abnormal mucosa
  • Caustic injury
  • Epidermolysis bullosa
  • Already requires general anesthesia
  • Ability to wire through narrow strictures
  • Ability to use radiographic assistance

Tip: Can use vegetable spray (eg. Pam) to make advancement of balloon catheter easy

How to do balloon dilation

  • Inflate balloon to ½ desired initial atmospheres & re‐check placement
  • Begin dilation at to 1‐2 mm more than initial estimated stricture diameter
  • Hold for 1 minute/dilation
  • •ove balloon catheter in and out during dilation;  if balloon moves freely, increase diameter by 1mm.  If stricture moves with the balloon, hold x 1 minute, then done
  • Oh, oh, there’s blood! Good! No blood, no dilation.
  • After dilation, carefully advance endoscope through the stricture; if resistance stop, can try cork‐screw maneuver
  • Document everything; especially stricture location (CM from incisors), dilation diameters (to help you next time)

Adjunct therapy for recalcitrant strictures  –adjunct therapy to sustain dilation needs further study

  • Oral & intravenous corticosteriods
  • Injectable corticosteroids – Thins the mucosa, OK 1‐2 times, but not repeated
  • Mitomycin C
  • Acid reduction
  • Stents

Endoscopy in the high‐risk patient: Keeping your patient safe —Jenifer R. Lightdale, MD, MPH (page 63)

Safety of Pediatric GI Procedures

  • Peds‐CORI data from >10,000 procedures
  • Overall rate of complications 2.3%: risk of hypoxia 1.5%; risk of bleeding 0.3%

Examples of pediatric populations at increased risk for perforation

  • History of caustic ingestion
  • Esophageal atresia/tracheo‐esophageal fistula
  • Severe duodenitis
  • Severe ulcerative colitis
  • Patients with multiple co‐morbidities (i.e. Type I diabetes, cerbrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency, liver disease)
  • Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome (Vascular Type)

Pre‐procedure Assessment –lends itself to a checklist 

Thrombocytopenia -Current recommendations

  • EGD ok if platelets >20,000/mL
  • Biopsies ok if platelets >50,000/mL

Bleeding –discussed high risk conditions

Decreasing Risk of Perforation:

  • Avoiding excessive pressure
  • Avoiding premature cutting of a polyp – Coagulate before cutting
  • Avoiding blind intubation of the lumen

Decreasing Risks of Infection

  • SBE Prophylaxis– generally NOT indicated in diagnostic procedures. Congenital heart disease is complex & may be needed on a case‐by‐case basis
  • Single‐dose cephalexin has been shown to decrease peristomal infection during PEG placement
  • Prophylactic antibiotics recommended for cirrhotic patients admitted with GI hemorrhage

Postgraduate Course Syllabus (posted with permission) with complete slides of above lectures: PG Syllabus

Related blog references:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) and specific medical management interventions should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Application of the information in a particular situation remains the professional responsibility of the practitioner.

A C difficile two-fer

Posted on by

Two recent review articles on Clostridium difficile are quite useful:

  • Mezoff EA, Cohen MB. J Pediatr 2013; 163: 627-30.
  • Dupont HL. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1216-23.

The first publication reviews acid suppression and the risk of C difficile infection (CDI).  It starts off with  a terrific piece of advice from Sir William Osler: “One of the first duties of the physician is to educate the masses not to take medicine.”  The authors note that pH above 4 has been shown to increase bacterial survival, including  C perfringe spores in a mouse model.  In addition, the article notes that there have been concerns as early as 1982 that acid suppression could be a risk factor for CDI.  Several recent studies were summarized, including the following:

  • A recent meta-analysis (Kwok CS et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1011-9) with 42 studies (N= 313,000 patients) “found an association between PPI use and risk of CDI (OR1.74, 05%CI 1.47-2.85).”
  • A review of the literature (Deshpande A et. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 225-33) between 1990-2010 found an overall increase in CDI risk with PPIs to be OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.81-2.55). No prospective studies were identified.
  • In pediatrics, a study (Turco et al. Alimentary Pharmacol Therapeut 2010; 31: 754-9) with 910 children admitted for abdominal pain and diarrhea identified 68 with CDI.  Compared with control patients, use of PPIs was significantly higher in CDI patients (OR 4.52, 95% CI 1.4-14.4).

The FDA has stated that PPIs may be associated with an increased risk of CDI.  In addition, the use of antibiotics “appear to act synergistically with PPIs.”  Thus, the authors recommend stopping PPIs in those who do not need them.  Periodic ‘holidays’ or dosing step-downs may help assess continued need for PPIs.

