Author Archives: gutsandgrowth

Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

Trying to Understand Gastroparesis

Posted on by

…all I know is that I know nothing. –Socrates

Perhaps Socrates was a gastroenterologist.  So much of what we think we know, we are finding out is poorly understood.  This applies to gallbladder dyskinesia, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and now gastroparesis.

A recent study (PJ Pasricha et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1762-74, commentary 1666-68) and commentary show how little we understand about gastroparesis.

The study was a large prospective surgery of 262 adult patients with gastroparesis (either diabetic or idiopathic).

Key findings:

  • 28% had improvement in the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) at 48 weeks.  Beyond 48 weeks, there were no significant reductions through week 192.
  • Favorable characteristics: male gender, age 50 and older, initial infectious prodrome (18% of cohort), antidepressant usage, and 4-hour gastric retention greater than 20%.
  • Unfavorable characteristics: obesity, smoking, use of pain modulators, moderate to severe abdominal pain, severe reflux, and moderate to severe depression.

The commentary suggests that those with the higher GCSI improved, in part, because of a regression toward the mean bias.  Other important commentary:

  • “More severely delayed gastric emptying was associated with a greater likelihood of improvement”
  • “There was no differences in outcome between diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis.”
  • Gastric emptying tests are not reliable:  “Pathophysiologic tests are useful in clinical practice if they are reproducible, explain the symptoms, guide therapeutic choices, and determine response to therapy and long-term prognosis.  Despite its popularity, the gastric emptying test scores low on most of these criteria.”
  • “A metaanalysis found no correlation between the change in gastric emptying rate and the symptom response during prokinetic therapy…A 5-year prospective follow-up study of …functional dyspepsia…found that more than 50% improved…with no relation to the presence of delayed gastric emptying.”
  • “Using the term gastroparesis also can lead to premature closure in our efforts to understand the pathophysiology of symptoms…can lead to botulinum injections into the pylorus or placement of gastric stimulators (formerly called gastric pacemakers) for gastroparesis, both of which have been shown to be nonefficacious in controlled trials.”

My take: It is unclear “when to consider gastric emptying testing and how to use it in patient management.”  For the pediatric population, gastroparesis is more likely to be associated with a prodromal infection which increases the likelihood of recovery.

Related blog posts:

Banning Mills

Banning Mills

Using Ustekinumab for Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

From GI & Hepatology News: New targeted Crohn’s therapy performs well in phase III trial.

This study of Ustekinumab (aka Stelara) was different than previous studies (see previous gutsandgrowth blog from 2012: Ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease) in that this study targeted patients who were NOT ant-TNF failures; however, about 80% of patients had failed corticosteroids.

An excerpt:

Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeted against interleukins 12 and 23 (IL-12 and IL-23)…

 The trial, called UNITI-2, enrolled patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease who had failed traditional therapies but were naive to or at least had not failed a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor…

In UNITI-2, 628 patients were randomized to placebo, 130 mg of ustekinumab in a fixed subcutaneous dose of 130 mg, or a weight-based dose of 6 mg/kg of subcutaneous ustekinumab…The primary endpoint was a CDAI reduction of at least 100 points at 6 weeks. Clinical remission at 8 weeks, defined as CDAI less than 150, was a secondary endpoint.

The primary endpoint was reached by 28.7% randomized to placebo, 51.7% of those randomized to the fixed dose of ustekinumab, and 55.5% of those randomized to weight-based dosing. The advantage for the active treatment arms was statistically significant (both P less than .001). For the secondary endpoint of clinical remission at 8 weeks, the rates were 19.6% for placebo, 30.6% (P = .009 vs. placebo) for fixed-dose ustekinumab, and 40.2% (P less than .001 vs. placebo) for the weight-based dose…

Ustekinumab was well tolerated with similar rates and types of adverse events reported in the active treatment and placebo groups.

My take: This study indicates that ustekinumab is likely to be another treatment option for patients with Crohn’s disease.

“Aging Elephant in the Room”

Posted on by

Happy New Year!

———————–

“Adults are just obsolete children” –Theodor Seuss Geisel

So, begins an interesting commentary (B Kinnear. JAMA pediatrics 2015; 169: 1081-2 -thanks to Ben Gold for this reference).

This editorial discusses a growing problem of patients older than 21 years of age seeking care in pediatric institutions.  Currently, ~15,000 admissions occur annually in the U.S..  At the author’s institution (Cincinnati Children’s), the average daily hospital census was 15.7 patients between 2012-2014.  In fact, at Cincinnati, which has an adult care hospital across the street, they have developed a team to care for these patients: “the Hospital Medicine Adult Care team.” In addition, they have established protocols to recognize and initiate treatment on problems like acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and acute stroke.

The author argues that age should not be the only factor determining which institution would offer the best care.  Some cognitively impaired adults with cerebral palsy may be better-suited at a pediatric facility and some obese teenagers with type 2 diabetes and hypertension may fit better at an adult care hospital.

Common barriers to transitioning to adult care hospitals:

  • Lack of adult health care professional knowledge and comfort by adult health care physicians
  • Poor communication between pediatric and adult care providers
  • Families fear of leaving established care settings

These adults in pediatric care settings do have increased length of stays and greater odds of mortality than adolescents, even when adjusting for  the increased number of chronic conditions.  Thus, it is not entirely clear that outcomes will be improved by retaining this vulnerable population at pediatric institutions.  Much of this question will be determined by the institutional resources available for their care.

My take: I worry that keeping adults (patients >21 years) in pediatric institutions is a mistake.  There are increasing numbers of vulnerable patients and their needs should be addressed by adult care providers.

Isle of Palms, SC

Isle of Palms, SC

My Favorite Posts 2015

Posted on by

I want to thank all of those who have provided input to this blog this year.  Best wishes to all for a happy and healthy 2016.

Here’s my list of favorite posts in the past year:

On being a doctor:

Nutrition posts:

Gastroenterology posts:

IBD posts:

Liver posts:

Screen Shot 2015-12-09 at 8.21.20 PM

Popular Posts 2015

Posted on by

Today and tomorrow I am posting the most popular posts and my personal favorite posts from 2015.  I am labeling the most popular posts as those posts that had the highest number of visits in the past year.

Most popular posts:

Shem Creek, SC

Shem Creek, SC

‘Don’t Believe Our Study’

Posted on by

The message I inferred from a recent study (CA Siegel et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 2233-40) was to disregard their results which generally showed a lack of benefit of combination therapy (aka “concomitant immunomodulator” or dual therapy) compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monotherapy for Crohn’s disease.

Specifically, the authors state the following in their discussion:

Although our results challenge the clinical importance of combination therapy in this specific scenario, it is hard to ignore the preponderance of data to date relating to the pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF medications that support the approach of combination therapy over monotherapy.

Here’s the background for this study.  The authors performed a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials (n=1601 subjects) to examine the question of whether continued use of immunomodulators (IMs) would be of benefit in patients who had failed monotherapy with IMs (“IM-experienced”).  The authors note that the SONIC study showed that combination therapy (infliximab and azathioprine) was more beneficial in patients who were IM-naive than monotherapy.  This meta-analysis included data from 3 anti-TNF agents: infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab.

Key findings:

  • Combination therapy was no more effective than monotherapy in inducing 6-month remission (odds ratio 1.02) or in maintaining a response (OR 1.53).
  • In subgroup analysis, there was a statistically-significant protective effect of baseline IM exposure versus no baseline IM exposure among those treated with infliximab.
  • Generally, combination therapy was not associated with any change in adverse reactions; however, combination therapy with infliximab had lower adverse events, which was driven by infusion reactions.

My take: This study indicates that combination therapy is likely helpful in IM-experienced patients who are starting infliximab and possibly not effective with the other anti-TNF agents.  The authors emphasize the need for well-designed, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial for a definitive answer.  Until then, don’t believe their study.

Of interest: Recently I became aware of a college scholarship opportunity for young adults with IBD: Abbvie Scholarship Program.

Related blog posts:

Clever Marketing or Truth in Advertising?

Clever Marketing or Truth in Advertising?

Yosemite National Park

Yosemite National Park

Should Teenagers with Severe NAFLD Undergo Bariatric Surgery?

Posted on by

A recent commentary (Stavra A. Xanthakos and Jeffrey B. Schwimmer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun; 12(6): 316–318.) discusses the role of bariatric surgery for teenagers with severe nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).  Full text Link: On a knife-edge—weight-loss surgery for NAFLD in adolescents.

Here’s an excerpt:

Abstract: A new position statement from Europe endorses expert-based recommendations to consider bariatric surgery as a treatment for severe NAFLD in severely obese adolescents. This article discusses the problem of severe paediatric obesity, its relationship with NAFLD, and the knowledge and needs regarding bariatric surgery in adolescents… it is critical that adolescents with NAFLD undergoing bariatric surgery be evaluated and managed in bariatric surgery centres with appropriate paediatric multidisciplinary expertise and a commitment to rigorously phenotype NAFLD histology at baseline and to follow outcomes prospectively as long as possible. These procedures can be particularly challenging in adolescents, who are prone to relocate in adulthood and thus might not return for follow-up. High quality prospective multicentre studies with low attrition rates, such as the Teen Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (USA) and the Adolescent Morbid Obesity Study (Sweden) have begun to provide short to intermediate term (1–2 year) outcomes after adolescent bariatric surgery, but do not include prospectively collected data on histological liver outcomes to support evidence-based recommendations regarding NASH as a specific indication for bariatric surgery. However, given the benefits that are emerging for type 2 diabetes and sleep apnoea, (which are comorbid conditions often associated with NASH), we concur with previously published expert guidelines that conclude that bariatric surgery is not contraindicated in a non-cirrhotic patient with NAFLD who otherwise meets appropriate medical and psychosocial criteria for bariatric surgery.2 The adolescent and family should, however, be counselled that a positive outcome with respect to NAFLD is, as yet, not a foregone conclusion.

Related blog posts:

Screen Shot 2015-12-15 at 7.37.51 PM

Should Patients with IBS be Screened for Celiac Disease?

Posted on by

Despite widespread expert opinion that those with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) should be screened for celiac disease, whether it is a good idea is not settled.  A recent study (RS Choung et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1937-43) showed that celiac disease has a low prevalence in US patients (mean age 61 yrs in this cohort) with IBS.

Here’s an excerpt of a summary of this report from the AGA Blog: “Should all Patients with IBS be Screened for Celiac Disease?”

Rok Seon Choung et al investigated whether subjects with positive results from serologic tests for celiac disease are frequently diagnosed with IBS or other functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs).

They sent self-report bowel disease questionnaires to 7217 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, to collect data on symptoms compatible with functional GI disorders, including IBS, collecting data on symptoms compatible with functional GI disorders, including IBS. These symptom data were linked to surveys of undiagnosed celiac disease conducted among more than 47,000 individuals from the same region, based on results of tests for immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase and then endomysial antibody.

Among the 3202 subjects who completed the questionnaires and had their serum sample analyzed, 13.6% had IBS and 55.2% had some gastrointestinal symptoms.

The prevalence of celiac disease, based on serologic markers, was 1.0%. However, whereas 3% of patients with celiac disease met the criteria for IBS, 14% of patients without celiac disease met the criteria for IBS.

Abdominal pain, constipation, weight loss, and dyspepsia were the most frequent symptoms reported by subjects who tested positive for celiac disease, but none of the gastrointestinal symptoms or disorders were significantly associated with results of serologic test for celiac disease.

My take: This study along with others show that celiac disease is infrequent in patients with IBS.  Since the symptoms of celiac disease overlap with IBS, I doubt this study will dissuade practitioners from screening for celiac despite the low yield.

Also, this fall I posted several blogs on GMOs.  An interesting article (from Vox/Grist) on this subject explains how GMOs are a lot like pornography: It’s practically impossible to define “GMOs”

Leaving Work

Atlanta Sky