According to this ranking, U.S. is 58th in the world:
From Health Affairs, Full Text: Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US
Related blog posts:
According to this ranking, U.S. is 58th in the world:
From Health Affairs, Full Text: Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US
Related blog posts:
Link: 22 minute video —COVID-19 and the GI Tract -What We Know Right Now
———————
A recent study (C Ma et al. Gastroenterol 2020; 158: 780-82) used cross-sectional data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) (2006-2015) with a total 7,872,115,883 weighted observations. They used this data to evaluate medication exposures and outcomes.
Key findings:
Discussion:
My take: With the exception of C difficile/intestinal infections, this study provides further evidence of the safety of PPIs and a lack of association between these medications and purported PPI-related adverse events. That said, it is still a good idea to limit use for appropriate indications.
Related blog posts:
Also, IOIBD recommendations for IBD patients and COVID-19 have been published.
Here is link as well:
IOIBD (International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease) Recommendations (#76) for IBD Patients with Regard to COVID-19:
Full link: IOIBD Update on COVID19 for Patients with Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (3/26/20)
The clever title is derived from an editorial (KE Burke, AN Ananthakrishan. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 1438-40) regarding three recent publications regarding Tofacitinib, a non-selective inhibitor of janus kinase (JAK) enzymes 1,2 and 3 which was FDA-approved in May 2018 for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. This report was published prior to recent FDA warning regarding blood clots: FDA Warning on Tofacitinib
Two of the reports have been summarized previously on this blog:
The third study examines the safety of tofacitinib: W Sandborn et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 1541-50
Methods: This study analyzed data from phase 2 and phase 3 trials with 1157 patients who had a median treatment of 1.4 years (1613 person-years). More than three-fourths were receiving 10 mg BID.
Findings:
The editorial recommends NOT using tofacitinib for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC); it “should be encouraged only in selected patients and preferably in the context of a research study.” “Infliximab and cyclosporine [should be used] for steroid refractory UC;” however, they suggest that “one can consider initiating tofacitinib PRIOR to patients becoming steroid refractory. “It could be used upfront on day 1.”
Related blog posts -Tofacitinib:
Related blog posts -ASUC:
Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.
An excerpt:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved new warnings about an increased risk of blood clots and of death with the 10 mg twice daily dose of tofacitinib (Xeljanz, Xeljanz XR), which is used in patients with ulcerative colitis…
Health care professionals should discontinue tofacitinib and promptly evaluate patients with symptoms of thrombosis. Counsel patients about the risks and advise them to seek medical attention immediately if they experience any unusual symptoms, including those of thrombosis listed above. Reserve tofacitinib to treat ulcerative colitis for patients who have failed or do not tolerate tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers. Avoid tofacitinib in patients who may have a higher risk of thrombosis. When treating ulcerative colitis, use tofacitinib at the lowest effective dose and limit the use of the 10 mg twice daily dosage to the shortest duration needed
Related blog posts:
(L Wang, et al. Gastroenterol 2018; 154: 540-555, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.006)
Using California’s Ambulatory Services Databases, the authors identified 1.58 million surveillance/screening colonoscopies (2005-2011) and compared complications to patients who underwent other ambulatory procedures like joint aspiration, arthroscopy and cataract surgery.
Availlable online: graphical abstract
Key findings:
Image available online: Figure 2
IJN Koppen et al. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition: October 2017 – Volume 65 – Issue 4 – p 361–363
Abstract:
According to international guidelines, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the laxative of first choice in the treatment of functional constipation in children, both for disimpaction and for maintenance treatment. PEG acts as an osmotic laxative and its efficacy is dose dependent. PEG is highly effective, has a good safety profile, and is well tolerated by children. Only minor adverse events have been reported. Overall the use of PEG in children has been reported to be safe, although in patients predisposed to water and electrolyte imbalances monitoring of serum electrolytes should be considered.
Because this topic is of great importance to the families that are seen by pediatric gastroenterologists (and pediatricians), I wanted to review this brief article which describes the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol (aka miralax).
Key Points:
Safety:
Combatting Myths:
Clinical Pearl: Stimulant Laxatives After Repaired Anorectal Malformations:
My take (borrowed from the authors): “PEG has rapidly become the treatment of first choice for children with functional constipation.”
Related blog posts:
Wednesday’s well publicized debate unfortunately discussed vaccination. Perhaps it is not surprising that a businessman/entertainer, Donald Trump, reiterated misinformation. Yet, the two former physicians (Ben Carson and Rand Paul) on the stage also provided misleading information. A good write-up of this issue from the NY Times: Not Up for Debate: The Science Behind Vaccination
Here’s an excerpt:
Here are the facts:
It’s also not correct to call autism an “epidemic,” as Mr. Trump often seems to do. Autism is more prevalent as a diagnosis than it used to be. But much of that in recent years is because we’ve changed the definition of what it means to have “autism spectrum disorder.” For instance, 10 years ago, two-thirds of children diagnosed with autism had below-average intelligence. But today only about a third of those diagnosed with A.S.D. do. The fastest-growing group of children with autism have average or above average intelligence. We’re being more inclusive in the diagnosis…
A recent review (Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 365-8) notes that “over the past 12 years, since the publication of the Institute of Medicine’s report, ‘To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, ‘ improving patient safety has been the focus of considerable public and professional interest.” The following is a summary of this report (Epocrates docalert summary):
Patient-safety experts in North America and the U.K. systematically reviewed the growing evidence base for 158 patient-safety topics, including 41 strategies designated as most important to practitioners and patients. All reviews are published in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) evidence report entitled “Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices” to update the original 2001 publication. After carefully analyzing each patient-safety problem and its related safety strategy, the authors strongly recommend immediate adoption of the following 10 strategies:
The authors also provide a list of 12 “encouraged” (rather than “strongly encouraged”) patient-safety practices, these are listed in Table 2 of the paper.