The second publication succinctly reviews the diagnosis and management of CDI.  The various diagnostic methods are compared in Table 1.  Therapeutic options for 1st time infection are reviewed in Table 2.  For adults with mild-to-moderate infections, metronidazole (500 mg TID for 10 days) is preferred.  Vancomycin or Fidaxomicin are recommended for more severe infections.

Table 3 lists treatment options for recurrent CDI.  Repeat course of any of the 1st round treatments can be considered depending on patient’s illness severity.  In addition, other potential treatments included the following:

  • vancomycin tapered dose (week 1: 125 mg 4 times/day, week 2: 125 mg 2 times/day, week 3: 125 mg once/day, week 4: 125 mg every other day, week 5 & 6: 125 mg every third day)
  • rifaximin (550 mg BID x 20 days)
  • high-dose vancomycin (250-500 mg 4 times/day for 10 days) followed by S boulardii (2 capsules BID for 28 d)
  • fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) –“although family member stool donors have been used, the current movement is toward volunteer donor pools.”  [I do not think ‘current movement’ was intended as a pun by the authors.]  Volunteer donors could lower the screening costs.
  • intravenous immunoglobulin (small clinical trials have failed to show efficacy)
  • monoclonal antibodies to toxins A/B

Related blog posts:

NASPGHAN Preview

Posted on by

I had a few free minutes so I decided to take a look at a bunch of upcoming lectures from the 2013 NASPGHAN upcoming meeting.  With electronic media, it is easy to take a quick glance.  Here’s the master link to all of the following talks:

Annual Meeting page.

Some of the power point lectures that I’ve seen so far:

  • Is my PPI dangerous for me? Eric Hassall MBChB, University of British Columbia One point in his slides that I had not seen much about was a hypothesis that PPI use may predispose to the development of eosinophilic esophagitis by allowing food proteins to be more intact ( attributed to Merwat, Spechler. Am J Gastro ’09).  He explains that “acid reflux” is a clever marketing term and has a slide with Madmen actors.  If there is “acid,” one must need acid suppression.
  • My child doesn’t go to school Lynne Walker MD, Vanderbilt University.  Lynne shows an interesting fax from a parent that asks if the problem is physical, how will she help? And, if it is psychological, how can this be remedied?  She outlines a lot of pain theory and indicates that parents need to become health coaches, avoid catastrophizing (?spelling), and encourages mental health evaluation.  Use the parents words ‘I’m going to refer xxx for relaxation and stress management.’
  • My child’s H. pylori will not go away – (the resistant bug) Benjamin Gold MD, Children’s Center for Digestive Healthcare. Ben manages to stuff so much information into his talk.  His talk is like one of those clown cars where more and more people keep coming out.  He has slides with worldwide resistance maps, slides with treatment regimens and algorithms, and the reasons for treatment failure. Perhaps I can convince him to give a live preview.
  • Administrative/executive functioning Richard Colletti MD, Fletcher Allen Healthcare. Offers personal and pragmatic advice for career advancement.  His slides indicate that he started his GI fellowship at age 40.  One of his quotes, “80% of success is showing up” (Woody Allen) is definitely true.  It’s pretty much akin to what I learned about success in medical school.  You need the three As: availability, affability, and ability.  My mentor said the first was what people needed most.
  • The changing face of intestinal transplantation
    Simon Horslen MD, Seattle Children’s Hospital.  Lecture notes that number of intestinal transplants have decreased dramatically, particularly in children. In 2012, only about 100 intestinal transplants were performed whereas it had peaked at nearly 200.  Much of the credit is due to intestinal rehabilitation work and adjustments in parenteral nutrition (eg. lipid minimization, line care).  Two most common reasons for intestinal transplantation at this time are gastroschisis and volvulus.
  •  Gluten sensitivity: Fact or fiction Alessio Fasano MD, MassGeneral Hospital for Children. This blog has covered a lot of the same material, but Alessio’s slides are pretty impressive.  Also, I was not aware that Lady Gaga consumes a gluten-free diet
  • Controversies in parenteral nutrition Christopher Duggan MD, Boston Children’s Hospital.  This lecture provides a timely update on nutrient deficiencies due to component shortages and discusses lipid minimization compared with fish oil-based lipid emulsions.
  • Vitamin D and immunity James Heubi MD, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Medical Center.  In the beginning of the slides, Jim provides a very user-friendly definition of an expert and a suitable picture.  He indicates that in 2011 there were 3746 vitamin D publications but inexplicably only chooses to review a tiny fraction.

At the time of this posting, I haven’t had a chance to look through these talks: